Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Messori

Publications and source records attributed to A Messori.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Treatments for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: analysis of survival data and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

The main therapeutic options currently available for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer include: (i) cisplatin-based chemotherapy at conventional doses without paclitaxel, (ii) paclitaxel+cisplatin at conventional doses and (iii) high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic rescue. After conducting a literature search to identify large-scale clinical trials based on these three therapeutic modalities, we carried out an analysis of the survival data and evaluated the cost-effectiveness ratio where appropriate. Cost data were obtained from published information. Effectiveness was estimated by determining the values of mean lifetime survival (MLS). Our analysis included a total of 15 clinical trials. The values of MLS were 3.05 years per patient for cisplatin-based chemotherapy at conventional doses without paclitaxel (1931 patients), 2.95 years per patient for chemotherapy with paclitaxel+cisplatin at conventional doses (184 patients) and 5.76 years per patient for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic rescue (53 patients). As compared with cisplatin-based chemotherapy without paclitaxel, high-dose treatments with hematopoietic rescue yielded a significantly better survival. Using cisplatin-based chemotherapy as a reference term, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for high-dose treatments was $25641 per life year gained (discounted dollars per discounted life year gained). Sensitivity testing suggested that the ratio remained below $50000 under most circumstances. We conclude that in the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic rescue seems to be more effective and more cost-effective than standard treatments with cisplatin-based regimens at conventional doses.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: a lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a modified Q-TWIST method.

The Q-TWIST (time spent without symptoms and toxicity) method [1-4] and the Gompertz extrapolation method [5-11] are two techniques that have been proposed for evaluating survival in cancer patients. The mathematical basis of the Q-TWIST method relies on estimating the area under the survival curve and partitioning its value into three components with different levels of quality of life (presence of toxicity, presence of symptoms, absence of symptoms and toxicity). The Gompertz approach utilises a curve-fitting procedure to extrapolate the survival curves to infinity. A recent report [12] has described a combined application of the Q-TWIST method and the Gompertz approach ("extrapolated Q-TWIST" method), which allows one to conduct a cost-utility analysis with the calculation of the cost per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) gained. In this paper, we describe a reappraisal of an earlier cost-effectiveness study [7] by application of this extrapolated Q-TWIST method [12]. Our cost-effectiveness study [7] evaluated the pharmacoeconomic profile of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with node-positive breast cancer [13] and utilised a Gompertz analysis to estimate lifetime overall survival (OS), which was 862 and 756 discounted years per 100 patients in the CMF and the control groups, respectively. In applying the extrapolated Q-TWIST method to this data set, a second Gompertz analysis is carried out on the disease-free survival (DFS) curve of the two patient groups. Lifetime DFS of Bonadonna's patients can thus be estimated as 741 years in the CMF group and 572 years in the controls (discounted values normalised to 100 patients). Figure 1 shows the two curves of OS and DFS for the CMF group and the partition of the area under the OS curve into its three components. To introduce an assessment of quality of life into these data, the Q-TWIST method partitions the value of OS into the three components called TWIST (absence of symptoms and toxicity), TOX (time spent with toxicity) and REL (survival after relapse). Hence, OS = TWIST + REL + TOX, where REL = OS - DFS. In the control group, TOX = O and TWIST = DFS because no treatment-related toxicity is present.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Survival curve fitting using the Gompertz function: a methodology for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses on mortality data.

The analysis of published survival curves can be the basis for incremental cost-effectiveness evaluations in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life-year saved. The typical case is when a new treatment becomes available which is more effective and more expensive than the corresponding standard treatment. When effectiveness is expressed using the end-point of mortality, cost-effectiveness analysis can compare the (incremental) cost associated with the new treatment with the (incremental) clinical benefit measured in terms of number of life-years gained. The (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratio is therefore quantified as cost per life-year gained. This pharmacoeconomic methodology requires that the total patients years for the treatment and the control groups are estimated from their respective survival curves. We describe herein a survival-curve fitting method which carries our this estimation and a computer program implementing the entire procedure. Our method is based on a non-linear least-squares analysis in which the experimental points of the survival curve are fitted to the Gompertz function. The availability of a commercial program (PCNONLIN) is needed to carry out matrix handling calculations. Our procedure performs the estimation of the best-fit parameters from the survival curve data and then integrates the Gompertz survival function from zero-time to infinity. This integration yields the value of the area under the survival curve (AUC) which is an estimate of the number of patients years totalled in the population examined. If this AUC estimation is performed separately for the two survival curves of two treatments being compared, the difference between the two AUCs permits to determine the incremental number of patient years gained using the more effective of the two treatments as opposed to the other. The cost-effectiveness analysis can consequently be carried out. An example of application of this methodology is presented in detail.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma.

