Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Wodak

Publications and source records attributed to A Wodak.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

HIV and HCV prevalence among trawler crew.

A survey of 51 people who work on trawlers was carried out to describe injecting and sexual behaviour and the prevalence of HIV and HCV antibody. All crew members who were departing from an Australian port during the last week of February 1996 to work on trawlers were asked to complete a brief, self-administered questionnaire and provide a finger prick blood sample. Questionnaires were received from 51 (77%) and blood samples from 45 (68%) of the 66 crew from 15 vessels. Almost half the respondents reported ever injecting illicit drugs. No respondents had HIV antibody while 27% had HCV antibody detected. Among 20 injecting drug user (IDU) respondents, the prevalence of HCV was 55% (95% CI 32%-77%). Twelve respondents reported new sex partners in the past month of whom half reported no condom use with these sex partners. The survey emphasises the diversity of the IDU population in Australia. Yet it would appear that regardless of the sub-population surveyed that HCV is endemic among IDUs in Australia. Effective HCV prevention programs targeted specifically for these (and other) sub-populations of IDUs should be devised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Aspects of care for the hepatitis C positive patient.

BACKGROUND: With almost 200,000 infected Australians, hepatitis C is Australia's commonest life threatening chronic infection. OBJECTIVE: Over 90% of the 11,000 new infections in Australia each year are associated with injecting drug use. Australia does not have a national plan for achieving control of hepatitis C. Treatment at present is expensive, less effective than many other conditions and associated with considerable side effects. DISCUSSION: Most people with chronic hepatitis C infection have a normal life expectancy with good quality of life. The role of general practitioners in prevention and treatment is increasing.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed1997

Injecting nation: achieving control of hepatitis C in Australia.

Since Australia banned heroin in 1953 consumption of illicit drugs, deaths, crime and corruption related to drugs have steadily increased. Injecting drug use (IDU) in Australia is now a significant public health problem linked each year to approximately 500 overdose deaths and more than 6000 hepatitis C infections. At least 85% of prevalent and incident hepatitis C cases in Australia are injecting drug users (IDUs) with annual incidence estimated at 15%. Although poorly documented, increasing numbers of patients with end-stage liver disease from hepatitis C now appear to present in Australia. This reflects a heroin-injecting epidemic commencing a quarter of a century ago, the close association between drug injecting and hepatitis C and the long delay between hepatitis C infection and complications. The overall health and economic burden of hepatitis C may soon exceed HIV. Control is far more difficult to achieve for hepatitis C than HIV because of much higher baseline prevalence levels and far greater infectiousness by blood to blood spread. Transmission appears to follow minimal breaches of infection control guidelines. Hepatitis C has not yet become a priority public health issue in Australia. No national prevention strategy has been proposed. Prevention strategies (such as needle exchange or methadone) which controlled HIV among IDUs should be expanded, with the expectation of some useful reduction of spread but without achieving control of hepatitis C. Other options for control must be considered. Eradicating illicit drug use in Australia is unachievable. Virtually eradicating injecting drug use by facilitating a switch to non-injecting routes of administration (NIROA) is achievable (although difficult) and this could control hepatitis C. NIROA will have the probable additional benefit of reducing drug overdose deaths. NIROA has begun recently to replace injecting in several countries without government intervention. Powerful cultural, pharmacological and economic factors strongly reinforce drug injecting. Economic impediments to NIROA could be reduced by drug policy reform. Facilitating a switch to NIROA carries some risk of increased discrimination directed against an already marginalized population. A major obstacle to harm reduction is the common assumption that any relaxation of drug policy invariably leads to increased consumption. Switching the predominant route of administration of illicit drugs from IDU to NIROA should be the major focus of national efforts to control hepatitis C and overdose deaths in Australia.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection among injecting drug users in Australia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Australia, and consider needs for further research and prevention policies and programmes. DESIGN: (1) Review of the results of surveillance for HCV; (2) review of published literature on prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for HCV among IDUs; and (3) reconstruction of incidence rates from prevalence studies of HCV in IDUs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Field and clinic based studies of IDUs in Australia. MAIN RESULTS: HCV has been present at high prevalences (of the order of 60-70%) in populations of Australian IDUs since at least 1971. Duration of injecting and main drug injected were the main predictors of seropositivity, the latter possibly a surrogate for frequency of injecting and both together as surrogate for cumulative numbers of times injected. Risk of infection begins with first injection and continues as long as injecting does. Current incidence is approximately 15 per 100 person years, and up to 40 per 100 person years in some subpopulations. Incidence may have decreased through the 1980s as a result of behaviour change in relation to HIV, as it has for hepatitis B, but not significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: Control of HCV infection in Australia will depend on effectiveness of measures to control HCV spread among IDUs. This will be a greater challenge than the control of HIV in this population has been. Needs identified include improved surveillance, especially for recently acquired infection, better understanding of exact transmission modes, and urgent improvement in prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users.

