Biomedical subjects

A Natale

Publications and source records attributed to A Natale.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Whether thrombolytic therapy alters the incidence and clinical outcome of bundle-branch block is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the occurrence of new-onset bundle-branch block, both transient and persistent, in 681 patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction 9 and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Arteries 1 protocols. Each patient underwent continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring for 36 to 72 hours with the Mortara ST monitoring system. Bundle-branch block was characterized as right, left, alternating, transient, or persistent. The overall incidence of bundle-branch block was 23.6% (n = 161), with transient block in 18.4% (n = 125) and persistent block in 5.3% (n = 36). Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n = 89) of the population; left bundle-branch block was found in 7% (n = 48). Alternating bundle-branch block was seen in 3.5% (n = 24) of patients. Left anterior descending artery infarcts accounted for most bundles (54%, n = 79). Patients with bundle-branch block had lower ejection fractions, higher peak creatine phosphokinase levels (P < .0001), and more diseased vessels (P < .019). Mortality rates in patients with and without bundle-branch block were 8.7% and 3.5%, respectively (P < .007). A higher mortality rate was observed in the presence of persistent (19.4%) versus transient (5.6%) or no (3.5%) bundle-branch block (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy reduces the overall mortality rate associated with persistent bundle-branch block. However, persistent bundle-branch block remains predictive of a higher mortality rate than either transient or no bundle-branch block. Continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring provides an accurate characterization of the incidence and type of conduction disturbances after acute myocardial infarction.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope without pharmacologic interventions.

In 54 patients with positive tilt and who refused medical therapy, we observed a significant decrease in the frequency of syncopal spells after diagnosis and counseling. However, symptoms were reported at follow-up by 64.8% of the patients and were predicted by the frequency and total number of syncope episodes before upright tilt.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Undetected ventricular fibrillation in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Prospective comparison of different lead system-device combinations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze redetection problems after unsuccessful shock with different lead systems and devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively analyzed detection and redetection characteristics among transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) using standard bipolar and integrated bipolar sensing. Monophasic and biphasic ICDs were included. Subthreshold shocks were intentionally delivered, and redetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF) was assessed before discharge and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Sensing of VF resulting from antitachycardia pacing and low-energy cardioversion ( < or = 2 J) also was analyzed. Before inclusion in the study, each patient underwent subthreshold shock testing at three different time intervals. Among the 160 ICDs with standard bipolar sensing, 530 VF inductions were analyzed. After the failed shocks, undersensing was more frequent (3% versus 20%, P<.01) but did not remarkably prolong redetection (3.1 +/- 0.8 versus 3.3 +/- 1.1 seconds). Among the 201 ICDs with integrated bipolar sensing, 80 were connected to a CPI device (60 Ventak 1600-Endotak 60 series and 20 PRx II 1715-Endotak 70 series) and 121 to the Ventritex defibrillator (91 Endotak 60 series, 14 TVL systems, and 16 Endotak 70 series). After 252 failed shocks, redetection was prolonged with the CPI system (3.1 +/- 1.4 versus 4.6 +/- 3.6 seconds, P<.05) but did not change after 396 failed shocks with the Ventritex ICD (5.4 +/- 1.9 versus 4.9 +/- 2.2 seconds). This may reflect different nominal settings for detection and redetection. In 9 of 121 patients with Ventritex and 1 of 80 with the CPI ICDs, the devices failed to redetect VF. However, redetection malfunction was never observed in patients with integrated bipolar systems with >6-mm electrode separation. After antitachycardia pacing in 1 patient and a 2-J shock in 1 patient, ventricular tachycardia turned into VF, which was undetected. Both patients used the Endotak 60 series-Cadence combination. None of the patients showing VF undersensing had sudden death at follow-up. Only 3 of the 12 patients with sensing malfunction were on antiarrhythmia drugs at the time of testing. Analysis of endocardial electrograms showed that failure to redetect VF is not associated with a uniform reduction but with a rapid and repetitive change of electrogram amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: Standard bipolar sensing redetects VF more effectively than integrated bipolar sensing. Endocardial electrogram analysis provides insights into the understanding of the mechanism of undersensing, and certain lead-device combinations result in a higher occurrence of VF undersensing. The clinical relevance of this phenomenon remains unknown.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Testing different biphasic waveforms and capacitances: effect on atrial defibrillation threshold and pain perception.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the effect of different tilts and capacitances for biphasic shocks on atrial defibrillation efficacy and pain threshold. BACKGROUND: Although biphasic shocks have been shown to be superior to monophasic shocks, the effect of tilt and capacitance on atrial defibrillation success and pain perception has not been studied in patients. METHODS: Atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed using a right atrial appendage/coronary sinus lead configuration in 38 patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing an invasive electrophysiologic study. Biphasic waveforms with 40%, 50%, 65%, 80%, 30%/50% and 40%/50% were tested randomly in 22 patients (Group 1). In 16 patients (Group 2), a 65% tilt waveform with 50- and 120-microF capacitance was tested. Before sedation, pain sensation was graded by 15 patients in Group 1 after delivery of a 0.5-J shock and by 10 patients in Group 2 after two 1.5-J shocks with 50- and 120-microF capacitance were delivered. RESULTS: The DFT energy for the 50% tilt waveform was significantly lower than the 65%, 80% and 30%/50% tilt waveforms. The 40%/50% tilt waveform provided slightly lower energy requirements than the 50% tilt waveform. Nine patients (60%) described the 0.5-J shock as very painful, and four (26.6%) complained of slight pain. The 50-microF capacitor lowered energy requirements compared with the 120-microF capacitor. Six patients (60%) perceived the 1.5-J 50-microF capacitor shock as more painful, whereas three (30%) perceived both shocks as equally painful. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic waveforms with 50% tilt in both phases and a smaller tilt in the positive phase than that in the negative phase (40%/50%) provided a decrease in energy requirements at atrial DFT. In addition, stored energy was reduced by biphasic shocks with 50-microF capacitance compared with 120-microF capacitance. Despite the reduction in energy requirements, shocks < 1 J continued to be perceived as painful in the majority of patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.

