Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Napier

Publications and source records attributed to A Napier.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Wound infection rates: the importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance.

The importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance on reported wound infection rates have been studied, using data taken from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the effect of whole body disinfection on postoperative wound infection rates. All patients admitted for an elective clean or potentially contaminated surgical procedure over a 32-month period were recruited into the study. Of the 3733 patients recruited, 3466 completed the study. Wound infection (which is defined for this study) is the main outcome that was examined. The effect of careful post-discharge follow-up of patients to look for wound infections was analysed for age, wound type and presence or absence of a drain. Sixty percent of postoperative wound infections occurred after discharge. A rising wound infection rate with increasing age was observed in the in-hospital cohort whereas the incidence of outpatient wound infections declined with age. This finding is attributed to the longer in-hospital stay encountered in patients above 50 years old (median, 3 vs. 5 days, P < 0.00001). Although clean operations had a significantly lower in-hospital infection rate, potentially contaminated procedures had a lower outpatient infection rate. A similar picture was observed in other subgroups of operations including horizontal versus vertical wounds and use of drains. When assessing reported wound infection rates, the definition of wound infection used and the extent of follow-up must be known to enable accurate assessment of the results.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1994

A randomized trial of immediate discharge of surgical patients to general practice.

BACKGROUND: This study compares, in clinical and economic terms, out-patient follow-up with immediate discharge to general practice of patients undergoing any one of 29 defined surgical procedures. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was undertaken in which patients recruited from two general surgery wards in Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, were randomized to follow-up care in the out-patient clinic or in general practice. Outcome was measured as clinical effectiveness in terms of morbidity and mortality; economic costs to the hospital compared with general practice; patient benefits and satisfaction; and General Practitioners' (GPs') opinions of the system. RESULTS: A total of 455 patients were randomized to outpatient and 454 to general practice follow-up. They were followed up for a minimum of six months. There were no differences in readmission rates, mean number of operations or mortality. The difference between the groups in the total health service costs was very small (2.68 pounds per patient more for those receiving out-patient follow-up). More of the general practice group preferred general practice care than the out-patient group preferred out-patient care (p = 0.03). The patient's travel costs and travel and treatment time were greater for the out-patient group (27.99 pounds, 113 min) than for the general practice group (24.90 pounds, 82 min). The GPs felt they had been given adequate information in the discharge documentation and were willing to accept immediate discharge as normal policy, although they expected it to increase their workload. If immediate discharge were instituted, the time saved in an out-patient clinic session of 40 patients would be an estimated 54 minutes, enough to see three extra new patients. CONCLUSION: General practice based follow-up care for this group of patients is as effective as, but less costly than outpatient care and is acceptable to GPs. Because of only small differences in costs between the two forms of follow-up, real gains to the health service will depend on the use of the time freed by a reduction in follow-up appointments in the out-patient clinic.

Aftercare↗
PubMed1992

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of chlorhexidine detergent in preoperative whole-body disinfection in wound infection prophylaxis.

A total of 3482 general surgical patients entered a trial in which they had a chlorhexidine or placebo detergent shower three times before elective clean wound or potentially contaminated surgery. Patients who showered with a chlorhexidine detergent (N = 1744) had a significant reduction in skin flora compared with those who showered with a placebo detergent (N = 1738). The majority of wound infections occurred outside hospital (312 outpatient infections vs. 201 inpatient infections). Wound infection rates were similar in the chlorhexidine and placebo groups (5.79% vs. 5.75% for inpatient infections and 8.54% vs. 9.38% for outpatient infections). The average hospital cost of both non-infected and infected patients was higher in the chlorhexidine group. The average cost of a non-infected chlorhexidine patient was 847.95 pounds as opposed to 804.60 pounds for a non-infected placebo patient, whilst the average cost of an infected patient was 1459.70 pounds (chlorhexidine) and 1414.22 pounds (placebo). A cross-match comparison of patients undergoing vascular surgery revealed no statistical significance in the difference between the two experimental groups. Patients were matched for age, sex, type of operation and surgeon. We conclude that preoperative whole-body disinfection with a chlorhexidine detergent is not a cost-effective treatment for reducing wound infection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Costing wound infection in a Scottish hospital.

Data from a trial of preoperative whole body disinfection in postoperative wound infection prophylaxis involving 3733 patients were used to analyse the cost of a postoperative wound infection. The overall wound infection rate was 14.73% (513/3482), 61% of which were diagnosed after hospital discharge (312 outpatient infections versus 201 inpatient infections). This highlights the prevalence of the transfer of the cost of wound infection to the community. The inpatient and outpatient costs were calculated separately for those with and without a wound infection. Operative procedures were placed into 38 different categories. 12 of these 38 categories accounted for over 90% of the total number of operations performed. Overall, infected patients cost society more than noninfected patients. The hospitalisation costs for inpatients for all categories of patients, whether infected or not, comprised over 99% of the total cost. The excess cost for the infected patients in the study was calculated as 312 915 British pounds sterling (1990 British pounds sterling) or 610 British pounds sterling per infected patient, equivalent to 1926 hospital days overall. For some operations (e.g. stripping varicose veins) an excess of 52 hospital days were associated with wound infection diagnosed after discharge from hospital. Wound infections in some operative categories were consistently more expensive to manage (e.g. excess cost/infected vascular patient = 1085 British pounds sterling) while other operative categories had less costly wound infections (e.g. excess cost/infected thyroid patient = 110 British pounds sterling).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Female↗
PubMed1992

The effect of diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution on intraocular pressure following cataract extraction.

Ninety-two nonglaucomatous patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens by residents at a Veterans hospital were randomized in double-masked fashion to receive either a topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent, diclofenac sodium 0.1%, or a placebo consisting of vehicle only. One drop of placebo or diclofenac sodium 0.1% was administered on an inpatient basis by trained staff every 6 hours for three doses, starting the afternoon prior to surgery. A further drop was given at 90, 60, 30, and 15 minutes before the operation. Starting 24 hours after surgery, all patients received diclofenac sodium 0.1%. All patients remained hospitalized for 72 hours postoperatively. Mean baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was 14.0 and 14.1 mm Hg in the diclofenac and placebo groups, respectively. IOP rose 8.6 mm Hg in both groups at 6 hours after surgery. At 24 hours, the mean IOP elevation from baseline was 11.3 mm Hg in the diclofenac group and 9.6 mm Hg in the placebo group (P = .47). Within the first 24 hours, IOP spiked more than 10 mm Hg in 57% (26/46) of the diclofenac patients and in 54% (25/46) of the placebo patients. These results suggest that diclofenac sodium 0.1% drops affect neither the incidence nor the height of IOP elevation following cataract surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

The effect of whole body disinfection on intraoperative wound contamination.

As part of a large whole body disinfection (WBD) trial two small sub-groups of patients who showered preoperatively with either a 4% chlorhexidine (CHX: N = 29) or placebo (N =27) detergent were studied to assess intraoperative wound contamination. The groups were well matched for age, sex and length of surgery. A membrane filter contact technique was used for bacterial recovery from the wounds after the initial skin incision and before wound closure. The membrane filters were incubated aerobically on blood agar plates with a CHX neutralizer for 48 h at 37 degrees C and colonies were counted. The results show a significant difference, between the bacterial counts at the start and end of surgery in the CHX and placebo groups. There was no difference in bacterial counts at the start of surgery between the CHX and placebo groups. There was a significant difference in the bacterial counts at the end of surgery between the CHX and placebo groups. These results indicate that preoperative WBD with CHX reduces intraoperative wound contamination but the effect of this on postoperative wound sepsis rates awaits the results of a large WBD trial.

Adult↗