Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Taube

Publications and source records attributed to A Taube.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Quality of life aspects and costs in treatment of Graves' hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs, surgery, or radioiodine: results from a prospective, randomized study.

The patients' views and costs of three different forms of treatment for Graves' hyperthyroidism were investigated. The study comprises 174 patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism who were stratified into two age groups: 20 to 34 years and 35 to 55 years. The younger group was randomly assigned to treatment with antithyroid drug plus thyroxine for 18 months or subtotal thyroidectomy, and in the older group iodine-131 was added as a third alternative. The patients' views of their therapy were based on a questionnaire formulated to identify possible differences between the three treatment forms. The costs were assessed by analyzing the official hospital reimbursement system for both outpatient and inpatient costs for a period of 2 years from the day of randomization. The results show that no significant differences in opinion were found between the five treatment groups with regard to any of the questions. Furthermore, only 10% of the patients expressed slight and 3% major hesitation to recommend the treatment form received to a friend with similar disease. Twenty percent of the patients with endocrine ophthalmopathy reported the eye problems to be much more troublesome and 14% somewhat more troublesome than the thyroid problems. The cost proportion between the medical and surgical treatment in the young group was 1:2.5 (1 = 1126 United States dollars [USD]) before and 1:1.3 (1 = 2284 USD) after inclusion of the relapse costs. The proportion between the medical, surgical, and iodine-131 treatment in the older group was 1:2.5:1.6 (1 = 1164 USD) before and 1:1.6:1.4 (1 = 1972 USD) after inclusion of the relapse costs.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A 10-year follow-up of snoring in men.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the natural development of snoring, and this survey was conducted to study the development of snoring in men over a 10-year period. DESIGN: Population-based prospective survey. SETTING: The Municipality of Uppsala, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In 1984, 3,201 randomly selected men aged 30 to 69 years answered a questionnaire on snoring and sleep disturbances. Of the 2,975 survivors in 1994, 2,668 (89.7%) answered a new questionnaire with identical questions to those used at baseline. Questions about smoking habits, alcohol, and physical activity were also added. RESULTS: Habitual snoring was reported by 393 men (15.0%) in 1984 and by 529 (20.4%) 10 years later. In both 1984 and 1994, the prevalence of snoring increased until age 50 to 60 years and then decreased. Risk factors for being a habitual snorer at the follow-up were investigated using multiple logistic regression with adjustments for previous snoring status, age, body mass index (BMI), weight gain, smoking habits, and physical activity. In men aged 30 to 49 years at baseline, the predictors of habitual snoring at the follow-up, in addition to previous snoring status, were as follows: persistent smoking (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) (1.4, 1.1 to 1.9), BMI 1984 (1.1, 1.02 to 1.1/kg/m2) and weight gain (1.1, 1.03 to 1.2/kg/m2). Among men aged 50 to 69 years, after adjustments for previous snoring status and age, weight gain was the only significant risk factor for developing habitual snoring (1.2, 1.05 to 1.4/kg/m2). CONCLUSIONS: In men, the prevalence of snoring increases up to the age of 50 to 60 years and is then followed by a decrease. Weight gain is a risk factor for snoring in all age groups, while smoking is mainly associated with snoring in men <60 years of age.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-one patients with low back pain were examined by two physiotherapists (50 patients) and two physicians (21 patients). The two physiotherapists had worked together for many years, but the two physicians had not. The interexaminer reliability of the clinical tests included in the physical examination was evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interexaminer reliability of clinical tests used in the physical examination of patients with low back pain under ideal circumstances, which was the case for the physiotherapists. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous clinical tests are used in the evaluation of patients with low back pain. To reach the correct diagnosis, only tests with an acceptable validity and reliability should be used. Previous studies have mainly shown low reliability. It is important that clinical tests not be rejected because of low reliability caused by differences between examiners in performance of the examination and in their definition of normal results. METHODS: Two examiners, either two physiotherapists or two physicians, independently examined patients with low back pain. RESULTS: In approximately half of the clinical tests studied, an acceptable reliability was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the physiotherapists series, the reliability was acceptable for a number of clinical tests that are used in the evaluation of patients with low back pain. The results suggest that clinical tests should be standardized to a much higher degree than they are today.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Analysis and presentation. Clinical trials on prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To present guidelines for the analysis and presentation of clinical trials on prostate cancer. METHODS: Textbooks in statistics and oncology were searched for information, as were separate articles on the topic. Previously published advice was fused with own experience. RESULTS: Minimum key points are given for the sections: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Summary. The importance of 1 primary question in any clinical trial is stressed. The value of a detailed presentation of the trial design, the patient population and the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the characterization of the disease, the treatment schedules, and toxicity is underlined. Application of various statistical methods for different endpoints is suggested. Maturity of data, time for publication, and avoidance of publication bias are discussed. Some common pitfalls in the statistical analyses of clinical results are indicated. The impact of prognostic factors, proper staging procedures, and secondary treatments on the interpretation of survival analysis is pointed out. A shift from the (mis-)use of the P value in favor of confidence intervals is strongly encouraged. The use of comparing the survival of responders versus nonresponders is to be abandoned. A few practical hints concerning the presentation are offered. The minimum of data that should be presented in absolute numbers is indicated. Also, the data that should be provided in both graphic and numeric format are exemplified. Examples of essential graphic illustrations are provided. The need for improvements in the design analysis, and presentation of clinical trials is reemphasized. Finally, numerous references are listed. The article is addressed not only to authors and readers of clinical trials, but also to editors of medical journals. CONCLUSION: The suggested guidelines may be useful in the analysis, presentation, and interpretation of clinical trials on prostate cancer. Moreover, compliance with these guidelines may facilitate comparisons with other similar trials and also, the incorporation of single studies into metaanalyses.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1997