In a study of 11 dogs, we assessed whether the defibrillation energy requirements of a single transvenous right ventricular electrode/defibrillator can system depended on the can size. We compared the defibrillation threshold obtained with 65% fixed-tilt biphasic shocks with 20, 40, and 80 ml surface area defibrillator cans. The energy was delivered between a right ventricular coil inserted through the jugular vein and the can placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the left superior chest wall. The testing order of each can size was randomly determined. Triplicate defibrillation thresholds were obtained with each can. Despite a higher impedance (20 ml 85 +/- 22 ohms vs 80 ml 71 +/- 16 ohms, p < 0.01), the 20 ml can resulted in a similar defibrillation threshold compared with the 80 ml (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 80 ml 7.5 +/- 3.4 J) and the 40 ml cans (20 ml 7.6 +/- 2.8 J vs 7.5 +/- 3.4 J). In conclusion, with the unipolar lead system the can size does not appear to be a factor limiting defibrillation success. Even a can the size of a pacemaker does not appear to significantly affect the defibrillation efficacy of this lead system.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Bicervical uterus and septate vagina: report of a previously undescribed Müllerian anomaly.

A case of non-septate uterus with double cervix and complete longitudinally septate vagina is described. This previously undescribed Müllerian anomaly has been detected by complete clinical and instrumental investigations (transvaginal ultrasonography, urography, hysterosalpingography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy). Aetiological hypotheses are discussed and we suggest adding the uterovaginal malformation described in this report to the embryological classification recently proposed by Acien et al. (1991, 1992) which postulates isolated Müllerian anomalies as a consequence of a minor mesonephric defect.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter and atrial tachycardias in patients with permanent indwelling catheters.

