Delayed-type hypersensitivity rash from ibuprofen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
A Tursi
Publications and source records attributed to A Tursi.
Latex hypersensitivity: relationship with positive prick test and patch test responses among hairdressers.
BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex is a frequent cause of IgE-mediated allergy in hairdressers; but a non-IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins can also occur. Sixty-one hairdressers, reporting latex glove-related symptoms, were enrolled in the study. METHODS: They were evaluated for latex allergy by assessment of serum specific IgE and skin prick tests. Patients were patch tested to a rubber additive series and to latex. Proportions were compared by one-tailed Fisher's exact test; mean values of continuous variables were compared by Student's t-test. RESULTS: A diagnosis of IgE-mediated latex allergy was made in 11 (18%) hairdressers; patch tests with rubber-related antigens were positive in 24 (39.3%) subjects. The most positive patch tests were those with para-phenylenediamine (33%). Two hairdressers (3.3%) showed delayed reactions to the latex sample. Hairdressers with IgE-mediated latex allergy were older and presented a personal history of atopy and local hives after exposure to latex; they were more likely to have a positive response to other allergens on prick or patch testing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a certain number of false-positive and false-negative results when reported symptoms of possible latex sensitivity were compared to prick and CAP tests to latex, indicating the problems of relying solely on self-report.
Adolescent↗
Clinical and aetiological aspects in urticaria and angio-oedema.
BACKGROUND: Urticaria is a common disorder that affects as many as 20% of all people at some time during their lifetime. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the prevalence of various forms of urticaria according to an aetiological and clinical classification, we carried out a 4-year study in an outpatient clinic. METHODS: The study was carried out on 562 consecutive patients (178 males and 384 females; mean age 35.4 +/- 16), who had been referred to our unit for the study of urticaria and angio-oedema. Baseline investigations included: the patient's family and personal history of allergy; duration of symptoms, presence of associated symptoms and objective signs of the current episode; clinical, laboratory and instrumental investigations; assessment of response to antihistamine treatment. RESULTS: A family history of atopy was present in 35% of patients and a personal history of allergy in 24%. We subdivided urticaria and angio-oedema into several groups on the basis of their clinical and aetiological aspects. Of the 562 patients, 424 (76%) presented with ordinary urticaria (43 acute urticaria, 311 chronic urticaria, 70 episodic urticaria), 80 (14%) physical urticaria, 49 (9%) angio-oedema without weals, six (1%) IgE-mediated contact urticaria and three (0.5%) urticarial vasculitis. In 64 cases (11%) urticaria/angio-oedema was associated with one or more symptoms. We identified 394 cases (82%) of idiopathic urticaria, 42 (9%) of immunological urticaria, 29 (6%) of non-immunological urticaria and 17 (3%) of urticaria secondary to infections. Of the treated subjects, 54% showed a good response to treatment with antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide an overview of urticaria/angio-oedema in a large series of patients, based on clinical-aetiological aspects, and related to recent diagnostic guidelines.
Acute Disease↗
Effectiveness of the sorbitol H2 breath test in detecting histological damage among relatives of coeliacs.
BACKGROUND: Small intestinal lesions have a wide severity in coeliac disease (CD), and early diagnosis is important in preventing neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders related to CD. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the sorbitol H2 breath test (H2-BT) and serological tests (antigliadin (AGA), antiendomysium (EMA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG)) as screening tests in the detection and estimation of CD prevalence in 1st-degree relatives. METHODS: Screening was performed in 111 1st-degree relatives of 37 coeliac families. Sorbitol H2-BT, AGA, EMA and anti-tTG antibodies were used to select the candidates for small-bowel biopsy. Relatives with abnormal serological tests and/or with sorbitol H2-BT positivity underwent a small-bowel biopsy. Small-bowel biopsy was also performed in relatives negative in all tests but with clinical complaints or suspected of having CD, and intestinal lesions were expressed according to the Marsh classification. RESULTS: CD was diagnosed in 49/111 screened relatives (44.14%): 5 showed Marsh IIIc, 8 Marsh IIIb, 16 Marsh IIIa, 13 Marsh II and 7 Marsh I lesions. Nineteen relatives showed the classical form of the disease, while the subclinical and silent forms were recorded in 20 and 10, respectively. AGA, EMA and anti-tTG showed strong positivity only in severe intestinal damage (Marsh IIIb-c lesions) (but overall positivity was 36.73%, 38.78% and 44.89% for AGA, EMA and anti-tTG, respectively), while sorbitol H2-BT showed strong positivity also in patients with slight histological damage (Marsh I-IIIa) (overall positivity was 83.67%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of coeliacs may be missed if relatives are screened by serology only, while the efficacy of sorbitol H2-BT in screening relatives is confirmed. This study confirms that neither a breath test nor serology can replace intestinal biopsy, which remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CD.
