Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Schreiner-Karoussou

Publications and source records attributed to A Schreiner-Karoussou.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.

The potential for decreasing patient dose is one of the main arguments for the justification of the cost of digital imaging equipment. However, the literature review with respect to patient doses using digital imaging modalities, presents conflicting results. During this study, patients' entrance surface doses were measured for three simple radiographic examinations, in European centres equipped with a computed radiography digital system. Results showed that doses between centres varied from 30% for chest LAT to 250% for chest PA examination. With the digital image quality criteria still under discussion, and with the post-processing parameters and/or image documentations varying, any dose comparisons between conventional/digital systems, as well as dose comparisons between different centre using digital units, are difficult. Clinical trials are required in order to define reference levels associated with quality of digital image necessary to address specific clinical requirements.

Humans↗

Review of image quality standards to control digital X-ray systems.

A literature review was carried out on quality criteria for the evaluation of image quality for interventional radiology, digital subtraction angiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography systems. Existing national and international standards were also reviewed. Recommendations for image quality standards for digital X-ray systems are proposed.

Humans↗

Dose optimisation in computed radiography.

After the installation of computed radiography (CR) systems in three hospitals in Luxembourg a patient dose survey was carried out for three radiographic examinations, thorax, pelvis and lumbar spine. It was found that the patient doses had changed in comparison with the patient doses measured for conventional radiography in the same three hospitals. A close collaboration between the manufacturers of the X-ray installations, the CR imaging systems and the medical physicists led to the discovery that the speed class with which each radiographic examination was to be performed, had been ignored, during installation of the digital imaging systems. A number of procedures were carried out in order to calibrate and program the X-ray installations in conjunction with the CR systems. Following this optimisation procedure, a new patient dose survey was carried out for the three radiographic examinations. It was found that patient doses for the three hospitals were reduced.

Humans↗

Practical implementation of the medical exposure directive (97/43) in Luxembourg.

The medical exposure Directive of 1984 was updated in 1997 (EURATOM 97/43) and should be implemented into national legislation before May 2000. Need for harmonisation exists in Europe, as differences in the application of ionising radiation exist throughout European countries and social mobility of the population is increasing. The context of the justification/optimisation process as well as specific characteristics of national health legislation and Social Security legislation and their impact on radiation protection of the patient, are presented. Existing differences in the justification process throughout Europe are: (i) prescribing process of the X ray examination, training of the prescriber, (ii) auto-referral; (iii) economic situation in the member states. The optimisation process is mainly sensitive to: (i) 'culture' of radiation protection in each national medical community; (ii) training; (iii) technical and clinical audits; (iv) quality assurance.

European Union↗

The quality assurance and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems.

X ray procedures which involve fluoroscopy often give significant radiation doses to patients. A valuable radiation protection procedure is the adoption of a quality assurance programme which will ensure the continual production of optimal quality images with the minimum necessary dose to the patient. Various publications exist which provide information on quality assurance (QA) and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems. These publications were reviewed and tests recommended for QA and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems are presented. It was found that not much information exists on QA and constancy checking for digital subtraction angiography and digital fluorography systems. More research is required in this field. Information on protocols used by various countries of the European Community for QA and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems was gathered. From this information it is apparent that there is a need for harmonisation within Europe.

European Union↗