Solitary nodular disease and multinodular goiter: a retrospective study on suppressive versus replacement levothyroxine therapy.
The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether patients affected by solitary nodular disease of the thyroid or multinodular goiter had a different clinical outcome when treated with suppressive levo-thyroxine (L-T4) therapy rather than replacement L-T4 therapy. We evaluated, by a retrospective analysis, 36 patients who had received TSH-suppressive L-T4 therapy according to TSH value and 55 who had received replacement L-T4 therapy. Fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroid scan after 131I were evaluated before L-T4 administration, while echographic monitoring of number and dimensions of nodules was recorded prior to and during L-T4 treatment. No difference in duration of L-T4 treatment (about 3 years) was registered between the TSH-suppressive therapy group and replacement therapy group. L-T4 administration in a TSH-suppressive or replacement manner did not induce a numerical or volumetric significant decrease of the main nodule or of the total nodule volume. Our data show that chronic TSH-suppressive therapy does not seem to be better than replacement therapy. Moreover, TSH-suppressive therapy presented a higher risk of adverse events than replacement therapy, thus requiring a more careful check with a higher cost of care.