Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Alessandro Brunelli

Publications and source records attributed to Alessandro Brunelli.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Evaluation of expiratory volume, diffusion capacity, and exercise tolerance following major lung resection: a prospective follow-up analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lung resections determine a variable functional reduction depending on the extent of the resection and the time elapsed from the operation. The objectives of this study were to prospectively investigate the postoperative changes in FEV(1), carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (Dlco), and exercise tolerance after major lung resection at repeated evaluation times. METHODS: FEV(1), Dlco, and peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) calculated using the stair climbing test were measured in 200 patients preoperatively, at discharge, and 1 month and 3 months after lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Preoperative and repeated postoperative measures were compared, and a time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative Vo(2)peak. RESULTS: One month after lobectomy, FEV(1), Dlco, and Vo(2)peak values were 79.5%, 81.5%, and 96% of preoperative values and recovered up to 84%, 88.5%, and 97% after 3 months, respectively. One month after pneumonectomy, FEV(1) percentage of predicted, Dlco percentage of predicted, and Vo(2)peak values were 65%, 75%, and 87% of preoperative values, and were 66%, 80%, and 89% after 3 months, respectively. Three months after lobectomy, 27% of patients with COPD had improved FEV(1), 34% had improved Dlco, and 43% had improved Vo(2)peak compared to preoperative values. The time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis showed that postoperative Vo(2)peak values were directly associated with preoperative values of Vo(2)peak, and postoperative values of FEV(1) and Dlco, and were inversely associated with age and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may be used during preoperative counseling and for deciding eligibility for operation along with other more traditional measures of outcome.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Measured FEV1 in the first postoperative day, and not ppoFEV1, is the best predictor of cardio-respiratory morbidity after lung resection.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: There is a low correlation between predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) and FEV1 measured the days after pulmonary resection, when most complications are developed. The hypothesis of this investigation is that ppoFEV1 does not predict postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing lung resection when immediate postoperative FEV1 is considered in the predictive model. METHODS: One hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy were included in a prospective, multiinstitutional study. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: age, body mass index, ppoFEV1, surgical approach (VATS or muscle-sparing thoracotomy), type of analgesia (epidural or intraveous), postoperative visual analogue pain score and FEV1 measured the day after the operation. Target variable: occurrence of postoperative cardio-respiratory complications. Method of analysis: classification tree (CART) dividing the population at random in two subsets and developing a bootstrap set of 100 trees resampling training data. The relative importance of each variable and the accuracy of both initial and committee trees to predict the outcome were presented. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven lobectomies and 21 pneumonectomies were included. Overall cardio-respiratory morbidity was 22%. According to CART results, first day FEV1 was the most important variable to classify cases as primary splitter and as a surrogate of each primary splitter (100% importance). Patient age followed (51%) and ppoFEV1 was third (43%) with a score similar to postoperative pain score (42%) and type of analgesia (36%). Sensitivity and specificity of the initial tree were, respectively, 0.5 and 0.7; values for committee tree were 0.5 sensitivity and 0.7 specificity. CONCLUSION: Postoperative cardio-respiratory complications are more related to FEV1 measured in the first postoperative day than to ppoFEV1 value.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality models to compare the performance of two units after major lung resections.