UNLABELLED: The presence of chronic indwelling leads in the area targeted for RF ablation may pose a technical challenge and reduce the chance of success of the ablation. In addition, application of lesions in close proximity to pacemaker leads or other permanent catheters could affect their function. Fourteen patients referred for RF ablation of atrial flutter/fibrillation and atrial tachycardia, who had a permanent dual chamber pacemaker (10 patients), ICD (1 patient), or both (3 patients) were studied to assess the safety, efficacy, and effects of the ablative procedure on device function. Lead impedance, R and P wave amplitude, and pacing threshold of the defibrillator and pacemaker were measured before and after ablation. The procedure was successful in all patients. In one patient who underwent both atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation ablation, the atrial pacing threshold increased from 1.0 preablation to 2.0 V postablation. No P wave was detectable after ablation. In another patient, the P wave amplitude went from 4.0 to 2.0 mV postablation. In both patients the device converted to the power reset mode. No changes were observed in the remaining patients. Postablation defibrillator testing showed no malfunction. Follow-up reinterrogation of the devices revealed no alterations. IN CONCLUSION: (1) RF ablation of atrial flutter and/or tachycardia is feasible even in patients with multiple chronic atrial and ventricular indwelling catheters; and (2) RF applications in close proximity of defibrillator and pacing catheters does not appear to alter their function unless lesions are produced in the area surrounding the distal pacing electrode.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Relative efficacy of different tilts with biphasic defibrillation in humans.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess if tilt bears any impact on defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shocks. BACKGROUND: Although it has been shown that biphasic waveform may increase the defibrillation efficacy, this pulsing method has not been as extensively studied in patients, and information regarding the effect of different tilts is lacking. METHODS: This study consisted of two similar but distinct protocols including 33 patients undergoing transvenous defibrillator implant. In 17 patients (Part I) defibrillation threshold was obtained delivering biphasic waveforms with 50%, 65%, and 80% tilt in random fashion. Similarly, in 16 patients (Part II) testing of biphasic waveform with 40%, 50%, and 65% tilt was performed in random order. The electrode system used consisted of two transvenous leads and a subcutaneous patch in all 33 patients. RESULTS: In Part I, tilt of 50% demonstrated a defibrillation threshold significantly lower than 65% tilt (7.5 +/- 4.3 J vs 9.7 +/- 5.0 J; P = 0.04) and 80% tilt (7.5 +/- 4.3 J vs 11.7 +/- 5.9 J; P < 0.01). Similarly, 65% tilt provided a lower defibrillation threshold than 80% tilt (9.7 +/- 5.0 J vs 11.7 +/- 5.9 J; P = 0.02). In Part II, no significant difference was observed in terms of defibrillation threshold between 40% tilt and the two tilts of 50% and 65%. However, as in Part I, 50% tilt provided a significant reduction of the energy to defibrillate as compared to 65% tilt (6.3 +/- 3.6 J vs 9.0 +/- 4.8 J; P < 0.01). The 50% tilt resulted in better defibrillation efficacy than 65% tilt independent of the lead system used for testing (Medtronic Transvene and CPI Endotak-C). CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic shocks with 50% tilt required less energy for defibrillation than 40%, 65%, and 80% tilts. However, in the clinical setting a programmable tilt may be preferable to account for some patient-to-patient variability.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Bundle branch reentry tachycardia and possible sustained interfascicular reentry tachycardia with a shared unusual induction pattern.

A case of bundle branch reentry tachycardia with an unusual induction pattern is presented. Unlike typical cases of this arrhythmia in which tachycardia is usually inducible with routine programmed ventricular stimulation and/or short-long sequences, tachycardia in this case was inducible only with atrial stimulation. It also arose spontaneously during atrial flutter and during isoproterenol administration. After ablation of the right bundle, possible interfascicular reentry tachycardia with a similar induction pattern was observed. This tachycardia was successfully ablated in the region of the posterior fascicle of the left bundle branch.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Response to beta blockers in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: how to predict beneficial effects.

