Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A de Graeff

Publications and source records attributed to A de Graeff.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the scales and test the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-H&N35, a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of life of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients in conjunction with the general cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were given to 500 H&N cancer patients from Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands as part of two prospective studies. The patients completed the questionnaires before, during (Norway and Sweden only), and after treatment, yielding a total of 2070 completed questionnaires. RESULTS: The compliance rate was high, and the questionnaires were well accepted by the patients. Seven scales were constructed (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, sexuality). Scales and single items were sensitive to differences between patient subgroups with relation to site, stage, or performance status. Most scales and single items were sensitive to changes, with differences of various magnitudes according to the site in question. The internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, varied according to assessment point and within subsamples of patients. A low overall alpha value was found for the speech and the senses scales, but values were higher in assessments of patients with laryngeal cancer and in patients with nose, sinus, and salivary gland tumors. Scales and single items in the QLQ-H&N35 seem to be more sensitive to differences between groups and changes over time than do the scales and single items in the core questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of H&N cancer patients before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

[Joint decisions, how? Physician-patient communication about palliative chemotherapy].

The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different patients. This is one of the reasons why patients should be informed thoroughly and included in the decision-making about treatment. The obligation to inform was laid down in 1995 in the Decree on the Medical Contract. In a case of metastasized cancer of the prostate it was decided more or less by mutual agreement between doctor and patient to administer palliative chemotherapy. It appeared subsequently that the physician had short-term palliation in mind, and the patient prolongation of survival. Although both are of the opinion that the patient was included actively in the decision-making, this was in reality not at all the case. The question arises whether the Decree on the Medical Contract does not demand too much from certain patients regarding their capacity to make a decision about the treatment of a terminal disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Phase II study of weekly high-dose cisplatin for six cycles in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

In a phase I study of weekly administered cisplatin, we observed a major response in 8 of 9 patients with locally far advanced head and neck cancer. Therefore, a phase II study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerance of this weekly cisplatin regimen. 59 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were entered into this phase II study. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for 6 cycles. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a 3-h infusion with standard pre- and posthydration. 51 patients were evaluable for response and 55 for toxicity. Only 9 patients were able to complete the treatment with the planned dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week. Complete disappearance of the tumour was observed in 8 patients and a partial response in 22 (response rate 59%; 51% of all eligible patients 95% CI limits 37-63%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients, and the tumour progressed in 9 patients. 47 patients subsequently received high-dose radiotherapy, 1 radiotherapy and surgery and 4 patients second-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival for all patients were 32 weeks and 56 weeks, respectively. Haematological toxicity consisted of anaemia, leucocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients). Because of leuco- and/or thrombocytopenia, treatment was delayed in 30 patients while 13 were taken off the study because of delayed bone marrow recovery. Non-haematological toxicities were: ototoxicity grade 1 in 3 patients, grade 2 in 7 and grade 3 in 3 patients; nephrotoxicity grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 2 and grade 3 in 1 patient. Neurotoxicity grade 1 was observed in only 8 patients. Cisplatin, as a single agent, administered at high-dose intensity, has an antitumour activity comparable with that of combination regimens in locally advanced head and neck cancer. The pattern of toxicity is different: leuco- and thrombocytopenia jeopardize the dose intensity concept; for patients ototoxicity is the more relevant toxicity. Further studies with weekly cisplatin are of interest particularly with newer measures to reduce toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Results of a phase II trial of epirubicin and cisplatin (EP) before and after irradiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an EORTC GITCCG study.

