Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Wein

Publications and source records attributed to A Wein.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Combination of the preoperative PSA level, biopsy gleason score, percentage of positive biopsies, and MRI T-stage to predict early PSA failure in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Early (2 years or less) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure has been shown to predict for distant failure. The independent clinical predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure were used to identify prostate cancer patients at high risk for early PSA failure. METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether additional predictive information was provided by the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) T-stage when controlling for the established prognostic factors in predicting the time to postoperative PSA failure in 977 men with palpable (T2) or PSA-detected (T1c) prostate cancer. RESULTS: Preoperative PSA (P = 0.0001), percentage of positive prostate biopsies (P= 0.0001), erMRI T-stage (P = 0.0001), biopsy Gleason score (P = 0.0015), and clinical stage T2c disease (P = 0.004) were independent predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in nomogram format stratified by the preoperative PSA, percentage of positive prostate biopsies, erMRI T-stage, and the biopsy Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for early PSA failure and subsequent distant progression include men with erMRI T3 disease and 3 or more of 6 cores positive for a Gleason score 6 or higher disease when the PSA is more than 10 but not more than 20 ng/mL and any Gleason score when the PSA is more than 20 ng/mL. Men with erMRI T2 disease and 3 or more of 6 cores positive for a Gleason score 8 or higher disease and who have a PSA more than 20 ng/mL are also at high risk. Neoadjuvant therapy trials in these select patients may be justified.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2000

Investigating the clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting PSA outcome following local therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

The clinical utility of the percent of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP), or external beam radiation therapy (RT), for men with PSA detected, or clinically palpable prostate cancer was investigated. After accounting for the established prognostic significance of the PSA level, biopsy Gleason score and the clinical T-stage, the percent of positive prostate biopsies added clinically significant information regarding time to PSA failure following RP. These findings were validated in the intermediate risk patients using an independent surgical and radiation data set. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2000) 3, 259-264

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

[Hepatic Doppler perfusion index--a sensitive screening method for detecting liver metastases?].

UNLABELLED: The sonographic measurement of the Doppler perfusion index (DPI)--the ratio of blood flow in the hepatic artery to total liver blood flow--has been suggested to represent a method of detecting even small liver metastases. AIM: To evaluate the DPI measurement in our patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer, gastric and bronchial carcinoma. METHOD: 36 patients with liver metastases were compared to 21 control subjects. The hepatic arterial and portal venous blood flows were calculated from the product of the average velocity of flow and the cross-sectional lumen of the vessel. Each measurement was performed three times by two independent examiners. RESULTS: Patients with metastases had a significantly higher hepatic blood flow and a significantly higher DPI (p = 0.0004; M +/- SD 0.23 +/- 0.11; r 0.06-0.52) compared with controls (M +/- SD 0.14 +/- 0.06, r. 0.05-0.26). No significant difference was seen in the portal vein blood flow. The DPI-values measured by the two examiners differed by 25.98% +/- 23.20. CONCLUSION: DPI values in patients with liver metastases differ from those in control subjects due to an increased hepatic arterial blood flow. No clear separation of the two groups was possible because DPI values overlapped. The inter observer agreement in DPI seems clinically acceptable.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is sometimes performed before radical prostatectomy but to our knowledge its role for predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy is not yet established. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of endorectal MRI for predicting time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy in 1,025 consecutive men with clinically localized or PSA detected prostate cancer. Our analysis controlled for PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage and percent of positive biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Cox regression analysis we prospectively assessed time to PSA failure to determine the role of endorectal MRI in predicting PSA outcome after radical prostatectomy at our institution, where an expert prostate magnetic resonance radiologist is available. The main outcome measure was actuarial freedom from PSA failure. RESULTS: Endorectal MRI did not add clinically meaningful information in 834 of our 1,025 cases (81%) after accounting for the prognostic value of PSA, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage and percent of positive biopsies. However, this modality provided a clinically and statistically relevant stratification of 5-year PSA outcome in the remaining 191 patients at intermediate risk based on established prognostic factors. Specifically when endorectal MRI was interpreted as indicating extracapsular versus organ confined disease the relative risk of PSA failure was 3.6 (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 6.3), and 5-year actuarial freedom from PSA failure was 33% versus 72% (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite expert radiological interpretation endorectal MRI had potential clinical value in less than 20% of the cases in our study after accounting for established prognostic factors. While further study of the value of this modality for predicting clinical outcome after radical prostatectomy should be performed in this select cohort, routine use of endorectal MRI cannot be justified based on these data.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) for men with PSA-detected or clinically palpable prostate cancer. METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether the percentage of positive prostate biopsies provided clinically relevant information about PSA outcome after RP in 960 men while accounting for the previously established risk groups that are defined according to pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical T stage. The findings were then tested using an independent surgical database that included data for 823 men. RESULTS: Controlling for the known prognostic factors, the percentage of positive prostate biopsies added clinically significant information (P <.0001) regarding time to PSA failure after RP. Specifically, 80% of the patients in the intermediate-risk group (1992 AJCC T2b, or biopsy Gleason 7 or PSA > 10 ng/mL and </= 20 ng/mL) could be classified into either an 11% or 86% 4-year PSA control cohort using the preoperative prostate biopsy data. These findings were validated in the intermediate-risk patients using an independent surgical data set. CONCLUSION: The validated stratification of PSA outcome after RP using the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in intermediate-risk patients is clinically significant. This information can be used to identify men with newly diagnosed and clinically localized prostate cancer who are at high risk for early (</= 2 years) PSA failure and, therefore, may benefit from the use of adjuvant therapy.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2000