Many clinicians are confronted by the use of illicit drugs on a daily basis. The unsanctioned use of opioids, psychostimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol and nicotine is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Multiple factors have inhibited the scientific study of these agents including prohibition, public denial and lack of commercial interests. In dealing with problems related to these drugs, clinicians need a scientific understanding of their pharmacology, quantifiable effects and potential adverse effects. Illicit drug users select drugs with particular pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic properties. Generally, rapid absorption, rapid entry into the central nervous system, high bioavailability, short half-life, small volume of distribution and high free drug clearance are pharmacokinetic characteristics which predict a high potential for harmful use because these factors increase positive reinforcement. Drug users adapt the method and route of drug administration to optimise the delivery of the drug to the brain while attempting to maximise the bioavailability of the drug. Inhalation and smoking are the routes of administration which allow the most rapid delivery of drug to the brain, while intravenous injection maximises the bioavailability of an administered drug. Each route of administration results in attendant complications related to mucosal damage, carcinogenesis and risk of infection. Negative reinforcement or withdrawal is a major drive to recurrent use. Many illicit drugs have pharmacological features that promote dependence, including long half-life, low free drug clearance and sufficient drug exposure to allow development of tolerance. The preventive or reductive pharmacotherapeutics of illicit drug use makes use of several subsets of agents: those which act on the same receptor or system as the illicit drug (such as methadone), those which produce an adverse reaction on consumption of the illicit drug (such as disulfiram) and those which symptomatically attenuate illicit drug withdrawal symptoms (such as clonidine). Many new agents are being trialled as potential preventive or reductive agents. It is important to consider pharmacotherapy as only one potential part of the treatment of illicit drug users. The complications of illicit drug use present many therapeutic challenges. As with all patients consuming multiple drugs, illicit drug users are prone to developing drug interactions. The most common interactions seen in practice are pharmacodynamic in nature, most often due to the additive effects of different drugs on the central nervous system. However, alcohol, cocaine, disulfiram, methadone and tricyclic antidepressants may be involved in important pharmacokinetic interactions. Of these the effect of long term alcohol consumption in increasing the hepatotoxicity of paracetamol and of cytochrome P450 3A microsomal enzyme stimulating drugs in diminishing the efficacy of methadone are the most commonly encountered.

Drug Interactions↗
PubMed1996

Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for pregnant injecting drug users at risk of HIV infection.

Pregnant injecting drug users were randomly assigned to: (i) individually receive a six-session cognitive-behavioural intervention in addition to their usual methadone maintenance treatment (intervention condition (I) (n = 40)); or (ii) their usual methadone maintenance treatment only (control condition (C) (n = 40)). There was no change in drug use per se in either group after the intervention. However, at 9-month follow-up the I group had significantly reduced some HIV risk-taking behaviours (in particular injecting risk behaviours). The I group reduced the needle risk associated both with "typical" use (drug use in the month before interview) and "binge" use (drug use in the month nominated as the heaviest month of drug use in the previous 6 months). The intervention had no effect on sexual risk behaviours. The finding of reduced injecting risk behaviour following the six-session intervention suggests that such an intervention may be of benefit for individuals persisting with injecting risk behaviours despite methadone maintenance treatment and the availability of sterile injection equipment.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Drug use.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

News↗
PubMed1996

Drug use.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

News↗