Adolescent↗
Allergic and pseudoallergic reactions induced by glucocorticoids: a review.
Glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the most effective treatment for autoimmune and allergic diseases, even if collateral effects are not rare, especially endocrine and immunosuppressive manifestations. Moreover, these drugs can develop adverse immunological reactions of I, III or IV type. Though immediate adverse reactions caused by systemic therapy with GCs are not very frequent, the possible beginning of anaphylactic and pseudo-anaphylactic manifestations in patients undergoing therapy with these drugs has to be considered. It has been observed that immediate adverse reactions usually are happened in asthmatic patients and in patients obliged to assume GCs again and again because of their pathology (e.g, kidney transplant). Other risk factors resulted to be female sex and hypersensibility to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Both in the cases of pseudo-allergic and allergic reactions, the pharmacological principle is hardly the responsible agent for the reaction; instead the excipients in drugs are often implicated (succinate salt, sulphites and carboxy-methyl-cellulose). It is possible that the IgE-response is highly specific for a fixed GC molecule as well depending on the way of administration and its salification. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that in patients with a first type allergic reaction to GCs there is a fourth type, sensitization to GCs, which is not usually diagnosed and even comes before IgE sensitization. Third type hypersensibility reactions may occur, too. Since GCs are large-scale drugs, also in emergency medicine and reanimation, allergic sensitization towards them, although infrequent, gives many interventionist problems. In the light of this feature, it seems of crucial importance to verify the tolerance toward other GC molecules. And in particular, it has been noted that patients presenting immediate reactions to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP) could tolerate prednisone and prednisolone per os and second-generation GCs, such as desamathazone and betamethazone. Nevertheless, second-generation GCs must not be considered safe; in fact, the beginning of allergic manifestations has been pointed out even towards them.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
Long-term treatment with mesalazine and rifaximin versus rifaximin alone for patients with recurrent attacks of acute diverticulitis of colon.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare efficacy of combined therapy with rifaximin and mesalazine versus rifaximin alone in treatment of patients with recurrent diverticulitis in order to evaluate: 1) rapidity in improvement of symptoms, 2) regulation of bowel attacks, 3) prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis. METHODS: A total of 218 consecutive eligible patients (131 males, 87 females age 64.3 years, range 51-79), affected by diverticulitis were monitored. Of these, 109 patients were treated with rifaximin 400 mg bid plus mesalazine 800 mg tid for 7 days, followed by rifaximin 400 mg bid plus mesalazine 800 mg bid for 7 days/month (group A); 109 patients were treated with rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days, followed by rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days/month (group B). Colonoscopy was performed after 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: At end of follow-up, 193 patients were fully compliant to therapy Two patients died during study (1 in group A, 1 in group B), while four patients were lost to follow-up [1 in group A (0.91%) and 3 in group B (2.75%)]. The only side-effects recorded were transient urticaria (1 in group B, 0.91%) and epigastric pain (9 in group A, 8.25%). Severity of symptoms improved significantly in group A vs group B within 3 months (p < 0.005, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0005 at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively). Bowel habits inproved significantly in group A vs group B within 3 months (p < 0.005, p < 0.0005, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 at 3,6,9 and 12 months respectively). Symptomatic recurrence of diverticulitis occurred in 3 patients in group A, while 13 patients showed recurrence of diverticulitis in group B (p < 0.005) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly shows that rifaximin plus mesalazine are more effective than rifaximin alone in resolution of symptoms and prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis.