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality models to compare the performance of 2 different thoracic surgery units in patients submitted to major lung resections. METHODS: Seven hundred forty-three patients (551 male and 192 female patients) who underwent lobectomy (n = 611) or pneumonectomy (n = 132) from January 2000 through August 2004 at 2 European thoracic units (519 patients in unit A and 224 patients in unit B) were analyzed. Risk-adjusted models of 30-day or in-hospital cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality were developed by using stepwise logistic regression analyses and validated by means of bootstrap analysis. Preoperative and operative variables were initially screened by using univariate analysis. Those with a P value of less than .10 were used as independent variables in the regression analyses. The regression equations were then used to estimate the risk of outcome, and the observed and predicted outcome rates of the 2 units were compared by using the z test for comparison of proportions. RESULTS: The following regression models were developed. Predicted morbidity: lnR/1-R=-2.4+0.03Xage-0.02XppoFEV1+0.6Xcardiaccomorbidity (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic = 6.1 [P = .6], c index = 0.65). Predicted mortality: lnR/1-R=-6.97+0.095Xage-0.042XppoFEV1 (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic = 2.99 [P = .9], c index = 0.77). The models proved to be stable at bootstrap analyses. No differences were noted between observed and predicted outcome rates within each unit, despite an apparent unadjusted better performance of unit B. CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk-adjusted outcome models avoided misleading information derived from the unadjusted analysis of performance. Risk modeling is essential for the evaluation of the quality of care.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Predicted versus observed FEV1 in the immediate postoperative period after pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Scanty information can be found regarding ppoFEV1% correlation with true FEV1% in the immediate days after surgery, when most cardio-respiratory complications are developed. This prospective multicentric investigation aims to describe the evolution of FEV1 in a series of uneventful lobectomy cases before hospital discharge, and to identify factors associated with the variation of postoperative residual FEV1, with the ratio between the actual and the predicted postoperative FEV1 measured during the first 6 postoperative days. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one patients submitted to lobectomy were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients with chest wall resections and postoperative complications were excluded. Data from a total of 125 patients were thus used for the analysis. The following clinical variables were recorded: age, preoperative FEV1, ppoFEV1, presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), surgical approach (VATS or muscle-sparing thoracotomy), side (right or left) and site (upper or lower) of resection, type of analgesia (epidural or intravenous), and daily visual analogue pain score (VAS). FEV1 was measured in every patient at hospital admission and daily until discharge or up to postoperative day 6. Random effects time-series cross-sectional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with variation of postoperative residual function (100-(preoperative FEV1-postoperative FEV1/preoperative FEV1 x 100)), and of FEV1 ratio ((actual postoperative FEV1 x 100)/ppoFEV1). For these analyses, the dependent variables (postoperative residual function and FEV1 ratio) and the pain score were analysed as panel longitudinal data. The regression analyses were subsequently validated by bootstrap procedure. RESULTS: FEV1% was lower at first postoperative day and increased gradually up to day 6 but mean values never reached ppoFEV1%. Pain scores decreased from day 1 to day 6. Preoperative FEV1 (p<0.0001) and postoperative pain score (p<0.0001) resulted independently and reliably inversely associated with postoperative residual FEV1 (model R2, 0.16). Preoperative FEV1 (p=0.001), postoperative pain score (p<0.0001), and epidural analgesia (p=0.04) resulted independently and reliably associated with postoperative FEV1 ratio (model R2, 0.13). CONCLUSION: Current methods of prediction of postoperative FEV1 greatly underestimated the real functional loss in the immediate postoperative period. Therefore, for the purpose of a more accurate risk stratification we need to correct the traditional prediction of postoperative FEV1.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity improves risk stratification in patients without airflow limitation: evidence for systematic measurement before lung resection.

