MMR safety studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A P Fletcher.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The present study was performed both to investigate whether there might be a difference between the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, (SSRIs) with regard to the incidence of withdrawal reactions, and to describe the associated symptoms. From the WHO database, therefore, all case reports from the year of introduction for each of the SSRIs, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline, were retrieved. Sales figures were obtained from Intercontinental Medical Statistics International. The reporting rates were calculated as the number of reports per million defined daily doses (DDDs) sold per year. RESULTS: The reporting rate of withdrawal reactions for paroxetine was found to be higher than that for sertraline and fluoxetine in each of the countries selected for detailed analyses (US, UK and Australia), as well as for all 16 countries combined. Moreover, using the WHO system of organ classification, the ratio of central nervous system to psychiatric withdrawal symptoms was 1.9 and 2.1 for paroxetine and sertraline, respectively, whereas that for fluoxetine was 0.48, indicating a possible qualitative difference between the SSRIs with respect to the nature of the withdrawal syndrome.
Series of well-documented case reports strongly suggest a causal association between tiaprofenic acid and a form of aseptic cystitis, which can cause serious and long-term morbidity if the drug is not withdrawn promptly. These findings are supported in the Australian and UK spontaneous reporting data-bases. Using sales data as the denominator, a comparison of NSAIDs in the WHO drug monitoring data-base indicates that the reaction is specific to tiaprofenic acid and cannot be accounted for by changes in reporting patterns in certain countries or years. Delayed recognition is an important feature of this reaction and possible reasons for this are discussed. Comparison of the risk profiles of seven NSAIDs indicated that tiaprofenic acid had the poorest risk profile, compared with NSAIDs of similar efficacy, when cystitis reports were included. The results suggest that combining spontaneous reports, classified according to severity, with sales data may enhance the ability of drug monitoring data-bases to contribute to risk benefit appraisals.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of discontinuation of and changes in treatment after newly prescribed courses of antihypertensive drugs of the four primary therapeutic classes: beta blocker, calcium channel blocker, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients on an automated database of 1.2 million patients was conducted on visits between 1 October 1992 and 30 September 1993. SETTING: General practices in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 37,643 patients with hypertension receiving a relevant drug in the time period were identified. A new course of treatment in at least one of the four therapeutic classes, defined as a drug not prescribed in the previous four months, was observed in 10,222 patients aged > or = 40 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients changing to other treatment or discontinuing after initiating a new course of treatment, defined as the absence of a refill prescription for the new drug or another in its category within a six month observation period. RESULTS: Changes in or discontinuation of treatment were frequently observed, and by month six continuation rates ranged between 40% to 50% for all four classes of drugs. CONCLUSION: Low rates of continuation with a newly prescribed antihypertensive drug exist regardless of which drug is prescribed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Awareness of the need to continue the safety assessment of new drugs into the post-marketing period has continued to increase over the past few years. The stage has been reached where there is, for all practical purposes, unanimous agreement that all new drugs, particularly those intended for widespread use and/or long-term administration, be subjected to some form of post-marketing monitoring. In many cases nationally sponsored spontaneous reporting systems are claimed to be sufficient to meet the needs without any critical appraisal being made of the suitability or reliability of this method. The adoption of 'pharmacovigilance' (spontaneous reporting) as the system for the whole European Community (EC) emphasizes the faith that has been placed in the system. At a recent symposium (Management Forum, 9-10 March, 1992) on post-marketing safety evaluation, more than half of the 16 papers presented were entirely or predominantly concerned with spontaneous reporting systems, which is a pattern common to other meetings on this topic. The Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) has referred to spontaneous reporting as the cornerstone of post-marketing surveillance which has further endorsed a general feeling of confidence that the system will meet our societal needs even though its scientific capability may be deficient. It is the purpose of this paper to challenge these assumptions and to make an objective appraisal of the various methods available.
Spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the mainstay of national and international drug safety evaluation in the post-approval phase. A major criticism of the method has been a high, but essentially unquantifiable, level of under-reporting by doctors. A direct comparison has been made between spontaneous ADR reporting and an observational event monitoring system for a group of more than 44,000 patients receiving one or other of a group of seven new drugs. The data suggests that under-reporting by the spontaneous system may be as high as 98% for several clinical events believed to be associated with drug treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.