To assess the cost per life year gained of alpha interferon (IFN) as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk resected melanoma, we conducted a retrospective, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis on clinical data from a previously published ECOG trial [9]. The Gompertz model was used to estimate the total lifetime values of patient-years of subjects receiving IFN in comparison with subjects given no adjuvant treatment. The ECOG trial involved 143 patients treated with high-dose IFN and 137 given no adjuvant treatment. Estimated drug expenditures were based on the assumption of a cost of $109.25 per 10 MU of IFN. Our analysis of the ECOG results showed that the adjuvant treatment of 100 subjects with high-dose IFN improved survival expectancy by 133.6 discounted life years or 308 undiscounted life years. The use of IFN (compared with no adjuvant treatment) implied an incremental cost of $16,467 per discounted life year saved (95% CI of $4752-50,000) or $7143 per undiscounted life year saved (95% CI of $3226-33,846). Sensitivity testing, in which variations were introduced in the main factors influencing cost and effectiveness, showed that this value always remained below $50,000. Our pharmacoeconomic analysis indicates that adjuvant treatment with high-dose IFN in patients with high-risk resected melanoma implies a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio. Because two other studies showed no significant survival benefit in patients receiving adjuvant IFN at lower values of total dose per patient, the controversy remains and confirmation data are needed for the ECOG trial's results. If these clinical results are confirmed, our analysis shows that the dosage of IFN given in this trial has a favourable pharmacoeconomic profile.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments)

Meta-analysis was proposed more than 20 years ago as an innovative technique for pooling the results of a series of clinical studies. This technique has a two-fold purpose: i) to retrieve pertinent clinical information without introducing selection biases; ii) to combine these clinical data obtained from different sources into a single synthetic index that summarises all available information. This review highlights the current perspectives in the application of meta-analysis and places particular emphasis on discussing the limitations of this technique that have been identified in recent years. Specific controversies in this area include: i) comparison between meta-analysis of the literature and meta-analysis of individual patient data; ii) heterogeneity of the clinical material introduced in the meta-analytic pooling; and iii) survival meta-analysis as a method for pooling long-term outcome data. After debating these three controversial points, this review examines the newest uses of meta-analysis that have been proposed for the evaluation of cost-effectiveness data and tries to identify the meta-analytic applications that will probably be expanded in the near future as opposed to those that will instead be developed less and less.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1997

Relationship between cathepsin-D content and disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Several reports have evaluated the correlation between cathepsin-D and overall survival or disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. Because conflicting data have so far been reported, a meta-analysis was conducted to clarify this problem. Eleven studies were included in our meta-analysis (total of 2690 patients). A specific meta-analytical methodology for censored data was used, and disease-free survival was the primary end point. Patients with low cathepsin-D levels had a significantly better disease-free survival than patients with high cathepsin-D values (meta-analytical odds ratio from 0.59 to 0.60 over the interval from 1 to 7 years). A secondary meta-analysis conducted exclusively on the data from eight studies based on cytosol assay gave substantially similar results. One limitation of our study is that the cut-off values to define high and low cathepsin-D concentrations were not identical in the various studies included in our meta-analysis (range from 20 to 78 pmol mg(-1) protein), thus introducing a possible bias in the statistical analysis of the data. However, a simulation based on the well-accepted method of the so-called publication bias showed that more than 100 null studies would be required to lead our results to a statistical level of non-significance. Considering the results of our meta-analysis, we conclude that the data presently available confirm a statistically significant association between high cathepsin-D values and poor disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Cost-effectiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The analysis of published survival curves can be used as the basis for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses in which two treatments are compared in terms of cost per life year saved. In patients with relapsed chemosensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has been reported to improve survival in comparison with control patients who receive standard chemotherapy. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken in which the Gompertz model was used to determine a lifetime estimate of patient-years gained by subjects given ABMT in comparison with controls. Our study utilised the cost data calculated by Uyl-de Groot et al and the clinical data reported by Philip et al. This latter randomised clinical trial involved 55 patients subjected to ABMT and 54 controls given chemotherapy. Lifetime survival advantage for patients of the ABMT group was estimated as 3606 discounted patient-months every 100 patients. The use of ABMT as opposed to standard chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of $9,229 per discounted life year gained (95% CI of $5,390 to $24,012). The cost-effectiveness ratio of ABMT in patients with relapsed chemosensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is noticeably favourable.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed1997

