Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Perrier

Publications and source records attributed to A Perrier.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism and decision analysis].

Decision analysis has greatly benefited to the field of pulmonary embolism diagnosis, by allowing the theoretical assessment of potential novel strategies, which could in turn be validated in clinical trials. The adjunction of clinical probability assessment, plasma D-dimer measurement, and lower limb venous compression ultrasonography, to pulmonary scintigraphy and angiography in the diagnostic workup, results in a considerable reduction in the requirement for angiography. Moreover, these strategies are highly cost-effective, yielding cost savings without increasing morbidity or mortality. Such diagnostic algorithms are safe, as demonstrated by clinical outcome studies. Finally, spiral CTscan combined with D-dimer and ultrasonography could also prove highly cost-effective, and replace either pulmonary angiography, or even both lung scan and angiography, if ongoing studies confirm the promising preliminary results obtained with CTscan. However, such a conclusion awaits the validation of algorithms including CTscan by clinical outcome trials, in which the therapeutic decision would rest on the result of the spiral CTscan.

Angiography↗
PubMed1998

Noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

With the development of new methods for detecting pulmonary embolism, the need for angiography has been greatly reduced. Plasma D-dimer assays, lower-limb ultrasonography, and ventilation/perfusion lung scans in combination with the clinical assessment enable safe, cost-effective diagnoses.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler-echocardiography in unselected patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

This study investigates the diagnostic value of echocardiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Doppler-echocardiography was performed in fifty consecutive patients, predominantly presenting in the emergency ward, with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Patients were classified as having or not pulmonary embolism by a sequential non-invasive strategy including lung scan, D-dimer measurement and lower limb venous compression ultrasonography, pulmonary angiography being performed in case of an inconclusive non-invasive work-up. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 36% (18 of 50 patients). Right ventricular dilatation on 2-D echocardiography associated to a tricuspid regurgitation velocity > or =2.7 m/s, corresponding to a pulmonary systolic pressure > or =39 mmHg, were present in 12 of the 18 patients (67%) with and in two of the 32 patients (6.3%) without pulmonary embolism. They were, however, absent in five of the 18 patients (28%), in whom the definite diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was made. The combination of these both echocardiographic criteria yielded a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 94%, positive predictive value was 86% and negative predictive value was 83%. The diagnostic performance of these two combined echocardiographic criteria, when present, permitted to reach in patients with a high clinical pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism the post-test probability values above 90%. On the other hand, the absence of these two Doppler-echocardiographic criteria did not allow to exclude pulmonary embolism, except in presence of a low pre-test probability. The findings of our study show that Doppler-echocardiography in patients with high clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism may represent a potentially useful screening technique for the diagnosis of the disease permitting prompt initiation of treatment. However, the method does not allow to exclude pulmonary embolism in all patients with intermediate or high clinical suspicion of the disease.

Dilatation, Pathologic↗
PubMed1997

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic aids in suspected pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive instruments such as plasma D-dimer measurement (DD) and lower-limb compression ultrasonography (US) are being increasingly advocated to reduce the number of necessary angiograms in patients having suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and a nondiagnostic lung scan. We therefore designed a decision analysis model (1) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combining these noninvasive diagnostic aids with lung scan and angiography in the diagnosis of PE and (2) to determine the optimal sequence and combination of tests taking into account the clinical probability of PE. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis based on literature data, including data from a management study in our institution. Six diagnostic strategies were compared with the reference, ie, lung scan followed when nondiagnostic (low or intermediate probability) by angiography. In all strategies, PE was ruled out by a normal or near-normal scan, a negative DD (plasma level below 500 micrograms/L), or a negative angiogram. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed and anticoagulant treatment was undertaken in the presence of a high-probability lung scan, deep vein thrombosis showed by US, or a positive angiogram. In case of a nondiagnostic scan (low or intermediate probability), patients could be either treated or not treated, or undergo other tests, according to the selected strategy. RESULTS: Under baseline conditions (prevalence of PE, 35%), strategies combining DD and US with lung scan, angiography being done only in case of an inconclusive noninvasive workup (DD level > 500 micrograms/L, normal US, and nondiagnostic lung scan), were most cost-effective. This approach yielded a 9% incremental cost reduction and a 37% to 47% decrease in the number of necessary angiograms compared with the reference strategy (scan +/- angiography). For patients with a low clinical probability of PE (< or = 20%), withholding treatment from those with a low-probability lung scan without performing an angiogram proved safe and highly cost-effective (30% cost reduction), provided US showed no deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: The DD test and US are cost-effective in the diagnostic workup of PE, whether performed after or before lung scan, thus allowing centers devoid of lung scanning and/or angiography facilities to screen patients with suspected PE and avoid costly referrals. In patients with a low clinical probability, a low-probability lung scan, and a normal US, treatment may be withheld without resorting to angiography.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1997

D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients.

