Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Orlando Ortiz

Publications and source records attributed to A Orlando Ortiz.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Computed tomography evaluation of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in asymptomatic patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective radiographic study involving analysis of abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans obtained on patients presenting with clinical conditions other than back pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in patients requiring inpatient or emergency department CT evaluation for unrelated abdominal and pelvic conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are part of a disease process that is thought to be resultant from biomechanical stresses related to bipedal locomotion. The incidence is estimated to be 3% to 10% in the general population. Many of these cases occur without associated symptoms. To our knowledge, there is a relative paucity of data on the use of CT to evaluate the prevalence of these 2 entities in patients seeking medical attention for unrelated conditions. METHODS: Five hundred ten consecutive abdominal and pelvic multi-detector CT scans obtained on a single scanner (Philips MX8000; Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were reviewed. These patients presented with such complaints as abdominal pain and fever, or were imaged as part of their inpatient evaluation for conditions unrelated to lumbar spine pathology. A board certified radiologist and a radiology resident retrospectively evaluated CT scans for lumbar spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and associated degenerative changes. A neuroradiologist confirmed all positive cases. RESULTS: Of the 510 cases examined, there were 29 cases of spondylolysis at L5, corresponding to a prevalence of 5.7%. Twenty-three of the cases demonstrated bilateral spondylolysis and 6 unilateral. Sixteen of the 23 cases of bilateral spondylolysis also had spondylolisthesis, 13 of which were grade I, and 3 of which were grade II. In patients 45 years old and younger who did not have spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis, we observed a 32.2% incidence of sclerosis involving the L5 lumbar pedicles. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a 5.7% prevalence of spondylolysis and a 3.1% prevalence of spondylolisthesis in patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis for unrelated reasons, corresponding to the rate of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis detected in prospective plain radiographic studies. We observed a 1.2% incidence of unilateral spondylolysis, and approximately 67% of these demonstrated contralateral sclerosis. It is suggested in the literature that sclerosis of the contralateral pedicle seen in cases of unilateral spondylolysis may be a compensatory response to mechanical stresses on an unstable lumbar vertebral body.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Radiation safety during spine interventions.

Image-guided spine interventions are being performed by radiologists and other physicians with increased frequency. This article assesses the use of several techniques and devices that can mitigate radiation exposure during interventional procedures. Measurements were obtained on a humanoid phantom with use of various shielding methods. Significant radiation dose reductions as great as 98.7% can be achieved with use of a combination of stationary and mobile lead barriers and operator position. The application of basic radiation physics in combination with prudent radiographic technique can significantly reduce radiation exposure to the operator and other personnel during spine interventions.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Indications for CT in patients receiving anticoagulation after head trauma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head CT is frequently ordered for trauma patients who are receiving anticoagulation. However, whether patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and normal findings on neurologic examination require CT is still debated. The purpose of our study was to assess the use of cranial CT in patients receiving anticoagulants after head trauma and to establish clinical criteria to identify those in this group who do not need emergency CT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving heparin or coumadin who had head trauma and who subsequently underwent cranial CT at a level I trauma center within a 4-year period. Patients were evaluated for mechanism of injury, clinical signs and symptoms of head injury, and type and reason for anticoagulation. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, GCS score, age, and head CT results were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Among them, 82 had no evidence of intracranial injury on CT. Seven patients had evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Patients without hemorrhage had no significant focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 14.8. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage tended to have focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 12.0. CONCLUSION: Patients with head injury, normal GCS scores, and no focal neurologic deficits and who are receiving the anticoagulants heparin or coumadin may not necessarily require emergency CT.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Discography.

Discography is an image-guided spine procedure that provides diagnostic information about the intervertebral disc. This procedure attempts to reproduce a patient's back or neck pain profile. Discography is used to confirm or refute the presence of a discogenic pain source. Additional morphologic information with post-discography computed tomography and manometric measurements of intradiscal pressure are further enhancements to this procedure.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2002

Facet blocks and sacroiliac joint injections.

Facet and sacroiliac joint pathology are not an uncommon cause of back or neck pain. Imaging-guided techniques provide ready access to these synovial joints. Percutaneous injection of the facet or sacroiliac joints yields important diagnostic information as to whether or not the interrogated joint is involved in the patient's pain syndrome. The injection of a steroid-anesthetic mixture into these joints is capable of providing significant, albeit temporary, pain relief.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2002

Kyphoplasty.

