Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Amit G Singal

Publications and source records attributed to Amit G Singal.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Radiology considerations for the PREMIUM study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of abbreviated MRI versus ultrasound for liver cancer screening in cirrhosis.

This paper describes the rationale and radiology considerations in the implementation of the Preventing Liver Cancer Mortality through Imaging with Ultrasound versus MRI (PREMIUM) study. PREMIUM is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs comparing dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) abbreviated MRI (aMRI) plus serum AFP versus ultrasound (US) plus serum AFP for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in patients with cirrhosis. PREMIUM aims to randomize 4,700 participants across over 47 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers to semiannual surveillance for up to eight years, with HCC-related mortality as the primary endpoint. To date, 35 sites have been activated with 1,085 patients randomized. To ensure uniform implementation and reporting of per-protocol screening, the PREMIUM Radiology Workgroup developed standardized imaging protocols, structured LI-RADS-based reporting templates, and a centralized training program for radiologists and technologists. They also perform ongoing quality control on both scans and reports. The aMRI protocols utilize multiphasic post-contrast imaging to allow LI-RADS scoring. A non-contrast-enhanced aMRI protocol is available for participants who develop renal impairment or contrast allergy during the study. US protocols conform to US LI-RADS standards. Structured reporting promotes consistency in documentation of findings, visualization scores, and follow-up recommendations. A centralized Image Repository was established, incorporating advanced de-identification methods to remove metadata and pixel-embedded protected health information from imaging files. More than 20,000 curated liver MRI and US exams are anticipated, supporting both trial outcomes and future radiomics and artificial intelligence research. PREMIUM aims to determine whether screening for HCC with a DCE aMRI protocol reduces HCC-related mortality and also facilitates ancillary studies utilizing the Image Repository.

Abbreviated MRI↗
PubMed2026

Multi-Target HCC Blood Test Demonstrates Consistent Performance Across Subgroups of Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is critical for improving patient outcomes; however, ultrasound-based surveillance has limited sensitivity and variable performance across patient populations. We evaluated the performance of a multitarget HCC blood test (mt-HBT), incorporating methylated DNA markers, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and patient sex, across clinically relevant subgroups. METHODS: We performed a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective case-control study that included 159 patients with early-stage HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A) and 649 control patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B without HCC. The mt-HBT combined methylated HOXA1, TSPYL5, and B3GALT6 markers with AFP and sex. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated overall and according to age, sex, obesity, liver disease etiology, Child Pugh class, and tumor size. Performance was compared with AFP and GALAD. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity and specificity of mt-HBT for early-stage HCC detection were 76.7% (95% CI, 69.6-82.6) and 87.5% (95% CI, 84.8-89.8), respectively. Sensitivity was significantly higher than that of AFP (35.2%, p < 0.001) and comparable to that of GALAD (78.6%, p = 0.56), whereas specificity was lower than that of AFP (98.5%, p < 0.001) but higher than that of GALAD (76.9%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was maintained across key subgroups, including patients with obesity (68.9%), Child Pugh B cirrhosis (75.0%), hepatitis C (80.0%), hepatitis B (72.2%), alcohol-associated liver disease (80.5%), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic disease (69.0%) (all p > 0.05 between subgroups). Specificity exceeded 80% in all examined populations and was significantly higher in women than in men (92.5% vs. 83.9%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity increased with tumor size, ranging from 60.0% for tumors < 2 cm to 100% for tumors > 5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The mt-HBT demonstrated robust, consistent performance for early-stage HCC detection across diverse patient populations, including subgroups in which ultrasound surveillance commonly underperforms. These findings support the prospective validation of mt-HBT as a blood-based surveillance strategy for HCC.

liver cancer↗
PubMed2026

The future of blood-based biomarkers in liver cancer.

Liquid biomarkers hold substantial promise in liver cancer, with potential applications in risk stratification, surveillance and early detection, therapeutic decision-making, and treatment-response monitoring. In parallel with oncologic advances, liquid biopsy has gained increasing attention. However, despite expanded research efforts, prospective clinical validation remains limited. While cell-free DNA-based detection of actionable alterations has entered clinical practice in select contexts, most candidate liquid biomarkers still require rigorous evaluation through translational research embedded in clinical trials and prospective cohort studies. In this review, we summarise the current landscape of blood-based biomarkers across the cancer care continuum for individuals at risk, or diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancers, and discuss the key challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Pandemic-Related Disruptions and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Safety-Net Settings.

