Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A W Partin

Publications and source records attributed to A W Partin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Expectant management: an option for localized prostate cancer.

Localized prostate cancer demonstrates tremendous heterogeneity in the natural history of the disease. To this end, although prostate cancer may be present histologically in nearly 30% of all men above the age of 50 y, the lifetime risk of developing clinically significant disease is 18% (one in six). Furthermore, the lifetime risk of dying from prostate cancer is less than 4%. Therefore, in order to avoid unnecessarily treating potentially insignificant prostate cancer, the concept of expectant management has been considered for this disease. In this brief review, we discuss the evolution of expectant management for men with localized prostate cancer.

Humans↗

The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: For complex oncological procedures, hospital volume affects short and long-term patient outcome. We examined the association of hospital volume and long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With a cohort study design, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked files to identify a population based sample of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer treated primarily with radical prostatectomy. Failure of cancer control was defined as the use of postoperative medical or surgical hormone ablation or treatment with radiation therapy more than 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 12,635 men underwent radical prostatectomy for incident prostate cancer. After adjusting for age, comorbidity, histological grade and clinical stage, the risk of adjuvant therapy was greater among those treated at low (1 to 33 cases) and medium (34 to 61 cases) volume hospitals than at very high (more than 108 cases) volume hospitals (HR 1.25, p <0.001 and HR 1.11, p =0.023 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at lower volume institutions are at increased risk of initiation of subsequent adjuvant therapy with radiation therapy, medical hormone ablation or orchiectomy. Noted differences in cancer control provide additional evidence regarding issues surrounding the debate over surgical volume standards for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Proteomic analysis of dunning prostate cancer cell lines with variable metastatic potential using SELDI-TOF.

BACKGROUND: Surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization-time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) is an evolving proteomic technology for improving biomarker discovery that allows for rapid and sensitive analysis of complex protein mixtures generated from body fluids, cells, and/or tissues. SELDI--based profiling identifies unique, differentially expressed proteins relating to specific cancer-related disease states. We utilized SELDI-TOF following pre-processing with molecular separation and chemical fractionation of cell membrane extracts from three Dunning rat prostate cancer cell lines of varying metastatic potential to search novel proteins that are differentially expressed. METHODS: Dunning rat cell sublines of variable (%) metastatic potential; G (0%), AT-1 (20%), and Mat-Ly-Lu (100%) were cultured in two different laboratories. Cell lysis was performed in a homogenation buffer (320 mM sucrose/50 mM Tris/0.5 mM PSMF) using Dounce homogenation. After centrifugation, the membrane pellet was washed 2x and then solublized in 2% CHAPS/8 M urea. This sample was further processed using positive pressure molecular ultrafiltration at 30 kDa or precipitation with 50% ammonium sulfate. Next, each sample was applied to an IMAC3-Ni ProteinChip (Ciphergen Biosystems, Freemont, CA) and analyzed using Ciphergen's Protein Biology System with protein peak analysis software. RESULTS: SELDI-TOF analysis differentiated the three Dunning rat cell sublines based upon protein concentration normalized profiles between 5,000 and 20,000 Da. The preparations from the three cells lines showed clear differences when the extracts from the metastatic sublines (AT-1 and MLL) were compared to the benign subline (G) for proteins with molecular weights of 9 kDa (decrease), 12 kDa (significant decrease), 14 kDa (decrease), and 17 kDa (significant gain). After pre-processing extracts with ammonium sulfate and molecular ultrafiltration, the molecular profile changes from one subline to the next became more apparent. Our results were reproducible using multiple runs including from Dunning cells cultured in a separate laboratory, and using different lots of SELDI ProteinChips. CONCLUSIONS: The application of SELDI-TOF to a series of Dunning rat prostate cancer cell lines illustrated apparent changes in protein profiles among the three cell lines with known differences in metastatic biologic activity. SELDI-TOF identified four reproducible changes in protein expression in the AT1 and MLL metastatic cell sublines. Three of the expression changes were manifested as decreases, but one protein (17 kDa) was over-expressed in the AT1 and MLL cell lines. Emphasis will be placed on the isolation, purification, and characterization of the 17 kDa over-expressed protein and its potential role in PCa metastasis.

