Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Markou

Publications and source records attributed to A Markou.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

From the endocrine point of view, menopause is considered a deficiency state and menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regarded as restoring the premenopausal endocrine milieu. Millions of healthy postmenopausal women were taking HRT in late 1990's many in the absence of menopausal symptoms. The major benefit from HRT was considered to be cardiovascular protection and also protection against osteoporosis and Alzheimer's Disease. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial and other studies published since 2002 fundamentally changed our understanding of risks and benefits associated with HRT. This review discusses the effects of HRT on menopausal symptoms, cognitive function, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and also breast and bowel cancer.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2002

The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP, but not the mGluR2/3 agonist LY314582, augments PCP effects on prepulse inhibition and locomotor activity.

Phencyclidine (PCP), a non-competitive antagonist of ionotropic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, produces psychotomimetic effects, such as a disruption in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response. NMDA antagonists also induce locomotor hyperactivity in rodents. We hypothesized that, like NMDA receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) modulate PPI and locomotor activity either alone or, in the case of mGluR5, via interaction with NMDA receptors. Rats treated with the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (2-methyl-6-phenylethynylpyridine) or the mGluR2/3 agonist LY314582, either alone or in combination with PCP, were tested in PPI and locomotor activity paradigms. Neither MPEP nor LY314582 altered PPI. MPEP, but not LY314582, potentiated the PPI-disruptive effects of PCP. MPEP alone did not alter locomotor or exploratory behavior, but augmented the complex, time-dependent locomotor-stimulating effects of PCP. LY314582 dose-dependently decreased locomotor activity and exploratory holepokes. LY314582 did not alter the PCP-induced increases in locomotor activity, but further decreased the number of holepokes. The effects of MPEP on the response to PCP may reflect the cooperation and co-localization of NMDA and mGlu5 receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Exposure to chronic mild stress alters thresholds for lateral hypothalamic stimulation reward and subsequent responsiveness to amphetamine.

Chronic mild stress in rodents has been proposed to model some of the environmental factors that contribute to the induction of depressive disorders in humans. This model is based on the hypothesis that chronic mild stress induces a change in brain reward function that resembles the symptomatology of major depression, namely, a decrease in responsiveness to rewarding stimuli. The purpose of the first experiment was to investigate whether chronic mild stress affects brain reward function as measured by alterations in lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation behavior in rats. Exposure to chronic mild stress induces a reduction in body weight which might affect brain reward function on its own. Therefore, the potential contribution of a reduction in body weight to the chronic mild stress-induced alterations in brain reward function was examined in a separate group of food-restricted rats. Thresholds for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation were slightly but significantly lowered in animals exposed to chronic mild stress, indicating an enhancement of stimulation reward efficacy. Food restriction had no effect on brain reward function. The second experiment examined the interaction between prior exposure to chronic mild stress or food restriction and responsiveness to a pharmacological challenge, amphetamine, that enhances brain reward function. Acute administration of amphetamine produced a greater enhancement of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation reward in animals exposed to chronic stress relative to non-stressed and food-restricted animals. Taken together, the present findings indicate that chronic mild stress sensitizes the neural substrates that mediate both lateral hypothalamic stimulation and psychostimulant drug reward. These findings support the hypothesis that prior exposure to stress affects the vulnerability for drug-taking behavior by increasing the positive reinforcing properties of drug of abuse.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed2001

Both GABA(B) receptor agonist and antagonists decreased brain stimulation reward in the rat.

