Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Adriaan P Ijzerman

Publications and source records attributed to Adriaan P Ijzerman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A two-entropies analysis to identify functional positions in the transmembrane region of class A G protein-coupled receptors.

Residues in the transmembrane region of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important for ligand binding and activation, but the function of individual positions is poorly understood. Using a sequence alignment of class A GPCRs (grouped in subfamilies), we propose a so-called "two-entropies analysis" to determine the potential role of individual positions in the transmembrane region of class A GPCRs. In our approach, such positions appear scattered, while largely clustered according to their biological function. Our method appears superior when compared to other bioinformatics approaches, such as the evolutionary trace method, entropy-variability plot, and correlated mutation analysis, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Structure-activity relationships of new 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivatives as allosteric enhancers of the A3 adenosine receptor.

1H-Imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivatives have been synthesized as allosteric modulators of the human A3 adenosine receptor (AR). Structural modifications were made at the 4-amino and 2 positions. The compounds were tested in both binding and functional assays, and many were found to be allosteric enhancers of the action of A3AR agonists by several different criteria. First, a potentiation of the maximum efficacy of the agonist Cl-IB-MECA was observed for numerous derivatives. Also, a number of these compounds decreased the rate of dissociation of the agonist [125I]I-AB-MECA from the A3AR. Most prominently, compound 43 (LUF6000) was found to enhance agonist efficacy in a functional assay by 45% and decrease dissociation rate similarly without influencing agonist potency. The structural requirements for allosteric enhancement at the A3AR were distinct from the requirements to inhibit equilibrium binding. Thus, we have prepared allosteric enhancers of the human A3AR that have an improved allosteric effect in comparison to the inhibition of equilibrium binding at the orthosteric site.

Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2006

2,6-disubstituted and 2,6,8-trisubstituted purines as adenosine receptor antagonists.

Purines have long been exploited as adenosine receptor antagonists. The substitution pattern about the purine ring has been well investigated, and certain criteria have become almost a prerequisite for good affinity at the adenosine A(1) receptor. The adaptation of the pharmacophore and the initial series of pyrimidines developed in an earlier publication resulted in a series of purines with an entirely new substitution pattern. One compound in particular, 8-cyclopentyl-2,6-diphenylpurine (31, LUF 5962) has been shown to be very promising with an affinity of 0.29 nM at the human adenosine A(1) receptor.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2006

Structure-affinity relationships of adenosine A2B receptor ligands.

Many selective and high affinity agonists and antagonists have been developed for the adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors. Very recently such compounds have been identified for the adenosine A(2B) receptors. This review presents an overview of the structure-affinity relationships of antagonists and agonists for this receptor subtype as published in the scientific and patent literature. To date the most selective >370-fold, high affinity adenosine A(2B) receptor antagonist is the xanthine analog, compound 16 (8-(1-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione). The pyrrolopyrimidine analog OSIP339391 (73) is slightly less selective, 70-fold, but has a higher affinity 0.41 nM compared to 1 nM for compound 16. Other promising classes of compounds with selectivities ranging from 10- to 160-fold and affinities ranging from 3 to 112 nM include triazolo, aminothiazole, quinazoline, and pyrimidin-2-amine analogs. Progress has also been achieved concerning the development of selective high affinity agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor. For years the most potent, albeit non-selective adenosine A(2B) receptor agonist was (S)PHPNECA (88). Last year, a new class of non-ribose ligands was reported. Several compounds displayed selectivity with respect to adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptors. In addition, full and partial agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor were identified with EC(50) values of 10 nM (LUF5835, 103) and 9 nM (LUF5845, 105), respectively.

Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-hyperalgesic and anti-nociceptive effect of adenosine A1 receptor partial agonists in neuropathic pain.

The objective of this investigation was to characterise the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation of adenosine A1 receptor partial agonists in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Following intravenous administration of 8-methylamino-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (MCPA; 10 mg/kg) and 2'deoxyribose-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (2'dCPA; 20 mg/kg), the time course of the effect on the mechanical paw pressure threshold was determined in conjunction with plasma concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was applied to derive individual concentration-effect relationships. A composite model consisting of an E(max) model for the anti-hyperalgesic effect in combination with a linear model for the anti-nociceptive effect accurately described the concentration-effect relationship. For both compounds, a full anti-hyperalgesic effect was observed. The values of the EC50 for the anti-hyperalgesic effect were (mean+/-S.D.): 3170+/-1460 and 2660+/-1200 ng/ml for MCPA and 2'dCPA versus 178+/-51 ng/ml for the reference full agonist 5'deoxyribose-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (5'dCPA). The values of the slope for the anti-nociceptive effect were 1.9+/-0.30 and 1.2+/-0.20 g.microl/ng, respectively, versus 55+/-8 g microl/ng for 5'dCPA. Adenosine A1 receptor partial agonists behave as full agonists with regard to the anti-hyperalgesic effect in neuropathic pain, but the anti-nociceptive effect is diminished.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

A series of ligands displaying a remarkable agonistic-antagonistic profile at the adenosine A1 receptor.

