Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Alfredo Llovet

Publications and source records attributed to Alfredo Llovet.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Implications of periaortic hematoma in patients with acute aortic dissection (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection).

The clinical profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with acute aortic dissections and associated periaortic hematomas on aortic imaging have not been described in a large cohort. This study sought to assess the prognostic implications of periaortic hematomas in patients with aortic dissections and to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with periaortic hematomas. The study population was 971 patients with acute aortic dissections enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection with available imaging data on presentation with the presence or absence of periaortic hematomas. Patients with periaortic hematomas (n = 227, 23.4%) were more likely to be women, to have a history of hypertension and atherosclerosis, and to present early to the hospital. At presentation, they had greater frequencies of shock, cardiac tamponade, coma, and/or altered consciousness. Clinical outcomes were significantly worse in patients with periaortic hematomas, including significantly greater mortality (33% vs 20.3%, p <0.001). A multivariate model demonstrated periaortic hematomas to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic dissections (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.54, p = 0.007). In conclusion, this study provides insight into the profiles, presentation, and outcomes of patients with periaortic hematomas and acute aortic dissections. The early identification and aggressive management of patients with periaortic hematomas may potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Association of painless acute aortic dissection with increased mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with painless acute aortic dissection (AAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this study conducted from 1997 to 2001, we searched the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection to identify patients with painless AAD (group 1). Their clinical features and in-hospital events were compared with patients who had painful AAD (group 2). RESULTS: Of the 977 patients in the database, 63 (6.4%) had painless AAD, and 914 (93.6%) had painful AAD. Patients in group 1 were older than those in group 2 (mean +/- SD age, 66.6 +/- 13.3 vs 61.9 +/- 14.1 years; P = .01). Type A dissection (involving the ascendIng aorta or the arch) was more frequent in group 1 (74.6% vs 60.9%; P = .03). Syncope (33.9% vs 11.7%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (19.7% vs 3.9%; P < .001), and stroke (11.3% vs 4.7%; P = .03) were more frequent presenting signs in group 1. Diabetes (10.2% vs 4.0%; P = .04), aortic aneurysm (29.5% vs 13.1%; P < .001), and prior cardiovascular surgery (48.1% vs 19.7%; P < .001) were also more common in group 1. In-hospital mortality was higher in group 1 (33.3% vs 23.2%; P = .05), especially due to type B dissection (limited to the descending aorta) (43.8% vs 10.4%; P < .001), and the prevalence of aortic rupture was higher among patients with type B dissection in group 1 (18.8% vs 5.9%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Patients with painless AAD had syncope, congestive heart failure, or stroke. Compared with patients who have painful AAD, patients who have painless AAD have higher mortality, especially when AAD is type B.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Syncope in acute aortic dissection: diagnostic, prognostic, and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a well-recognized symptom of acute aortic dissection, often indicating the development of dangerous complications such as cardiac tamponade. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection at 18 referral centers in six countries. Data on key clinical findings and outcomes were collected via extensive questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine the association between syncope and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for demographic characteristics, dissection type, comorbid conditions, and complications (e.g., cardiac tamponade). RESULTS: Syncope was reported in 96 (13%) of 728 patients. Patients with syncope were more likely to die in the hospital (34% [n = 33 deaths]) than were those without syncope (23% [144/632], P = 0.01). They were also more likely to have cardiac tamponade (28% [n = 27] vs. 8% [n = 49], P <0.001), stroke (18% [n = 17] vs. 4% [n = 27], P <0.001), and other neurologic deficits (25% [n = 24] vs. 14% [n = 88], P = 0.005). After multivariate adjustment, clinical factors independently associated with the occurrence of syncope included a proximal dissection (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 12; P <0.001), cardiac tamponade (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.7 to 5.4; P <0.001), and stroke (OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7 to 7.2; P = 0.001). There was a significant association between in-hospital death and syncope after adjustment for demographic characteristics alone (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.5; P = 0.01), but not after adjustment for dissection type, comorbid conditions, and complications. CONCLUSION: Patients with dissections complicated by cardiac tamponade or stroke are significantly more likely to present with syncope. If these complications are excluded, syncope alone does not appear to increase the risk of death independently.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Predicting death in patients with acute type a aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Given the high mortality rates in patients with type A aortic dissection, predictive tools to identify patients at increased risk of death are needed to assist clinicians for optimal treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Accordingly, we evaluated 547 patients with this diagnosis enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between January 1996 and December 1999. Univariate testing followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of death. In-hospital mortality rate was 32.5% in type A dissection patients. In-hospital complications (neurological deficits, altered mental status, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia, kidney failure, hypotension, cardiac tamponade, and limb ischemia) were increased in patients who died compared with survivors (P<0.05 for all). Logistic regression identified the following presenting variables as predictors of death: age > or =70 years (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.77; P=0.03), abrupt onset of chest pain (OR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.22 to 5.54; P=0.01), hypotension/shock/tamponade (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.83 to 4.81; P<0.0001), kidney failure (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.80 to 12.6; P=0.002), pulse deficit (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.29, P=0.004), and abnormal ECG (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.95; P=0.03) (area under receiver operating curve, 0.74; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The in-hospital mortality rate in acute type A aortic dissection is high and can be predicted with the use of a clinical model incorporated in a simple risk prediction tool. This tool can be used to educate patients with dissection about their predicted risk and in clinical research for risk adjustment while comparing outcomes of different therapies.

Aged↗