The present experiments were designed to determine the role of GABA(B) receptor function on brain stimulation reward. Using a discrete-trial current-intensity threshold procedure, dose-effect functions were generated for the GABA(B) receptor agonist CGP 44532 (0-1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and the GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP 56433A (0-10.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and CGP 51176 (0-300.0 mg/kg, s.c.) on brain reward thresholds in rats. The GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP 56433A and CGP 51176 were used also to examine interaction effects with the GABA(B) receptor agonist CGP 44532 on reward thresholds. Administration of the highest doses of both the GABA(B) receptor agonist and antagonists elevated reward thresholds. Thus, both the agonist and antagonists used induced a reward decrement when administered separately. In addition, the co-administration of either of the two receptor antagonists with the agonist induced an additive effect on thresholds, rather than blocking the agonist-induced threshold elevations. These results suggest that activation of GABA(B) receptors modulates intracranial self-stimulation behavior in a complex fashion, possibly through differential effects of GABA(B) agonists and antagonists on pre- and post-synaptic GABA(B) receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Neurobiology of the nicotine withdrawal syndrome.

The aversive aspects of withdrawal from chronic nicotine exposure are thought to be an important motivational factor contributing to the maintenance of the tobacco habit in human smokers. Much emphasis has been placed on delineating the underlying neurobiological mechanisms mediating different components of the nicotine withdrawal syndrome. Recent studies have shown that both central and peripheral populations of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are involved in mediating somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal as measured by the rodent nicotine abstinence scale. However, only central populations of nAChRs are involved in mediating affective aspects of nicotine withdrawal, as measured by elevations in brain-stimulation reward thresholds and conditioned place aversion. Nicotine interacts with several neurotransmitter systems, including acetylcholine, dopamine, opioid peptides, serotonin, and glutamate systems. Evidence so far suggests that these neurotransmitters play a role in nicotine dependence and withdrawal processes. The available evidence also suggests that different underlying neurochemical deficits mediate somatic and affective components of nicotine withdrawal. The aim of the present review is to discuss preclinical findings concerning the neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates involved in these different aspects of nicotine withdrawal.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Fluoxetine combined with a serotonin-1A receptor antagonist reversed reward deficits observed during nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal in rats.

The symptom of "diminished interest or pleasure" in rewarding stimuli is an affective symptom of nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal, and a core symptom of depression. An operational measure of this symptom is elevation of brain reward thresholds during drug withdrawal. We report here that acute co-administration of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and p-MPPI, a serotonin-1A receptor antagonist, alleviated the diminished interest in brain stimulation reward observed during withdrawal from nicotine or amphetamine in rats (i.e., increased reward). By contrast, the same drug combination treatment did not reduce the somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal indicating symptom-specific neurobiological abnormalities. Surprisingly, the same treatment had opposite effects in control rats where reductions in reward were produced, suggesting that animal models should be based primarily on studying specific deficits that are pathognomic of a psychiatric disorder. The reversal of the affective aspects of drug withdrawal by a treatment that enhances serotonin neurotransmission indicates that decreased serotonergic function may mediate the reward decrements characterizing nicotine and amphetamine withdrawal, and that these symptoms may be homologous to a core symptom of non-drug-induced depressions.

Aminopyridines↗
PubMed2001

The nicotinic antagonist methyllycaconitine has differential effects on nicotine self-administration and nicotine withdrawal in the rat.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists have been shown previously to decrease nicotine self-administration and precipitate elevations in brain reward thresholds and somatic signs of withdrawal in animals chronically exposed to nicotine. Both the positive-reinforcing effects of acute nicotine and the negative effects of nicotine withdrawal have been hypothesized to contribute to the development and maintenance of nicotine dependence. The aim of the present study was to use methyllycaconitine (MLA), an alpha 7 nAChR antagonist, to investigate the role of alpha 7 receptors in the reinforcing effects of nicotine and nicotine withdrawal. MLA was administered to animals allowed to self-administer nicotine intravenously, and also to animals that had been prepared with nicotine-containing osmotic mini-pumps and trained on a brain stimulation reward procedure. The results indicated that pretreatment with the highest doses of MLA used (3.9 and 7.8 mg/kg) significantly reduced nicotine self-administration at two doses of self-administered nicotine (0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg/infusion). Nevertheless, MLA administration, at all doses tested, had no effect on brain reward thresholds or the number of somatic signs of withdrawal observed in rats chronically exposed to either nicotine or saline. In conclusion, the alpha 7 nAChR subtype appears to play a significant role in the reinforcing effects of acute nicotine administered intravenously, but not in nicotine dependence, as reflected in the lack of precipitation of the nicotine withdrawal syndrome in nicotine-treated animals.