Clinical utility of percent-positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for men with PSA-detected or palpable prostate cancer is not established. METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether percent-positive prostate biopsies provided clinically relevant information about PSA outcome after RP in 960 men, while accounting for the previously established risk groups based on the pretreatment PSA concentration biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer clinical T stage. RESULTS: In the intermediate-risk group, 80% of the patients (stage T(2b) or biopsy Gleason 7 or PSA 10-20 ng/mL) could be classified into either an 11% or an 86% 4-year PSA control cohort using the preoperative prostate biopsy data. These findings were validated using an independent surgical (N = 823) and radiation (N = 473) data set. Percent-positive prostate biopsies added clinically significant information regarding time to PSA failure after RP. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of positive prostate biopsies should be considered in conjunction with the PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T stage when counseling patients with newly diagnosed and clinically localized prostate cancer about PSA outcome after RP or EBRT.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1999

Optimizing patient selection for dose escalation techniques using the prostate-specific antigen level, biopsy gleason score, and clinical T-stage.

PURPOSE: Ideal candidates for 3D dose escalation conformal radiation or external beam + implant therapy are identified on the basis of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) clinical T-stage. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The pathologic findings of 1742 men with clinical stage T1c,2 prostate cancer managed with a radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1990 and 1998 were subjected to a logistic regression multivariable analysis. The endpoints examined included pathologic organ-confined (OC), specimen-confined (SC), and margin (M) or seminal vesicle (SV) positive disease. SC disease was defined as extracapsular extension (ECE) with a negative surgical margin. The clinical factors tested included PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 AJCC clinical T-stage. PSA failure-free (bNED) survival was calculated according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. RESULTS: Significant negative predictors of pathologic OC-disease or positive predictors of M+ or SV+ disease included a PSA > 10 ng/ml (p<0.0001), biopsy Gleason score < or =7 (p< or =0.0004), and > or =T2b disease (p< or =0.03). Only biopsy Gleason score 7 (p = 0.0006) and PSA 10-15 ng/ml (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of SC disease. The estimates of 5-year bNED survival were 80%, 62%, and 35% (p<0.0001) for patients having a low, intermediate, or high likelihood of having M+ or SV+ disease respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients most likely to derive a survival benefit from the improved local control possible using dose escalation techniques were those who had both a low risk of having occult micrometastatic disease (<25% M+ or SV+) and a reasonable likelihood of remaining disease-free after RP (>50% 5-year bNED). These patients included those having T1c, 2a, PSA > 10-15 ng/ml, and biopsy Gleason < or =6 or T1c, 2a, 2b, PSA < or =10 ng/ml, and biopsy Gleason < or =7 prostate cancer.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1999

Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To present nomograms providing estimates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for men diagnosed during the PSA era with clinically localized disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment PSA level, 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score in predicting the time to posttherapy PSA failure in 1,654 men with T1c,2 prostate cancer managed with either RP or RT. RESULTS: Pretherapy PSA, AJCC clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score were independent predictors (P < .0001) of time to posttherapy PSA failure in patients managed with either RP or RT. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in the format of a nomogram stratified by the pretreatment PSA, AJCC clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and local treatment modality. CONCLUSION: Men at high risk (> 50%) for early (< or = 2 years) PSA failure could be identified on the basis of the type of local therapy received and the clinical information obtained as part of the routine work-up for localized prostate cancer. Selection of these men for trials evaluating adjuvant systemic and improved local therapies may be justified.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