Advanced HIV infection treated with zidovudine monotherapy: lifetime values of absolute cost-effectiveness as a pharmacoeconomic reference for future studies evaluating antiretroviral combination treatments. The Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the cost and the effectiveness of zidovudine monotherapy in patients with advanced HIV infection and to derive preliminary data on the cost-effectiveness of the triple treatment with saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone. DESIGN: We used a combined method of survival analysis utilizing both the quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWIST) method and the Gompertz approach. This combined method was applied to assess the absolute cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios of zidovudine monotherapy and to perform a preliminary incremental cost-effectiveness comparison of saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone. The clinical material used in our study was derived from two reports on the treatment of advanced HIV infection. Data of lifetime costs of HIV infection were obtained from published information. RESULTS: In patients with advanced HIV infection treated with zidovudine monotherapy, lifetime survival was 252.1 discounted person-years per 100 patients. Using an average lifetime cost of $93,000 (discounted) per individual, the absolute ratio of cost-effectiveness for zidovudine monotherapy was $36,980 per life-year, while the absolute cost-utility ratio was $47,112 per quality-adjusted life-year. In the comparative analysis of saquinavir plus zalcitabine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone, our calculations showed that the administration of the triple treatment can have an "average" cost-effectiveness, provided that mean lifetime survival per patient (discounted) is improved to at least 3.68 years (with an average survival gain of at least 14 mo per patient). CONCLUSIONS: The values of absolute cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios for zidovudine monotherapy are a useful reference point for further pharmacoeconomic studies in the area of antiretroviral drugs.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1997

Drug treatments for maintaining remission in Crohn's disease. A lifetime cost-utility analysis.