UNLABELLED: No definitive data are available about the possibility of predicting improvement in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope treated with beta blockers. Among 112 patients with syncope and a positive head-up tilt test (HUT), independent predictors for prevention of symptoms with beta blockers were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Each patient underwent HUT at 70 degrees for 20 minutes both in the drug-free state and during isoproterenol infusion given to increase the heart rate by at least 25%. Fifty-nine patients had a positive HUT during isoproterenol infusion and 53 in the drug-free state. All patients were then given esmolol infusion at 500 micrograms/kg per minute for 3 minutes followed by 300 micrograms/kg per minute maintenance dose. HUT was then repeated as previously described with or without isoproterenol, depending upon the initial positive response. Regardless of the response during esmolol, all patients were treated with metoprolol 50 to 100 mg twice daily. At follow-up, 36 patients experienced symptom relapse. Four of them had negative HUT on esmolol, whereas the remaining 32 did not respond to the acute infusion of esmolol. Only four patients with positive HUT on esmolol had a favorable response to metoprolol. Patients responding to metoprolol were older (55 +/- 12 years vs 42 +/- 15 years, P < 0.05). Response to metoprolol was predicted by a negative test on esmolol (P < 0.0001) and a positive HUT on isoproterenol (P < 0.001). Age older than 42 years was also associated with a higher likelihood of metoprolol success (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Acute challenge with esmolol infusion appears to be an accurate predictor of response to chronic beta blockers, together with age and a positive HUT during low-dose isoproterenol infusion.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed1996

Safety of nurse-administered deep sedation for defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory.

UNLABELLED: Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory has been shown to be safe. However, general endotracheal anesthesia and/or administration of sedatives is mostly performed by anesthesiologists. In 53 patients undergoing ICD implantation in the EP laboratory, we prospectively assessed whether deep sedation without endotracheal intubation can be administered by nursing personnel under medical supervision. The mean patient age was 67 +/- 7 years, and the mean ejection fraction was 32 +/- 8%. All ICDs were placed in the abdomen requiring lead tunneling. Patients were monitored with pulse oximetry and noninvasive blood pressure recordings. The level of consciousness and vital signs were evaluated at 5-minute intervals. Deep sedation was induced with phenergan and midazolam and maintained with either meperidine or fentanyl. The mean doses given were as follows: phenergan 0.33 +/- 0.15 mg/kg, midazolam 0.05 +/- 0.03 mg/kg, meperidine 0.46 +/- 0.10 mg/kg per hour, and fentanyl 1.94 +/- 0.71 micrograms/kg per hour. None of the patients required intubation during or after the procedure. No death occurred and no patient had any recollection of the procedure. In three patients, O2 desaturation was easily managed by transient reversion of the effects of meperidine or fentanyl with naloxone. No patient experienced prolonged hospitalization after the implant (mean 2.4 +/- 0.5 days). IN CONCLUSION: (1) adequate sedation for ICD implantation and testing can be administered safely by nursing staff in the EP lab; (2) optimum sedation protocols should include drugs easy to reverse in case of excessive respiratory depression; and (3) this may represent a more cost-effective approach to ICD implantation.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

[Cholecysto-biliary fistulas].

Out of a total of 910 cholecystectomies performed on patients suffering from biliary calculosis, from January 1980 to December 1994 the Authors observed two cases of cholecysto-biliary fistulas (0.2%), a complication which can rarely affect biliary stones. In the light of the international literature and of their own, however, limited experience, the Authors take into account the pathophysiologic and clinical aspects of this pathology. They agree with the literature data on the lack of specificity of the clinical signs and uselessness of preoperative diagnostic tools, the only exception sometimes being E.R.C.P. The Authors find Csendes' cholecysto-biliary fistulas classification extremely useful as far as the subsequent surgical treatment is concerned. The latter should be electric, i.e. evaluation of each single case depending on the type of fistula, its size, conditions of its edges, dilatation of the main bile duct. Surgery may range from a simple suture of the fistula edges with endoluminal drainage, associated or not to surgery of the papilla, to a biliary digestive anastomosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

[The assessment of the operative risk in vascular surgery].

Atherosclerosis is a polydistrectual disease. The patients with peripheral, carotid or aortoiliac pathology suffer frequently from coronary disease; so, a careful evaluation of operative risk is indispensable related to the anatomic district that we intend submit to surgery. In this work we separately explore the risk related to peripheral revasculations, aortic surgery and carotid surgery following the current literature and our experience.

Aorta↗

PubMed1995

Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope.

