Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Reis

Publications and source records attributed to A Reis.

222 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.

Fracture of anterior teeth by trauma is a common problem in children and teenagers. Complex metal-ceramic crowns with considerable loss of remaining sound structure are no longer necessary due to adhesive techniques, such as composite restorations and re-attachment techniques. This study compared the fracture strength of sound and restored anterior teeth using a resin composite and four re-attachment techniques. A "one bottle" adhesive system (One-Step, BISCO) and a dual cure resin cement (Duo-Link, BISCO) were applied. Thirty-five sound permanent lower central incisors were fractured by an axial load applied to the buccal area and randomly divided into five groups. The teeth were restored as follows: 1) bonded only = just bonding the fragment; 2) chamfer-group = after bonding, a chamfer was prepared on the enamel at the bonding line and filled with composite; 3) overcontour group = after bonding, a thin composite overcontour was applied on the buccal surface around the fracture line; 4) internal dentinal groove = before bonding, an internal groove was made and filled with a resin composite; 5) resin composite group = after a bevel preparation on the enamel edge, the adhesive system was applied and the fractured part of the teeth rebuilt by resin composite. Restored teeth were subjected to the same loading in the same buccal area. Fracture strength after restorative procedure was expressed as a percentage of the original fracture strength and the results analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis. The mean percentages of fracture strength were: Group 1: 37.09%, Group 2: 60.62%, Group 3: 97.2%, Group 4: 90.54% and Group 5: 95.8%. It was concluded that the re-attachment techniques used in Groups 3 and 4, as well as the composite restored group (Group 5), were statistically similar and reached the highest fracture resistance, similar to the fracture resistance of sound teeth.

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate↗
PubMedDate not supplied

One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations.

This study evaluated the clinical performance of four packable resin composite restorative materials in posterior teeth (Class I and II) compared with one hybrid composite after one year. Eighty-four restorations were placed in 16 patients. Each patient received at least five restorations. The tested materials were: (1) Solitaire + Solid Bond; (2) ALERT + Bond-1; (3) Surefil + Prime & Bond NT (4) Filtek P60 + Single Bond and; (5) TPH Spectrum + Prime & Bond 2.1. All restorations were made using rubber dam isolation, and the cavity design was restricted to the elimination of carious tissue. Deeper cavities were covered with calcium hydroxide and/or glass ionomer cement. In shallow and medium cavities, no protection was performed except for the respective adhesive system used in each group. Each adhesive system and resin composite was placed according to the manufacturer's instructions. One week later, the restorations were finished/polished and evaluated according to the USPHS modified criteria. All patients attended the one-year recall, and the 84 restorations were evaluated at that time based on the same evaluation criteria. The scores were submitted to statistical analysis (Chi-square test, p<0.05). Solitaire and TPH showed some fractures at marginal ridges. Solitaire, ALERT and TPH showed some concerns related to color match and surface texture. Surefil and Filtek P60 showed an excellent clinical performance after one year.

Composite Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reattachment of fractured teeth: a review of literature regarding techniques and materials.

Anterior crown fractures are a common form of injury that mainly affects children and adolescents. The position of maxillary incisors and their eruptive pattern carries a significant risk for trauma. In the pre-adhesive era, fractured teeth needed to be restored either with pin-retained inlays or cast restorations that sacrificed healthy tooth structure and were a challenge for clinicians to match with adjacent teeth. The development of adhesive dentistry has allowed dentists to use the patient's own fragment to restore the fractured tooth. Since then, several successful case reports that use a variety of techniques and materials to reattach fractured teeth have been published. This article presents a comprehensive literature review on techniques and materials used to restore uncomplicated dental trauma.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improved outcome of rat lung transplantation with modification of the nonsuture external cuff technique.

BACKGROUND: The development of lung transplantation in inbred rats has simplified immunologic studies concerning lung allografts. Unfortunately, up to now, such models have been limited by the high level of surgical expertise required. METHODS: In this study 92 rats underwent left lung transplantation with a simplified cuff technique. The feasibility and reliability of this technique was determined by examining graft patency through the use of gross and histologic examination, angiography, and bronchography. RESULTS: On gross examination, grafts looked well perfused and ventilated. Histologic examination showed little evidence of foreign body reaction against the Teflon cuff devices, and angiography showed no abnormalities; however, bronchography did show signs of airway stricture at the site of the anastomosis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the nonsuture external cuff technique with Teflon devices represents a reliable, safe, and fast method for performing orthotopic left lung transplantation in the rat.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