Adenosine receptor agonists are usually variations of the natural ligand, adenosine. The ribose moiety in the ligand has previously been shown to be of great importance for the agonistic effects of the compound. In this paper, we present a series of nonadenosine ligands selective for the adenosine A(1) receptor with an extraordinary pharmacological profile. 2-Amino-4-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (70, LUF 5853) shows full agonistic behavior comparable with the reference compound CPA, while also displaying comparable receptor binding affinity (K(i) = 11 nM). In contrast, compound 58 (2-amino-4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, LUF 5948) has a binding affinity of 14 nM and acts as an inverse agonist. Also present within this same series are compounds that show neutral antagonism of the adenosine A(1) receptor, for example compound 65 (2-amino-4-(4-difluoromethoxyphenyl)-6-(2-hydroxyethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, LUF 5826).

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-aminothiazoles and their amide derivatives on human adenosine receptors. Lack of effect of 2-aminothiazoles as allosteric enhancers.

A number of 2-aminothiazoles (2a-e) and their amide derivatives (4-10) were prepared. The 2-aminothiazoles themselves were tested as allosteric enhancers of agonist binding to human adenosine A(1) receptors. In a variety of experimental set-ups the compounds did not show any such effect, in contrast to earlier findings by another research group. Subsequently the 2-aminothiazoles were used as intermediates in the synthesis of a number of amide derivatives of either aromatic (4-6) or aliphatic nature (7-10). Some of the compounds emerged as moderately active antagonists on human adenosine A(1) and/or A(2A) receptors with lower or negligible potency at adenosine A(3) receptors.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2005

Synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of 2,3,5-substituted [1,2,4]-thiadiazoles as modulators of adenosine A1 receptors and their molecular mechanism of action.

We synthesized two series (7a-i and 8a-i) of 2,3,5-substituted [1,2,4]-thiadiazole analogues of SCH-202676 (7a, 2,3-diphenyl-5-N-methylimino-2H-[1,2,4]-thiadiazole) with emphasis on the N-imino substituent. Compounds 7a-g,i and 8a-g at a final concentration of 1 microM significantly inhibited [(3)H]CCPA (2-chloro-N(6)- cyclopentyladenosine) agonist binding to human A(1) adenosine receptors. At the same concentration, all compounds appeared to increase [(3)H]DPCPX (1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine) antagonist binding. Compound 7a and LUF5855 (7g) were selected for further characterization and studied in both equilibrium and kinetic radioligand binding experiments. The results suggest a nonstoichiometric interaction with the receptor. Further bioanalytical procedures (HPLC and MS) provided proof for an unusual receptor interaction in which 7a and 7g upon incubation were transformed into their corresponding thioureas 5a and 5g. We suggest that the thiadiazoles are sulfhydryl modifying agents rather than allosteric modulators, as they appear to reversibly modify the sulfhydryl groups of cysteine residues in cell membrane preparations.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Structure-activity relationships of inverse agonists for G-protein-coupled receptors.

It has been recently established that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be constitutively active, i.e., they can be active in the absence of an agonist. This activity can be inhibited by so-called inverse agonists. For a number of GPCRs, such inverse agonists have been developed and studied, now enabling for the first time a study into their structure-activity relationships.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2005