BACKGROUND: Head-up tilt test is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with syncope. This study was designed to evaluate the specificity of head-up tilt testing using different tilt angles and isoproterenol infusion doses in normal volunteers with no prior history of syncope or presyncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty volunteers were randomized to two groups of 75 each. In group 1, subjects were further randomized to have head-up tilt testing at a 60, 70, or 80 degree angle at baseline followed by repeat tilt testing during a low-dose isoproterenol infusion that increased the heart rate by an average of 20%. In group 2, after having a baseline head-up tilt test at a 70 degree angle for a maximum of 20 minutes, subjects were randomized to have a repeat tilt table testing at a 70 degree angle during a low-dose, 3 micrograms/min, or 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusion. In group 1, syncope or presyncope along with hypotension developed in 2 subjects during the baseline test at 60 and 70 degrees of tilt and in 5 subjects during tilting at 80 degrees. The addition of low-dose isoproterenol reduced the specificity minimally from 92% to 88% at both 60 and 70 degrees of tilt but substantially to 60% at an 80 degrees angle. However, 6 of the 10 subjects with a positive test at an 80 degree angle had an abnormal response after 10 minutes of tilt testing. In group 2, using various isoproterenol doses with tilt table testing at a 70 degree angle, low-dose (mean infusion dose, 1.5 +/- 0.45 microgram/min), 3 micrograms/min, and 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusions elicited an abnormal response in 1 (4%), 5 (20%), and 14 (56%) of the subjects, respectively. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, head-up tilt testing at an 80 degree angle (P = .01) or during 3 micrograms/min (P = .02) and 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusion rates (P < .001) was the most significant predictor of an abnormal response. CONCLUSIONS: Head-up tilt testing at a 60 or 70 degree angle with or without low-dose isoproterenol infusion provides an adequate specificity. Caution is needed, however, in interpreting the results if the head-up tilt test at 80 degrees is extended beyond 10 minutes or if high doses of isoproterenol are used.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Termination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by premature stimulation from ablating catheter. A reliable guide to identify site for slow-pathway ablation.

BACKGROUND: Slow-pathway ablation is currently used more frequently to control atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, in patients with the common type of AVNRT, successful ablation of the slow pathway can be difficult and time-consuming. We tested a simple method to predict a site for slow-pathway ablation in patients with AVNRT of the common variety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with symptomatic common AVNRT (13 women and 7 men; mean age, 41 +/- 21 years) were included in the study. Once the AVNRT had a stable cycle length (+/- 10 ms) for at least 20 cycles, single extrastimuli were delivered from the ablating catheter tip beginning with 20 ms less than the tachycardia cycle length and decrementing by 10 ms until tachycardia terminated or loss of capture occurred at the pacing site. The pacing protcol was performed systematically in a stepwise fashion at four adjacent sites starting from the posterior/inferior interatrial septum near the tricuspid annulus and moving progressively more anteriorly. The pacing protocol was then repeated in the same sequence, followed by delivery of radiofrequency current at each site to determine its effect at sites where AVNRT could not be terminated with a pacing protocol. AVNRT could be terminated in the anterograde direction from at least one site in 19 patients. Tachycardia could be terminated at two or more adjacent sites in 5 patients. The longest atrial coupling interval at the site of tachycardia termination was 67 +/- 27 ms (range, 30 to 130 ms) less than the AVNRT cycle length. Resetting of subsequent His bundle depolarization (H2), producing an H-H2 interval prolongation of 26 +/- 24 ms (range, 10 to 80 ms), occurred in 17 patients before termination of the tachycardia. In 18 of the 19 patients, the slow pathway was successfully ablated at the site at which AVNRT was terminated at the longest atrial coupling interval. CONCLUSIONS: Termination of tachycardia in the anterograde direction at the longest atrial coupling interval by extrastimuli delivered from the ablating catheter can be helpful for identification of an optimal site for slow-pathway ablation in patients with the common variety of AVNRT.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Relevance of asystole during head-up tilt testing.