OBJECTIVE: In many centers, carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) is still not routinely measured in all patients but only in patients with airflow limitation. The objective of the study was to assess the degree of correlation between forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and DLCO, and verify whether a low predicted postoperative DLCO (ppoDLCO) could have a role in predicting complications in patients without airflow limitation. METHODS: We analyzed 872 patients submitted to lung resection between January 2000 and December 2004 in two units measuring systematically DLCO before operation. Correlation between FEV1 and DLCO was assessed in the entire dataset and in different subsets of patients. A number of variables were then tested for a possible association with postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in patients with FEV1>80% by univariate analysis. Variables with p<0.10 at univariate analysis were used as independent variables in a stepwise logistic regression analysis (dependent variable: presence of cardiopulmonary morbidity), which was in turn validated by bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between FEV1 and DLCO in the entire dataset and in different subsets of lung resection candidates (stratified by age, gender, cause of operation, airflow limitation) were all below 0.5, showing a modest degree of correlation. Two hundred and nineteen of the 508 patients (43%) with FEV1>80% had DLCO<80%. Moreover, in patients with FEV1>80%, logistic regression analysis showed that ppoDLCO<40% was a significant and reliable predictor of postoperative complications (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: The modest correlation between FEV1 and DLCO and the capacity of ppoDLCO to discriminate between patients with and without complications in subjects with a normal FEV1, warrants the routine measurement of DLCO in all candidates for lung resection, irrespective of their FEV1 value, in order to improve surgical risk stratification.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy before lung resection: a case-matched analysis of early outcome.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with an increased incidence of morbidity and mortality after major lung resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 570 patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer at our institution from January 2000 through June 2005. Of these, 70 patients underwent three cycles of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy before operation for locally advanced disease. Propensity scores were constructed to match those patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lung resection with those undergoing surgery alone. The propensity score analysis yielded two groups of 70 well-matched pairs that were compared in terms of baseline characteristics and early outcome (morbidity, mortality, length of postoperative stay, intensive care unit admission). RESULTS: The two case-matched groups had similar morbidity (p = 0.8), mortality (p = 0.4), perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.8) and intensive care unit admission rates (p = 0.8). Likewise, the length of postoperative stay did not differ between the groups (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabin-cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be safe before major lung resection. This finding warrants its use for efficacy studies of locally advanced and even early-stage lung cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: bootstrap versus training-and-test sampling.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present analysis was to compare the performance of a lung resection mortality model developed by means of logistic regression and bootstrap analysis with that of multiple mortality models developed by using the traditional training-and-test method from the same dataset. METHODS: Eleven mortality models (1 developed by means of logistic regression and bootstrap validation and the other 10 developed by means of the traditional training-and-test random splitting of the dataset) were generated by the data of unit A (571 patients submitted to major lung resection). The performances of each of the 11 mortality models were then evaluated by assessing the distribution of the respective c-statistics in 1000 bootstrap samples derived from unit B (224 patients). RESULTS: The first model (logistic regression and bootstrap analysis) had good discrimination among the 1000 bootstrap external samples (c-statistics >0.7 in 80% of samples and >0.8 in 38% of samples). Among the 10 training-and-test models, only one model had a similar performance, whereas the others had a poorer discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional training-and-test method for risk model building proved to be unreliable across multiple external populations and was generally inferior to bootstrap analysis for variable selection in regression analysis. Therefore the use of bootstrap analysis must be recommended for every future model-building process.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Air leaks after lobectomy increase the risk of empyema but not of cardiopulmonary complications: a case-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the presence and duration of air leaks after lobectomy are associated with an increased incidence of cardiopulmonary complications. METHODS: Propensity score analysis was used on 726 patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy from 1995 through 2004 to form three well-matched pairs of patients: patients with prolonged air leak (PAL) [> 7 days] and without air leak; patients with short air leak (SAL) [< or = 7 days] and without air leak; and patients with SAL and PAL. These matched groups were then compared to assess postoperative hospital stay and early outcome. RESULTS: Patients with SAL had a longer postoperative hospital stay compared to patients without air leak (8.6 days vs 7.8 days, respectively; p < 0.0001) but had similar morbidity and mortality. Patients with PAL had a longer postoperative hospital stay compared to patients without air leak (16.2 days vs 8.3 days, respectively; p < 0.0001) and with SAL (16.9 days vs 9 days, respectively; p < 0.0001), but similar cardiopulmonary complications were noted between the groups. Patients with PAL had a higher rate of empyema compared to patients without air leak and with SAL (8.2% vs 0%, p = 0.01 and 10.4% vs.1.1%, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of air leak was not associated with an increased incidence of cardiopulmonary morbidity but was associated with an increased risk of empyema. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm safety of fast track in patients with air leak.