Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A M Lincoff

Publications and source records attributed to A M Lincoff.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Impact of preprocedural white blood cell count on long term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials.

BACKGROUND: Raised inflammatory markers are associated with worse outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). An increase in the white blood cell (WBC) count is a non-specific response to inflammation. We hypothesised that a raised baseline WBC count would be a predictor of mortality in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: The association between preprocedural WBC count and long term mortality was studied in 7179 patients enrolled in the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials. The end points were the incidence of myocardial infarction at one year, and one and three year mortality. RESULTS: There were 188 deaths and 582 myocardial infarctions at one year. While WBC count was a strong predictor of death at one year, with every increase of 1 k/micro l (1x10(6)/l) being associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.109 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.072 to 1.147, p < 0.001), there was no association with myocardial infarction at one year (HR 1.020, 95% CI 0.990 to 1.052, p = 0.195). There were a total of 406 deaths at three years with a strong association between WBC count and three year mortality (HR for every 1 k/microl increase 1.089, 95% CI 1.058 to 1.121, p < 0.001). WBC count remained a significant predictor of mortality after multivariable adjustment (HR for every 1 k/micro l increase 1.100, 95% CI 1.069 to 1.131, p < 0.001). The association was significant across multiple subgroups, including diabetes, female sex, clinical presentation, and cigarette smoking. CONCLUSION: A raised pre-procedural WBC count in patients undergoing PCI is associated with an increased risk of long term death. These results suggest a key role for inflammation in coronary artery disease.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2002

Patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention benefit most from early intervention with protection by a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with acute coronary syndromes are offered percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the appropriate indications for, and optimal timing of, such procedures are uncertain. We analysed timing of intervention and associated events (death and myocardial infarction) in the PURSUIT trial in which 9461 patients received a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, or placebo for 72 h. Other treatment was left to the investigators. 2430 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days. Four groups were distinguished, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1; on days 2 or 3; at 4 to 7 days; or between 8 until 30 days, for eptifibatide- and placebo-treated patients. RESULTS: The four groups treated with placebo demonstrated total 30-day events of 15.9% for day 1 percutaneous coronary intervention, 17.7%, 15.0% and 18.2%, respectively, for successive intervals of later intervention. Later intervention was associated with more pre-procedural events (2.2% to 13.7%, P=0.001) which was balanced by a decrease in procedure-related events (12.1 to 3.1%, P=0.001), while the overall 30-day event rates were similar. Eptifibatide-treated patients with percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1 had the lowest rate of 30-day events (9.2%, P<0.05 vs other groups). In this group, pre-procedural risk was only 0.3%, while percutaneous coronary intervention on eptifibatide treatment was associated with low procedural risk (7.2%). The total 30-day event rate for later percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving eptifibatide was 14.0 on days 2 and 3, 15.0% for days 4 to 7 and 17.4% for days 7 to 30, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker, and early percutaneous coronary intervention (within 24 h) had the lowest event rate in this post hoc analysis. Thus 'watchful waiting' may not be the optimal strategy. Rather an early invasive strategy with percutaneous coronary intervention under protection of a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker should be considered in selected patients. Randomized trials are warranted to verify this issue.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Does eptifibatide confer a greater benefit to patients with unstable angina than with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction? Insights from the PURSUIT Trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the differential effects of eptifibatide therapy on unstable angina vs non-ST elevation myocardial infarction at enrollment, since the separate impact on these two major diagnostic subsets of acute coronary syndrome patients has not been fully investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the 9461 patients in the PURSUIT trial (conducted between 1995 and 1997) to compare the effects of eptifibatide on unstable angina and myocardial infarction. The study showed greater and more consistent effects of eptifibatide therapy on unstable angina than non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in reducing 30-day death/(re)infarction (from the unadjusted rate of 13.0% to 11.2%, P=0.059 for unstable angina; and 18.9% to 17.9%, P=0.387 for myocardial infarction), especially among patients who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratios=0.49 and 0.86, 95% confidence intervals=0.30-0.80 and 0.53-1.42, respectively, for unstable angina and myocardial infarction). The only subgroup for whom the benefit of eptifibatide was not evident was female myocardial infarction patients who did not undergo early percutaneous coronary intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that eptifibatide benefited unstable angina patients more than myocardial infarction patients, especially among those who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention, and support its use as concomitant therapy with early percutaneous coronary intervention especially in female myocardial infarction patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Attenuation of rebound ischemia after discontinuation of heparin therapy by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes: observations from the platelet IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial.