What is the long term value of multiphasic health screening and the initial judgement of benefit?

The long term effects of multiphasic health screening (MHS) are rarely studied. In 1964 a random sample of 546 women and 544 men born 1899, 1904, 1909, 1914 or 1919 equally distributed on cohorts from the Swedish town Eskilstuna were invited to examination. For several reasons 167 persons (15%) did not participate in the study. In 1969 the whole sample was invited to a second MHS together with a control group that had not been exposed to MHS. Furthermore, 79 of those alive 1989 born 1899 or 1904 and examined 1964 and 1969 were reexamined. Over all survival rate 1989 for those examined 1964 was for males 18% and for females 35%. Screening instruments 1964 and 1969 were questionnaires, laboratory tests, antropometric measurements, ECG, measurement of blood pressure, chest radiography, peak expiratory flow (PEF), tonometry and fundoscopy of the eyes, audiometric screening, dental, gynecological and general clinical examination. Systolic hypertension for both sexes, low PEF and smoking, low cholesterol in women were negatively related to survival. Of 18 diabetics only one was alive at follow-up. No association was found between BMI and mortality for men, but some (1964 p < 0.01; 1969 p < 0.05) for women. Altogether 87 individuals were 1969 judged to have had some benefit of the MHS in 1964, 40 of them substantial. This was, however, not statistically significantly associated with improved survival. Of the reexamined survivors 86% reported to be generally satisfied with their life situation. The prognostic value of graded benefit was analysed in some detail. The survival to age 85 in the group allotted any benefit was somewhat less good (37%) than in the group with no benefit (44%). The difference did not reach statistical significance.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Physicians' attitudes toward clinical trials and their relationship to patient accrual in a Nordic multicenter study on myeloma.

Ninety-nine physicians participating in a Nordic multicenter trial on myeloma in 1990-1994 were surveyed, by means of a mailed questionnaire, with respect to their attitudes toward clinical trials and their opinions regarding the importance of certain factors influencing patient accrual. The inclusion rate of each participating clinic was recorded. Questions related to attitudes of presumed importance for patient accrual were analyzed for associations between the response distribution and the inclusion rate for the corresponding clinics. Ninety-three of the surveyed physicians responded to the questionnaire. The survey indicated that the physicians considered the scientific purpose of a trial to be the most important factor for patient accrual, followed by the simplicity of study protocol, the rightness of ethical aspects, the quality of communication with the study organization, and the degree of participation in investigators' meetings. A positive correlation to patient accrual was found for several attitudes held by the participating physicians, including their perception of the importance of a quality-of-life study in the protocol, their conception of the simplicity of the study protocol, their frequency of participation in investigators' meetings, and their awareness of cost and reimbursement levels for entered patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