Brain penetration of synthetic adenosine A1 receptor agonists in situ: role of the rENT1 nucleoside transporter and binding to blood constituents.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport of synthetic A(1) receptor agonists was studied in an in situ brain perfusion model in the presence and absence of the selective nucleoside transport inhibitor S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine (NBTI). For 8-methylamino-N(6)cyclopentyladenosine (MCPA), N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 2'deoxy-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (2'dCPA) and 5'deoxy-N(6)-cyclopentyl adenosine (5'dCPA) the brain uptake clearance was low with values of 0.0045+/-0.0012, 0.018+/-0.0020, 0.022+/-0.0028 and 0.12+/-0.054 ml min(-1)g(-1), respectively. In the presence of an average NBTI plasma concentration of 2.6+/-0.3 microg ml(-1) (NBTI dose: 3 mg kg(-1) i.v.) the values of the brain uptake clearance were 0.0062+/-0.0012, 0.013+/-0.0017, 0.014+/-0.0030 and 0.13+/-0.066 ml min(-1)g(-1), respectively and not significantly different from the values in the absence of NBTI. In a separate experiment the brain uptake of MCPA from phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and whole blood were compared. The brain uptake clearance from whole blood (0.0012+/-0.001 ml min(-1)g(-1)) was significantly lower than from PBS (0.0045+/-0.0012 ml min(-1)g(-1)). The results of these studies show that the rENT1 nucleoside transporter does not contribute significantly to the transport of synthetic A(1) receptor agonists across the BBB and that binding to blood constituents restricts the brain uptake.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2005

Techniques: how to boost GPCR mutagenesis studies using yeast.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the major targets of today's medicines. To elucidate the mechanism of activation of GPCRs and the interaction of these receptors with their G proteins, mutagenesis studies have proven to be a powerful tool and have provided insight into the structure and function of GPCRs. Random mutagenesis is useful in this respect particularly when combined with a robust screening assay that is based on the functional properties of the mutants. In this article, the use of random mutagenesis combined with a functional screening assay in yeast is described and compared with alternative approaches such as site-directed mutagenesis per se, alanine/cysteine scanning and another screening assay, receptor selection and amplification technology (R-SAT). Screening in yeast of randomly mutated GPCRs has proven successful in the identification of ligands for orphan receptors and in high-throughput approaches. Moreover, it has provided substantial insight into G-protein coupling and receptor activation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Allosteric modulation of the adenosine family of receptors.

Allosteric modulators for adenosine receptors (ARs) are of an increasing interest and may have potential therapeutic advantage over orthosteric ligands. Benzoylthiophene derivatives (including PD 81,723), 2-aminothiazolium salts, and related allosteric modulators of the A(1) AR have been studied. The benzoylthiophene derivatives were demonstrated to be selective enhancers for the A(1) AR, with little or no effect on other subtypes of ARs. Allosteric modulation of the A(2A) AR has also been reported. A(3) allosteric enhancers may be predicted to be useful against ischemic conditions. We have recently characterized two classes of A(3) AR allosteric modulators: 3-(2-pyridinyl)isoquinolines (e.g. VUF5455) and 1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines (e.g. DU124183), which selectively decreased the agonist dissociation rate at the human A(3)AR but not at A(1) and A(2A) ARs. DU124183 left-shifted the agonist conc.-response curve for inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact cells expressing the human A(3)AR with up to 30% potentiation of the maximal efficacy. The increased potency of A(3) agonists was evident only in the presence of an A(3) antagonist, since VUF5455 and DU124183 also antagonized, i.e. displaced binding at the orthosteric site, with K(i) values of 1.68 and 0.82 microM, respectively. A(3)AR mutagenesis studies implicated F182(5.43) and N274(7.45) in the action of the enhancers and was interpreted using a rhodopsin-based A(3)AR molecular model, suggesting multiple binding modes. Amiloride analogues, SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5(2H)-ylidene)methanamine), and sodium ions were demonstrated to be common allosteric modulators for at least three subtypes (A(1), A(2A), and A(3)) of ARs.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

2,4,6-trisubstituted pyrimidines as a new class of selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonists.

Adenosine receptor antagonists usually possess a bi- or tricyclic heteroaromatic structure at their core with varying substitution patterns to achieve selectivity and/or greater affinity. Taking into account molecular modeling results from a series of potent adenosine A1 receptor antagonists, a pharmacophore was derived from which we show that a monocyclic core can be equally effective. To achieve a compound that may act at the CNS we propose imposing a restriction related to its polar surface area (PSA). In consequence, we have synthesized two novel series of pyrimidines, possessing good potency at the adenosine A1 receptor and desirable PSA values. In particular, compound 30 (LUF 5735) displays excellent A1 affinity (Ki = 4 nM) and selectivity (< or =50% displacement of 1 muM concentrations of the radioligand at the other three adenosine receptors) and has a PSA value of 53 A2.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-hyperalgesic effect of 5'deoxy-N6-cylopentyladenosine in the mononeuropathic rat.