The plasma level of D-dimer, a fibrin degradation product (FDP), is nearly always increased in the presence of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Hence, a normal D-dimer level (below a cutoff value of 500 micrograms/L by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) may allow the exclusion of PE. To assess the negative predictive value of a D-dimer concentration below 500 micrograms/L in outpatients with suspected PE, and the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment from such patients, we performed D-dimer assays, lower limb venous compression ultrasonography, and lung scans in 671 consecutive outpatients presenting in the Emergency Center of the Geneva University Hospital with suspected PE. Pulmonary angiography was reserved for patients with an inconclusive noninvasive workup. Patients with a normal D-dimer concentration were discharged without anticoagulant treatment and followed for 3 mo. The prevalence of PE was 29%, and D-dimer (using a cutoff of 500 micrograms/L) had a diagnostic sensitivity for PE of 99.5%. Overall diagnostic specificity of D-dimer was 41%, but it was lower among older patients. Of the 198 patients with a D-dimer concentration below the cutoff value, 196 were free of PE, one had a PE, and one had incomplete information because of loss to follow-up. Thus, the negative predictive value of D-dimer concentration fell between 197 of 198 and 196 of 198 cases of PE (99% [95% CI: 96.4 to 99.9]). Using a cutoff value of 4,000 micrograms/L, the overall specificity of D-dimer concentration for PE was 93.1%. In conclusion, a plasma D-dimer concentration below 500 micrograms/L allows the exclusion of PE in 29% of outpatients suspected of having PE. Withholding anticoagulation from such patients is associated with a conservative 1% risk of thromboembolic events during follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Resistance to activated protein C in an unselected population of patients with pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to activated protein C (APC) is the most frequent cause of inherited thrombophilia. This phenomenon has been reported in 10-50% of selected patients with venous thromboembolism, a variation that might result from different degrees of selection in different reports. METHODS: We measured the APC sensitivity ratio in 494 frozen blood samples from unselected consecutive outpatients suspected of pulmonary embolism and referred over a 30-month period to the emergency ward of the University Hospital of Geneva, the only public primary-tertiary care hospital in the region of Geneva (400,000 inhabitants). FINDINGS: Prevalence of resistance to APC was 5.5% (95% Cl 2.4-10.5%) (8/146) in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism and 4.0% (2.2-6.7%) (14/348) in patients in whom the diagnosis could be ruled out (p = 0.66), giving an odds ratio of 1.36 (0.56-3.32). INTERPRETATION: The very different risks of venous thromboembolism in the presence of resistance to APC that have been reported in trials published so far are probably due to variable recruitment conditions. The lower prevalence observed in our totally unselected population of patients with pulmonary embolism may be more representative of the real risk with which clinicians will be confronted. Therefore, more data are needed from various populations of patients with venous thromboembolism to help decide which patients will benefit from screening for resistance to APC.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism].

Several recent studies have clarified the diagnostic strategy for suspected pulmonary embolism. Lung scan is diagnostic in aproximately 30% of patients. The combination of a low clinical probability and a low probability lung scan renders pulmonary embolism unlikely. A plasma D-dimer level lower than 500 micrograms/L measured by an ELISA assay virtually excludes pulmonary embolism. Finding a deep venous thrombosis by lower limb venous compression ultrasonography warrants anticoagulant treatment without resorting to further tests. Pulmonary angiography is usually performed only when the diagnosis remains unclear after noninvasive testing.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

[Ambulatory follow-up in oral anticoagulation: recommendations for clinical practice].

