An epidemic of blindness: a consequence of improved HIV care?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Telenti.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An adaptation of the HPLC method previously described for the simultaneous assay of amprenavir, ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir and efavirenz after solid-phase extraction is proposed here for the separate analysis of the newer PI lopinavir (LPV) and the NNRTI nevirapine (NVP). After viral inactivation by heat (60 degrees C for 60 min), plasma (600 microl), with clozapine added as internal standard, is diluted 1+1 with phosphate buffer pH 7 and subjected to a solid-phase extraction on a C(18) cartridge. Matrix components are eliminated with 2 x 500 microl of a solution of 0.1% H(3)PO(4) neutralised with NaOH to pH 7. LPV and NVP are eluted with 3 x 500 microl MeOH. The resulting eluate is evaporated under nitrogen at room temperature and is reconstituted in 100 microl MeOH 50%. A 40-microl volume is injected onto a Nucleosil 100, 5 microm C(18) AB column. LPV and NVP are analysed separately using a gradient elution program with solvents constituted of MeCN and phosphate buffer adjusted to pH 5.07 and containing 0.02% sodium heptanesulfonate. LPV and NVP are detected by UV at 201 and 282 nm, respectively. The calibration curves are linear up to 10 microg/ml. The mean absolute recovery of LPV and NVP is 91% and 88%, respectively. The method is precise with mean inter-day C.V.s within 2.1-6.6% and 0.9-1.7% for LPV and NVP, and accurate (range of inter-day deviations -1.1 to +2.4%, and -1.9 to +0.8%, for LPV and NVP, respectively). The method has been validated and is currently applied to the monitoring of LPV and NVP in HIV patients, and has been notably applied in a study aimed at assessing the extent of transplacental passage of nevirapine and PIs, notably lopinavir, at the time of delivery in pregnant HIV-infected women.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the response to ritonavir (RTV) plus saquinavir (SQV) with single protease inhibitor (PI) therapies among PI-naive HIV-1 infected individuals. METHODS: Response to treatment was analysed according to the intent-to-treat principle in a prospective observational cohort study of 177 patients who between May 1995 and March 2000 started a double PI therapy with RTV and SQV (nonboosting dosages) plus at least one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and 2,214 patients with a single PI therapy plus two NRTIs. We used survival analysis and Cox's proportional hazard regression methods. The primary endpoint was the time to a plasma viral load of < 400 copies/mL. Secondary endpoints were taken as a gain in the CD4 count of >100 cells/microL, and change of initial PI for any reason. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics in both treatment groups were balanced. Median follow-up in both groups was 10.4 months. Time to an HIV-1 viral load of < 400 copies/mL and an increase in the CD4 count of >100 x 10(6) cells/L was shorter for RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens (log rank test for each endpoint P < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratios of RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens were 1.21 (95% confidence interval 0.99-1.47) for achieving an HIV-1 viral load of < 400 copies/mL, 1.12 (0.88-1.42) for an increase in the CD4 count of > 100 cells/microL, and 0.90 (0.73-1.11) for change of first PI regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with RTV plus SQV compared with single PI regimens appeared to give similar results for virological or immunological response.
The laboratory tests currently available to the clinician for day-to-day management of HIV infection are generally limited to the measurement of the viral load and of the CD4 cell count. More recently, analysis of drug resistance and of plasma drug levels have been added to the monitoring armamentarium. There are, however, numerous other techniques currently available to researchers that may in the future be incorporated into clinical routine. These include the analysis of human and viral genetic determinants of disease evolution, detailed analyses of immune recovery and reserve, pharmacogenetic determinants of treatment response, and toxicity. These approaches may in the future provide highly individualized disease management.