The objective of this investigation was to characterise the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation of 5'-deoxy-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (5'dCPA) in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Following intravenous administration of 5'dCPA (0.30 or 0.75 mg kg(-1)), the time course of the drug concentration in plasma was determined in conjunction with the effect on (1) the mechanical paw pressure and (2) the Von Frey Hair monofilament withdrawal threshold. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was applied to derive individual concentration-effect relationships. For mechanical paw pressure a composite model consisting of an Emax model for the anti-hyperalgesic effect in combination with a linear model for the anti-nociceptive effect accurately described the data. The EC50 for the anti-hyperalgesic effect was 178+/-51 ng ml(-1) and the slope of the anti-nociceptive effect 0.055+/-0.008 g ml ng(-1). For the Von Frey Hair monofilament withdrawal threshold responders and non-responders were observed. Typically, in responders, full pain relief was observed at concentrations exceeding 100 ng ml(-1). The high plasma concentrations required for the anti-hyperalgesic effect relative to the receptor affinity are consistent with restricted transport of 5'dCPA to the site of action in the spinal cord and/or the brain.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2004

Coupling of the human A1 adenosine receptor to different heterotrimeric G proteins: evidence for agonist-specific G protein activation.

The present study investigates the effect of varying ligand structure on the ability of agonists to activate guanine nucleotide-binding proteins of the Gi, Gs and Gq families via the A(1) adenosine receptor. In CHO cells expressing this receptor, inhibition or potentiation of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was used as an end point to measure the activation of Gi and, in Pertussis toxin (PTX)-treated cells, Gs, respectively. Stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation in PTX-treated cells was used as an index of Gq activation. CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine), NECA (5'-N-ethyl-carboxyamidoadenosine) and eight analogues of these ligands presented a range of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-activating profiles. Some ligands could only activate Gi (e.g. 2'deoxyCPA), some primarily Gi and Gs (and only weakly Gq) (e.g. 3'deoxyCPA), highlighting the importance of the ribose hydroxyls in agonist activation of multiple G proteins. CHA (N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine) activated Gi, Gs and Gq, but was more efficacious than CPA in activating Gs. The NECA analogues 5'-N-cyclopropyl-carboxamidoadenosine, 5'-N-cyclobutyl-carboxamidoadenosine and 5'-N-cyclopentyl-carboxamidoadenosine (CPeCA) also activated all three G proteins, although their ability to activate Gs and Gq (relative to CPA) was reduced with increasing substituent size, such that CPeCA produced only a small stimulation (at 100 microM) at Gq, but was a full agonist, relative to CPA, at Gi and Gs. This study suggests that the A(1) adenosine receptor can adopt agonist-specific conformations, arising from small changes in ligand structure, which lead to the differential activation of Gi, Gs and Gq.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists↗
PubMed2004

The mouse brain adenosine A1 receptor: functional expression and pharmacology.

The adenosinergic system is involved in many important physiological functions. Adenosine exerts its extracellular effects through four types of G-protein-coupled receptors: A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Adenosine acts as an important regulator of metabolic processes. In the brain adenosine mediates prominent neuroprotective functions via the adenosine A(1) receptor. Whereas the pharmacological characteristics of the rat and human adenosine A(1) receptor have been intensively studied, the mouse adenosine A(1) receptor has not yet been characterised. Accordingly, we have cloned the mouse brain adenosine A(1) receptor and present here a pharmacological characterisation of the mouse adenosine A(1) receptor using functional studies and radioligand binding assays. The results show that the binding affinities of several ligands for the mouse adenosine A(1) receptor are similar to the affinities for the rat and human adenosine A(1) receptor with some exceptions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Partial adenosine A(1) receptor agonists inhibit sarin-induced epileptiform activity in the hippocampal slice.

Organophosphate poisoning can result in seizures and subsequent neuropathology. One possible therapeutic approach would be to employ adenosine A(1) receptor agonists, which have already been shown to have protective effects against organophosphate poisoning. Using an in vitro model of organophosphate-induced seizures, we have investigated the ability of several adenosine A(1) receptor agonists to inhibit epileptiform activity induced by the organophosphate sarin, in the CA1 stratum pyramidale of the guinea pig hippocampal slice. Application of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) or the partial adenosine A(1) receptor agonists 2-deoxy-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (2-deoxy-CPA) and 8-butylamino-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (8-butylamino-CPA) abolished epileptiform activity in a concentration-related manner. The rank order of potency was CPA (IC(50) 4-5 nM) >2-deoxy-CPA (IC(50) 113-119 nM)=8-butylamino-CPA (IC(50) 90-115 nM). These data suggest that partial adenosine A(1) receptor agonists, which have fewer cardiovascular effects, should be further evaluated in vivo as potential treatments for organophosphate poisoning.

Action Potentials↗