Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A S Feng

Publications and source records attributed to A S Feng.

65 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1980

Method for tracing single fibers in the organ of Corti with horseradish peroxidase.

A method based on the axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) has been developed to trace single fibers in the organ of Corti. HRP was injected into the auditory nerve or cochlear nucleus of the adult chinchilla, and the entire cochlea was subsequently incubated for reaction product. Of most significance was the Golgi-like labelling of single radial afferents innervating the inner hair cells. Heretofore, radial afferents have been difficult to trace with more conventional staining techniques, especially in adult animals. Outer spiral fibers, presumably afferent, were also labelled in one of the cochleas.

Animals↗
PubMed1980

Directional characteristics of the acoustic receiver of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens): a study of eighth nerve auditory responses.

The directional characteristics of the peripheral auditory system were assessed from studying the effects of sound direction on the responses of single auditory fibers in the eighth nerve of leopard frogs (Rana pipiens). Two types of directional response characteristics were observed which are correlated with the best excitatory frequency of the afferent fiber. Low-frequency sensitive neurons possessed V-shaped directional-response curves with a null at the frontal sound field. High-frequency sensitive neurons, on the other hand, showed a strong response to sound coming from the ipsilateral field with a progressively weaker response as the sound source was rotated to the frontal and contralateral field. Two directional cues were revealed: pressure variation at the eardrum and the directionality of the acoustic receiver system. The relative weight contributed by each factor also varies with frequency.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

Echo detection and target-ranging neurons in the auditory system of the bat Eptesicus fuscus.

Some of the neurons in the nucleus intercollicularis and auditory cortex of the echolocating bat Eptesicus fuscus respond selectively to sonar echoes occurring with specific echo delays or pulse-echo intervals. They do not respond for a wide range of other types of sounds or for sonar echoes at longer or shorter pulse-echo intervals; they may, therefore, be specialized for detection and ranging of sonar targets.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

Postsynaptic potentials in pacemaker cells: a correlation of behavior in command cells of an electric fish.

Intracellular recordings were made from pacemaker-command cells of the electric organ discharge (EOD) of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. The fish was immobilized with gallamine triethiodide (Flaxedil) which silenced the EOD. A simulated EOD of this fish (ca. 300 Hz) and a sine wave simulating a neighbor, a few Hz higher (+deltaF) or lower (-deltaF) were introduced into the bath to elicit the "jamming avoidance response" (JAR), monitored through the pacemaker potential. We observed that accompanying the JAR there is a minute hyperpolarizing postsynaptic potential (hpsp) superimposed on the pacemaker potential. A shift in the phase of the hpsp occurs with a change in the sign of deltaF, and therefore of the JAR. Assuming that the behaviorally correlated hpsp is inhibitory, it suggests that mutual inhibition may play a role in regulating the synchronous firing frequency of command neurons, which are electrically coupled with one-another. Scheich and Bullock (1974) proposed a neuronal scheme for the JAR in which they suggest that two systems (P and T) operate together in the nervous system. The T system affects the pacemaker cells at a precise, variable phase of the pacemaker cycle. Although the present results indeed reveal a shift in the hpsp with a change in the sign of deltaF, the actual significance of this shift remains to be evaluated. The unexpected direction of the shift suggests either that the hpsp is excitatory at the phases when it occurs, or that effectiveness of inhibition decreases at later phases in this case instead of increasing as in other cases, or that the hpsp opposes the JAR. The parallel P system is probably more important in explaining the JAR, acting by a DC level control rather than a phase control.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1977

The role of the electrosensory system in postural control of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens.

The role of the electrosensory inputs in postural control was examined in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. These fish exhibit tonic postural tilt in response to a tilted plexiglas substrate in both transverse and longitudinal planes (rolling and head-up pitching responses, respectively), but not to electrically "transparent" agar substrate. The fish's pitching and rolling responses were abolished when the electrosensory inputs from the trunk were bilaterally eliminated even though the fish's visual and mechanosensory lateral-line systems remained intact. Unilateral lesion abolished the rolling response but not the pitching response. These results demonstrate the functional role of the electrosensory system in postural control, in addition to its known role in social communication and in object location, and the underlying neuronal mechanism is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1977

Neuronal mechanisms for object discrimination in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens.

The peripheral sensory basis for object discrimination was investigated in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. Single unit recordings were made from the primary afferent fibres in the posterior branch of the anterior lateral line nerve while the local electric field (self-generated and stimulated) was modified by external resistance and capacitance shunts. Both fibre types (probability and phase coders) responded differentially to capacitance and resistance shunts of equivalent impedence. The degree of response differentiation between the two shunting conditions varied with the intensity of the electrical stimulus at the receptor. These data suggest that the primary electroreceptors can discriminatively encode the two electrical characteristics of 'objects'. However, since the response of primary electroreceptors also varied with the spatial orientation of the shunting electrodes, central structures must play an important role in object discrimination.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1976

Sound localization in anurans. I. Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana).

1. The response patterns of single cells to monaural and binaural acoustic stimuli were studied in the dorsal medullary nucleus of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). This nucleus represents the first ascending center in the anuran's central auditory nervous system. 2. Of the 142 cells isolated, 75 units responded only to monaural stimulation. Approximately 80% of these monaural cells could be excited by the ipsilateral ear, while the remaining 20% received their excitatory input from the contralateral ear. The other 67 units responded to binaural stimuli. Of these binaural cells, 14 could be excited by either contralateral or ipsilateral stimuli, and the threshold and best excitatory frequency were similar for each ear (EE). The other 53 binaural cells (EI) could be excited by stimulation of one ear and inhibited by stimulation of the other ear; for almost all of these cells the contralateral ear was excitatory and the ipsilateral ear was inhibitory. The best inhibitory frequency for one ear was approximately the same as the best excitatory frequency for the other ear, and the threshold for inhibition was near the threshold for excitation. 3. The tuning curves for all of the cells in the dorsal medullary nucleus were unimodal with "Q" values ranging from 0.4 to 4. The excitatory thresholds were widely scattered between 22 and 115 dB SPL. 4. The distribution of best excitatory frequencies for the monaural cells comprised three groups: 200-300, 500-800, and 900-1,600 Hz. The best excitatory frequencies of the binaural cells were scattered over this entire range, with a broad peak around 200-800 Hz. 5. Approximately 80% of the cells in the dorsal nucleus responded tonically throughout the duration of an excitatory tone burst. The remaining 20% of the cells responded phasically during the transient stages of a tone burst over a wide intensity range. 6. Response latencies were compared for the two types of monaural cells to tones at their best exciatatory frequencies at 10 dB above threshold. The latencies for the contralaterally excitable cells were just a few milliseconds longer than the latencies for the ipsilaterally excitable cells. For binaural cells the latency for contralateral stimulation was only 1-2 ms longer than for ipsilateral stimulation. It was concluded that the contralateral input to the dorsal medullary nucleus is not of efferent descending origin from higher auditory centers. 7. All of the binaural EI cells were sensitive to small interaural intensity differences and many were also sensitive to minute interaural time differences. These cells likely play a role in localization of sounds of significance to anurans.

Action Potentials↗