Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A S Coates

Publications and source records attributed to A S Coates.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Survival of patients with visceral metastatic melanoma from an occult primary lesion: a retrospective matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma presents as metastatic disease without an apparent primary in about 4% of cases. These are referred to as occult primary melanoma (OPM). It is not known whether these represent de novo malignant transformation in non-cutaneous sites or the disappearance of an unrecognised primary, perhaps on an immunological basis. We hypothesised that OPM might have a superior prognosis compared to patients with similar disease extent from a known primary lesion (KPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort survival study of 146 patients with OPM and visceral metastases treated at the Sydney Melanoma Unit between 1983 and 1996. A control group of patients with KPM was matched for age, sex and site of visceral metastases. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis of visceral metastases. RESULTS: Patients with OPM had a median survival of 233 days, significantly longer than the 176 days for those with KPM (P = 0.024; logrank test). Multivariate analysis allowing for simultaneous or prior involvement of lymph nodes, subcutaneous tissues or bone, and site of visceral involvement showed a significantly superior survival for OPM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.93). A small part of the effect was explained by treatment, but models allowing for this still showed a significantly longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was longer in OPM patients. This may reflect an intrinsically superior host-tumour interaction.

Adolescent↗

Adding adjuvant CMF chemotherapy to either radiotherapy or tamoxifen: are all CMFs alike? The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG).

The first reported effective adjuvant combination regimen for patients with operable breast cancer comprised oral cyclophosphamide (C) days 1-14 with intravenous methotrexate (M) and fluorouracil (F) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days ('classical' CMF). These drugs have since been extensively used with or without endocrine therapies and/or other cytotoxics, as well as with radiation therapy to the chest wall yielding conflicting results. Although doses and schedules have varied widely, the combination of these three drugs has been generically referred to as CMF. Evidence exists that reducing the dose and/or altering the schedule of CMF ('modified' CMF) have compromised its efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. Reduction below standard dose of a similar regimen also gave inferior results in the adjuvant setting. In fact, the recently reported improved outcome of adding radiation therapy to CMF was only demonstrated in comparisons with a 'modified' CMF. Furthermore, trials in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, which did not demonstrate any significant benefit for the addition of adjuvant CMF to tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone, also used 'modified' CMF. Therefore, adherence to the 'classical' dose and schedule is recommended when CMF is used in adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

New treatments for breast cancer: breakthroughs for patient care or just steps in the right direction?

Three areas of clinical research in breast cancer treatment led to news breaking presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, 1998, in Los Angeles. All three subjects represent important advances in cancer medicine. PREVENTION: Two related drugs, tamoxifen and raloxifene, were found in placebo controlled trials to significantly reduce the incidence of breast cancer for women at increased risk of developing the disease. Patterns of relapse showed that the reduced rate of breast cancer was exclusively observed for tumors expressing estrogen receptors, while the rate of tumors classified as estrogen-receptor negative was similar for the treatment and the control groups. This may indicate that the observed reduction in breast cancer incidence is due to a treatment effect on occult disease rather than its prevention. We certainly have no adequate information on mortality prevention. ADJUVANT THERAPIES: Taxol given every three weeks for four courses following an adjuvant treatment with four courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination was found to be superior to not adding treatment after the four courses of AC in a trial involving 3170 patients. At 22 months of median follow-up, the quoted P-values were P = 0.0077 for disease-free survival and P = 0.039 for overall survival, but these did not cross the prospectively defined interim analysis boundaries for statistical significance at the 0.05 level. The difference was observed early during follow-up, and was exclusively seen in the 40% of patients who had ER-negative primaries and, therefore, did not receive tamoxifen following chemotherapy. One may thus argue that the early difference observed was primarily due to differences in the duration of the treatment regimens in the two groups and the early entry into the trial of patients with particularly aggressive neoplasia (e.g., ER-negative primaries) who would have benefited from a longer duration treatment. TREATMENT OF ADVANCED DISEASE: The use of monoclonal antibodies to c-erb-B2 was found to induce responses in metastatic breast cancer. Patients with tumors expressing c-erb-B2 responded to weekly infusions of this biological agent. It was particularly impressive that the response rate for patients receiving infusion of the monoclonal antibodies together with the cytotoxics was superior to that with chemotherapy alone in a randomized trial. It is important to note that only patients with tumors overexpressing c-erbB-2 (the overall incidence is about 20%) were tested. It must still be demonstrated that the effect of these monoclonal antibodies is indeed confined to cells overexpressing c-erbB-2. Treatment related cardiac toxicity remains a problem, and the effects of treatment in various subsets of patients need to be defined before starting investigations in the adjuvant setting, which is a clear further objective of this specific research. The significant findings from clinical research opened several new questions, which must be answered before allowing them to be employed in routine patient care.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Factors affecting baseline quality of life in two international adjuvant breast cancer trials. International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG).