The objective of the present study was to define the role of chemotherapy, in the form of the EP regimen, consisting of epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) in addition to irradiation in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of pancreatic cancer. 53 eligible patients with histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with three cycles of E 60 mg/m2 (if this dose was well tolerated then the dose of E was increased by 10 mg/m2 in the next cycle; 80 mg/m2 was the maximum dose for the following cycles) and P 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks, followed after 4 weeks by a split course of irradiation of 40 Gy with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 on each of the first 3 days of each 20 Gy treatment segment. This was followed by another three cycles of EP in patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or a better response after the first three cycles. The treatment given with standard anti-emetics was moderately tolerated. The chemotherapy related toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and the chemoradiotherapy related toxicity of gastrointestinal side-effects. However, due to the long duration of treatment which made the whole treatment difficult to endure, only 18/53 (34%) actually completed the full treatment regimen. Responses were evaluated after the first three cycles and 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment by serial CT-scans using standard criteria. The results in 53 evaluable patients after the first three cycles of EP were as follows: 1 patient achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 7 a partial response (PR) (CR + PR: 15%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11-33%), 36 patients (68%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 patients progressive disease (PD). There was 1 early PD, 1 toxic death and 1 patient could not be evaluated. The response at the end of the treatment was 3 CR, 11 PR (CR + PR: 14/53 (26%); 95% CI: 15-40%), 30 SD and 6 PD. The median time to progression was 8.9 months and the median duration of response 13.1 months. The median survival of all treated patients was 10.8 months (range 7 days to 41.5 months), of responders 15.1 months and, of the patients with SD 10.3 months. These results are comparable to other combined modality regimens reported in the literature for locally advanced disease. The addition of the systemic treatment with E and P offers no additional advantage to combined modality treatment alone.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study on mitoxantrone in adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Based on activity in a case report, mitoxantrone was studied in a phase II study in adenoid cystic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic and/or rapidly progressive metastatic or recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma were eligible for this study. They were treated with mitoxantrone given intravenously by bolus injection at a dose of 14 mg/m2, cycles repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients entered on trial, 4 were ineligible. A median of 6 cycles per patient were given. Leucocytopenia (in 97% of patients) was the most important side effect and tended to be cumulative. Other side effects were mainly mild to moderate and consisted of nausea (62%), vomiting (29%), alopecia (53%) and mucositis (41%). Four of 32 patients had a partial response (12%; 95% CI 4%-29%) lasting 3-13 months, 22 patients (69%) had a stable disease. CONCLUSION: Mitoxantrone at this dose and schedule has modest activity in adenoid cystic carcinomas.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group study.

PURPOSE: To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity. RESULTS: Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.

Agranulocytosis↗
PubMed1993

Phase II study of sequential high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (F) alternated with epirubicin (E) and cisplatin (P) [FEMTX-P] in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: FAMTX (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, methotrexate) is one of the most effective drug combinations in gastric cancer. Therefore, modifications of FAMTX appear of interest and the FEMTX-P regiment was conceived. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma were treated with methotrexate 1500 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-fluorouracil 1500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; leucovorin rescue 15 mg/m2 orally every 6 hours for 8 doses on days 2 and 3; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 15, q 4 weeks. RESULTS: Of forty-seven patients evaluable for response, five (11%) achieved complete responses and seventeen (36%) partial responses (total response rate 47%). The median duration of response was 8+ months (range: 5-25+ months). Four of 14 patients with locally advanced disease were successfully downstaged and subsequently resected. The median duration of survival of all patients was 10 months (range: 1-25+ months). Leukopenia grade 4 occurred in 18% of patients and thrombocytopenia grade 4 and mucositis grade 4 in 4% and 2%, respectively. Treatment postponement for hematologic toxicity was necessary in 54% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The FEMTX-P regimen is an active regimen in advanced gastric carcinoma, with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Combination of 5-FU, high dose methotrexate, epirubicin and cisplatin (FEMTX-P protocol) in non surgical or locally recurrent metastatic gastric cancers].

In this phase II study, fifty patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma were treated with methotrexate 1.5 g/m2 iv and 5-fluorouracil 1.5 g/m2 iv on day 1; leucovorin rescue 15 mg/m2 orally every 6 h for 8 doses on day 2 and 3; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 iv and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 iv on day 15, q 4 weeks. The median age of the patients was 59 years and their median performance status 1. In forty-eight patients evaluable for response, five (10.4%) of the patients achieved a complete response and seventeen (35.6%) obtained a partial response (total response rate 46%; 95% confidence interval: 32%-60%). The median duration of response was 8+ months (range: 5-25 months). The median duration of survival of all patients was 10 months (range: 1-25+ months). Toxicities > grade 2 included vomiting grade 3 (31%), leucopenia grade 4 (18%) and thrombocytopenia grade 4 (4%). Treatment postponement or dose reduction for hematologic toxicity was necessary in 54% of patients. Median survival was 10 months. In conclusion, the FEMTX-P regimen is an active treatment in advanced gastric carcinoma with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Phase II study of edatrexate in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer.