Background- A reactivation of ischemia after the discontinuation of intravenous heparin in acute coronary syndromes has been described. The effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade on heparin rebound is unknown. Methods and Results- Patients with acute coronary syndromes who received heparin therapy but not initial revascularization in the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial were analyzed. Rates of death or myocardial (re)infarction while on heparin therapy and in 12-hour periods in the 2 days after heparin discontinuation were compared between eptifibatide and placebo. There was no difference between study groups in event rates during heparin infusion. In the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation, there was a 2.5-fold increase in all events, an 8-fold increase in death, and a 2-fold increase in myocardial infarction. However, in the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation, there was a significantly lower rate of events (1.68% versus 2.53%, P=0.03) and death (0.77% versus 0.21%, P=0.002) in the eptifibatide group compared with the placebo group. When only considering patients who were on study drug at the time of heparin discontinuation, the reduction in the combined end point was marginally significant, but the difference in the rate of death remained significant (0.68% versus 0.06%, P=0.004). In logistic regression analyses, the multivariate predictors of rebound events were the duration of heparin therapy, age, North American site, and lack of eptifibatide treatment. Conclusions- An increase in death or myocardial infarction occurs in the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This rebound is attenuated by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

beta-blockers before percutaneous coronary intervention do not attenuate postprocedural creatine kinase isoenzyme rise.

BACKGROUND: beta-blocker (BB) use reduces infarct size in spontaneously occurring nonreperfused infarcts but probably does not change infarct size in patients treated with reperfusion therapy. A recent observational study suggested that BB use concurrent with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased the risk of creatine kinase (CK)-MB elevation. The cogency of such a conclusion is dependent on the ability to risk-adjust for the multiple differences in patients treated with and without BBs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using propensity score and multivariate regression analyses, 6200 consecutive patients were analyzed to assess the relationship between BB use before PCI and per protocol-measured CK and CK-MB rise. There were several highly significant (P<0.001) differences between patients with and without BB treatment (eg, age, prior infarction, unstable angina). Maximum CK and CK-MB levels were higher in patients taking BBs (CK median, 95 U [interquartile range: 61, 175]; CK-MB, 3 U [2, 5]) than in patients not taking BBs (CK, 91 U [60, 157]; CK-MB, 3 U [2, 4]) (P=0.011 and P=0.021 for CK and CK-MB, respectively). After adjustment for significant differences in baseline characteristics there was no difference in either maximum CK rise (P=0.21) or maximum CK-MB rise (P=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large observation study do not support the contention that BB use before PCI decreases myocardial injury.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention (the PRIDE study).

This study describes the dose-exploration phase of the PRIDE trial, an investigation of the clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes of treatment with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were dependent upon proper dosing selection. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical study, 127 patients were randomized 1:1:2:2 into 1 of the following treatment groups: placebo; eptifibatide as a 135 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.75 microg/kg/min infusion; eptifibatide as a 180 microg/kg bolus with a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion; or eptifibatide as a 250 microg/kg bolus with a 3.0 microg/kg/min infusion. Light transmission aggregometry was used to determine platelet aggregation in response to 20 microM adenosine diphosphate, and platelet receptor occupancy was also determined. Eptifibatide exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was greater in samples collected in sodium citrate compared with those collected in D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone. The 180/2.0 dosing regimen achieved 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation immediately (5 minutes) and at steady state (8 to 24 hours). At 1 hour, mean inhibition of platelet aggregation was 80%. Eptifibatide exhibited dose-dependent pharmacodynamics that were dependent upon choice of anticoagulant. A 180 microg/kg bolus followed by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion at steady state achieved >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation. With the single-bolus regimen, however, there was an early loss of the inhibition of platelet aggregation before steady state was reached. Additional dose-exploration studies may further optimize eptifibatide dosing.

Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones↗
PubMed2001

Abciximab readministration: results of the ReoPro Readministration Registry.

BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with abciximab (ReoPro) improves the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. This registry was conducted to characterize the effects of repeated administration of abciximab during intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recruited 500 consecutive patients at 22 centers in the United States who were receiving abciximab for at least a second time during percutaneous coronary intervention. Safety was measured as the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Efficacy was assessed as event-free clinical success. Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) responses were also characterized. There were no cases of hypersensitivity (95% upper confidence bound, 0.3%), major bleeding, or death. Clinical success was 94.4%. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 patients (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.8% to 6.4%), including 12 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 3.7%) who developed profound thrombocytopenia (<20x10(9) cells/L). In 2 patients (0.4%), profound thrombocytopenia did not develop until after hospital discharge; in 4 (0.8%), profound thrombocytopenia recurred despite platelet transfusion. Before a first readministration, a positive HACA titer was present in 22 of 454 patients (4.8%); after a first readministration, an additional 82 of 432 (19.0%) became HACA-positive. HACA did not neutralize the in vitro inhibition of platelet aggregation by abciximab or correlate with clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: The results, including overall rates of thrombocytopenia, were consistent with randomized clinical trials of first abciximab treatment. However, there was a shift from mild to profound thrombocytopenia, and cases of delayed presentation and of recurrent thrombocytopenia were seen. These findings suggest that indications and guidelines for first-time use apply to retreatment, particularly the systematic monitoring for thrombocytopenia.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury is increased in a rat model of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The key biological determinants that promote restenosis in the setting of diabetes have not been elucidated. There is no accepted animal model to study restenosis in diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 2 models of diabetes mellitus: (1) streptozotocin (STZ)-treated Sprague-Dawley rats (type I diabetes) versus regular Sprague-Dawley rats and (2) obese Zucker rats (type II diabetes) versus lean Zucker rats. Neointimal hyperplasia was assessed after carotid balloon injury at 21 days by computerized morphometry. There was no difference in neointimal area in the STZ-treated rats compared with controls, irrespective of insulin administration or dose of STZ. Neointimal area was increased >2-fold in obese Zucker rats compared with lean Zucker rats (0.21+/-0.06 versus 0.08+/-0.03 mm(2), P<0.01). The neointimal area was markedly increased in the obese Zucker rats 7 days after injury (0.058+/-0.024 versus 0.033+/-0.009 mm(2), P<0.05) and persisted through 21 days. In both obese and lean Zucker rats, cell proliferation peaked in the media at 3 days (118.66+/-84.28 versus 27.50+/-12.75 bromodeoxyuridine-labeled cells per cross section). In the intima, cell proliferation markedly increased beginning at day 3 and persisted through day 14 in the obese and lean Zucker rats (202.27+/-98.86 versus 35.71+/-20.54 bromodeoxyuridine-labeled cells at 7 days). CONCLUSIONS: The type II diabetic rat model, typifying insulin resistance, is associated with a propensity for neointima. The obese Zucker rat model may be an ideal diabetic model to further characterize the diabetic vascular response to injury.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes: prospective analysis from PURSUIT.