Acute Disease↗
Sorbitol H2-breath test versus anti-endomysium antibodies to assess histological recovery after gluten-free diet in coeliac disease.
BACKGROUND: Gluten-free diet plays a key role in treatment of coeliac disease, but it is difficult to evaluate its effect on improvement of villous architecture using sensitive non-invasive tests. AIMS: To compare sorbitol H2-Breath Test with antiendomysial antibodies in the follow-up of coeliac disease to detect histological recovery METHODS: A total of 38 consecutive patients with coeliac disease were studied. All underwent Sorbitol H2-Breath Test, antiendomysial and oesophagogastroduodenoscopy with multiple bioptic samples before diet and then 6, 12 and 18 months after gluten-free diet. Expiratory samples were collected before patients drank the test solution (5 g sorbitol in 150 ml tap water) and thereafter every 30 min for 4 hours. An increase in H2 concentration of > or = 20 ppm above fasting baseline was considered positive for sorbitol malabsorption. Antiendomysial antibodies were evaluated by the indirect immunofluorescent method. RESULTS: Antiendomysial antibodies were positive in 32/38 patients before gluten-free diet (84.21%), while they were positive in 20/34 (54.82%), 2/16 (12.5%) and 0/2 (0%) cases after 6, 12 and 18 months of gluten-free diet, respectively, no correlation being found with improvement of histological lesions (p = ns). As far as concerns sorbitol H2-Breath Test, maximal cut-off value (in ppm) decreased progressively and parallel to histological recovery during follow-up. Indeed, it decreased from a mean 63 ppm before diet to 35, 19 and 12 ppm, after 6, 12 and 18 months of gluten-free diet, with a stetistical difference being found before and after (p < 0.001). Likewise, the peak value (in minutes) appeared progressively later during follow-up, parallel to histological recovery. In fact, it appeared at a mean of 119 minutes before gluten-free diet, while it appears at a mean of 164, 195 and 219 minutes after 6, 12 and 18 months on gluten-free diet. A statistical difference before and after start of gluten-free diet was found also in this case (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sorbitol H2-Breath Test is better than antiendomysial antibodies in revealing histological recovery in the follow-up of coeliac patients after the start of gluten-free diet due to its good correlation with histological damage. Moreover, it also appears to be able to detect dietary mistakes of the patients on gluten-free diet.
Adolescent↗
Benzydamine: an alternative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in patients with nimesulide-induced urticaria.
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in particular urticaria/angiedema syndrome, represent a frequent problem in clinical practice. To date laboratory tests for the diagnosis of these adverse reactions are not available. A patient with an adverse drug reaction to NSAIDs needs an alternative drug to assume if necessary. Nimesulide is a highly prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) world-wide. It is also described as one of the most tolerated NSAID. In this paper we present data on the tolerability of benzydamine in nimesulide-sensitive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with nimesulide-induced urticaria were submitted to a single-blind, placebo-controlled peroral challenge with increasing doses of benzydamine. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four out of 137 (98%) patients tolerated benzydamine without adverse effects, only three (2%) experienced immediate systemic urticaria (1 at the first dose and 2 at the second dose). CONCLUSION: Benzydamine is a well tolerated drug in patients with nimesulide-induced urticaria and it may represent a valid alternative NSAID in nimesulide-sensitive patients.
Acetaminophen↗
Reactivity to autologous serum skin test and clinical features in chronic idiopathic urticaria.
The autologous-serum skin test (ASST) can cause a wheal-and-flare response in some cases of chronic idiopathic urticaria. We subjected 102 patients affected by chronic idiopathic urticaria to this test and studied some clinical parameters to detect any significant differences between ASST-positive and ASST-negative patients. The only significant difference we noted between the two groups was the incidence of angioedema (P = 0.01). We suggest that the ASST cannot be used alone either to predict the severity of urticaria or to define it as 'autoimmune'.
