Biomedical subjects

Aleksey S Tsukanov

Publications and source records attributed to Aleksey S Tsukanov.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

CHEK2 Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition: Whole Genome Sequencing Results.

While pathogenic germline CHEK2 variants are known to increase cancer risk, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding the precise risk of developing malignant neoplasms associated with specific missense variants or variants of uncertain significance. As a result, no clear clinical guidelines exist regarding consultation, monitoring and specific treatment options for those patients. For the first time in Russia, clinical data and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) results were analyzed for 3150 patients with cancer and suspected hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) and 5163 healthy individuals. This dataset formed the basis for assessing the role of germline CHEK2 variants in the development of different cancer types. The chromosomal coordinates and coding sequence coordinates are given in accordance with the GRCh38 (hg38) genome assembly and the NM_007194.4 transcript. Pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants of CHEK2 significantly increased the risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.015 [95% CI: 1.27-3.21]; p = 0.0031), but the association with colorectal cancer was not statistically significant (OR = 1.354 [95% CI: 0.42-4.42]; p = 0.616). A moderate increase in cancer risk was identified for the c.1100del variant (OR = 2.263 [95% CI: 1.19-4.32]; p = 0.0132) and for the common P/LP variants c.1100del, c.444+1G>A and c.433C>T (OR = 2.219 [95% CI: 1.40-3.51]; p = 0.0007). Notably, our study confirmed that CHEK2 c.470T>C (p.Ile157Thr) is the most common variant in the patient group, identified in 3.8% of cases (120/3150), compared with 3.0% in the control group (155/5163). Although the association between the most common CHEK2 variant c.470T>C and cancer risk reached nominal statistical significance (OR = 1.279 [95% CI: 1.00-1.63]; p = 0.0463), the effect size was minimal, suggesting that the contribution of this variant to hereditary cancer risk in the Russian population is modest. Additional studies are required before this variant can be definitively excluded from clinical interpretation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Analysis of APC promoter 1B deletions in Russian families with familial adenomatous polyposis.

OBJECTIVE: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a severe autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Patients develop hundreds of adenomatous polyps throughout the colon with the risk of colorectal cancer, if untreated, approaching 100%. FAP is caused by pathogenic germline variants in the APC gene. Deletions in the APC 1B promoter cause FAP in a small subgroup of patients. Previous studies suggested that the APC promoter deletions in unrelated FAP patients from the US and Italy are identical and may thus have spread from a single founder. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a similar founder effect can be detected in the Russian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed whole-genome sequencing on five unrelated patients (three males and two females) with extensive (over 100) colon polyps, family history of FAP, and germline APC 1B promoter deletions previously detected by the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and detected precise deletion boundaries. RESULTS: The patients carried deletions in the APC 1B promoter ranging from ~3 to ~122 kbp. We found no association between the deletion size and either the age of the onset or severity of the disease. All deletions were unique and no identical deletion boundaries were observed. However, in four patients, the right deletion breakpoints fell into a 1 kbp region downstream of the 1B promoter. The right breakpoints of several deletions detected in FAP patients from other countries also fell into this narrow region. CONCLUSION: The APC 1B promoter deletions analyzed in this study had arisen independently and there is thus no evidence of a founder effect. Therefore, at least for the cohort of FAP patients with APC 1B promoter deletions studied here, WGS did not provide an added diagnostic benefit to MLPA aside from precisely determining the deletion breakpoints.

APC promoter 1B deletion↗