Quality of life (QL) is used to assess treatments in clinical trials but may be influenced by other factors. We analysed the impact of biomedical, sociodemographic and cultural factors on baseline QL indicators in two International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Patients with stage II breast cancer were randomized within 6 weeks of primary surgery to various adjuvant treatments. They were asked to assess five indicators of QL at baseline. QL forms were available for 1231 (83%) of the 1475 premenopausal and 989 (82%) of the 1212 post-menopausal patients, who were from nine countries and spoke seven languages. Culture (defined as language/country groups) had a statistically significant impact on baseline QL measures. Premenopausal patients with poor prognostic factors showed a tendency to report worse QL, with oestrogen receptor status as an independent predictor for mood (P = 0.0005). Older post-menopausal patients reported better emotional wellbeing (P = 0.002), mood (P = 0.002), and less effort to cope (P = 0.0009) compared with younger post-menopausal patients. Co-morbidity, type of surgery, treatment assignment and sociodemographic factors showed a statistically significant impact in post-menopausal patients only. Cultural and biomedical factors influenced baseline QL and should be considered when evaluating the impact of treatment on QL in international breast cancer clinical trials.

Adult↗

Adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dose and schedule may make a difference. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant cytotoxics prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast cancer. The first reported effective adjuvant combination regimen consisted of oral cyclophosphamide on days 1 to 14 with intravenous methotrexate and fluorouracil on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days (classical CMF). These drugs have since been extensively used with or without endocrine therapies and/or other cytotoxic agents. Although doses and schedules have varied widely, the combination of these three drugs is generically referred to as CMF. RESULTS: Reducing the dose and/or altering the schedule of CMF have compromised its efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. Reduction below standard dose of a similar regimen also gave inferior results in the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSION: Details of dose and schedule may therefore explain part of the heterogeneity of results observed with CMF. Particular controversy surrounds the contribution of CMF in postmenopausal women who are also receiving tamoxifen (TAM). However, the trials that demonstrated a significant benefit for the addition of CMF to TAM, even in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, used classical CMF. Therefore, adherence to the classical dose and schedule is recommended when CMF is used in adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine alone, dacarbazine plus interferon (IFN), dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (TMX), or dacarbazine plus IFN plus TMX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-one patients (258 were eligible) were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive one of the above treatments. The trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in survival with 83% power. RESULTS: Nine complete (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed in the patients who received treatments that contained IFN compared with four CRs and 18 PRs in the patients who received treatments that did not contain IFN. Five CRs and 20 PRs occurred in patients treated with TMX compared with eight CRs and 16 PRs in those treated without TMX. Response differences were nonsignificant. The overall median TTF was 2.6 months, and the overall median survival was 8.9 months. There was no significant difference in TTF or survival among any of the different treatments. Poor performance status (PS), hepatic metastases, and weight loss were significant adverse prognostic factors. Twenty-three patients had a TTF greater than 20 months, and these durable responses were evenly distributed among the treatment arms. Significantly more severe and life-threatening toxic events occurred with treatments that contained IFN. CONCLUSION: Neither IFN, TMX, nor the combination significantly improved the response rate, TTF, or survival when added to dacarbazine, but IFN significantly increased toxicity.