A phase II trial of the new antifolate edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin) was performed in thirty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer who had never received chemotherapy. Edatrexate was administered as a weekly intravenous bolus injection at a dose of 80 mg/m2. Sites of metastases included visceral (31%), soft tissue/lymph node/bone (51%), and bone only (18%). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response; there were 3 complete responses (CR) and 8 partial responses (PR), yielding a response rate (CR plus PR) of 34% (95% confidence limits, 17.9% to 50.9%). Responses were seen in soft tissue metastases, in visceral metastases (liver, lung) and in one patient with bone metastases. Median duration of response was 30 weeks (range 12-66 weeks). Substantial toxicity was observed. The dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis, myelo-suppression and skin toxicity. The general toxicity profile was similar to that usually reported for methotrexate, but mucositis and skin toxicity were more pronounced. Edatrexate appears to be an active drug in the treatment of chemotherapy-native patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Imipenem versus gentamicin combined with either cefuroxime or cephalothin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients.

A prospective randomized study was conducted to determine the efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin (hereafter referred to as imipenem) (500 mg four times daily) versus combination therapy for febrile neutropenic patients receiving either no prophylaxis or ciprofloxacin for prevention of infections. Combination therapy consisted of gentamicin (80 mg every 8 h) plus either cefuroxime (1,500 mg every 8 h) or cephalothin (1,000 mg every 4 h) for suspected catheter-related infections. Ninety-four neutropenic fever episodes in 87 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall clinical rate of response to imipenem was significantly higher than that to combination therapy (91 versus 74%; P = 0.05). The difference in efficacy was most pronounced in patients with microbiologically documented infections (89 versus 53%; P = 0.025), which were predominantly caused by gram-positive bacteria. Differences in susceptibility may have caused the better rate of response to imipenem. Two of 29 gram-positive bacteria were imipenem resistant, whereas 10 were resistant to cephalothin and cefuroxime and 12 were resistant to gentamicin. No causative gram-negative bacterium and 24 gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 61 fever episodes with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral). In contrast, nine causative gram-negative and five gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 33 episodes without prophylaxis. The difference in distribution proved to be statistically significant for gram-negative (P = 0.0001) as well as gram-positive (P = 0.025) bacteria, indicating that ciprofloxacin effectively prevented the occurrence of gram-negative bacteria and may have contributed to the relatively large number of gram-positive bacteria isolated. Empirical initial therapy with imipenem may be a valuable alternative to combination therapy for neutropenic fever episodes.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Cellular pharmacokinetics of carboplatin and cisplatin in relation to their cytotoxic action.

We have studied the cellular pharmacokinetics of carboplatin (CBDCA), as part of the evaluation of the antitumor activity of CBDCA in cancers limited to the peritoneal cavity in comparison with cisplatin (cDDP). The uptake of CBDCA into L1210 (lymphosarcoma), CC531 (colonic carcinoma), COV413.B (human ovarian carcinoma) and NB1 (human neuroblastoma) cells was 1.5 to 13 times lower than the uptake of cDDP. The uptake of CBDCA into human ovarian carcinoma cells, taken directly from patients, was also 8-20 times lower than cDDP. Platinum concentrations, expressed as a percentage of the total intracellular Pt concentration, were similar for CBDCA and cDDP in cytosol and nucleus/membrane fractions. A second major difference between the drugs was their binding to DNA. Less CBDCA-DNA than cDDP-DNA adducts were formed after incubation at equimolar amounts of drug with isolated salmon sperm DNA (5-25 times less). A 16-69 times higher concentration of CBDCA than cDDP was needed to induce similar changes in cell growth activity (50% [3H]thymidine inhibition) in CC531 and COV413.B cells, indicating that equitoxicity can only be achieved when tumor cells are exposed to higher concentrations of CBDCA than cDDP. Similar toxicity was achieved in CC531 cells after incubation with a 16-fold higher CBDCA dose than cDDP. Comparable intracellular platinum concentrations, however, were obtained with a 10-fold higher CBDCA dose, suggesting that cellular pharmacokinetics of the drugs are different. Regarding drug uptake and pharmacokinetics the mechanism of action of CBDCA differed from cDDP at a cellular level.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

[Ambulatory continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil: a feasible palliative form of chemotherapy].

