Teachers' personality ratings of pupils in Scottish primary schools.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Morrison.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Men and women in recovery from addiction were compared on levels of depression and self-conscious affect including proneness to shame, guilt, externalization, detachment, and pride. The sample consisted of 130 subjects (88 men and 42 women; mean age 33.04), 90 of whom were active participants in a 12-step recovery program, and 40 of whom were in a residential treatment community. Subjects completed The Beck Depression Inventory and The Test of Self-Conscious Affect. Significant differences between the sexes were found for proneness to shame, detachment, and depression. Women were significantly higher on shame and depression; men were significantly higher on detachment. The subjects were compared to subjects who were not chemically dependent. It was found that these recovering drug-addicted subjects scored significantly higher in proneness to shame and externalization and significantly lower on proneness to guilt. Treatment implications of proneness to shame in the drug-addicted population, and particularly in women, are discussed. The use of confrontational drug treatment strategies may be contraindicated.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Men and women in recovery from addiction were compared on levels of depression, guilt, and shame. The measurement of guilt included subscales of Survivor Guilt, Separation Guilt, Omnipotent Responsibility Guilt, Trait Guilt, State Guilt, and Adaptive Guilt. The sample included 75 men and 33 women in treatment in a residential treatment community. It was found that women were significantly higher than men in depression. The recovering subjects were compared to nonaddicted subjects and established norms, and it was found that the recovering people were higher on depression, shame, and the subscales of maladaptive guilt. Both men and women in recovery were significantly lower than norms in adaptive guilt.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to show the limitations of the case-mix "based on attendance", which take into account neither the seriousness of the diagnoses nor the comorbidity. DESIGN: A crossover descriptive study of a retrospective nature. SETTING: In New York, in two centres located in the Hispanic community of Upper Manhattan and a third in the Presbyterian Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: During 1991, 225 patients were studied: 150 attended in the hospital PCC and 75 in the non-hospital PCCs. A simple random sampling of the list of patients attended was performed. INTERVENTIONS: The seriousness of the conditions of the patients attended in the two different types of PCC was compared through the Duke Severity of Illness Scale (DUSOI), a patient-based case-mix which assesses the level of seriousness of each individual diagnosis and the comorbidity linked to the diagnoses grouped together. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Significant differences between the seriousness of the conditions of the patients in the two sub-samples were found when comparison by means of bivariant analysis was performed. Scoring on the Severity Scale was significantly higher for those attending hospital (65.5 and 55.1 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patient classification systems based on the reasons for attendance underestimate the seriousness of the condition. A case-mix in which the patient is the unit of analysis needs to be developed.