Angioedema↗
Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms.
BACKGROUND: It has been established that there are type I and type IV allergens in latex gloves. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to establish the prevalence of rubber glove-induced skin symptoms among health care workers in one Italian hospital. METHODS: Health care workers (n = 1584) were evaluated using a written questionnaire and 295 respondents with glove-induced skin symptoms were tested. We performed: skin prick test with latex glove extract and commercial latex, and environmental and food allergens; glove use test; patch tests with a rubber additive series; and RASTs. RESULTS: Hospital employees who used or had used latex gloves at work were 1294. Three hundred and sixteen (24.4%) reported glove-induced symptoms, namely, cutaneous symptoms in all the cases and non-cutaneous symptoms in 105 subjects (8.1%). Twenty-seven of the 295 symptomatic employees tested (9.1%) were latex sensitive. Thirty-one patients (10.5%) exhibited positive patch test to rubber-related allergens. The most positive readings were obtained from the Thiuram mix and the Carba mix, with 12 and 9 positivities, respectively. The risk factors for latex skin sensitization were: a previous history of atopy and asthma; history of surgery; pre-existing hand dermatitis; work-related symptoms; and positive skin tests to common inhalant and certain foods (P < 0.05). Subjects who exhibited positive patch test were significantly more likely to have a prior hand dermatitis (P < 0.001). Of the 295 cases, 275 (93.2%) were contact dermatitis (CD), 13 (4.4%) contact urticaria (CU) (including protein CD) and 7 (2.4%) CD associated with CU. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high prevalence of rubber glove-induced dermatoses among the employees in one Italian hospital. The majority of skin complaints of latex gloves are related to skin irritation rather than to allergy. The immediate allergy to latex and the delayed allergy to rubber chemicals suggest that all the health care workers with glove-related dermatitis should undergo both skin prick test and glove use test to detect type I hypersensitivity to latex, and patch test to detect type IV hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals.
Adult↗
Safety of inhalant allergen immunotherapy with mass units-standardized extracts.
BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is an effective treatment for patients with respiratory allergies. However, subcutaneous injection of allergens can provoke systemic side-effects. OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to determine the incidence and risk factors o fsystemic reactions caused by SIT treatment, using extracts of different inhalant allergens, adsorbed in aluminium hydroxide and biologically standardized with the major allergens quantified in mass units. METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-five subjects with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma were evaluated on clinical history and skin prick test (SPT) reactions to common inhalant allergens. Subcutaneous SIT was administered to all patients, according to the suggested precautionary guidelines and administration schedule. Patients were treated with house dust mite, grass pollen, Parietaria judaica pollen and olive pollen extracts, each receiving one or two extracts. RESULTS: A total of 36,359 injections were administered in the 555 patients. We observed 34 episodes of serious systemic side-effects (0.093% of all injections), in 29 patients (5.2% of all patients), and no fatalities. About 55% of patients reported mild rhinitis and asthma. The majority (59%) of the serious systemic reactions (SSR), and all the anaphylactic reactions, were immediate (i.e. occurred within 30 min after the injection). Asthmatic subjects were at higher risk of SSR than patients with rhinitis (P = 0.01). Most of the side-effects observed occurred during the dose-increase phase (P < 0.05). There was no association of SSR with age, gender, SPT reactivity or allergen type. CONCLUSION: SIT performed in patients with respiratory allergies by specialized staff with the allergen extracts studied, standardized in mass units, provoked a low rate of SSR. The significant risk factors for systemic reactions were asthma and the build-up period.