A recent literature overview has estimated the long term frequency of the main outcomes of Crohn's disease (e.g. relapses, hospitalisations and surgery). Using these frequency data, we defined a model for the long term course of the disease. In this model, the quality-of-life (QOL) scores for the main levels of disease severity were determined by a panel of expert gastroenterologists. We conducted a combined analysis of these long term clinical data and of this QOL information to determine the cost-utility ratio of long term maintenance therapy with mesalazine (mesalamine) in patients with inactive Crohn's disease. After obtaining the cost-of-illness data needed for this analysis from a recent study conducted in the UK, we completed our incremental cost-utility analysis, in which mesalazine was compared with no maintenance treatment, using 2 hypothetical groups of 100 patients. These 2 groups were assumed to have the same general characteristics as those found in a group of 583 patients included in a recent meta-analysis. Our cost-utility evaluation included 5% annual discounting. In the mesalazine group, the overall lifetime costs for the 100 patients were around $US5 100,000 with an overall utility value of about 1700 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Both the lifetime costs and the utility values for the placebo (no treatment) group were very similar to those calculated for the mesalazine group. Our cost-utility analysis showed that mesalazine maintenance therapy was associated with a cost of about $US5000 per QALY gained. There was, therefore, a small incremental benefit obtained, albeit with a very small incremental cost. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. In conclusion, our study showed that long term maintenance therapy with mesalazine in patients with inactive Crohn's disease should not be discouraged on the basis of preliminary cost-utility considerations. However, long term placebo-controlled studies of mesalazine are urgently needed to better define the long term prognosis of these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets and enemas for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis: a randomized double-blind study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a combination of oral and topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis, we undertook a double-blind randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 yr (with disease extent greater than proctitis only) were eligible for inclusion in the study if they met the following criteria: (a) history of two or more relapses in the last year; (b) achievement of remission in the last 3 months (with maintenance of remission for at least 1 month). Patients enrolled in the study were randomly assigned to one of the two following 1-yr treatments: (1) combined therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and 5-ASA enemas 4 g/100 ml twice weekly; (2) oral therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and placebo enemas/twice weekly. The main end point of the study was the maintenance of remission at 12 months. RESULTS: Upon completion of the study, relapse occurred in 13 of 33 patients in the combined treatment group versus 23 of 36 patients in the oral treatment group (39 vs 69%; p = 0.036). No significant side effects related to treatment were observed in either group. A simplified pharmacoeconomic analysis shows that this form of combined treatment can have a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that 5-ASA given daily by oral route and intermittently by topical route can be more effective than oral therapy alone. This form of combination treatment can be appropriate for patients at high risk of relapse.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Pharmacoeconomic profile of paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. A lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of published survival curves has recently been proposed as a method for conducting incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per year of life gained. In patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has been reported to improve survival more significantly than standard therapy with cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. However, the high cost of paclitaxel indicates a need for an evaluation of the pharmacoeconomic profile of these treatments. METHODS: The authors conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the paclitaxel-based regimen in terms of cost per year of life gained. The analysis utilized data from a published controlled long term trial involving 184 patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin and 202 patients treated with cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. Gompertz' law was employed to obtain the lifetime estimate of the years gained by patients given the first treatment in comparison with patients given the second. RESULTS: The paclitaxel-based treatment was found to improve life expectancy by 46 years for every 100 patients. Costs of chemotherapy were higher in the paclitaxel group than in the standard-therapy group (the cost difference was $901,723 for every 100 patients; costs for treating febrile neutropenia induced by chemotherapy were taken into account). On the basis of these data of cost and effectiveness, the administration of paclitaxel and cisplatin was found to imply a cost per year of life gained of $19,603 more than standard chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacoeconomic profile of paclitaxel compares favorably with economic data previously calculated for other types of pharmacologic treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of published survival curves can be used as the basis for incremental cost-effectiveness analyses in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life year saved. In patients with node-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+ methotrexate+fluorouracil has been reported to improve survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment. METHODS: To assess the pharmacoeconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of cost per life-year gained, we conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which the Gompertz model was used to calculate the lifetime estimate of the patient-years gained by treated subjects compared to controls. RESULTS: Using data from a published, controlled long-term trial involving 207 patients treated with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil and 179 controls, we estimated that this adjuvant chemotherapy improved life expectancy by 357 patient-years per 100 subjects. Direct costs, which were almost exclusively related to the administration of chemotherapy, were estimated to be US $159,516 per 100 patients. On the basis of these data, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of US $447 per life-year saved. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer seems to be particularly favourable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously calculated for other types of pharmacological intervention.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones for bacterial infections in neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis.

We conducted a two-part meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of fluoroquinolones for preventing bacterial infections in granulocytopenic patients who are receiving chemotherapy for malignancies. Overall, 19 randomized studies met selection criteria and were included in this meta-analysis of 2,112 patients. Thirteen studies that compared the fluoroquinolones alone with control regimens (co-trimoxazole, oral nonabsorbable antibiotics, or placebo) and six studies that compared the fluoroquinolones plus prophylaxis for bacteremia due to gram-positive bacteria with control regimens (fluoroquinolones or oral nonabsorbable antibiotics) were included in the two meta-analyses. The results of the first meta-analysis indicate that fluoroquinolones alone are effective in preventing gram-negative bacteremia (overall odds ratio [OR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16; P < .001), but not gram-positive bacteremia (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.76-1.45; P = .7), fever-related morbidity (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.04; P = .09), and infection-related mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.47-1.34; P = .4). The results of the second meta-analysis indicate that a combination of fluoroquinolones plus prophylaxis for gram-positive bacteremia (penicillin, vancomycin, or macrolides) significantly reduces the occurrence of gram-positive bacteremia (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.33-0.63; P < .001) without affecting the incidence of fever-related morbidity (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.13; P = .2) and infection-related mortality (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.40-1.38; P = .3)

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Cost effectiveness of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