A study to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of outpatient continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) was initiated at the department of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital of Utrecht. To this purpose a subcutaneous drug delivery system (Port-a-Cath) was implanted in 36 patients with various advanced cancers. Of these patients 83% had received prior chemotherapy (including 5-FU in 62%). Ambulatory continuous-infusion pumps were used to administer 5-FU in a dosage of 300 mg/m2/24 h. The treatment was continued until tumour progression was seen, and it was interrupted in case of toxicity grade 2 or more (WHO criteria). A Port-a-Cath was implanted 37 times in the 36 patients. The main complications of this infusion system were pneumothorax (2/37), arrhythmia (1/37), catheter sepsis (2/37) and thrombosis (2/37); they were easily managed. The toxicity and feasibility of this treatment were evaluable in 30 patients. They received a median of 44 g 5-FU (range 11-136, 5 g, mean 281 mg/m2/24 h) during a median infusion time of 12 weeks (range 4-32 w). Side effects were encountered in 70% of the patients and consisted of the hand-foot syndrome (14/30), nausea and vomiting (8/30), diarrhoea (8/30) and stomatitis (7/30). The toxicity was completely reversible after a short interruption of the chemotherapy. The treatment was tolerated well, and good palliation was attained in 22 of 30 patients. The best response was seen in patients with colon and breast cancer. We conclude that continuous infusion of 5-FU is a reliable outpatient chemotherapy even in this category of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

A phase II clinical and pharmacokinetic study of Lonidamine in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Lonidamine is a substituted indazole carboxylic acid with a unique mechanism of action and early clinical studies have reported anti-tumour activity. In a phase II study 32 patients with previously treated advanced breast cancer were given Lonidamine in a daily divided oral dose of 600 mg. Of 28 patients evaluable for response, three (11%) achieved a partial response (4-24+ months) and three (11%) a minor response. Two patients have stable disease (greater than 3 months) and 20 progressed. Toxicity was very mild. Sixteen (53%) of 31 patients had myalgia which lasted a median of 2 weeks. This was investigated with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in four patients but the changes were unrelated to the degree of myalgia. No other major side-effect was seen, and no dose reduction was required. Lonidamine pharmacokinetics have been investigated in 17 patients 1 month after the start of therapy. Lonidamine was detected in the plasma of all patients, but there was no clear relationship between Lonidamine levels and clinical response or toxicity. Lonidamine appears to be active against advanced breast cancer and its low toxicity would allow combination studies with chemotherapy.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1989

Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute leukaemia following treatment of soft tissue sarcoma.

The incidence of secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute leukaemias (AL) after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is increasing. Most cases have been described in patients with Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, multiple myeloma, polycythemia vera, ovarian cancer and breast cancer. We report 2 patients with secondary MDS and acute myeloblastic leukaemia after combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Five more cases have been described in the literature. The data of all patients are summarized. The occurrence of secondary MDS/AL in patients with soft tissue sarcoma may become a problem, in particular in children, who have been cured after combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Resistance to cisplatin and analogues: mechanisms and potential clinical implications.

In view of the important role of cisplatin (CDDP) in cancer chemotherapy, the frequent occurrence of resistance to the drug is a major clinical problem. The main cause for unresponsiveness of a tumor to CDDP is thought to be cellular drug resistance, which may be caused by (1) a decreased uptake of CDDP, (2) an increase in metallothioneins, (3) an increase in glutathione and/or glutathione-S-transferase, (4) increased DNA repair, or (5) increased tolerance to unrepaired lesions in DNA. Several mechanisms may be concomitantly operative. However, almost all data on CDDP resistance are derived from cell lines or experimental animal systems, and it is uncertain whether they are relevant for human tumors. Possible methods for overcoming CDDP resistance in cancer patients include the use of high-dose CDDP or carboplatin or of different formulations of platinum derivatives, the regional administration of CDDP, the inducement of hyperthermia, the depletion of glutathione by buthionine-S-R-sulfoximine (BSO), or the use of platinum analogues. The development of methods to detect and classify CDDP resistance in human tumor samples is urgently required for the development of modalities to overcome resistance.

Animals↗