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Inability to perform maximal stair climbing test before lung resection: a propensity score analysis on early outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to assess whether patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test had an increased incidence of morbidity and mortality after major lung resection compared to patients who were able to exercise. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety one patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer were analyzed. Forty-five of these patients were unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test for underlying comorbidities. Unadjusted and propensity score case matched comparisons were performed between patients who could and who could not perform a preoperative stair climbing test. Multi-variable analyses were then performed to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality, and were validated by bootstrap bagging. RESULTS: Patients who could not perform the stair climbing test had similar morbidity rates (31.1 vs. 35.6%, respectively, P=0.7), but higher mortality rates (15.6 vs. 4.4%, respectively, P=0.08) and deaths among complicated patients (50 vs. 12.5%, respectively, P=0.025), compared to propensity score matched patients who could perform the stair climbing test. Logistic regression analyses showed that the inability to perform the stair climbing test was an independent and reliable predictor of mortality (P=0.005) but not of morbidity (P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal exercise test had an increased risk of mortality after major lung resection. Half of these patients did not survive postoperative complications, due to their decreased aerobic reserve caused by physical inactivity which made them unable to cope with the increased oxygen demand.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Alternate suction reduces prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized comparison versus water seal.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to compare in a prospective randomized fashion two different management schemes for chest tubes after lobectomy: water seal versus alternate suction (suction overnight and water seal during the day). METHODS: Ninety-four patients with air leak on the morning of the first postoperative day were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 (water seal alone), 47 patients; or group 2 (alternate suction), 47 patients. The groups were then compared in terms of preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables. RESULTS: Alternate suction patients showed a reduced incidence of air leak longer than 4 days (p = 0.04) and longer than 7 days (p = 0.02), a shorter duration of chest tubes in place (p = 0.002), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Alternate suction was superior to water seal alone in reducing the incidence of prolonged air leak and postoperative hospital stay after lobectomy. As suction was applied only overnight, this modality has the same advantage of water seal in terms of early mobilization of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection.

OBJECTIVE: To identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality following lung resection and to construct a risk model that could be used prospectively to inform decisions and retrospectively to enable fair comparisons of outcomes. METHODS: Data were submitted to the European Thoracic Surgery Database from 27 units in 14 countries. We analysed data concerning all patients that had a lung resection. Logistic regression was used with a random sample of 60% of cases to identify pre-operative factors associated with in-hospital mortality and to build a model of risk. The resulting model was tested on the remaining 40% of patients. A second model based on age and ppoFEV1% was developed for risk of in-hospital death amongst tumour resection patients. RESULTS: Of the 3426 adult patients that had a first lung resection for whom mortality data were available, 66 died within the same hospital admission. Within the data used for model development, dyspnoea (according to the Medical Research Council classification), ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score, class of procedure and age were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital death in a multivariate analysis. The logistic model developed on these data displayed predictive value when tested on the remaining data. CONCLUSIONS: Two models of the risk of in-hospital death amongst adult patients undergoing lung resection have been developed. The models show predictive value and can be used to discern between high-risk and low-risk patients. Amongst the test data, the model developed for all diagnoses performed well at low risk, underestimated mortality at medium risk and overestimated mortality at high risk. The second model for resection of lung neoplasms was developed after establishing the performance of the first model and so could not be tested robustly. That said, we were encouraged by its performance over the entire range of estimated risk. The first of these two models could be regarded as an evaluation based on clinically available criteria while the second uses data obtained from objective measurement. We are optimistic that further model development and testing will provide a tool suitable for case mix adjustment.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Predictors of prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify the predictors of prolonged air leak (air leak longer than 7 days) in patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on 588 patients operated on of pulmonary lobectomy from January 1995 through June 2003 was performed. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to generate a model predicting the risk of prolonged air leak. Bootstrap resampling technique was used to validate the regression model. RESULTS: A prolonged leak was exhibited by 15.6% of patients. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that significant independent predictors of prolonged air leak were a reduced predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (p < 0.0001), the presence of pleural adhesions (p = 0.003), and upper resections (p = 0.006). Bootstrap resampling analysis confirmed the reliability of these variables. A regression equation was generated for the prediction of the risk of prolonged air leak. CONCLUSIONS: We report that a low predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the presence of pleural adhesions, and the upper lobectomy or bilobectomy increased the risk of air leak persisting for more than 7 days. A model was generated to calculate this risk and assist the surgeon in taking extra measures to prevent such complication (ie, optimizing bronchodilator treatment, pleural tent, sealants, buttressed staple lines, water seal, and chest tube drainage).

