Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Vernava

Publications and source records attributed to A Vernava.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded?

BACKGROUND: The role of surgeons as endoscopists has been extensively debated in the literature, with conflicting studies published regarding the safety and efficacy of surgeons performing colonoscopies. A multitude of medical federations and societies have set various standards for granting endoscopy privileges, many with a bias against general surgeons [1, 3]. We reviewed the colonoscopy experience at our institution to evaluate differences between gastroenterologists (GI) and general (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS) in procedure times and complication and cecal intubation rates. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2002, 5237 colonoscopies were performed at our institution. The data for procedure times, completion, and complication rates were collected in a prospective database. Complications were defined as perforation, bleeding, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Incomplete colonoscopies due to colitis, poor bowel preparation, or tumor obstruction were excluded. Chi-squared test was used to compare complication and cecal intubation rates between the three groups. Median procedure times were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn's pairwise tests. A significant p-value was defined as <0.05. RESULTS: No differences in the complication rate was noted between the three groups: GI (0.12%), CRS (0.15%), and GS (0.11%) ( p = 0.99). There was a trend toward a lower incomplete colonoscopy rate in the GS group compared to CRS and GI: 0.32% vs 0.84% and 0.36%, respectively ( p = 0.07). The median colonoscopy times for GS (29 min), however, were shorter than for GI (34 min, p < 0.001) or CRS (31 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: General surgeons perform colonoscopies expeditiously, with as low a morbidity rate and as high a completion rate as their gastroenterology or colorectal surgery colleagues. As the results of this study confirm, general surgeons should not be excluded from endoscopy suites.

Cecostomy↗
PubMed2003

Screening colonoscopy in the asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-old population.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to decrease the death rate from colorectal cancer, a multitude of medical societies and task forces recommend routine screening for colorectal cancer beginning at age 50. Yet, there is no consensus as to the best and most cost-effective screening method. Medicare now pays for screening colonoscopies for its average risk beneficiaries [3]. Many insurance companies, however, will not cover this test in younger patients. We therefore reviewed our institution's colonoscopy experience with asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-olds, with negative fecal occult blood tests and negative family histories. METHODS: Between January 1999 and January 2002, 4779 colonoscopies were performed at our institution. The charts for 619 persons 50-59 years of age were retrospectively reviewed, with 91 patients meeting the strict requirements of this study. We defined polyps with high-grade neoplasias as those with villous or tubulovillous components, and cancerous lesions included those with carcinoma in situ. The distal colon was defined as the rectum and sigmoid colon. RESULTS: There was a 58% incidence of neoplastic polyps in this younger asymptomatic population. More than 4% of our subjects had high-grade neoplasias or cancerous lesions. In the absence of any distal findings, flexible sigmoidoscopy would have missed up to 38% of these polyps. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the recommendations by the American College of Gastroenterology for average-risk patients to preferentially undergo a screening colonoscopy at age 50 in lieu of other methods.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis--supporting documentation. The Standards Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all of the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

Diverticulitis, Colonic↗
PubMed1987

Pancreatitis after biliary tract surgery.

Pancreatitis associated with biliary tract operations continues to be an important clinical problem. The results of biliary tract operations performed on 1256 patients were carefully scrutinized for the presence of postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis persisting after 48 hours. Patients were evaluated in the context of the presence or absence of preoperative pancreatic dysfunction. Similarly, various operative risk factors were evaluated, including cholangiography, choledocholithiasis, common duct exploration, choledochoscopy, choledochoduodenostomy, and sphincteroplasty. Operative cholangiography did not induce postoperative pancreatitis. The incidence of postoperative pancreatitis following cholecystectomy was 0.6%, which was significantly greater than the incidence following common duct exploration (8.4%). Pancreatitis following biliary tract surgery seemed to be not directly related to the performance of choledochoscopy, sphincteroplasty, or choledochoduodenostomy, as it developed with similar frequency in patients undergoing common duct exploration alone. The timing of operative therapy in patients with biliary tract pancreatitis did not significantly alter the frequency with which pancreatitis persisted in the postoperative period. In 970 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, one patient who had preoperative pancreatitis died of postoperative pancreatitis. Of 286 patients undergoing common duct exploration, seven patients died with pancreatitis. In three of these patients there was no active preoperative pancreatitis, and in one of these patients pancreatitis was the cause of death. Four patients with preoperative pancreatitis eventually died of pancreatitis in the postoperative period. Pancreatitis is an important complication of biliary tract disease and operations, and all efforts should be extended to suppress its occurrence and development.

Amylases↗