Animals↗

Stromal-epithelial measurements of prostate cancer in native Japanese and Japanese-American men.

We measured the histologic stromal and epithelial tissue components of the benign (normal) and malignant tissue compartments of Japanese-Americans (J-A) and native Japanese (NJ) men living in Japan. The patient cohort included 25 NJ men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in Nagoya, Japan and 25 J-A (second or third generation US born). We conducted tissue image quantitation (in-house image software) of the stromal and epithelial compartments in malignant and adjacent normal tissue areas from a tissue microarray (TMA) selected from radical prostatectomy (RP) blocks. Stromal-epithelial (S-E) areas were determined using immunohistochemical stains for CAM-5.2 epithelial cytokeratin marker and the Masson trichrome stain to measure the stroma component. We observed differences in the volumes of normal and cancer epithelium and stroma within both the J-A and NJ study populations (P<0.01). Only the individual average cancer epithelium (CE) volume (JA=24.1 vs NJ=29.9) differed significantly between the NJ and J-A study populations (P=0.03). Consequently, the S-E ratio in NJ group was significantly different from that of J-A population (P=0.05). The decrease in S-E ratio noted in the malignant tissues of NJ prostate tissue may provide a biological marker for differentiation of the two groups and suggests a need for further investigations into the molecular basis for these histologic differences.

Aged↗

Prediction of prostate carcinoma stage by quantitative biopsy pathology.

BACKGROUND: Considerable evidence has shown that the use of computational algorithms to combine pretreatment clinical and pathology results can enhance predictions of patient outcome. The aim of this study was to prove that the application of such methods to predict patient-specific likelihoods of organ-confined (OC) prostate carcinoma (PCA) may be helpful to patients and physicians when they are choosing an optimal treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. METHODS: The authors used clinical and quantitative pathology results from the biopsy specimens of 817 PCA patients who had been evaluated at a large national pathology reference laboratory. The pathology parameters that were measured included the number of positive cores, Gleason grades and score, percentage of tumor involvement, and the tumor location. The pathologic stage of these cases, as determined by results from radical prostatectomy, lymphadenectomy, or bone scan, categorized the PCA as either OC, non-OC due to capsular penetration only (NOC-CP) or advanced disease with metastasis (NOC-Mets), i.e., seminal vesicle and/or lymph-node positive or bone-scan positive. There were a total of 481 OC cases, 185 NOC-CP cases, and 151 NOC-Mets cases. Patient-specific prediction models were trained by ordinal logistic regression (OLOGIT) and genetically engineered neural networks (GENNs), and the resulting trained models were validated by biopsy information from an independent set of 116 PCA patients. RESULTS: When the authors applied a cutoff of >or= 35% for the n = 817 training set of OC, NOC-CP, and NOC-Mets predictive probabilities, the OLOGIT model predicted OC PCA with an accuracy of 91%, whereas the GENN model predicted the same with an accuracy of 95%. When the authors employed the n = 116 validation set (76 OCs, 31 NOC-CPs, and 9 NOC-Mets), the OLOGIT and GENN models correctly identified OC PCA with 91% and 97% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The value of combining patient pretreatment diagnostic pathology parameters to make predictions concerning the postoperative extent of pathology was illustrated clearly in this study. This finding further confirms the need to pursue such approaches for PCA disease management in the future, especially with the increasing prevalence of clinical T1c (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 1977) disease.

Biopsy↗

Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the standard for predicting pathologic stage from information available at the time of prostate biopsy is the "Partin nomograms" that were derived using logistic regression analysis. The authors retrospectively reviewed a large series of men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma who underwent staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy. They then utilized pathologic and clinical data at the time of prostate biopsy to develop and test an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the final pathologic stage for this group of men. They then compared the results of ANN with the previous nomograms. METHODS: Five thousand seven hundred forty-four men were treated at the authors' institution from 1985 to 1998. An ANN was developed using two randomly selected training and validation sets for predicting pathologic stage. Input variables included age, preoperative serum prostate specific antigen level, clinical TNM (tumor, lymph node, and metastasis) classification, and Gleason score from the biopsy specimen. Outcomes included organ confinement and lymph node involvement status. RESULTS: The ANN was slightly superior to the nomograms in predicting pathologic stage, such as organ confinement and lymph node involvement status. CONCLUSIONS: In predicting organ confinement and lymph node involvement status, ANN was more accurate and had a larger area under ROC than the nomograms based on the logistic regression method. Artificial neural network models can be developed and used to better predict final pathologic stage when preoperative pathologic and clinical features are known.