Adolescent↗
Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic esophageal stenosis with electrocautery.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Stricture of the esophagus following surgical resection is uncommon. Several methods have been described for treatment of this entity, but the therapeutic success may be impaired either by poor long-term results or by poor acceptance by patients. Even the high cost of the therapeutic management may represent a problem. We describe the use of electrocautery to treat benign anastomotic esophageal stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six unselected consecutive patients (four men, two women; mean age 68.3, range 54 - 82) with stenosis following esophagojejunostomy were enrolled in this trial. Postoperative stenoses were shown endoscopically (four patients) or radiographically (two patients). We performed endoscopic dilation of the strictures using electrocautery. RESULTS: In all patients we obtained dilation of the strictures, without any immediate or delayed procedure-related complication. No recurrence of the stenosis was demonstrated during a mean 24-month follow-up (range 8 - 33 months). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that endoscopic electrocautery is a safe and effective treatment for benign anastomotic esophageal stenosis.
Aged↗
Endoscopic polypectomy of large pedunculated gastric polyps using a new, safe, and effective technique.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Endoscopic features of celiac disease in adults and their correlation with age, histological damage, and clinical form of the disease.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although earlier studies have focused on endoscopic markers as predictors of celiac disease, there are still no certainties about the value of these markers. The aim of this study was to consider first, specific endoscopic features as predictors of specific histological damage; secondly, whether there is an association between the endoscopic features of celiac disease and the age of patients at the time of diagnosis; and thirdly, whether particular endoscopic features of celiac disease are associated with the clinical form of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the endoscopic features of celiac disease in 144 consecutive adult patients (52 had the classical form of the disease, 64 the subclinical and 28 the silent form). The histopathological findings were expressed according to the Marsh classification. RESULTS: Slight/mild damage seen at endoscopy was associated with a Marsh II-IIIa grading (P < 0.005), while severe endoscopic damage was related to a Marsh IIIb-IIIc grading (P < 0.0005). Younger patients showed slighter damage at endoscopy (P < 0.001), while older patients showed more severe damage (P < 0.005). Finally, the classical form of celiac disease showed more severe damage at endoscopy, while the subclinical/silent forms of celiac disease showed slighter damage endoscopically (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the endoscopic appearance of the duodenum may be predictive of histological damage grading. Moreover, we showed that in young patients with subclinical/silent celiac disease there is a greater probability of finding slight/mild endoscopic abnormalities associated with slight/mild histological damage.
Adolescent↗
Latex hypersensitivity: personal data and review of the literature.
Latex allergy is an increasingly common condition, because use of latex products is widespread. The reactions to latex manufactures can be classified as allergic and non-allergic, these are the most common. Latex proteins are responsible for immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity allergic reactions. Symptoms range from rhinitis, conjunctivitis and urticaria to anaphylactic shock. Chemical additives can cause allergic contact dermatitis. The clinical symptoms of latex allergy could arise from direct contact with latex products, but may also result from inhalation of airborne allergens. Subpopulations at particular risk include: atopics, children with spina bifida or individuals who required frequent surgical instrumentations, health care workers, and all persons who have regular contact with latex products. Diagnosis of allergy is based initially on history: search for specific serum IgE, skin prick test and provocation test may confirm the suspicion. The most effective strategy in the treatment of latex allergy is avoidance, however this is virtually impossible, given large number of latex products we encounter since childhood. In this paper we review the current state of knowledge concerning latex allergy, including the clinical spectrum, identified allergens, the cross-reactions regarding the latex-fruit syndrome, diagnostic procedures and preventive measures. Several personal data increase awareness on this issue.
Allergens↗
Invasive or non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of subclinical coeliac disease?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency↗
Second generation antihistamines in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria and cypress pollen.
Second generation antihistamines have been employed in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis for many years. However, their effects on two distinctive Mediterranean allergic conditions, viz. Parietaria pollinosis and cypress pollinosis, have been scarcely investigated, so far. A comparative efficacy and side effect trial of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis due to either Parietaria or cypress pollen was carried out in 27 adult patients, according to a double-blind, double-dummy parallel-group design. Airborne pollen monitoring allowed comparison of symptom scores with pollen counts. Seven patients (26%) withdrew, due to poor symptom control. In contrast, in a subset of 15 patients who completed the trial, treatment led to a substantial and statistically significant decline in symptom severity in both the astemizole and the terfenadine study group. However, no statistically significant inter-group differences could be detected.
Adult↗
Mast-cell phenotype in urticaria.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