Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A R Margulis

Publications and source records attributed to A R Margulis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Radiology at the turn of the millennium.

Herein, the authors (a) review the status of the specialty; (b) report and analyze the various areas in which progress has occurred, namely, conventional radiology and picture archiving and communication systems (or PACS), ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine; and (c) discuss the problems radiology faces as it enters the new millennium. The problems are those facing medicine as a whole, as well as those threatening the future of radiology. These include the following: Will there be a need for radiologists in the future? Will radiology be too costly to be affordable? How can turf wars and fragmentation be solved? Possible remedies are suggested. Positive aspects are discussed in the light of the challenge to demonstrate value. Medical imaging is entering the new millennium with a solid record of recent advances in digital, cross-sectional, and interventional radiology. These advances have made the specialty indispensable in the treatment of patients. Careful statesmanship will be needed to solve the many problems that face medicine as a whole and radiology in particular.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMed2000

Gastrointestinal radiology in the United States: An overview of the past 50 years.

Gastrointestinal radiology has expanded its scope beyond conventional abdominal radiography, barium studies, and cholecystography. Ultrasonography allows imaging of solid abdominal organs and the intestine without the use of radiation. Computed tomography now allows comprehensive assessment of abdominal and pelvic inflammatory and infectious processes, obstruction, tumor detection and staging, and display of vasculature and blunt trauma effects that were not possible 50 years ago. Magnetic resonance imaging provides multiplanar imaging to the same degree, without the use of radiation. Barium studies of the gastrointestinal tract, enteroclysis for small-bowel assessment, and conventional radiography still have a role, despite the extensive use of fiberoptic endoscopy. Fluoroscopy is still important, but great advances in technologies have changed gastrointestinal radiology irrevocably.

Digestive System↗
PubMed1992

Proceedings of a National Cancer Institute workshop: MR spectroscopy and tumor cell biology.

In December 1991, the National Cancer Institute held a workshop to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy in human cancer biology. The clinical and basic cancer research issues requiring use of MR spectroscopy, the advantages and limitations of MR spectroscopy, and future directions in MR spectroscopy of cancer were discussed. Consensus-building panels were formed on the following four topics: cell membrane biochemistry, tumor therapeutic response or drug resistance, appropriate model systems, and potential clinical applications of MR spectroscopy. The workshop members concluded that large prospective clinical studies as well as in vivo animal and human studies to define prognostic variables should be performed, with correlation between MR spectroscopic results and biochemical and physiologic features. Studies of phospholipid metabolism, the pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents, and effects of new cancer treatments on the tumor vasculature and normal tissues are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed1991

Gastrointestinal radiology from the time of Walter B. Cannon to the 21st century.

From its very inception, gastrointestinal radiology was at the forefront of radiology, combining physiologic and anatomic information. From evaluation of esophageal motility to the first depiction of gastric ulcers and carcinomas of the alimentary tube, gastrointestinal radiology became indispensable to physicians and surgeons. Improvements in fluoroscopic and radiographic equipment, the tilting table, the image intensifier with the television train, the introduction of selective visceral angiography with safer contrast media and, more recently, digital subtraction angiography, digital ultrasound (US), color Doppler US, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging--all of these advances have made imaging diagnosis more precise and specific. A new modality--localized tissue MR spectroscopy--should offer an insight into metabolism and suggest optimal modes of treatment and follow-up. The gastrointestinal radiologist of the future will have to be multimodality trained. A new generation of alimentary tract interventional radiologists will further the trend toward less invasive surgical therapy. No end of advances is in sight.

Biliary Tract↗
PubMed1989

Hepatic neoplasia: breath-hold MR imaging.

Twenty-seven patients with hepatic neoplasms were prospectively examined at 0.35 T with multisection magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during a single breath hold. The procedures included a spin-echo (SE) sequence with a repetition time (TR) of 250 or 125 msec and an echo time (TE) of 15 msec (TR/TE = 250 or 125/15) and gradient-echo (GRE) partial-flip sequences at 250 or 125/20 in phase and 250 or 125/12 out of phase (flip angle of 70 degrees). These procedures were compared with conventional multiacquisition sequences at SE 250/15 (n = 8) in the same patients. GRE partial-flip sequences with a large flip angle provided the optimum combination of contrast and signal-to-noise ratio for imaging hepatic neoplasms, with a signal-difference-to-noise ratio that for in-phase images was 93% greater and for out-of-phase images was 53% greater than that of the SE images. The use of in-phase TEs was preferable to maintain tissue contrast, and presaturation pulses were employed to eliminate vascular pulsation artifacts. All breath-hold procedures provided suppression of motion artifacts superior to that of the short TR, short TE multiacquisition SE imaging. Such sequences should become indispensable for MR imaging of the upper abdomen.

Humans↗