Adult↗

The problem of cutoff levels in a screened population: appropriateness of informing screenees about their risk of having prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Transrectal prostate biopsy decisions often have been based on absolute cutoff values for total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The authors decided that it would be more appropriate to develop risk profiles for the individual patient to allow him to decide whether to undergo a prostate biopsy. METHODS: To develop risk profiles, the authors first used multivariate logistic regression analysis to analyze 2054 males who were part of the Tyrol (Austria) PSA Screening Project. Second, artificial neural network (ANN) analyses were performed using data from 3474 males who also were part of the Tyrol PSA Screening Project and who had undergone prostate biopsy. These analyses were compared with standard cutoff levels of specificity for the detection of prostate carcinoma. RESULTS: To the authors' knowledge, this was the first time that multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to decide whether to perform prostate biopsies based on risk profiles rather than on single cutoff levels. For the detection of prostate carcinoma, at sensitivity levels of 90--95%, the ANN was 150--200% more specific than the standard cutoff points. For screened volunteers with total PSA levels below 4 ng/mL, ANN showed a lower cancer predictive ability in comparison with volunteers with total PSA levels above 4 ng/mL. However, the ANN was approximately 150--200% more specific than the standard cutoff levels in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: At high sensitivity levels, ANN increased the specificity for prostate carcinoma detection in a PSA-based screened population. The improvement in specificity between standard cutoff levels and ANN ranged between 150--200% and was not affected by the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostatitis.

Aged↗

Executive Summary of the National Cancer Institute Workshop: Highlights and recommendations.

Prostate cancer chemoprevention represents a relatively new and promising strategy for reducing the immense public health burden of this devastating cancer of men in the United States and Western societies. Chemoprevention is defined as the administration of agents (drugs, biologics, and natural products) that modulate (inhibit) one or more steps in the multistage carcinogenesis process culminating in invasive adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In 2000, there were an estimated 170,000 new cases of prostate cancer and 31,000 deaths in the United States. During the past decade, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) organized the chemoprevention research program and began testing the first generation of promising agents (eg, 4-(hydroxy)-fenretinide [4-HPR], difluoromethylornithine [DFMO], antiandrogens) in high-risk cohorts and launched the first-large scale US phase 3 primary prevention trial, known as Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT-1), in 18,000 average-risk men (age more than 55 years and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] less than 3 ng/mL) treated for 7 years with finasteride or placebo. In the summer of 1998, the NCI Prostate Cancer Progress Review Group (PRG) Report to the director of NCI was published in response to the leadership of the prostate cancer advocacy community in conjunction with Congress. To further elucidate and address critical issues identified in this report and to develop a research agenda for the newly created Prostate and Urologic Cancer Research Group in the Division of Cancer Prevention at NCI, the NCI organized the workshop "New Clinical Trial Strategies for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention." The major objectives were to promote understanding and cooperation among the NCI, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academia, pharmaceutical industry, and the public regarding new opportunities for clinical prevention trials for prostate cancer. The workshop was divided into three concurrent breakout panels and a fourth joint integrative panel. The workshop addressed multiple key areas identified in the PRG report in the following panels: (1) Molecular Targets and Promising Agents in Clinical Development; (2) Intermediate Endpoint Biomarkers for Prevention Trials; (3) High-Risk Study Populations for Prevention Trials, and (4) Preventive Clinical Trial Designs and Regulatory Issues. Expert panelists were drawn from leading academic, pharmaceutical, and government scientists in basic research and clinical investigation. Key pharmaceutical, biotechnology, academic, and National Institutes of Health scientists presented overviews of their new agents and products in clinical development (representing the next generation of promising agents). Senior FDA physicians from the Center for Drugs and Center for Biologics presented on current standards for new drug and biologic approval for chemoprevention efficacy. Some of the key topics included recent advances in the state of knowledge of promising agents in the clinic based on molecular targets as well as bottlenecks in drug development for pharmaceutical sponsors; strategic modulable biomarkers that can serve as primary endpoints in phase 1/2 trials to assess preventive efficacy; high-risk cohorts with precancer (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia) and representative clinical trial designs that are ready for immediate translation into efficient prevention trials, such as Bayesian sequential monitoring for early assessment of biologic activity and factorial designs for assessment of multiagent combinations. Finally, each expert panel generated recommendations for areas of future research emphasizing opportunities and infrastructure needs.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗

Histological markers of risk and the role of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

The marked discrepancy between the prevalence of preclinical prostate cancer and the incidence of clinically manifest disease indicates a long latency phase and significant heterogeneity in the progression potential of early neoplastic lesions. There are a variety of histologic changes within prostatic epithelium that have been termed atypical or dysplastic. The 2 most widely studied of these lesions are prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH). Although associations between AAH and adenocarcinoma are spurious, those linking high-grade PIN (HGPIN) to cancer are far more established. There is a significantly increased risk for patients with isolated HGPIN to have prostate cancer confirmed on subsequent biopsy, suggesting that HGPIN is a marker for prostate carcinoma in addition to its potential role as a premalignant lesion. Autopsy studies reveal that HGPIN is found in association with cancer in 63% to 94% of malignant and 25% to 43% of benign prostates. Data on age and race reveal that African American men develop more extensive HGPIN at a younger age than white men. A wide spectrum of molecular/genetic abnormalities appears to be common to both HGPIN and prostate cancer. Data loss of 8p, 10q, 16q, 18q, and gain of 7q31, 8q, multiple copies of the c-myc genes, along with changes in chromatin texture, telomerase activity, cell cycle status, and proliferative indices collectively suggest that HGPIN is intermediate between benign epithelium and prostatic carcinoma with respect to these markers. These data indicate that HGPIN is important in neoplastic progression, and may present an appropriate target/marker for chemoprevention.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prostate-specific antigen and new serum biomarkers for evaluation of chemopreventive agents.

A great deal of effort regarding the basic understanding and clinical relevance of the prevention of prostate cancer has emerged over the past decade. Chemoprevention or the administration of a drug or other agent in an attempt to prevent, inhibit, or delay the progression of localized prostate cancer has gained the most recent attention. Efforts have focused primarily in the identification of bioactive chemopreventive agents, risk factors identifying individuals with the highest likelihood of developing prostate cancer, pathologic identification of premalignant lesions, and epidemiologic studies to better understand the natural history of early prostate cancer. However, less work has been focused on identifying and characterizing our presently available biomarkers in an attempt to validate their use as surrogate endpoints or documenting their clinical utility in chemoprevention. This update will focus on a critical evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA, and human glandular kallikrein-2 (hK2) and how they may be used or misused for chemoprevention studies.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

The role of prostate needle biopsy in evaluation of chemopreventive agents.

Needle biopsy of the prostate safely furnishes tissue that can be studied for the effects of promising chemopreventive agents on biomarkers. The modulation of biomarkers, such as those for apoptosis (TUNEL, Bcl-2, or nuclear morphometry), angiogenesis (factor 8), and cell proliferation (Ki-67), can indicate the potential of a new agent without waiting for the definitive evaluation of traditional endpoints, such as reduction in cancer mortality. A recent modification of prostate biopsy technique, including additional cores taken from the lateral peripheral zone, may improve the cancer yield by as much as 35% without increasing major complications, facilitating serial in vivo tests on cancer tissue. The serial biopsy approach may be especially valuable in "watchful waiting" cohorts.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗

Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict lymph node (LN) spread in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and to describe a clinically useful method for interpreting the ANN's output scores. METHODS: A simple, feed-forward ANN was trained and validated using clinical and pathologic data from two institutions (n = 6135 and n = 319). The clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, and prostate-specific antigen level were the input parameters and the presence or absence of LN spread was the output parameter. Patients with similar ANN outputs were grouped and assumed to be part of a cohort. The prevalence of LN spread for each of these patient cohorts was plotted against the range of ANN outputs to create a risk curve. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the first and second validation data sets was 0.81 and 0.77, respectively. At an ANN output cutoff of 0.3, the sensitivity achieved for each validation set was 63.8% and 44.4%; the specificity was 81.5% and 81.3%; the positive predictive value was 13.6% and 6.5%; and the negative predictive value was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. The risk curve showed a nearly linear increase (best fit R(2) = 0.972) in the prevalence of LN spread with increases in raw ANN output. CONCLUSIONS: The ANN's performance on the two validation data sets suggests a role for ANNs in the accurate clinical staging of patients with prostate cancer. The risk curve provides a clinically useful tool that can be used to give patients a realistic assessment of their risk of LN spread.

False Negative Reactions↗

Serum acid phosphatase level and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Serum acid phosphatase (ACP) was once used as the marker for advanced prostate cancer. However, with the development of assays for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a more sensitive and specific tumor marker, the use of ACP has diminished. We investigated the prognostic value of preoperative serum ACP in predicting prognosis for men with localized prostate cancer following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). METHODS: Of 2293 men treated from 1982 to 1998, 1681 men had a preoperative ACP measurement using an enzymatic assay. We analyzed the actuarial freedom from biochemical (PSA) progression following RRP according to ACP levels. We used multivariate logistic regression and proportional hazards models to determine the independent prognostic value of ACP level with respect of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: ACP was not an independent predictor of organ confinement or lymph node involvement in the multivariate logistic regression models using preoperative variables. However, in the proportional hazards model, ACP was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence following RRP, and there was a statistically significant improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival for men with lower levels of ACP (P <0.001). Furthermore, the normalized hazard ratios of ACP and PSA for predicting biochemical recurrence were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Stratification of men according to their preoperative ACP levels was predictive of patient outcome after RRP. Proportional hazards modeling using preoperative variables demonstrated that the serum ACP level is an independent predictor of tumor recurrence following RRP.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Contemporary use of complexed PSA and calculated percent free PSA for early detection of prostate cancer: impact of changing disease demographics.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA), total PSA (tPSA), and calculated free/total PSA (f/t PSA) ratios in the differentiation of benign disease from prostate cancer (CaP) using a contemporary patient cohort. METHODS: The cPSA, tPSA, and calculated fPSA values were determined using the Bayer Immuno-1 system. To validate our calculated f/t PSA ratio, we also retrospectively measured fPSA using the Abbott AxSYM immunoassay system in archival pretreatment sera obtained between 1990 and 1997 from 362 men with clinically and biopsy-confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 179) or CaP (n = 183). The diagnostic utility of tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was assessed using a contemporary test population consisting of sera prospectively collected between June 1999 and June 2000 from 3006 men who had recently undergone a systematic biopsy by urologists in clinical practices throughout the United States. This contemporary patient sample had biopsy diagnoses of either no evidence of malignancy (n = 1857) or CaP (n = 1149). All serum samples had tPSA values between 2.0 and 20.0 ng/mL. RESULTS: The measured versus calculated f/t PSA ratios had a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.9130 in the retrospectively studied population of 362 men. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUCs) for the measured and calculated f/t PSA ratios were indistinguishable (69.6% versus 69.2%, respectively). In the contemporary population (n = 3006), the ROC-AUC for tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was 52.2%, 53.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. We also compared the diagnostic performance using published cutoffs for tPSA (greater than 4.0 ng/mL), cPSA (greater than 3.8 ng/mL), and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 15% and greater than 25%) in tPSA reflex ranges of 2 to 20 ng/mL and 2 to 10 ng/mL. We found that both cPSA and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 25% cutoff) outperformed tPSA and yielded similar results in terms of biopsies spared and cancers missed. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated f/t PSA ratio and cPSA perform equally well in terms of the improvement of specificity in the discrimination of benign disease and CaP. The f/t PSA ratio and cPSA provide clinical benefits over the use of tPSA alone, such as an increased sparing of unnecessary biopsies performed with a manageable degree of risk of delayed cancer detection.

