BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for the histopathologic diagnosis of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection have been drawn from changes seen in cervical specimens not necessarily applicable to penile epithelium. GOAL: To evaluate histopathologic examination as a means of diagnosing HPV infection of the male genital tract. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-two consecutive male patients seen at the sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Twelve had condyloma acuminatum, and 80 had papular lesions, macular lesions, or both. Fifteen men without signs of HPV infection served as controls. Biopsy specimens were evaluated morphologically by light microscopy, and HPV DNA detection was performed by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All acuminate lesions were HPV DNA positive with in situ hybridization. Forty papular and/or macular lesions harbored HPV DNA, 28 (35%) of them positive with in situ hybridization and the other 12 (15%) positive with polymerase chain reaction. Morphologic signs attributed to HPV infection were found in HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile lesions, as well as in normal epithelium. In papular and macular lesions, the only criterion associated with HPV DNA positivity was neoplastic changes, which was present in 16 (40%) HPV DNA-positive specimens, compared to 4 (10%) HPV DNA-negative specimens (P < 0.01). Of the 16 lesions with neoplasia, 15 (94%) had detectable HPV DNA of a potentially oncogenic type. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic signs of HPV infection other than neoplasia seem to be of limited value. Detection of the infectious agent, in this case HPV, should be the gold standard for the diagnosis as it is for other infectious diseases. The strong association between neoplasia and potentially oncogenic HPV types makes this issue even more important.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

In situ hybridization for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in gynaecological biopsies. A study of two commercial kits.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in biopsies from the lower genital tract may be requested by clinicians as a complement to ordinary histopathological diagnosis. In the present study, two commercial kits, (Enzo Diagnostics Inc., New York, USA and Biohit, Helsinki, Finland) used for in situ hybridization with biotinylated c-DNA probes were compared and the HPV-expression was evaluated in relation to histopathological findings. The Enzo kit identifies HPV-types 6/11, 16/18, 18 and 31/33/51, whereas the Biohit kit has separate probes for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31 and 33, but none for HPV 51. The usefulness of a general probe (probemix) for the visualization of HPV irrespective of type (Enzo Diagnostics Inc.) was also studied Altogether 226 biopsies from the lower female genital tract were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and processed for routine histopathological grading. Consecutive sections were employed for in situ hybridization. 50 biopsies were subject to double-testing with Enzo and Biohit, whereas 176 were tested with Enzo only. Of the double-tested biopsies, 30% displayed a nuclear staining with the Enzo kit and 28% with the Biohit kit. It is concluded that the probes of these two kits have the same sensitivity in detecting HPV in tissue sections. Condylomata acuminata were HPV-positive in 81%, mostly for types 6/11. Flat condylomas were HPV-positive in 35%. The HPV-positivity of biopsies with low grade SIL (I) was 50% and that of high grade SIL (II and III) was 37%. High grade SIL contained either HPV-types 16/18 or 31/33/51. A correlation was found between the occurrence of koilocytosis and the presence of HPV-DNA. HPV-expression was most easily visualized in condylomata acuminata. In epithelium of normal appearance or with inflammatory alterations HPV-DNA was not seen.

Biopsy↗