Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A V Hodges

Publications and source records attributed to A V Hodges.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children.

Certain leaders of the Deaf community are attempting to generate opposition to cochlear implants in children by pitting the rights of deaf children and their families against the needs of deaf society. They have labeled physicians as unethical and CIs as "child abuse," resulting in misunderstanding, anger, and violence. However, the arguments of these leaders are internally contradictory: they hold that deafness is not a disability but support disability benefits for the deaf; they maintain both that cochlear implants do not work and that they work so well that they are "genocidal" (i.e., they will eliminate deafness). Their positions oppose the ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy as they relate to self-determination and privacy. Ethical standards hold that the best interests of the child precede those of a special interest group and that parents have the responsibility to determine their children's best interests.

Child↗
PubMed1996

Otitis media in children with cochlear implants.

Fifty children who received a cochlear implant between 1991 and 1995 were evaluated for incidence of acute otitis media (AOM). Thirty-seven (74%) children had AOM before implantation and 8 (16%) after implantation. All children who had AOM after implantation had a history of AOM. A subgroup of 14 children required ventilating tubes for recurrent AOM before implantation. Five (35.7%) in this group had AOM after implantation. The incidence and severity of AOM decreased after implantation. All episodes of postimplant AOM were successfully treated with routine oral antibiotics, and no infectious complications occurred. A history of recurrent AOM should not inordinately delay cochlear implantation.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Update on cochlear implantation.

Cochlear implants are computerized devices that partially replace the transduction and encoding functions of the cochlea. Over the past 20 years studies have demonstrated that cochlear implants are safe and effective, with modern computer-based multichannel devices providing open-set word understanding for the majority of implanted postlingually deafened adults as well as pre- and postlingually deafened children. Advances in word processing strategy have led to ever-improving word recognition skills and recent studies have demonstrated that oral language develops in congenitally deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Misleading the deaf community about cochlear implantation in children.

Activists are misleading the deaf community in an effort to generate opposition to cochlear implants in children. Their methods include both misinformation and the use of inflammatory, illogical rhetoric. To date they have been successful in causing anger, frustration, and overt violence among the culturally deaf with the use of such terms as "genocide" and "child abuse." Because the average reading level of a deaf residential high school graduate is at the third or fourth grade level, a small elite is able to control the interpretation and flow of complex information to many deaf people. It is a challenge to make accurate information, both positive and negative, accessible directly to deaf society. Just as the deaf have abandoned opposition to cochlear implants in adults, the same might be expected to occur in children when they and their parents become aware of the results of implantation.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1994

Ophthalmologic abnormalities in the pediatric cochlear implant population.

To determine the nature and prevalence of ophthalmologic abnormalities in children with congenital or prelinguistic sensorineural deafness, we performed complete ophthalmologic examinations on 54 children aged 2 to 14 years from the University of Miami Ear Institute's Cochlear Implant Program. Of 54 children, 33 (61.1%) had some form of ophthalmologic abnormality, with the majority (24 patients; 44.4%) being refractive errors. Of 54 patients, two (3.7%) had strabismus and two (3.7%) had external adnexal anomalies. One child (1.8%) had cataracts. The cause of the deafness, which had previously been unknown, was determined in three of 54 cases (5.6%) as a result of ocular examinations documenting rubella retinopathy, tapetoretinal degeneration (Usher's syndrome), and iris heterochromia (Waardenburg's syndrome). Routine ophthalmologic examination must be mandated for this population, and the ophthalmologist should be encouraged to play a broader role in the care of children with deficiencies of both vision and audition.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: The electrically elicited auditory brain-stem response (EABR) has been proposed as a tool for use in cochlear implant device setting. To systematically examine the relationships of psychophysical perceptions and EABRs, implant users underwent a series of comparative measurements. The characteristics of the EABR were assessed for their predictive value in determining the subjective measures needed to set the implant device. DESIGN: Characteristics of the EABR and various perceptual measures in a group of cochlear implant users served as compared variables in a correlational study. SETTING: The study was carried out in the audiology clinic of a university hospital. The audiology clinic maintained a fully equipped evoked potential laboratory, and was part of an otolaryngology department that supported a cochlear implant program. SUBJECTS: The subjects consisted of 10 consecutively selected postlinguistically deafened adult multichannel cochlear implant users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphology, latency, and amplitude measures of the EABR recordings were compared with behavioral perceptions of threshold, most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels. RESULTS: Perceptual measures of threshold were found to be significantly related to the threshold of the EABR across subjects and electrode position. Simple linear regression analysis was used to measure the degree of the relationship. An r value of 0.89 attests to a significant relationship. The EABR wave latencies and amplitudes were found to have no significant relationship to any of the perceptual measures examined. CONCLUSIONS: Although EABR cannot replace behavioral measurements for device setting, in difficult cases EABR thresholds may be used as a starting point from which to estimate settings for the device.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Cochlear endoscopy with preservation of hearing in guinea pigs.

Advances in fiberoptic technology have revolutionized the way many disorders are treated by otolaryngologists. We have previously described our experiences with cochlear endoscopy during cochlear implantation. However, endoscopy of the functioning cochlea has not previously been reported. To test the hypothesis that endoscopy of the guinea pig cochlea is possible without catastrophic loss of auditory function, we subjected 20 ears of 10 Hartley-strain albino guinea pigs to limited endoscopy of the cochlea through the round window with evaluation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain stem responses. Insertion of the endoscope caused measurable changes in auditory brain stem response latency and amplitude. Distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes were reduced an average of 6 dB with greater loss close to the round window. Frequencies above 18 kHz, corresponding to the region of endoscopy, were not evaluated in this preliminary study and are suspected to have sustained more damage. Results demonstrate that endoscopy of the guinea pig cochlea is possible without major loss of the above physiologic measures in the regions tested. If endoscopy of the cochlea is to become a tool with clinical and basic science applications, refinements in techniques to avoid damage are necessary.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Multichannel cochlear implant and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in a child with labyrinthitis ossificans.

Ossification of the cochlea following meningitis presents a surgical challenge. Electrode mapping, especially in the young child, is difficult given the uncertainty of electrode contact with viable neural elements. This paper reviews surgical technique and the use of auditory brainstem responses to map the electrodes. A 4-year-old child deafened by meningitis at age 20 months had bilateral cochlear ossification by computed tomography. At surgery, a canal wall-down mastoidectomy and closure of the ear canal were performed. A trough around the modiolus was drilled, and the electrode array was placed in it. Post-operatively, the patient gave aversive or no responses to electrode stimulation. To assess electrode function, auditory brainstem responses to individual electrode activation were obtained under general anesthesia. Functioning electrodes could thus be selected for mapping. The patient now responds well to sound.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1987

Meningitis and facial paresis. Implications for cochlear implantation.

Most postlingually deafened individuals receive auditory sensations with a cochlear implant. We describe a postmeningitic patient with bilateral facial paresis who failed to be stimulated with a multichannel device. In light of the facial dysfunction, primary auditory nerve damage by meningitis is postulated as the cause of implant failure. Preoperation electrical stimulation of the cochlea using an alternating current signal is recommended as a means of assessing cochlear implant candidacy.

Cochlear Implants↗