Aconitine↗
PubMed2001

Serotonergic manipulations both potentiate and reduce brain stimulation reward in rats: involvement of serotonin-1A receptors.

A discrete-trial current-threshold self-stimulation procedure was used to assess the effects of increased and decreased serotonergic neurotransmission, and 5-HT(1A) receptor activation on brain stimulation reward. Systemic administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT had a biphasic effect on brain reward thresholds, without affecting the latency to respond, a measure of performance. The low dose of 8-OH-DPAT (0.03 mg/kg) lowered reward thresholds, whereas higher doses (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) elevated thresholds. The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist p-MPPI had no effect on brain stimulation behavior, but reversed both the 8-OH-DPAT-induced lowering and elevation of thresholds, indicating that both of these effects of 8-OH-DPAT are mediated through the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Injections of 8-OH-DPAT into the median raphé nucleus also lowered brain reward thresholds, without affecting measures of performance, whereas injections of 8-OH-DPAT into the dorsal raphé nucleus had no effect. A high dose of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) elevated reward thresholds and responses latencies, whereas lower doses (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) increased response latencies without affecting thresholds. Furthermore, the coadministration of a 5-HT(1A) antagonist, p-MPPI, and a previously ineffective dose of fluoxetine, a drug combination that increases serotonin levels, significantly elevated thresholds. Thus, it is suggested here that the reward-potentiating effects of systemically administered low doses of 8-OH-DPAT may be the result of reduced serotonergic neurotransmission, mediated by activation of 5-HT(1A) somatodendritic autoreceptors in the median, but not the dorsal, raphé nucleus. In conclusion, the present data support the hypothesis that serotonin exerts an inhibitory influence on reward processes.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗
PubMed2000

CRF and urocortin decreased brain stimulation reward in the rat: reversal by a CRF receptor antagonist.

The present studies were designed to investigate the effects of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor activation and antagonism on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) reward using a discrete-trial current-intensity threshold procedure. Bipolar electrodes were implanted in the lateral hypothalamus, and cannula guides were implanted above the lateral ventricle of male Wistar rats. Dose-effect functions were established for the effects on ICSS of the competitive CRF receptor agonist h/rCRF (0-5.0 microg, i.c.v. ), the CRF receptor agonist urocortin (0-5.0 microg, i.c.v.), and the CRF receptor antagonist [D-Phe(12), Nle(21,38), C(alpha) MeLeu(37)] h/rCRF(12-41) (0-5.0 microg, i.c.v.). Administration of h/rCRF or urocortin dose-dependently elevated ICSS thresholds without altering performance measures (latencies to respond to stimulation, extra and time-out responses). CRF was more potent than urocortin in terms of threshold dose-effects on ICSS thresholds compared to vehicle. Despite these apparent potency differences, percent effect sizes on ICSS thresholds were comparable at the highest doses of both peptides. In contrast to the significant threshold elevation effects of CRF and urocortin, the competitive CRF antagonist D-Phe CRF(12-41) had no effect on ICSS thresholds or performance measures. To determine the neuropharmacological specificity of the effect of CRF on brain stimulation reward, D-Phe CRF(12-41) was used to antagonize CRF-induced threshold elevations. Pretreatment with either the 5.0- or 10.0-microg doses of D-Phe CRF(12-41) effectively blocked CRF-induced reward threshold elevations (3.0 microg) without affecting other ICSS performance measures. These results indicate that CRF neurotransmission can modulate ICSS reward processes.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Effects of repeated withdrawal from continuous amphetamine administration on brain reward function in rats.