CONTEXT: Interstitial radiation (implant) therapy is used to treat clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, but how it compares with other treatments is not known. OBJECTIVE: To estimate control of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation (RT), or implant with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of outcome data compared using Cox regression multivariable analyses. SETTING AND PATIENTS: A total of 1872 men treated between January 1989 and October 1997 with an RP (n = 888) or implant with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (n = 218) at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, or RT (n = 766) at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Boston, Mass, were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Actuarial freedom from PSA failure (defined as PSA outcome). RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) of PSA failure in low-risk patients (stage T1c, T2a and PSA level < or =10 ng/mL and Gleason score < or =6) treated using RT, implant plus androgen deprivation therapy, or implant therapy was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.7), 0.5 (95% CI, 0.1-1.9), and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.3-3.6), respectively, compared with those patients treated with RP. The RRs of PSA failure in the intermediate-risk patients (stage T2b or Gleason score of 7 or PSA level >10 and < or =20 ng/mL) and high-risk patients (stage T2c or PSA level >20 ng/mL or Gleason score > or =8) treated with implant compared with RP were 3.1 (95% CI, 1.5-6.1) and 3.0 (95% CI, 1.8-5.0), respectively. The addition of androgen deprivation to implant therapy did not improve PSA outcome in high-risk patients but resulted in a PSA outcome that was not statistically different compared with the results obtained using RP or RT in intermediate-risk patients. These results were unchanged when patients were stratified using the traditional rankings of biopsy Gleason scores of 2 through 4 vs 5 through 6 vs 7 vs 8 through 10. CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk patients had estimates of 5-year PSA outcome after treatment with RP, RT, or implant with or without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation that were not statistically different, whereas intermediate- and high-risk patients treated with RP or RT did better then those treated by implant. Prospective randomized trials are needed to verify these findings.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Assessment of outcome prediction models for patients with localized prostate carcinoma managed with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: A clinical staging system for localized prostate carcinoma that provides reliable information on which management decisions regarding an individual patient can be based is lacking. This study compared the abilities of all published proposed clinical staging systems to predict time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 1441 clinically localized prostate carcinoma patients who were managed with radical prostatectomy at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (n = 688) or the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston (n = 288) or with external beam radiation therapy at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy in Boston (n = 465) were entered into this study. Patients who received adjuvant or neoadjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy were excluded. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwartz Bayesian Criterion (SBC) estimates, which are comparative measures, were calculated for each clinical staging system. Pairwise comparisons of the AIC and SBC estimates for the most predictive clinical staging systems were performed using a formal bootstrap technique with 2000 replications. RESULTS: Both the staging system based on the risk score and the staging system based on the calculated volume of prostate carcinoma and PSA (cVCa-PSA) optimized the prediction of time to posttreatment PSA failure. The cVCa-PSA system, however, provided a more clinically useful stratification of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Improved clinical staging for patients with localized prostate carcinoma may be possible with parameters obtained during routine evaluation. Validation by other investigators is underway.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Calculated prostate carcinoma volume: The optimal predictor of 3-year prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure free survival after surgery or radiation therapy of patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 4-20 nanograms per milliliter.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors evaluated whether a clinically relevant stratification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure free survival (bNED) after definitive local therapy could be made for patients with prostate carcinoma clinically classified as T1 or T2 and pretreatment PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL. METHODS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma patients who presented with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL. Three hundred forty-eight of the patients were managed definitively with conventional external beam radiation therapy (median dose, 67 gray), whereas 547 of the patients were managed definitively with a radical retropubic prostatectomy. The outcome tested was time to posttreatment PSA failure. The clinical predictors evaluated included the standard paradigm (PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage); type of local therapy; and a newly defined factor, the calculated prostate cancer volume (cV[Ca]). RESULTS: Time to posttreatment PSA failure was equivalent (P = 0.52) independent of the type of local therapy. The cV(Ca) (P < 0.0001), pretreatment PSA (P = 0.003), and clinical classification of T2c (P = 0.04) remained significant predictors of time to posttreatment PSA failure in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The staging system described herein, which is based on cV(Ca) and PSA, may optimize patient selection for definitive local therapy and entry onto randomized clinical trials examining the use of adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy in patients with clinically localized disease who present with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL. Validation of this staging system by other investigators is currently underway.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1998

Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease.