Recent studies have shown that the analysis of published survival curves allows cost-effectiveness evaluations in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life-year saved. In patients with colorectal cancer, the administration of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy (with mitomycin and fluorouracil) has been reported to improve long-term survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment. To assess the pharmacoceconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapy, we carried out an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which we used the Gompertz model to estimate lifetime patient years gained by patients given this chemotherapy in comparison with controls. Using the data of a published controlled long-term trial involving 252 patients treated with intraportal chemotherapy and 253 controls who were given no such therapy, we estimated that the adjuvant treatment improved life expectancy by 89 discounted patient years (or 218 undiscounted patient years) every 100 patients. Cost of chemotherapy was calculated as $107,720 for every 100 patients. On the basis of these data, the administration of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of $1,210 per discounted life-year saved or $494 per undiscounted life-year saved. The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer seems to be particularly favorable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously obtained in many other areas of pharmacological intervention. Even though systemic fluorouracil + levamisole is the form of adjuvant chemotherapy most widely used in these patients, intraportal chemotherapy has the best cost-effectiveness profile.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

G-CSF for the prophylaxis of neutropenic fever in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive antineoplastic chemotherapy: meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Standard meta-analytical and pharmacoeconomic techniques were used to study the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness ratio of the prophylactic (or pre-emptive) administration of G-CSF to patients with small cell lung cancer treated with conventional myelosuppressive cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the first part of our study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials evaluating G-CSF for this clinical indication. Three trials were identified by our literature search and were included in the meta-analysis (overall number of patients = 606). The end-points for evaluating G-CSF included mortality from infection and the cumulative incidence of neutropenic fever over six cycles of chemotherapy. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that prophylactic G-CSF did not affect mortality but significantly reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever from 68.3% to 38.7% (pooled odds ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21-0.40; P < 0.001). In the second part of our study, we carried out a pharmacoeconomic analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of pre-emptive G-CSF (i.e. the 'average' cost associated with the prevention of an episode of neutropenic fever). This cost-effectiveness ratio was US$ 14,372 using the Italian price of the drug converted into dollars, or US$ 41 088 using the US price. Finally, we estimated the revenue-neutral price of G-CSF based on American data of the cost-of-illness. The price ranged from US$ 395 to US$ 569 per cycle, a figure higher than the value (US$ 150) previously reported in the literature.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Intermittent negative pressure ventilation in the treatment of hypoxic hypercapnic coma in chronic respiratory insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: In recent years non-invasive ventilatory techniques have been used successfully in the treatment of acute on chronic respiratory failure (ACRF), but careful selection of patients is essential and a comatose state may represent an exclusion criterion. The aim of this retrospective and uncontrolled study was to evaluate whether a non-invasive ventilatory technique such as the iron lung could also be used successfully in patients with hypoxic hypercapnic coma, thus widening the range for application of non-invasive ventilatory techniques. METHODS: A series of 150 consecutive patients with ACRF and hypoxic hypercapnic coma admitted to our respiratory intensive care unit were evaluated retrospectively. The most common underlying condition was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (79%). On admission a severe hypoxaemia (Pao2 5.81 (3.01) kPa) and hypercapnia (Paco2 14.88 (2.78) kPa) associated with a decompensated acidosis (pH 7.13 (0.13)) were present, the Glasgow coma score ranged from 3 to 8, and the mean APACHE II score was 31.6 (5.3). All patients underwent intermittent negative pressure ventilation with the iron lung. The study end point was based on a dichotomous classification of treatment failure (defined as death or need for endotracheal intubation) versus therapeutic success. RESULTS: There were 45 treatment failures (30%) and 36 deaths (24%). Nine patients (6%) required intubation because of lack of airway control. The median total duration of ventilation was 27 hours per patient (range 2-274). The 105 successfully treated cases recovered consciousness after a median of four hours (range 1-90) of continuous ventilatory treatment and were discharged after 12.1 (9.0) days. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that, in patients with acute on chronic respiratory failure and hypoxic hypercapnic coma, the iron lung resulted in a high rate of success. As this study has the typical limitations of all retrospective and uncontrolled studies, the results need to be formally confirmed by controlled prospective studies. Confirmation of these results could widen the range of application of non-invasive ventilatory techniques.

Aged↗