Biomedical subjects

Ahalya Subramanian

Publications and source records attributed to Ahalya Subramanian.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The repeatability of MNREAD acuity charts and variability at different test distances.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to establish the repeatability of the MNREAD acuity charts in a normal adult population and to determine the coefficient of repeatability for reading acuity, reading speed, and critical print size. The study also investigates how changing the working distance affects these parameters. METHODS: Thirty normal young adults (mean age, 23.3 years) participated. Test-retest repeatability was assessed at 40 cm over two sessions by the same examiner using MNREAD charts 1 and 2. Additional measurements were also carried out at 24 cm and 52 cm working distances. The distance and the version of the chart used were randomized. RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability was found to be +/- 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for reading acuity, +/- 0.12 logMAR for critical print size, and +/- 8.6 words per minute for reading speed. Reading acuity and critical print size changed significantly with testing distance (p = 0.001). No changes were found in the reading speed at the different test distances (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: The MNREAD acuity charts can be used reliably to measure reading acuity, reading speed, and critical print size in a normal adult population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Spatial localization in visual impairment.

PURPOSE: To investigate self-reported difficulties experienced by visually impaired subjects in real-world tasks requiring judgment of space and distance and to determine whether laboratory measures of spatial localization predict self-reported difficulty with spatial tasks better than traditional measures of visual function, such as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: Forty-two subjects with visual impairment participated. The Spatial Localization Questionnaire (SLQ) was developed to investigate self-reported spatial localization difficulties, and subjects answered the questionnaire as part of the study. Subjects also completed a variety of clinical vision tests (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereo acuity, and reading speed) and laboratory vision tests (vernier acuity, bisection acuity, and visual direction). RESULTS: The SLQ was found to have good validity. Several significant correlations were found between the Rasch analysis ability scores for the questionnaire and the clinical and laboratory vision tests. Using stepwise regression analysis, we found that vernier acuity and contrast sensitivity accounted for 42% of the variance in the Rasch scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that certain subjects with visual impairment have difficulty with real-world spatial tasks, as indicated by the SLQ. Of note, these difficulties were better predicted by vernier acuity (a resolution test) and contrast sensitivity, rather than vernier or bisection bias, which measure localization.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Size constancy in visual impairment: a comparison with normally sighted individuals.

Size judgements are usually based on size constancy. However, as the number of visual cues decreases, such as by decreasing the field of view, size judgements gradually change from those based on size constancy to those based on the visual angle. The present study investigated whether visually impaired (VI) individuals, most of whom do not have measurable stereoacuity and have visual field defects, might therefore make judgements based on visual angle rather than size constancy. Size constancy was measured on 42 VI and 20 normally sighted subjects. Results indicated that size judgements are similar for both VI and normally sighted individuals at 0.50 m, 1 and 2 m. Statistically significant differences were found at 3 m. Despite this it would appear that VI individuals are able to make judgements based on size constancy rather than the visual angle.

Adult↗