Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A R Wolf

Publications and source records attributed to A R Wolf.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Propofol and alfentanil in children: infusion technique and dose requirement for total i.v. anaesthesia.

We estimated the dose of propofol (initial dose followed by a stepped infusion) when given with two different infusion rates of alfentanil for total i.v. anaesthesia in 59 children aged 3-12 yr. Patients in series 1 (four groups) received an alfentanil loading dose of 85 micrograms kg-1 and an infusion of 65 micrograms kg-1 h-1. Patients in series 2 (groups 5 and 6) received an alfentanil loading dose of 65 micrograms kg-1 and infusion of 50 micrograms kg-1 h-1. Parents gave their informed consent. Premedication comprised temazepam 0.3 mg kg-1. Glycopyrronium 5 micrograms kg-1 was administered and anaesthesia induced and maintained with alfentanil (loading dose and infusion) followed by propofol (loading dose and three-stage manual infusion scheme). Suxamethonium 1 mg kg-1 was used to facilitate tracheal intubation and the lungs were ventilated artificially to normocapnia with 30% oxygen in air. Probit analysis was used to determine the dose requirement of propofol. In series 1, the ED50 was 6.0 mg kg-1 h-1 (95% confidence limits 5.5-6.2 mg kg-1 h-1) and ED95 8.6 (6.8-7.8) mg kg-1 h-1. Corresponding values for series 2 were ED50 7.5 (8.0-9.8) mg kg-1 h-1 and ED95 10.5 (9.6-13.1) mg kg-1 h-1.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Combined morphine-bupivacaine caudals for reconstructive penile surgery in children: systemic absorption of morphine and postoperative analgesia.

We wished to determine if the addition of a small dose of morphine (0.05 mg.kg-1) to a caudal solution of 0.25% bupivacaine could extend the duration of analgesia after major reconstructive penile surgery and also to measure the systemic absorption of morphine after caudal injection. Thirty children undergoing reconstructive penile surgery received a caudal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine 0.75 ml.kg-1 with or without morphine 0.05 mg.kg-1. All patients awoke pain-free, but eight of the fifteen patients receiving bupivacaine alone required supplementary injections of opioid postoperatively, whereas none of the patients receiving the bupivacaine-morphine mixture required additional opioids. The incidence of side-effects was similar for the two groups. Morphine was absorbed rapidly after caudal injection to reach a peak plasma level of 21.2 (+/- 4.8) ng.ml-1 at ten minutes and then fell to 10.1 (+/- 3.8) ng.ml-1 at one hour and 4.1 (+/- 2.6) ng.ml-1 at three hours. These levels are low compared with plasma levels associated with systemic analgesia. We conclude that the extended duration of analgesia from morphine 0.05 mg/kg given caudally is due at least in part to specific spinal analgesia.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1990

Postoperative analgesia after paediatric orchidopexy: evaluation of a bupivacaine-morphine mixture.

The value of combining morphine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia was investigated. Thirty children, undergoing orchidopexy, received a caudal block of 0.125% bupivacaine with or without morphine 0.05 mg kg-1. Analgesia, side-effects, ventilatory frequency and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were recorded after operation. None of the 15 patients receiving the bupivacaine-morphine mixture required post-operative opioids, whereas eight of 15 patients receiving bupivacaine alone needed additional opioid analgesia. The incidence of side effects after surgery was similar for the two groups and there was no detectable difference in ventilatory frequency or SaO2.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1988

Fresh gas formulae do not accurately predict end-tidal PCO2 in paediatric patients.

To determine the fresh gas flow (FGF) requirements in paediatric patients, we measured the FGFs needed to maintain distal end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) values at 30 and 38 mmHg in patients weighing between 3.8 and 20 kg ventilated with either a Sechrist Infant Ventilator IV-100B or an Air-Shields Ventimeter and a Mapleson D circuit. The FGF requirement was 500 ml.kg-1.min-1 to maintain a PETCO2 of 30 mmHg and 250 ml.kg-1.min-1 to maintain a PETCO2 of 38 mmHg when minute ventilation greater than or equal to FGF. When these formulae were used in a subsequent group of similar patients, a wide variation in PETCO2 measurements were obtained. We conclude that the safest and most accurate approach to determine the FGF requirement of paediatric patients is to continuously monitor the PETCO2 in each patient and to adjust the FGF accordingly.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1987

A modified Pitot tube for the accurate measurement of tidal volume in children.

A device using modification of a Pitot tube has been designed for measurement of tidal volume in infants and small children. Its accuracy was compared both n vitro and n vivo to that of a calibrated pneumotachograph (Fleish #1) designed for a similar flow range. In vitro measurement of air flow with the modified Pitot tube (MPT) was within 5% of the pneumotachograph readings over a range of 1-60 l/min. Similar accuracy was found with measurement of tidal volumes from 20 ml to 1 l, delivered by a calibrated volume-cycled ventilator using a variety of inspiratory flow rates. Tidal volume measurements with the MPT were compared to the pneumotachograph using helium, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and a range of nitrous oxide/oxygen mixtures. A manual control was incorporated into the MPT electronics to allow direct measurements of tidal volume with different nitrous oxide/oxygen concentrations. In vivo, the insertion of the MPT into the patient circuit caused no apparent changes in ventilatory parameters in children under 20 kg. Measurement of tidal volumes with the MPT agreed to within 8% of pneumotachograph readings. The low dead space (1.5 cc) and light weight (12 gm) of the MPT confer advantages over the pneumotachograph (15 ml dead space and a weight of 90 gm) for routine use in pediatric anesthesia.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pain in children.

Children, and particularly neonates, often receive inadequate pain relief after surgery. In this review we describe the important physiological and pharmacological differences between babies and children, and discuss practical aspects of pain assessment and relief.

Analgesics↗