Adolescent↗

Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) has developed and approach for assessing the impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life (QL) within the framework of international, multilingual clinical trials. The major steps are summarized. Conceptual, methodological and practical issues are discussed with reference to results of two trials closed to accrual (IBCSG VI, VII) and one subsequent ongoing trial (IBCSG IX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: QL was assessed in pre- and post-menopausal patients with operable breast cancer. Various single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scales were used as indicators of components of QL, including global indicators of well-being, functioning and health perception, and specific indicators of symptoms of disease and treatment. In trials VI and VII, QL was assessed at baseline, during adjuvant treatment and follow-up, and at recurrence. Based on this experience, the QL form was revised for subsequent trials and further investigated in a subsample of patients randomized into trial IX. RESULTS: In trials VI and VII, the QL indicators were responsive to the impact of biomedical factors at baseline, various adjuvant treatments, changes over the first 18 months, and recurrence. In trial IX, the revised QL form was well accepted by patients and staff. Completing this form did not exceed five minutes. QL differences between on and off cytotoxic treatment strengthen the claim that these measures are responsive. Correlations and logistic regression analyses show the expected relationship among the various global and specific indicators. CONCLUSION: Results from two trials closed to accrual and an ongoing trial confirm the feasibility, validity and clinical relevance of the IBCSG approach for studying the impact of adjuvant breast cancer therapy on QL in international clinical trials.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Medroxyprogesterone acetate addition or substitution for tamoxifen in advanced tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: a phase III randomized trial. Australian-New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a strategy of adding medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to tamoxifen (TAM) is superior to the substitution of MPA for TAM among women with advanced breast cancer and disease progressing on TAM. To assess the patterns or response and subsequent progression in sites and tissues according to prior involvement and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred-fifteen postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on TAM after receiving TAM for at least six months were randomized: 109 to add MPA 500 mg/day orally (TAM + MPA), and 106 to stop TAM and to substitute MPA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to complete plus partial response rates: TAM + MPA 10%, MPA 9%, median time to progression TAM + MPA 3.0 months, MPA 4.5 months, or median overall survival, TAM + MPA 17.2 months, MPA 18.4 months. In a multivariate model, prognostic factors significant for a shorter time to disease progression were worse for performance status, involvement of more than one tissue, prior radiotherapy, and shorter time from recurrence after primary therapy to randomization. Adjusting for these factors, treatment with TAM + MPA was associated with a higher relative risk for disease progression, with a hazards ratio of 1.31, but this was not significant (95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.74; P = .067). However, in an exploratory analysis, the time to disease progression, among patients with progesterone receptor positive (PR+) tumors, was 6.3 months with MPA versus 2.9 months with TAM + MPA, with a hazards ratio of 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 3.32; P = .02). There was a significant interaction, P = .04, between PR status and treatment, indicating an advantage to treatment substitution for those who have PR+ tumors. Tumor response occurred in 14% of assessed metastatic sites. Subsequent progression occurred in a new tissue alone in 13% of patients, in both new and previously involved (old) tissues in 76%, and in old tissues only in 11%. In 23% of patients, progression occurred only at a new site, in 50% at both old and new sites, and in 27% only at old sites. No significant differences in the patterns of response or progression were seen in the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Among women with breast cancer whose disease is progressing after at least six months of treatment with TAM, there is no advantage to maintaining TAM when MPA is to be given. An overall effect of treatment on the pattern of failure at old sites or at new sites or tissues cannot be discerned.

Aged↗

Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer is effective but may be toxic. Our aim was to investigate the impact of the presence, timing, and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients' perceptions of their quality of life (QL). METHODS: International Breast Cancer Study Group trial VI assessed adjuvant chemotherapy in 1475 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients, and trial VII assessed adjuvant tamoxifen or chemoendocrine therapy in 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients were asked to complete a QL questionnaire-single-item linear analogue self-assessment scales measured physical wellbeing, mood, appetite, and perceived adjustment/coping. QL was assessed in this way at the beginning of treatment, 2 months after the start of treatment, every 3 months, and at 1 and 6 months after recurrence. FINDINGS: Baseline QL scores decreased as the number of involved axillary nodes increased (for example, mean mood score: 66.1 for women with one positive node, 66.4 for two to four positive nodes, 61.3 for five to nine positive nodes, and 59.1 for ten or more positive nodes; p = 0.008 for trends), and were lower in patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative than in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours (61.4 vs 66.3, p = 0.0009). All treatment groups showed substantial improvement in QL scores during adjuvant therapy. Patterns of QL scores reflected presence, duration, and timing of cytotoxic treatment. Longer initial cytotoxic therapy delayed improvement in QL scores. Later cytotoxic therapy had transient adverse effects. Anticipation of future therapy also affected QL scores. INTERPRETATION: Overall, chemotherapy had a measurable adverse effect on QL, but this effect was transient and minor compared with patients' adaptation/coping after diagnosis and surgery. This finding should encourage patients and doctors to choose appropriate adjuvant therapy with less concern for initial toxicity.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Subungual melanoma of the hand.

Subungual melanoma is a rare but well-recognized tumor of the hand. Its management is ill defined and the factors influencing prognosis have not been well described. The clinicopathologic features of a series of 38 patients with subungual melanoma of the hand are reported. The median thickness was 3 mm, and only seven patients presented with pathologic stage I disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] system). Ulceration and lack of pigmentation were the only significant univariate prognostic indicators. There was no significant difference in local recurrence rates among patients whose amputation was carried out proximal or distal to the interphalangeal joint of the thumb or the middle of the middle phalanx in the other fingers. Management of the regional lymph node field based on the use of selective lymphadenectomy is described.

Adult↗

On the receiving end. V: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993.

BACKGROUND: A study conducted in 1983 to identify and rank the symptoms experienced by patients receiving cancer chemotherapy reported that vomiting and nausea were the most important symptoms experienced. With the advent of new antiemetic regimens and changes in cancer chemotherapy, it was anticipated that changes may have occurred in patient perception of symptoms. The study was therefore repeated in 1993. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a large urban teaching hospital participated in the study. Patients selected from cards listing symptoms all those experienced and the five most troublesome. RESULTS: Patients reported experiencing an average of 20 symptoms (13 physical and 7 psychosocial). Nausea was reported as the most severe symptom followed by tiredness and loss of hair. Vomiting which was the most severe symptom in 1983, now ranked 5th. Differences were detected in the symptoms experienced and reported as most severe, between chemotherapy regimens, between older and younger patients and between males and females. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a reduction in the severity of some symptoms experienced while receiving chemotherapy and a shift from concerns about physical to psychosocial issues.

