Age-stratified mutation patterns in early-onset colorectal cancer reveal distinct molecular features and therapeutic implications.
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in younger adults, with evidence that early-onset cases (age <50 years) differ in the spectrum of prevalent gene mutations compared with older individuals. To evaluate how these age-related differences may inform testing guidelines and therapeutic development, we examined mutation rates of the most prevalent gene mutations across four age-stratified cohorts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicogenomic data were obtained from Memorial Sloan Kettering Center for Harmonized Onco-genomic Research Dataset and China Pan-Cancer cohorts available in cBioPortal. A total of 6762 samples were analyzed. Mutation frequencies for a comprehensive panel of the 100 most prevalent CRC genes were compared across four age groups: 18-29 (n = 79), 30-39 (n = 402), 40-49 (n = 1064), and ≥50 (n = 5217) using chi-square analysis. False discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons was carried out using Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: Statistically significant variation in mutation frequency across age groups was seen in 22 key genes. APC mutations increased with age and were seen in 49.4% of patients in the 18-29 group, 69.7% in 30-39, 73.3% in 40-49, and 75.25% of patients ≥50 (P < 0.001, FDR < 0.001). The oldest cohort was more than three times more likely to have an APC mutation than the youngest [odds ratio (OR) = 3.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-5.74, P < 0.001]. In contrast, SMAD4 mutations were twice as common in the youngest age group at 31.6% compared with those over 40, with a prevalence of 17.29% in patients 40-49, and 18.84% in patients over 50 (OR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.26-3.27, P < 0.001, FDR < 0.001). POLE mutations peaked in the 30-39 age group with a prevalence of 10.7% compared with 6.3% in patients aged 18-29, 4.9% in patients aged 40-49, and 5.9% in patients aged ≥50 (P < 0.001, FDR < 0.001). Individuals in the 30-39 group were nearly twice as likely to carry a POLE mutation compared with those over 40 (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.41-2.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in mutations of key genes including a lower prevalence of APC mutations and increased SMAD4 mutations in younger individuals provides further supporting evidence that early-onset CRC may represent a distinct biological subtype of CRC. Enrichment of POLE mutations in younger patients highlights the importance of expanded molecular profiling in early-onset CRC, which could help identify patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and advance personalized treatment strategies in CRC. Together, these findings reinforce the need to approach early-onset CRC as a distinct biological entity and ensure that appropriate molecular assays are incorporated to guide care.