After occupational exposures, immediate HIV testing of source patients may avoid the unnecessary use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Two time periods were compared. Before the availability of 24 h a day immediate testing, PEP was initiated after 12.6% of exposures, compared with 3.7% during the second period. The adjusted relative odds ratio of PEP during the second compared with the first period, was 0.23. The availability of immediate HIV testing limits unnecessary occupational PEP.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of primary HIV infection (PHI) on the spread of HIV and the temporal trends in transmission of HIV drug resistance between 1996 and 1999 in Switzerland. METHODS: Sequencing of the genes for reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease was performed for 197 individuals with documented PHI. Phylogenetic analyses were confronted with epidemiological data. RESULTS: Significant clustering was demonstrated for 29% of the RT sequences. All these cases occurred closely together in place and time; contact tracing demonstrated transmission at the time of PHI in 30% of them. Genotypic drug resistance was detected in 8.6% of PHI individuals in 1996, 14.6% in 1997, 8.8% in 1998 and 5.0% in 1999. Drug-resistant variants were identified in 11.3% of individuals infected by homosexual contacts, 6.1% by heterosexual contacts, 13% of intravenous drug users and more frequently in men (10.4%) than women (2.6%). Potential factors involved in the recent decrease of transmission of drug-resistant variants include increase of HIV non-B subtypes from 23% in 1996 to 35% in 1999 (only one non-B subtype had resistance mutations) and a steady increase of patients with undetectable viraemia as documented in Swiss HIV Cohort Study (10% in 1996 vs 53% in 1999). CONCLUSIONS: Phylogenetic and epidemiological analyses underline the impact of PHI in the spread of HIV. Moreover, this study indicates that drug resistance transmission may have decreased recently in Switzerland through the increased frequency of infection with HIV non-B subtypes and the steady increase of patients with undetectable viraemia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The prevalence, clinical presentation, and risk factors for hyperlactatemia among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy was determined during a 1-month period for patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Overall, 73 (8.3%) of 880 patients presented an increase in serum lactate of >1.1 times the upper normal limit (UNL). For 9 patients (1%), lactate elevation was moderate or severe (>2.2 times the UNL). Patients who presented with hyperlactatemia were more likely to be receiving stavudine with or without didanosine (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.8), as compared with patients who received zidovudine-based regimens. The risk increased with increasing time receiving stavudine with or without didanosine. The association between hyperlactatemia and stavudine with or without didanosine was not biased by these medications being more recently available and, therefore, being given preferentially to patients who had prolonged use of nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Hyperlactatemia was associated with lipoatrophy, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia. Age, sex, or stage of infection with human immunodeficiency virus were not predictive of hyperlactatemia. Determination of lactate levels may prove useful in the screening for mitochondrial toxicity.
BACKGROUND: Data on adverse events to antiretroviral treatment have been recorded in clinical trials, post-marketing analyses, and anecdotal reports. Such data might not be an up-to-date or comprehensive assessment of all possible treatment combinations defined as potent antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: Using a standard clinical and laboratory method, we assessed prevalence of adverse events in 1160 patients who were receiving antiretroviral treatment. We measured the toxic effects associated with the drug regimen (protease inhibitor [PI], non-nucleoside and nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor) and specific compounds using multivariate analyses. FINDINGS: 47% (545 of 1160) of patients presented with clinical and 27% (194 of 712) with laboratory adverse events probably or definitely attributed to antiretroviral treatment. Among these, 9% (47 of 545) and 16% (30 of 194), respectively, were graded as serious or severe. Single-PI and PI-sparing-antiretroviral treatment were associated with a comparable prevalence of adverse events. Compared with single-PI treatment, use of dual-PI-antiretroviral treatment and three-class-antiretroviral treatment was associated with higher prevalence of adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 2.0 [95% CI 1.0-4.0], and 3.9 [1.2-12.9], respectively). Compound specific associations were identified for zidovudine, lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, abacavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, efavirenz, and nevirapine. INTERPRETATION: We recorded a high prevalence of toxic effects attributed to antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1. Such data provides a reference for regimen-specific and compound-specific adverse events and could be useful in postmarketing analyses of toxic effects.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the response to protease inhibitor (PI) and efavirenz-containing combination therapy among treatment-naive HIV-infected persons. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Response to treatment was analysed according to the intent-to-treat principle among antiretroviral-naive patients who started either efavirenz (n = 89) or PI (n = 183) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors between February 1999 and March 2000 using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression methods. Primary endpoint was time to undetectable plasma viral load. Secondary endpoints included the number of CD4 cells gained, virological rebound, treatment change, and clinical progression. RESULTS: Patients on PI regimens had lower median CD4 counts (165 versus 216 x 5 106/l; P = 0.15) and were more likely to have AIDS at initiation of treatment (25% versus 15% P = 0.048) than patients starting efavirenz regimens. The probability of reaching plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml was higher with efavirenz- than with PI-containing regimens [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-2.29]. Median times to undetectable viral load were 58 days (95% CI, 44-70 days) for efavirenz-treated and 88 days (95% CI, 79-98 days) for PI-treated patients. The median number of CD4 cells gained in the first 6 months (90 x 10(6) cells/l with efavirenz, 10(7) x 10(6) cells/l with PI; P = 0.63), time to and reasons for treatment change, time to viral rebound, drug intolerance and clinical progression rates were similar in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with efavirenz-, compared with PI-based regimens, appeared to result in a superior virological response but no difference in immunological or clinical efficacy. The relevance of these observations remains to be determined in studies with longer follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Introduction of potent antiretroviral combination therapy (ART) has reduced overall morbidity and mortality amongst HIV-infected adults. Some prophylactic regimes against opportunistic infections can be discontinued in patients under successful ART. QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: (1) The influence of the availability of ART on incidence and mortality of disseminated M. avium Complex infection (MAC). (2) The safety of discontinuation of maintenance therapy against MAC in patients on ART. SETTING: The Swiss HIV-Cohort Study, a prospective multicentre study of HIV-infected adults. METHODS: Patients with a nadir CD4 count below 50 cells/mm3 were considered at risk for MAC and contributed to total follow-up time for calculating the incidence. Survival analysis was performed by using Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Safety of discontinuation of maintenance therapy was evaluated by review of the medical notes. RESULTS: 398 patients were diagnosed with MAC from 1990 to 1999. 350 had a previous CD4 count below 50 cells/mm3. A total of 3208 patients had a nadir CD4 count of less than 50 cells/mm3 during the study period and contributed to a total follow-up of 6004 person-years. The incidence over the whole study period was 5.8 events per 100 person-years. In the time period of available ART the incidence of MAC was significantly reduced (1.4 versus 8.8 events per 100 person-years, p < 0.001). Being diagnosed after 1995 was the most powerful predictor of better survival (adjusted hazard ratio for death: 0.27; p < 0.001). None of 24 patients discontinuing maintenance therapy while on ART experienced recurrence of MAC during a total follow-up of 56.6 person-years (upper 95% confidence limit 5.3 per 100 person-years). CONCLUSION: Introducing ART has markedly reduced the risk of MAC for HIV-infected individuals with a history of very low CD4 counts. Survival after diagnosis of MAC has improved after ART became available. In patients responding to ART, discontinuation of maintenance therapy against M. avium may be safe.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of discontinuation of primary prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral combination therapy at high risk of developing Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The incidence of P. carinii pneumonia after discontinuation of primary prophylaxis was studied in 396 HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral combination therapy who experienced an increase in their CD4 cell count to at least 200 x 10(6)/l and 14% of total lymphocytes; the study population included 191 patients with a history of CD4 cell counts below 100 x 10(6)/l (245 person-years) and 144 patients with plasma HIV RNA above 200 copies/ml (215 person-years). RESULTS: There was one case of Pneumocystis pneumonia, an incidence of 0.18 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.005--1.0 per 100 person-years]. No case was diagnosed in groups with low nadir CD4 cell counts (95% CI, 0--1.2 per 100 person-years) or detectable plasma HIV RNA (95% CI, 0--1.4 per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia is safe in patients who have responded with a sustained increase in their CD4 cell count to antiretroviral combination therapy, irrespective of the CD4 cell count nadir and the viral load at the time of stopping prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: Lipid disorders associated with the use of protease inhibitors may contribute to the premature development of atherosclerosis. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the administration of a protease inhibitor-containing regimen to middle-aged (30-50 years) HIV-infected individuals for 6 months or longer is associated with an increased prevalence of atherosclerosis. METHODS: High-resolution B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to visualize the femoral and carotid arteries of 68 HIV-negative and 168 HIV-infected individuals, including 136 patients who had received protease inhibitors for 26.8 +/- 8.9 months (mean +/- SD). Atherogenic plaques were defined as a thickening of the intima-media > or = 1200 mm. RESULTS: The proportion of participants with one or more plaques was higher in the HIV-infected group in comparison with the HIV-negative group (55 versus 38%; P = 0.02), and so was the prevalence of cigarette smoking (61 versus 46%; P = 0.03) and hyperlipidaemia (56 versus 24%; P < 0.001). The presence of plaque was independently associated with age, male gender, plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and smoking. In univariate logistic regression analysis, an association was also found with HIV infection. Among HIV-infected subjects protease inhibitor therapy was not associated with the presence of plaque. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of the middle-aged HIV-infected individuals examined during this study had one or more atherosclerotic plaques within the femoral or carotid arteries. The presence of peripheral atherosclerosis within this population is not associated with the use of protease inhibitors, but rather with 'classic' cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking and hyperlipidaemia, which are amenable to interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Limited information exists on the clinical usefulness of drug level monitoring for efavirenz, a once-daily non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). The aim of this study was to determine whether efavirenz plasma concentration monitoring could predict treatment failure and central nervous system (CNS) tolerability. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 130 HIV-infected patients receiving efavirenz in combination with other antiretroviral agents for more than 3 months. Efavirenz plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. An evaluation of CNS side-effects was performed and the viral load, CD4 cell count and other clinical and laboratory data were assessed. In 85 patients, these measures were repeated at 3 month intervals. RESULTS: Efavirenz plasma levels (n = 226) were measured at an average of 14 h after drug intake. Drug concentrations ranged from 125 to 15230 microg/l (median 2188). Large inter-patient (CV 118%) and limited intra-patient (CV 30%) variabilities were observed in efavirenz levels. Virological failure was observed in 50% of patients with low efavirenz levels (< 1000 microg/l) versus 22 and 18% in patients with 1000-4000 microg/l or more than 4000 microg/l, respectively. CNS toxicity was approximately three times more frequent in patients with high efavirenz levels (> 4000 microg/l) compared with patients with 1000-4000 microg/l. CONCLUSION: Treatment failure and CNS side-effects are associated with low and high efavirenz plasma levels, respectively. The important inter-individual variability in efavirenz levels strongly argues for dose adjustment on the basis of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize treatment.
Nelfinavir has been recently approved as a twice-daily (BID) dose regimen, but no evaluation of the influence of this regimen change on patients' protease inhibitor exposure has been published. The aim of this study was to compare trough plasma concentrations of nelfinavir obtained under the 1250-mg b.i.d regimen with the levels achieved with the original 750-mg three-times-daily (TID) regimen in 56 HIV-infected patients. Blood samples were obtained at steady state before the morning dose of nelfinavir. Plasma levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Eleven and 45 patients were following TID and BID regimens, respectively. Trough concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 11.74 mg/L and from 0.36 to 10.57 mg/L under TID and BID regimens, respectively. Large interpatient (coefficient of variation: 153%) and modest intrapatient (45%) variabilities of nelfinavir levels were observed. Twenty-one patients (38%) and six patients (11%) had levels above and below, respectively, the trough nelfinavir range (1.0--3.0 mg/L) recommended by the manufacturer. Trough levels are not affected by the dosing regimen; they mainly reflect the important interindividual variability, while remaining fairly stable over time. Many subjects had plasma levels repeatedly outside the assumed therapeutic range. Dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring may contribute to optimizing antiretroviral therapy.
Resistance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to antiretroviral agents results from target gene mutation within the pol gene, which encodes the viral protease, reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase. We speculated that mutations in genes other that the drug target could lead to drug resistance. For this purpose, the p1-p6(gag)-p6(pol) region of HIV-1, placed immediately upstream of pol, was analyzed. This region has the potential to alter Pol through frameshift regulation (p1), through improved packaging of viral enzymes (p6(Gag)), or by changes in activation of the viral protease (p6(Pol)). Duplication of the proline-rich p6(Gag) PTAP motif, necessary for late viral cycle activities, was identified in plasma virus from 47 of 222 (21.2%) patients treated with nucleoside analog RT inhibitor (NRTI) antiretroviral therapy but was identified very rarely from drug-naïve individuals. Molecular clones carrying a 3-amino-acid duplication, APPAPP (transframe duplication SPTSPT in p6(Pol)), displayed a delay in protein maturation; however, they packaged a 34% excess of RT and exhibited a marked competitive growth advantage in the presence of NRTIs. This phenotype is reminiscent of the inoculum effect described in bacteriology, where a larger input, or a greater infectivity of an organism with a wild-type antimicrobial target, leads to escape from drug pressure and a higher MIC in vitro. Though the mechanism by which the PTAP region participates in viral maturation is not known, duplication of this proline-rich motif could improve assembly and packaging at membrane locations, resulting in the observed phenotype of increased infectivity and drug resistance.