The prognosis of patients manifesting prolonged asystole during head-up tilt testing is unclear. In 209 consecutive patients with a history of syncope and positive head-up tilt tests, 19 had asystole lasting > 5 seconds (mean duration 15 +/- 10) (group 1a). When compared with patients without asystole (group 1b), group 1a patients were younger (32 +/- 12 vs 47 +/- 21 years, p < 0.005), but clinical manifestations were not any more dramatic (the number of episodes of syncope [7 +/- 5 vs 8 +/- 6 episodes, p = NS] and injury during syncope [2 vs 13 patients, p = NS] were similar). During follow-up (mean 2 +/- 1 year), with the patient taking pharmacologic therapy such as beta blockers, ephedrine, theophylline, or disopyramide, the recurrence rate was 11% and 8% in groups 1a and 1b (p = NS). No patient in the asystole group underwent pacemaker implantation. Additionally, of 75 normal volunteers (group 2) with no history of syncope undergoing tilt tests to define its specificity, 3 had asystole (mean duration 10 seconds). During > 1 year of follow-up, despite no treatment, all 3 are symptom free. Thus, asystole during head-up tilt testing does not predict either a more malignant outcome or a poor response to pharmacologic therapy. Moreover, an asystolic response does not enhance the specificity of the head-up tilt test because it may be present in asymptomatic "normal" volunteers.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape?

With present implantable defibrillators, the ability to vary the defibrillation technique has been shown to increase the number of patients suitable for transvenous system. As newer waveforms become available, the need for a flexible device may change. In addition, although it has been shown that the option of biphasic waveform may increase the defibrillation efficacy, this may depend upon the shape of the biphasic waveform used. Thirty patients undergoing transvenous defibrillator implant were included in the study. In 20 patients (group I), defibrillation efficacy of simultaneous monophasic, sequential monophasic, and biphasic waveform with 50% tilt was determined randomly. Similarly, in ten patients (group II) testing of simultaneous monophasic shocks and biphasic waveforms with 65% and 80% tilt was performed in random order. The electrode system used consisted of two transvenous leads and a subcutaneous patch in all 30 patients. In group I, 50% tilt biphasic waveform consistently provided similar or better defibrillation efficacy compared to monophasic waveforms (biphasic 7.5 +/- 5.1 joules vs simultaneous 17 +/- 7.8 joules, P < 0.01; and vs sequential 17 +/- 8.4 joules, P < 0.01). In group II, 65% tilt biphasic pulse required less energy for defibrillation as compared with simultaneous monophasic shocks (9.6 +/- 4.5 joules vs 15.6 +/- 5.1 joules, P = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in terms of defibrillation threshold between 80% tilt biphasic shocks and simultaneous monophasic pulses (11.8 +/- 6 joules vs 15.6 +/- 5.1 joules, P = NS). Biphasic shocks with smaller tilt delivered using a triple lead system more uniformly improved defibrillation threshold over standard monophasic waveforms.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗

PubMed1995

Effects of initial polarity on defibrillation threshold with biphasic pulses.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the polarity of epicardial patches significantly affects the defibrillation efficacy of monophasic shocks. However, whether this improvement can be extended to different pulsing methods and lead systems, such as biphasic shocks using endocardial defibrillating electrodes, is unknown. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing testing and permanent implant using an Endotak lead system with a biphasic device were included in the study. In each patient the defibrillation threshold was determined delivering biphasic pulses with the distal coil as the cathode and the proximal coil as the anode during the positive phase and with the polarity reversed. The initial electrode polarity tested was chosen randomly. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that effectively terminated ventricular fibrillation induced with 60-Hz alternating current. For each biphasic pulse peak voltage, pulse duration, resistance, and stored energy were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 12 (60%) had lower defibrillation threshold when the proximal coil was negative, whereas only 2 patients had a lower defibrillation threshold when the distal coil was negative. In four patients a subcutaneous patch would have been required if only the biphasic pulse with the distal coil as negative had been tested. The mean stored defibrillation threshold energy was lower with the configuration using the proximal coil as cathode (16.3 +/- 8.8 J vs 21.5 +/- 11 J; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Change in the initial polarity of biphasic shocks may influence defibrillation efficacy and should, therefore, be assessed in each patient to achieve a more satisfactory safety margin and minimize the use of more invasive lead configurations.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