The aim of this investigation performed in 75 outpatients taking oral anticoagulant after an episode of pulmonary embolism was to specify the modalities of ambulatory monitoring during oral anticoagulation. All patients were followed up by their family doctor after hospital discharge. The principal results of this investigation were (1) the general difficulty of obtaining and maintaining anticoagulation stability in a recommended therapeutic range (INR 2-3) for venous thromboembolic disease, (2) that in only 15% of personal anticoagulation notebooks were the laboratory results expressed in INR, (3) the lack of information given to the patients taking oral anticoagulant. Based on these results we started an education programme for nurses and physicians designed to promote the use of INR and to improve the quality of information given to anticoagulated patients. A new anticoagulation monitoring notebook should help medical staff and patients to increase the safety of anticoagulation.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonography: a management study.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the clinical probability of pulmonary emboli sm, plasma D-dimer measurement, and lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography have all been advocated in the workup of suspected pulmonary embolism, to minimize the requirement for pulmonary angiography in patients with nondiagnostic lung scans. However, their contribution has not been assessed prospectively. METHODS: Three hundred eight consecutive patients who came to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism were managed according to a diagnostic protocol that included clinical probability assessment, lung scan, and sequential noninvasive tests: plasma D-dimer measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (a concentration <500 microgram/L ruled out pulmonary embolism) and lower-limb B-mode venous compression ultrasonography (a positive finding was diagnostic of venous thromboembolism). Patients without pulmonary embolism according to the diagnostic workup did not receive anticoagulant treatment. The safety of this approach was assessed by a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: of the 308 patients, 106 (34%) had a diagnostic lung scan (normal in 43 and high probability in 63). For the remaining 202 patients, noninvasive workup was diagnostic in 125 (62%). Pulmonary embolism was ruled out by a low clinical probability and a nondiagnostic scan in 48 patients and a D-dimer level less than 500 microgram/L in 53; pulmonary embolism was established by a high clinical probability and a nondiagnostic scan in seven patients and by a finding of a deep vein thrombosis on ultrasonography in 17. Therefore, only 77 of these 202 patients underwent pulmonary angiography (negative in 55; positive in 22). At 6-month follow-up (completed for 99.4% of the study population), only two of the 199 patients in whom the diagnostic protocol had ruled out pulmonary embolism (1.0% [95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 3.6]) had a thromboembolic event (pulmonary embolism, one; deep vein thrombosis, one). CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis strategy yielded a definitive noninvasive diagnosis in 62% of patients with a nondiagnostic scan and appears to be safe.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Contribution of a new, rapid, individual and quantitative automated D-dimer ELISA to exclude pulmonary embolism.

The performance of a new automated ELISA for a rapid, individual and quantitative measurement of plasma D-dimer (VIDAS D-dimer) has been evaluated. First, a study of 100 patients was performed in order to choose the best couple of antibodies in comparison with an already clinically validated ELISA. Then the results were certified in a prospective study including 195 consecutive patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE). For a cut-off level of 500 ng/ml VIDAS D-dimer showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval 92-100), a specificity of 37.6%, a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 93.3-100) and a positive predictive value of 33.1%. During a 6 months' follow-up no patient (95% CI 0-6.4) with D-dimer < 500 ng/ml presented a new suspicion of venous thromboembolic disease. These results suggest that this rapid and single-dose ELISA provides a very useful tool for the clinician to exclude on a day-to-day basis the diagnosis of PE.

Autoanalysis↗
PubMed1995

Isoniazid preventive therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis sequelae: which patients up to which age?

SETTING: Preventive therapy with isoniazid (INH) is usually recommended for all patients with pulmonary fibrotic lesions compatible with previous tuberculosis (TB). OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal strategy between a 6- to 12-month course of prophylactic INH and therapeutic abstention in different age groups and in patients with severe coexisting diseases that limit life expectancy, such as chronic heart failure (CHF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: A Markov decision analysis model that balances the risk of developing active TB against TB-related mortality, the risk of INH-related hepatitis, and INH-related death. RESULTS: In all groups of patients, prophylactic INH clearly reduced the number of deaths from TB, whereas very few cases died from INH-related toxicity. However, because INH-related deaths occur early, and TB-related deaths occur early or late, the gain in life expectancy was small. Particularly for patients with short survival such as those older than 80 years and those with CHF or COPD, the average gain in life expectancy provided by prophylactic INH did not exceed one week. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms that prophylactic INH is beneficial to all cohort groups of patients. However, in the case of very old age or severe disease, the gain in life expectancy is minimal. In these cases, the decision to give INH prophylaxis should be tailored on an individual basis with special consideration given to the patient and his environment.

Adult↗