Adult↗

The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The addition of low-dose prednisone (p) to the adjuvant regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) allowed patients to receive a larger dose of cytotoxics when compared with those on CMF alone. However, disease-free survival and overall survival were similar for the two groups. To test the hypothesis that low-dose prednisone might influence the efficacy of the cytotoxic regimen used, the toxicity profiles of the two treatment regimens and the patterns of treatment failure (relapse, second malignancy, or death) were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes included in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial I from 1978 to 1981 and randomized to receive CMF or CMFp were analyzed for differences in long-term outcome and toxic events. The 250 patients assigned to CMF and prednisone received on the average 12% more cytotoxic drugs than those who received CMF alone. RESULTS: The 13-year DFS for the CMFp group was 49% as compared to 52% for CMF alone, and the respective OS percents were 59% and 65%. Several toxic effects such as leukopenia, alopecia, mucositis and induced amenorrhea were reported at a similar incidence in the two treatment groups. Using cumulative incidence methodology for competing risks, we detected a statistically significant increase in first relapse in the skeleton for the CMFp group at 13 years follow-up with a relative risk (RR) of 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 3.46; P = 0.004]. Patients with larger tumors in the CMFp regimen were especially subject to this increase with a RR for failure in the skeleton of 3.32 (95% CI, 1.57 to 7.02; P = 0.0005). CMFp-treated patients also had a larger proportion of second malignancies (not breast cancer), with RR of 3.34 (95% CI, 0.91 to 12.31; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose continuous prednisone added to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy enabled the use of higher doses of cytotoxics. This increased dose had no beneficial effect on treatment outcome, but was associated with an increased risk for bone relapses and a small, not statistically significant increased incidence of second malignancies. The effects of steroids, which are widely used as antiemetics (oral or pulse injection) together with cytotoxics, should be investigated to identify their influence upon treatment outcome.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Clinical responses and lymphoid infiltrates in metastatic melanoma following treatment with intralesional GM-CSF.

Past studies in animal models with gene-transfected tumour cells have suggested that GM-CSF may have a role in immunotherapy of tumours as a result of the effects it has on antigen-presenting cells. The present (phase I) studies were carried out to examine whether intralesional injections of GM-CSF induce regression of subcutaneous metastases in patients with melanoma and influence lymphoid infiltrates in and around the metastases. Thirteen patients had 15-50 mg doses of GM-CSF injected into two subcutaneous metastases. In each case one metastasis received only five injections before excision whereas the other received weekly injections up to 6 months. Partial regression of injected and/or non-injected metastases was seen in three patients. The metastases from the responding patients that were treated with intralesional GM-CSF had marked increases and high absolute numbers of T cell infiltrates into the tumour, particularly of the CD4 T cell subset. There was an increase in IL-2R expression on the T cells and an increase in the number of Langerhans' cells infiltrating the tumours. The best predictors of clinical responses therefore appeared to be high relative increases and high absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells and Langerhans' cells within the treated tumour. These results provide support for further exploration of the role of GM-CSF in immunotherapy of human melanoma.

Adult↗

Routine tests during follow-up of patients after primary treatment for operable breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)

BACKGROUND: Follow-up tests for patients after diagnosis and primary treatment of breast cancer are routinely performed. However, the usefulness of these follow-up parameters remains unclear. We determined the yield of a variety of blood tests used to detect the presence of overt metastatic disease. METHODS: 4105 patients enrolled in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trials from 1978 to 1985 were analyzed for abnormal or equivocal findings in six routine blood tests obtained every 3 months for the first two years, every six months for years 3-5 and yearly thereafter. The relationship of test results to the occurrence of overt metastatic disease was evaluated. The relapses were categorized as follows in order to estimate the yield of the different tests for relevant sites of metastases: any breast cancer relapse, bone +/- other; liver +/- other. RESULTS: Alkaline phosphatase alone was abnormal in a high proportion of patients with either bone metastases, liver metastases, or both. SGOT and gamma-GT were also sensitive for patients with liver metastases. Bilirubin, serum calcium, and serum creatinine were relatively insensitive indicators of relapse. Abnormal test results were reported sometime during a patient's disease-free period for 3% to 6% of patients, depending on the test. CONCLUSIONS: Alkaline phosphatase was the most effective blood test to distinguish patients with relapse from those without relapse. It is inexpensive and its yield is relatively high for predicting liver and bone metastases. The routine use of the other tests analyzed to detect metastases was not justified.

Breast Neoplasms↗