OBJECTIVES: Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) has been reported to improve the prediction of pathologic Stage T3 disease in patients with clinical Stage T1,2 disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10 to 20 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 7 or less, and at least 50% of the biopsy specimens positive from a sextant sampling. This study examines the performance characteristics of the erMRI to predict established extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and PSA failure-free survival (bNED) in this subgroup. METHODS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of the erMRI to predict established ECE and SVI were calculated in the proposed subgroup. PSA failure-free survival stratified by the erMRI-defined stage was estimated by using the method of Kaplan and Meier. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy to predict established ECE and SVI in clinical Stage T1,2 patients was 65%, 100%, 100%, 79%, and 84%, respectively. No patient would have been excluded from surgery on the basis of a false-positive study. Moreover, the percent of patients with pathologic organ-confined disease would have increased from 32% to 61%, and the 3-year bNED rate would have increased from 12% to 45% (P = 0.07) if only patients with erMRI Stage T2 disease were selected for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The erMRI may significantly improve the identification of established ECE and SVI in select patients with prostate cancer preoperatively. Further study of the erMRI in these select patients is warranted and ongoing.

Disease-Free Survival↗
PubMed1998

A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Both the benign and malignant prostatic epithelial components of the prostate gland contribute to the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Therefore, for a given PSA, the presence of benign hyperplastic prostate tissue (BHPT) may indicate a lower cancer burden. This study was performed to assess the impact of varying amounts of BHPT on PSA failure free (bNED) survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Cox regression multivariable analyses were performed to assess the ability of the clinical stage, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and prostate gland volume to predict time to postoperative PSA failure in 885 patients. RESULTS: In addition to the PSA (P < 0.0001), biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10 (P < 0.0001) and of 7 (P = 0.05), and clinical Stage T2c,3a (P < 0.0001) and T2b (P = 0.0016), the prostatectomy prostate gland volume (P < 0.0001) was a significant predictor of time to postoperative PSA failure. Patients with a prostatectomy prostate gland volume greater than 75 cm3 had a 100% 4-year bNED survival and favorable pathologic characteristics (pathologic Stage T2, 85%; prostatectomy Gleason score 6 or less, 78% and 7, 22%; and negative margins, 95%) despite a preoperative PSA of 10 to 20 ng/mL and more than 20 ng/mL in 28% and 13% of these men, respectively. In 75% of these cases, lead time bias because of PSA driven repeat biopsies provided an explanation. CONCLUSIONS: Lead time bias because of PSA driven repeat biopsy accounted for the high 4-year bNED survival and favorable pathologic findings for most patients who had prostate cancer coexisting in a prostate gland comprised of BHPT and a total gland volume in excess of 75 cm3. An additional explanation is needed, however, for the remaining patients.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed1998

The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The independent clinical and pathological predictors of time to postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure were used to identify prostate cancer patients at high risk for this end point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of preoperative PSA, pathological stage, prostatectomy Gleason score and margin status in predicting the time to postoperative PSA failure in 862 men with palpable (T2) or PSA detected (T1c) prostate cancer. The 2-year PSA failure rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the results of Cox regression analysis and a bootstrap procedure with 2,000 replications, respectively, and are presented in nomogram format stratified by preoperative PSA, pathological stage, prostatectomy Gleason score and margin status. RESULTS: Preoperative PSA (p = 0.0001), pathological stage (p< or =0.002), margin status (p = 0.0001) and prostatectomy Gleason score (p = 0.034) were independent predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for early PSA failure could be identified postoperatively on the basis of preoperative PSA and prostatectomy pathology. Adjuvant therapy trials in these select patients may be justified.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed1998

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: an active and tolerable outpatient regimen.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity and efficacy of an outpatient regimen of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received paclitaxel 150 to 225 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by carboplatin (targeted area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 6 mg/mL x min) every 3 weeks. During phase I accrual, 16 patients were treated; 17 additional patients were enrolled at the phase II dose. The median age was 70 years (range, 47 to 82). The median serum creatinine concentration was 1.1 mg/dL (range, 0.7 to 2.7) and the median estimated creatinine clearance was 52 mL/min (range, 24 to 110). RESULTS: During phase I accrual, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the regimen was not defined. Phase II accrual occurred at the paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 dose level. A total of 156 cycles were administered. The median number of cycles received was five (range, one to eight). Sensorimotor neuropathy was the principal nonhematologic toxicity. Significant granulocytopenia was common, but significant thrombocytopenia was not. Objective responses were demonstrated at all dose levels. At the phase II dose (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin at AUC 6 mg/mL x min), the objective response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 72%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is an active and tolerable outpatient treatment for patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. The ability to administer this combination over multiple cycles even to patients with advanced age and abnormal renal function makes it well suited for this patient population. Confirmatory trials of this regimen are ongoing.

Aged↗