Area Under Curve↗

Contemporary identification of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model that will identify a contemporary cohort of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence (greater than 50% at 36 months) after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. Data from this model will provide important information for patient selection and the design of prospective randomized trials of adjuvant therapies. METHODS: Proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to two patient cohorts to develop and cross-validate a multifactorial predictive model to identify men with the highest risk of early prostate cancer recurrence. The model and validation cohorts contained 904 and 901 men, respectively, who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital. This model was then externally validated using a cohort of patients from the Mayo Clinic. RESULTS: A model for weighted risk of recurrence was developed: R(W)'=lymph node involvement (0/1)x1.43+surgical margin status (0/1)x1.15+modified Gleason score (0 to 4)x0.71+seminal vesicle involvement (0/1)x0.51. Men with an R(W)' greater than 2.84 (9%) demonstrated a 50% biochemical recurrence rate (prostrate-specific antigen level greater than 0.2 ng/mL) at 3 years and thus were placed in the high-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analyses of biochemical recurrence-free survival demonstrated rapid deviation of the curves based on the R(W)'. This model was cross-validated in the second group of patients and performed with similar results. Furthermore, similar trends were apparent when the model was externally validated on patients treated at the Mayo Clinic. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model that successfully stratifies patients on the basis of their risk of early prostate cancer recurrence.

Adult↗

Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of the probability of having prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The decision to perform prostate biopsy has traditionally been based on an abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. For example, a 60-year-old man with a benign DRE and PSA level of 4.1 ng/mL would be counseled for biopsy, and the same man with a PSA level of 3.9 ng/mL might be counseled against biopsy. However, the difference in these PSA levels and in the likelihood of these two men having prostate cancer is not significant. We constructed a probability nomogram for the likelihood of detecting prostate cancer, thus aiding in the decision of whether to perform a prostate biopsy. METHODS: Using multivariate logistic regression analysis and data from 2054 men (mean age 64 years) participating in the Tyrol Screening Project between January 9, 1993 and January 9, 1997, patient age, PSA level, and DRE findings were analyzed for their ability to determine the likelihood of finding prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. RESULTS: DRE was suspicious in 278 men (13.5%). Overall, 498 (24.5%) of 2054 men biopsied had prostate cancer. The probability of discovering cancer on biopsy was calculated using patient age, DRE findings, and PSA level. CONCLUSIONS: DRE status had a large influence on the likelihood of positive biopsy across all PSA and age ranges. A combination of PSA, DRE result, and age better defined the probability of a positive biopsy than any factor alone. Using this nomogram, the decision to proceed with or defer prostate biopsy can be based on an actual probability of discovering prostate cancer rather than a single PSA-based cutpoint. These data may aid physicians and patients in decision-making.

Age Factors↗

Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of isolated, histologically identified capsular incision (CI) (exposure of benign or malignant glands to the inked surgical margin in the setting of organ-confined disease) on disease progression after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Between March 1993 and September 1999, 4747 men underwent RRP at the Johns Hopkins Hospital; 107 men (2.3%) were diagnosed with CI in otherwise organ-confined disease; 92 (86%) had at least 6 months (mean 30) of follow-up. We matched these CI cases (based on surgeon, age, clinical stage, final pathologic Gleason grade, and preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level) one-for-one with controls in three additional pathologically defined groups and compared the freedom from disease progression (prostate-specific antigen level greater than 0.2 ng/mL and/or local palpable recurrence) after RRP. RESULTS: The actuarial 3-year likelihood of freedom from disease progression was 87.8% for the CI group, 96.4% for men with organ-confined disease (P = 0.10), 91.3% for men with extraprostatic extension and negative surgical margins (P = 0.99), and 73.9% for men with positive surgical margins resulting from extraprostatic extension (P <0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the actuarial likelihood of freedom from disease progression between men with CI into benign glands (n = 22) and men with CI into tumor (n = 70) (P = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was found in the likelihood of early recurrence between patients with isolated CI and other specimen-confined disease. Patients with isolated CI have a significantly lower likelihood of early recurrence than patients with positive surgical margins due to extraprostatic extension, regardless of whether the CI is into benign glands or tumor. Long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings.

Adult↗