Kyphoplasty is a relatively new procedure that is indicated for the treatment of osteoporotic or pathologic compression fractures of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine. This minimally invasive procedure requires imaging guidance. Kyphoplasty entails the inflation of a balloon tamp, prior to the injection of opacified acrylic bone cement, within the compressed vertebral body in an attempt to restore vertebral body height and reduce the associated kyphotic deformity. Preliminary studies show that kyphoplasty, like vertebroplasty, provides significant pain relief in properly selected patients. Definitive demonstration of height restoration and kyphosis correction are still under investigation.

Body Height↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pediatric cervical spine: normal anatomy, variants, and trauma.

Emergency radiologic evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine can be challenging because of the confusing appearance of synchondroses, normal anatomic variants, and injuries that are unique to children. Cervical spine injuries in children are usually seen in the upper cervical region owing to the unique biomechanics and anatomy of the pediatric cervical spine. Knowledge of the normal embryologic development and anatomy of the cervical spine is important to avoid mistaking synchondroses for fractures in the setting of trauma. Familiarity with anatomic variants is also important for correct image interpretation. These variants include pseudosubluxation, absence of cervical lordosis, wedging of the C3 vertebra, widening of the predental space, prevertebral soft-tissue widening, intervertebral widening, and "pseudo-Jefferson fracture." In addition, familiarity with mechanisms of injury and appropriate imaging modalities will aid in the correct interpretation of radiologic images of the pediatric cervical spine.

Cervical Vertebrae↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Preparing a business justification for going electronic.

Exponential advances in the technology sector and computer industry have benefited the science and practice of radiology. Modalities such as digital radiography, computed radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital angiography, and gamma cameras are all capable of producing DICOM compliant images. Text can likewise be acquired using voice recognition technology (VRT) and efficiently rendered into a digital format. All of these digital data sets can subsequently be transferred over a network between machines for display and further manipulation on workstations. Large capacity archiving units are required to store these voluminous data sets. The enterprise components of radiology departments and imaging centers--radiology information systems (RIS) and picture archiving and communications systems (PACS)--have thus undergone a transition from hardcopy to softcopy. When preparing to make transition to a digital environment, the first step is introspective. A detailed SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis, with a focus on the status of "electronic preparedness," ensues. The next step in the strategic planning process is to formulate responses to the following questions: Will this technology acquisition provide sufficient value to my organization to justify the expense? Is there a true need for the new technology? What issues or problems does this technology address? What customer needs will this technology satisfy today and tomorrow? How will the organization's shareholders benefit from this technology? The answers to these questions and the questions that they in turn generate will stimulate the strategic planning process to define demands, investigate technology and investment options, identify resources and set goals. The mission of your radiology center will determine what you will demand from the electronic environment. All radiology practices must address the demand of clinical service. Additional demands based on your mission may include education and research. The investigation of options is probably the most time consuming portion of the analysis. It is in this stage where the system architecture is drafted. Important contributions must be solicited from your information technology division, radiologists and other physicians, hospital administration and any other service where the use of imaging technology information is required and beneficial. Vendors and consultants can be extremely valuable in generating workflow diagrams, which include imaging acquisition components and imaging display components. A request for proposal (RFP) may facilitate this step. A detailed inventory of imaging equipment, imaging equipment locations and use, imaging equipment DICOM compatibility, imaging equipment upgrade requirements, reading locations and user locations must be obtained and confirmed. It is a good idea to take a careful inventory of your resources during the process of investigating system architecture and financial options. An often-ignored issue is the human resource allocation that is required to implement, maintain and upgrade the system. These costs must be estimated and included in the financial analysis. Further, to predict the finances of your operation in the future, a solid understanding of your center's historical financial data is required. This will enable you to make legitimate and reasonable financial calculations using incremental volumes. The radiology center must formulate and articulate discrete clinical and business goals for the transition to a digital environment that are consistent with the institutional or enterprise mission. Once goals are set, it is possible to generate a strategic plan. It is necessary to establish individual accountability for all aspects of the planning and implementation process. A realistic timetable should be implemented. Keep in mind that this is a dynamic process; technology is rapidly changing, as are clinical service demands and regulatory initiatives. It is therefore prudent to monitor the process, make appropriate revisions when necessary and address contingencies as they arise.

Capital Expenditures↗