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of water seal and suction after pulmonary lobectomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to assess whether placing chest tubes on water seal after pulmonary lobectomy reduced the duration of air leak compared with suction. METHODS: One hundred forty-five patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer and with an air leak on the first postoperative day were prospectively randomly assigned to two groups: in group 1 (72 patients), chest tubes were placed on water seal on the morning of the first postoperative day; in group 2 (73 patients), chest tubes were on continuous suction (-20 cm H(2)O). Eighty percent of the patients who underwent upper lobectomy had also a pleural tent procedure. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The two groups were evenly matched for preoperative and operative characteristics. No statistically significant differences were found between group 1 and group 2 in terms of air leak duration (6.5 versus 6.3, respectively; p = 0.9) and the incidence of prolonged air leak cases (27.8% versus 30.1%, respectively; p = 0.8). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was corrected for the length of the stapled parenchyma and the site of resection (upper and lower resections) or restricted to patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted. Water seal patients had increased postoperative complications compared with suction patients (31.9% versus 17.8%, respectively; p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tubes placed on water seal after pulmonary lobectomy were generally well tolerated and safe; however, they did not reduce the duration of air leak or the incidence of prolonged air leak compared with suction.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A model for the internal evaluation of the quality of care after lung resection in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a logistic model for internal audit in a population of elderly patients submitted to lung resection. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-six patients older than 70 years of age and submitted to lung resection for lung carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and logistic regression analyses yielded a model for the prediction of postoperative complications that was validated by bootstrap resampling analysis. The model was then used to assess the performance of our unit during two successive periods of activity ('early', 1993-1999; 'late', 2000-2003). RESULTS: Significant independent predictors of postoperative complications were a low ppoFEV1 (P < 0.0001) the presence of concomitant cardiac disease (P = 0.01) and extended resection (P = 0.03). The observed morbidity rate in the late period was higher than that in the early period (48.3 vs. 33.8%; P = 0.008). The predicted morbidity rate was also higher in the late period, compared to that in the early period (44 vs. 39%; P = 0.003). Moreover, no differences were noted between predicted and observed morbidity rates in each of the two periods (early, P = 0.4 late, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that applying a model of risk-adjustment in elderly patients submitted to lung resection was useful for the internal evaluation of the quality of care and prevented misleading information derived by the comparison of the crude rates of the observed morbidity.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Stair climbing test as a predictor of cardiopulmonary complications after pulmonary lobectomy in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the role of a symptom-limited stair climbing test in predicting postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in elderly candidates for lung resection. METHODS: A consecutive series of 109 patients more than 70 years of age who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for lung carcinoma from January 2000 through May 2003 formed the prospective database of this study. All patients in the analysis performed a preoperative symptom-limited stair climbing test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, the patients with complications had a lower forced expiratory capacity percentage of predicted (p = 0.048), predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage of predicted (p = 0.049), climbed a lower height at preoperative stair climbing test (p = 0.0004), and presented a greater proportion of cardiac comorbiditiy with respect to the patients without complications (p = 0.02). After logistic regression analysis, significant predictors of postoperative complications resulted in the presence of a concomitant cardiac disease (p = 0.04) and a low height climbed preoperatively (p = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: A symptom-limited stair climbing test was a safe and simple instrument capable of predicting cardiopulmonary complications in the elderly after lung resection.

Aged↗