RATIONALE: The study of the effects of repeated amphetamine administration and withdrawal on brain reward function has relevance to both amphetamine dependence and non-drug-induced depressions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous amphetamine administration and withdrawal on brain stimulation reward thresholds, and the changes that occur with repeated amphetamine exposures. METHODS: Rats were prepared with bipolar electrodes in the lateral hypothalamus and trained in a discrete-trial reward threshold procedure. Then, rats underwent two separate periods of amphetamine administration via subcutaneous osmotic mini-pumps. RESULTS: Continuous amphetamine administration was associated with lowering in brain reward thresholds and decreases in response latencies, while withdrawal was associated with threshold elevations. These effects changed with subsequent amphetamine administration and withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that with the amphetamine administration regime used here, rats developed increased sensitivity to the effects of acute amphetamine administration and tolerance to the effects of amphetamine withdrawal.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed2000

Time-dependent alterations in ICSS thresholds associated with repeated amphetamine administrations.

The time interval between successive injections of psychostimulant drugs, such as amphetamine, plays an important role in the development of neuroadaptive responses to these drugs. Changes in reward function were quantified using a discrete-trial current-intensity paradigm to determine thresholds for lateral hypothalamic electrical self-stimulation after experimenter-administered amphetamine injections (4 mg/kg, IP) at 1- and 5-day intervals. Repeated administration of amphetamine produced progressive changes in ICSS behavior that were dependent on the time interval between injections. The acute effects of amphetamine on ICSS thresholds were potentiated, and threshold elevations associated with withdrawal from the drug diminished after repeated drug challenges at 5-day intervals. By contrast, daily injections of the same dose of amphetamine did not alter the acute threshold-lowering effect of the drug, but resulted in progressive increments in thresholds at later time points. Notably, the decreases in response latency produce by acute amphetamine administration were potentiated by both exposure regimens, which indicates a dissociation of drug effects on motor performance and brain stimulation reward. Thus, the distinct components of changes in reward function associated with acute amphetamine administration and subsequent withdrawal were differentially altered by the two exposure regimens, suggesting that the pattern of exposure is an important determinant of neuroadaptive responses to the drug.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed2000

Neural mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction: acute positive reinforcement and withdrawal.

The neurobiology of nicotine addiction is reviewed within the context of neurobiological and behavioral theories postulated for other drugs of abuse. The roles of various neurotransmitter systems, including acetylcholine, dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and opioid peptides in acute nicotine reinforcement and withdrawal from chronic administration are examined followed by a discussion of potential neuroadaptations within these neurochemical systems that may lead to the development of nicotine dependence. The link between nicotine administration, depression and schizophrenia are also discussed. Finally, a theoretical model of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying acute nicotine withdrawal and protracted abstinence involves alterations within dopaminergic, serotonergic, and stress systems that are hypothesized to contribute to the negative affective state associated with nicotine abstinence.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Reward and somatic changes during precipitated nicotine withdrawal in rats: centrally and peripherally mediated effects.

The negative affective aspects of nicotine withdrawal have been hypothesized to contribute to tobacco dependence. In the present studies in rats, brain stimulation reward thresholds, conditioned place aversions, and somatic signs of withdrawal were used to investigate the role of central and peripheral nicotinic acetylcholine and opioid receptors in nicotine withdrawal. Rats prepared with s.c. osmotic mini-pumps delivering 9.0 mg/kg/day nicotine hydrogen tartrate or saline were administered various doses of the nicotinic antagonists mecamylamine (s.c.), chlorisondamine (s. c. or i.c.v.), dihydro-beta-erythroidine (s.c.), or the opiate antagonist naloxone (s.c.). Nicotine-treated rats receiving mecamylamine or i.c.v. chlorisondamine exhibited elevated thresholds and more somatic signs than saline-treated rats. Nicotine-treated rats receiving s.c. chlorisondamine, at doses that do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, exhibited more somatic signs than saline-treated rats with no threshold elevations. Naloxone administration produced threshold elevations and somatic signs only at high doses that induced similar magnitude effects in both nicotine- and saline-treated subjects. Mecamylamine or dihydro-beta-erythroidine administration induced conditioned place aversions in nicotine-treated rats but required higher doses than those needed to precipitate threshold elevations. In contrast, naloxone administration induced conditioned place aversions at lower doses than those required to precipitate threshold elevations and somatic signs. These data provide evidence for a dissociation between centrally mediated elevations in reward thresholds and somatic signs that are both centrally and peripherally mediated. Furthermore, threshold elevations and somatic signs of withdrawal appear to be mediated by cholinergic neurotransmission, whereas conditioned place aversions appear to be primarily mediated by the opioid system.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Role of adenosine A2 receptors in brain stimulation reward under baseline conditions and during cocaine withdrawal in rats.

