Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Alexandra L DeCandia

Publications and source records attributed to Alexandra L DeCandia.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Ex situ reared black-footed ferrets exhibit altered sperm DNA methylation.

Many endangered species rely on ex situ management for survival when external threats exist on the landscape. Yet, ex situ settings pose challenges through space limitation, altered environment, and diet. This can lead to environmentally determined inbreeding depression, where ex situ animals exhibit reduced reproductive fitness compared with their in situ counterparts, despite originating from the same genetic stock. We investigated epigenetic differences as a potential mechanism underlying environmentally determined inbreeding depression in black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes), a North American endemic species reliant on ex situ conservation. More specifically, we explored how environmental context may influence sperm DNA methylation in samples collected from 12 ex situ and 5 in situ males. Average sperm DNA methylation was significantly higher in ex situ individuals. We additionally identified more than 500 differentially methylated regions between ex situ and in situ sperm samples that were enriched for gene ontology terms pertaining to reproduction and development. Putative genes of interest included NPR2, WEE2, SLC15A1, PDE10A, PIP5K1B, CACNA1E, and CACNA1A, all of which have previously been linked to spermatogenesis, sperm motility, or fertilization in mammals. Results suggest that environmental conditions may alter sperm DNA methylation in black-footed ferrets, with possible links to decreased reproductive success in ex situ settings. These findings provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying environmentally determined inbreeding depression in black-footed ferrets and other conservation-reliant species, and can serve as a foundation for future research on improving reproductive health in endangered wildlife.

Animals

Evolving conservation: The role of unconventional approaches to restore contemporary vertebrate populations and genomic biodiversity.

Conservation biology and restoration ecology are two essential yet distinct disciplines that address the growing challenge of biodiversity loss. Traditionally, these fields have relied on ecological principles and management practices aimed at protecting or reestablishing natural systems. The crisis is no longer just ecological; it is evolutionary and genomic. The accelerating pace of environmental change has outstripped the capacity of conventional approaches, creating a pressing need for innovative solutions. Biotechnology offers potentially transformative tools that can enhance the effectiveness and precision of both conservation and restoration efforts, especially for species where conventional conservation approaches have proved insufficient. Techniques such as genetic rescue, synthetic biology, and gene editing are increasingly being explored to address critical challenges, such as invasive species control, genetic diversity loss, and habitat fragmentation, to both invigorate endangered species and restore historical biodiversity. Despite its promise, the integration of biotechnology into conservation and restoration has raised ethical, ecological, and regulatory concerns. These include ecological unpredictability and public resistance to genetic interventions in wild populations. This perspective examines the current landscape of biotechnological applications in conservation and restoration, highlighting successful case studies, ongoing controversies, and optimism for additional progress. We argue that thoughtful, transparent integration of biotechnology that is grounded in ecological knowledge and stakeholder engagement can reconcile the goals of conservation and restoration. As ecosystems face mounting pressures, biotech-enabled strategies may prove essential for fostering resilience and ensuring long-term ecological sustainability.

Conservation of Natural Resources