IMPORTANCE: Pandemic-related disruptions in cirrhosis care resulted in major gaps and delays in surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether these initial declines improved and rebounded to prepandemic levels remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary clinical practice data on HCC surveillance utilization from before the COVID-19 pandemic to 4 years after the onset of the pandemic among safety-net populations with cirrhosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 5 safety-net health systems in the US. Adults with cirrhosis were evaluated longitudinally across 3 time periods: March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period), March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022 (COVID-19 era), and March 1, 2022, to February 29, 2024 (post-COVID-19 period). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was undergoing HCC surveillance identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and corresponding International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for indication. Comparisons of HCC surveillance across time periods used paired t tests, and comparisons of HCC surveillance between subgroups within the same time period used &#x3c7;2 tests. RESULTS: Among 6940 patients with cirrhosis, 4001 (57.7%) were men (median [IQR] age, 58 [52-64] years), 206 (3.0%) were Asian, 1720 (24.8%) were Hispanic, 1672 (24.1%) were non-Hispanic Black or African American, and 3081 (44.4%) were non-Hispanic White. The proportion who underwent HCC surveillance within 6 months after diagnosis was 30.8% (1940 patients) in the pre-COVID-19 era, which declined to 21.1% (1468 patients) in the COVID-19 era, and remained at 22.3% (1405 patients) in the post-COVID-19 era. Consistent trends were observed among men and women and among all age and race groups, except for Asian individuals, for whom there was an observed increase in the post-COVID-19 era. Similar trends of low HCC surveillance post-COVID-19 were observed across insurance types but was particularly concerning among uninsured or indigent care covered patients, among whom only 116 of 997 (11.9%) underwent surveillance in the most recent period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this observational study of US safety-net populations with cirrhosis, rates of HCC surveillance following pandemic-related declines remained persistently low even up to 4 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with fewer than 1 in 4 patients having undergone guideline-concordant HCC surveillance.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

Value of HCC surveillance in a landscape of emerging surveillance options: Perspectives of a multi-stakeholder modified Delphi panel.

HCC surveillance is recommended by liver professional societies but lacks broad acceptance by several primary care and cancer societies due to limitations in the existing data. We convened a diverse multidisciplinary group of cancer screening experts to evaluate current and future paradigms of HCC prevention and early detection using a rigorous Delphi panel approach. The experts had high agreement on 21 statements about primary prevention, HCC surveillance benefits, HCC surveillance harms, and the evaluation of emerging surveillance modalities. The experts agreed that current data have methodologic limitations as well as unclear generalizability to Western populations. Although a randomized clinical trial of surveillance versus no surveillance is unlikely feasible, they concurred that alternative designs, such as a comparison of 2 surveillance modalities, could provide indirect evidence of surveillance efficacy. The panel acknowledged the presence of surveillance harms, but concurred the overall value of surveillance appears high, particularly given a greater emphasis on benefits over harms by both patients and clinicians. The experts underscored the importance of a framework for measuring both benefits and harms when evaluating emerging surveillance strategies. The panel acknowledged performance metrics of emerging methods may differ from other cancer screening programs given differences in populations, including higher risk of cancer development and competing risk of morality, and differences in diagnostic workflow in patients at risk of HCC. These data provide insights into the perceived value of HCC surveillance in an era of emerging blood- and imaging-based surveillance strategies.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

The phosphatidylserine targeting antibody bavituximab plus pembrolizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 trial.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/L1 have modest efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma as single agents. Targeting membranous phosphatidylserine may induce pro-inflammatory and -immune stimulating effects that enhance immunotherapy activity. This hypothesis was tested in a single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating frontline bavituximab, a phosphatidylserine targeting antibody, plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (NCT03519997). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate among evaluable patients, and secondary end points included progression-free survival, incidence of adverse events, overall survival, and duration of response. Among 28 evaluable patients, the confirmed response rate was 32.1%, which met the pre-specified endpoint, and the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 1.3-11.3 months). Treatment related-adverse events of any grade occurred in 45.7% of patients, with grade 3 or greater adverse events in 14.3% of patients. Adverse events of any cause were observed in 33 patients (94.3%), with grade 3 or greater adverse events in 11 patients (31.4%). Prespecified exploratory analyses of baseline tumor specimens showed that a depletion of B cells, and the presence of fibrotic tissue and expression of immune checkpoints in stroma was associated with tumor response. These results suggest that targeting phosphatidylserine may lead to synergistic effects with PD-1 blockade without increasing toxicity rates, and future studies on this therapeutic strategy may be guided by biomarkers characterizing the pre-treatment tumor microenvironment.

Humans↗
PubMed2023

International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) white paper on hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification and surveillance.

Major research efforts in liver cancer have been devoted to increasing the efficacy and effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As with other cancers, surveillance programmes aim to detect tumours at an early stage, facilitate curative-intent treatment, and reduce cancer-related mortality. HCC surveillance is supported by a large randomised-controlled trial in patients with chronic HBV infection and several cohort studies in cirrhosis; however, effectiveness in clinical practice is limited by several barriers, including inadequate risk stratification, underuse of surveillance, and suboptimal accuracy of screening tests. There are several proposed strategies to address these limitations, including risk stratification algorithms and biomarkers to better identity at-risk individuals, interventions to increase surveillance, and emerging imaging- and blood-based surveillance tests with improved sensitivity and specificity for early HCC detection. Beyond clinical validation, data are needed to establish clinical utility, i.e. increased early tumour detection and reduced HCC-related mortality. If successful, these data could facilitate a precision screening paradigm in which surveillance strategies are tailored to individual HCC risk to maximise overall surveillance value. However, practical and logistical considerations must be considered when designing and implementing these validation efforts. To address these issues, ILCA (the International Liver Cancer Association) adjourned a single topic workshop on HCC risk stratification and surveillance in June 2022. Herein, we present a white paper on these topics, including the status of the field, ongoing research efforts, and barriers to the translation of emerging strategies.

Humans↗