The present experiments tested the hypothesis that adenosine A2 receptors are involved in central reward function. Adenosine receptor agonists or antagonists were administered to animals that had been trained to self-stimulate in a rate-free brain stimulation reward (BSR) task that provides current thresholds as a measure of reward. The adenosine A(2A) receptor-selective agonists 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine hydrochloride (CGS 21680) (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) and 2-[(2-aminoethylamino)carbonylethyl phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (APEC) (0.003-0.03 mg/kg) elevated reward thresholds without increasing response latencies, a measure of performance. Specifically, CGS 21680 had no effect on response latency, whereas APEC shortened latencies. Bilateral infusion of CGS 21680 (3, 10, and 30 ng/side), directly into the nucleus accumbens, elevated thresholds but shortened latencies. The highly selective A(2A) antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (0.01-10.0 mg/kg) and the A2-preferring antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX) (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) did not alter thresholds or latencies, but DMPX (1.0, 10.0 mg/kg) blocked the threshold-elevating effect of APEC (0.03 mg/kg). In another study, repeated administration of cocaine (eight cocaine injections of 15 mg/kg, i.p., administered over 9 hr) produced elevations in thresholds at 4, 8, and 12 hr after cocaine. DMPX (3 and 10 mg/kg), administered before both the 8 and 12 hr post-cocaine self-stimulation tests, reversed the threshold elevation produced by cocaine withdrawal. These results indicate that stimulating adenosine A(2A) receptors diminishes BSR without producing performance deficits, whereas blocking adenosine receptors reverses the reward impairment produced by cocaine withdrawal or by an A(2A) agonist. These findings indicate that adenosine, via A(2A) receptors, may inhibit central reward processes, particularly during the neuroadaptations associated with chronic drug-induced neuronal activation.

Adenosine↗
PubMed1999

Increased sensitivity to the locomotor depressant effect of a dopamine receptor antagonist during cocaine withdrawal in the rat.

The effect of a dopamine receptor antagonist on locomotor activity was examined during withdrawal from either self-administered or experimenter-administered cocaine. In the self-administration experiment, the locomotor response to a challenge injection of cis-flupenthixol was assessed in photocell cages at 4 h after the cessation of a 12-h cocaine self-administration session. Rats which had self-administered cocaine, and were challenged with cis-flupenthixol (0.05 mg/kg), were found to be hypoactive relative to controls. In the experimenter-administered cocaine experiment, animals were given eight IP injections of 15 mg/kg cocaine over a 9.5-h period, for a total of 120 mg/kg. At 4, 8, and 24 h (tested in three separate groups of rats) after cessation of the eight injections, the locomotor response to a challenge injection of saline or cis-flupenthixol was tested. Cocaine-treated animals displayed a dose-dependent, heightened sensitivity to the locomotor depressant effects of 0.05 mg/kg and 0.2 mg/kg cis-flupenthixol 4 h post-cocaine, whereas they did not show increased sensitivity to 0.05 mg/kg cis-flupenthixol 8 or 24 h post-cocaine. However, cocaine-treated animals displayed a mild hypoactivity 8 h post-cocaine. In a separate group of animals, a dose-response experiment was performed which indicated that a dose of cis-flupenthixol as high as 0.2 mg/kg was required to produce locomotor depression in cocaine-naive rats. The results of this study support clinical observations of dopamine antagonist-precipitated motor dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers, and lend further support to the hypothesis that alterations in dopaminergic neurotransmission consequent to prolonged cocaine exposure are partly responsible for some of the symptoms of cocaine withdrawal.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

RU 24969, a 5-HT1A/1B agonist, elevates brain stimulation reward thresholds: an effect reversed by GR 127935, a 5-HT1B/1D antagonist.

