Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Melbourn

Publications and source records attributed to A Melbourn.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?

BACKGROUND: Stroke units reduce mortality and dependence, but the reasons are unclear. We have compared differences in management and complications of patients with acute stroke who were admitted to a stroke unit or to a general ward as part of a previously reported randomised trial. METHODS: 304 patients had been randomly assigned to stroke units (n=152) or to general wards supported by a specialist stroke team (152). We used a structured format to gather prospective data on the frequency of prespecified interventions in each of the major aspects of stroke care. Observations were undertaken daily for the first week and every week for the next 3 months by independent observers. The effect of differences in management on outcome at 3 months was assessed with the modified Rankin score, dichotomised to good (0-3) and poor (4-6) outcome. FINDINGS: Patients in the stroke unit were monitored more frequently (odds ratio 2.1 [1.3-3.4]) and more patients received oxygen (2.0 [1.3-3.2]), antipyretics (6.4 [1.5-27.5]), measures to reduce aspiration (6.0 [2.3-15.5]), and early nutrition (14.4 [5.1-40.9]) than those in general wards. Complications were less frequent in patients in the stroke unit than those in general wards (0.6 [0.2-0.7]), with fewer patients having progression of stroke, chest infection, or dehydration. Measures to prevent aspiration, early feeding, stroke unit management, and frequency of complications independently affected outcome. INTERPRETATION: Differences in management and complications between the stroke unit and general wards differ substantially, even when specialist support is provided. Such differences could be responsible for the more favourable outcome seen in patients on stroke units than those on general wards.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) is an organized, goal-defined, and time-managed plan that has the potential of facilitating timely interdisciplinary coordination, improving discharge planning, and reducing length of hospital stay. METHODS: An ICP for stroke rehabilitation based on evidence of best practice, professional standards, and existing infrastructure was developed. Its effectiveness was tested in 152 stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation who were randomized to receive ICP care coordinated by an experienced nurse (n=76) or conventional multidisciplinary care (n=76). RESULTS: The age, sex, premorbid functional ability, and stroke characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no differences in mortality rates (10 [13%] versus 6 [8%]), institutionalization (10 [13%] versus 16 [21%]), or length of hospital stay (50+/-19 versus 45+/-23 days) between patients receiving ICP or multidisciplinary care. Patients receiving conventional multidisciplinary care improved significantly faster between 4 and 12 weeks (median change in Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index 6 versus 2; P<0.01) and had higher Quality of Life scores at 12 weeks (65 versus 59; P=0.07) and 6 months (72 versus 63; P<0.005). There were no significant differences in the mean duration of physiotherapy (42.8+/-41.2 versus 39.4+/-36.4 hours) or occupational therapy (8.5+/-7.5 versus 8.0+/-7.5 hours) received between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: ICP management offered no benefit over conventional multidisciplinary care on a stroke rehabilitation unit. Functional recovery was faster and Quality of Life outcomes better in patients receiving conventional multidisciplinary care.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Use of antithrombotic measures for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate appropriateness of antithrombotic use to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation. DESIGN, PATIENTS: 344 patients with atrial fibrillation, stratified by age, were assessed clinically for contraindications to anticoagulation and stroke risk. The use of warfarin and aspirin was compared with recommendations for anticoagulation derived from pooled clinical trial data. RESULTS: Low risk of stroke was seen in 47 (14%) patients, moderate risk in 213 (62%), and high risk in 84 (24%) patients included in the sample (mean (SD) age 68.4 (17.2) years, 42% men). The proportion of patients requiring anticoagulation varied from 258/344 (75%) to 72/344 (21%) depending upon criteria used, of whom 86/258 (33%) and 36/72 (50%) were receiving warfarin, respectively. Warfarin or aspirin were not being used in 124/297 (42%) patients with moderate to high risk, whereas anticoagulation was being undertaken in 13/47 (27%) patients at low risk of stroke. Antithrombotic use (warfarin or aspirin) was significantly less common in patients over 75 years of age, regardless of absence of contraindications and eligibility according to various criteria (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A clear need for anticoagulation using clinical criteria existed in about 25% of patients in atrial fibrillation presenting to medical clinics who were at high risk of stroke. Of these, only 50% of eligible patients were being anticoagulated. Appropriate anticoagulation needs to be based on risk assessment rather than age. Consensus is therefore needed on appropriate antithrombotic use in clinical practice.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Risk assessment and anticoagulation for primary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Risk assessment before anticoagulation is important for effective stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A study was undertaken in patients with AF to investigate the contribution of clinical and echocardiography (ECHO) criteria to treatment decisions on anticoagulation. Patients were stratified by age and stroke risk; contraindications to anticoagulation and warfarin use were assessed. The value of ECHO in treatment decisions, effect of age, and existing anticoagulation practice were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean+/-SD age of 234 patients was 67.1+/-11.8 years, and 122 (52%) were women. Clinical risk factors were present in 74 of 80 patients (92%) aged >75 years compared with 99 of 154 patients (64%) </=75 years (P<0.01). ECHO risk was identified in 94 of 154 patients (61%) </=75 years, 16 (17%) of whom had no clinical risk factors. ECHO risk was present in 71 patients (88%) >75 years of age, and was associated with clinical risk factors in all patients. Eligibility for anticoagulation was seen in 72 of 154 (47%) to 105 of 154 (68%) patients aged </=75 years, depending on the criteria used, and in 66 of 80 patients (83%) >75 years, regardless of criteria used (P<0.01). Warfarin was being used in 55 of 105 patients (51%) </=75 years and 8 of 66 patients (12%) >75 years (P<0.001). Anticoagulation was being undertaken in 7 of 49 patients (14%) </=75 years despite no clinical or ECHO risks. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate assessments of eligibility and appropriateness of anticoagulation in AF can be made on clinical criteria alone, especially in older people. The value of ECHO in treatment decisions is limited to patients </=75 years of age with no clinical risk factors.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Stroke risk management: changes in mainstream practice.

BACKGROUND: Research shows that identification and control of risk factors reduces ischemic stroke. The impact of this evidence and health initiatives on mainstream practice remains unknown. METHODS: The purpose of this observational study was to investigate prior management of risk factors (hypertension, atrial fibrillation, previous stroke/transient ischemic attacks) in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Data were collected on the frequency of known risk factors before the incident stroke and their management compared with predefined criteria for appropriateness. The proportion of patients receiving treatment for risk factors before the acute episode was studied over 3 years. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-four patients (median age, 76 years; 60% women) were included in the study over 3 years. The proportion of patients with known hypertension (41% to 46%), diabetes (12% to 13%), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (21% to 31%), and atrial fibrillation (16% to 21%) remained stable. Overall, approximately 45% patients with atrial fibrillation, 60% patients with hypertension, and 70% with cerebrovascular disease were being actively managed. Time trends analysis showed a significant increase in the proportion of patients being treated for risk due to known cerebrovascular disease (59% to 85%), atrial fibrillation (18% to 59%), ischemic heart disease (35% to 72%), and carotid disease (13% to 85%) between the first and third year. The proportion of patients receiving treatment for hypertension remained unchanged. Patients with preexisting symptomatic vascular disease were more likely to receive appropriate risk management compared with asymptomatic patients (72% versus 46%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although a significant number of ischemic events remain potentially preventable, there appears to be a positive trend in improved control of stroke risk.

Acute Disease↗