Recent studies suggest that serotonergic neurotransmission through the serotonin-1B (5-HT1B) receptor is involved in reward processes. The purpose of the present studies was to investigate the effects of 5-HT(1B) receptor activation and antagonism on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) reward using a current-threshold ICSS task. Male Wistar rats were prepared with bipolar electrodes in the lateral hypothalamus. When stable baseline thresholds were established, the effects of the mixed 5-HT(1A)/1B receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0-1 mg/kg, SC), on ICSS behavior were assessed. Administration of this compound elevated ICSS thresholds without affecting response latencies, a measure of general motoric activity. The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, GR 127935 (0-10 mg/kg, SC), had no significant effect on ICSS behavior. However, pretreatment with an intermediate dose of GR 127935 (3 mg/kg), which was previously without effect on ICSS behavior, reversed the threshold-elevating effects of RU 24969 (1 mg/kg), suggesting the involvement of the 5-HT1B receptor in this effect of RU 24969 administration. Furthermore, pretreatment with RU 24969 (0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg), prior to 10 mg/kg cocaine hydrochloride, dose-dependently attenuated the threshold-reducing effects of cocaine. This result is interpreted as two opposing drug effects canceling each other out rather than a specific pharmacological antagonism. In conclusion, the results suggest that activation of 5-HT(1B) receptors reduces brain stimulation reward.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Differential effects of withdrawal from chronic amphetamine or fluoxetine administration on brain stimulation reward in the rat--interactions between the two drugs.

RATIONALE: Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine administration is characterized by deficits in reward that resemble some symptoms of depression. Nevertheless, the effects of long-term administration and withdrawal from other drugs, such as fluoxetine, that have the potential to elevate mood in depressed individuals have not been characterized. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of withdrawal from chronic amphetamine or fluoxetine administration on central reward function. Furthermore, the effects of acute or chronic pretreatment with fluoxetine on responsiveness to an acute amphetamine challenge were examined to identify potential interactions between the two drugs. METHODS: A rate-independent discrete-trial threshold procedure was used to characterize self-stimulation behavior in rats prepared with bipolar electrodes in the medial forebrain bundle. RESULTS: Elevations in intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, reflecting a decrease in the reward value of the stimulation, were associated with withdrawal from various chronic amphetamine treatment regimens (1-5 mg/kg, three injections per day for 1, 2, 4 or 6 days). The magnitude and duration of threshold elevations were proportional to the duration and dose of amphetamine treatment prior to withdrawal. In contrast, no alterations in ICSS thresholds were associated with withdrawal from chronic fluoxetine treatment (5 mg/kg/day for 15 days). While neither acute nor chronic administration of fluoxetine alone altered ICSS thresholds, chronic pretreatment with fluoxetine blocked the threshold-lowering effect of acute amphetamine administration (4 mg/kg), but acute pretreatment did not. Amphetamine-induced decreases in response latency, a measure of motor performance, were not affected by either chronic or acute fluoxetine pretreatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these experiments suggest that chronic fluoxetine treatment may induce adaptive changes in serotonergic transmission that, in themselves, do not alter the function of central reward processes, but may alter the ability of amphetamine to potentiate ICSS reward. In addition, the lack of change in ICSS thresholds during withdrawal from the chronic fluoxetine treatment regimen used suggests that withdrawal from all mood-altering drugs may not necessarily produce changes in central reward functions.

Amphetamine↗