BACKGROUND: Platelet deposition and aggregation are central to the pathogenesis of ischemic complications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Pharmacodynamic effects of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist eptifibatide have been delineated in healthy subjects but not in patients with ACS. We assessed effects of eptifibatide on ex vivo platelet aggregation in patients enrolled in the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial of ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to an intravenous bolus (180 microgram/kg) and 72-hour infusion of eptifibatide (2.0 microgram/kg per minute, n=48) or placebo (n=50). We assessed correlations of plasma eptifibatide levels with receptor occupancy and inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation at 5 minutes and 1, 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours during treatment and 4 and 8 hours after termination of infusion. Blood was collected in buffered citrate and D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethylketone anticoagulants. Although eptifibatide produced profound, prolonged inhibition of platelet aggregation during therapy, aggregation appeared to recover partially by 4 hours after the bolus. The aggregation response was greater with thrombin receptor agonist peptide versus ADP stimulation; inhibition of platelet aggregation was greater in blood samples anticoagulated with citrate versus D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethylketone (PPACK). Plasma eptifibatide levels correlated significantly with receptor occupancy but not with inhibition of platelet aggregation. CONCLUSIONS: A bolus and infusion of eptifibatide inhibits platelet aggregation profoundly in patients with ACS and is followed by brief, partial recovery. These results enhance our understanding of the relation between pharmacodynamic and clinical effects of eptifibatide in such patients and may have important implications for its use in percutaneous interventions.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗
PubMed2001

Abciximab suppresses the rise in levels of circulating inflammatory markers after percutaneous coronary revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Previous investigators have shown that systemic markers of inflammation may be increased in patients with acute ischemic syndromes or after percutaneous coronary revascularization and that persistent elevation in these markers is predictive of excess risk of subsequent adverse cardiac events. By virtue of its cross-reactivity with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, avbeta3, and alphaMbeta2 receptors, abciximab may reduce inflammatory processes. Methods and Results-- Assays for the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were performed on serum samples obtained from 160 patients in a placebo-controlled, randomized trial of abciximab during angioplasty. Eighty patients each had received a placebo or abciximab bolus plus a 12-hour infusion. Serum samples were drawn at baseline (before revascularization), 24 to 48 hours after study drug administration, and 4 weeks after study drug administration. Between baseline and 24 to 48 hours, the increase in C-reactive protein was 32% less in patients receiving abciximab than placebo (P=0.025); the rise in interleukin-6 levels was 76% less in the abciximab group (P<0.001); and the rise in tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels was 100% less with abciximab therapy (P=0.112). By 4 weeks, most marker levels had returned to baseline, with no significant differences between placebo and abciximab groups. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic markers of inflammation increase in the first 24 to 48 hours after angioplasty, but the magnitude of that rise is diminished by periprocedural abciximab. Some of the long-term clinical benefit derived from this agent may be related to an anti-inflammatory effect.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Risk of stroke associated with abciximab among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

CONTEXT: Abciximab, a potent inhibitor of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, reduces thrombotic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because of its potent inhibition of platelet aggregation, the effect of abciximab on risk of stroke is a concern. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether abciximab use among patients undergoing PCI is associated with an increased risk of stroke. DESIGN: Combined analysis of data from 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (EPIC, CAPTURE, EPILOG, and EPISTENT) conducted between November 1991 and October 1997 at a total of 257 academic and community hospitals in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: A total of 8555 patients undergoing PCI with or without stent deployment for a variety of indications were randomly assigned to receive a bolus and infusion of abciximab (n = 5476) or matching placebo (n = 3079). One treatment group in EPIC received a bolus of abciximab only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke within 30 days of treatment among abciximab and placebo groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in stroke rate was observed between patients assigned abciximab (n = 22 [0.40%]) and those assigned placebo (n = 9 [0.29%]; P =.46). Excluding the EPIC abciximab bolus-only group, there were 9 strokes (0.30%) among 3023 patients who received placebo and 15 (0.32%) in 4680 patients treated with abciximab bolus plus infusion, a difference of 0.02% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.23% to 0.28%). The rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke was 0.17% in patients treated with abciximab and 0.20% in patients treated with placebo (difference, -0.03%; 95% CI, -0.23% to 0.17%), and the rates of hemorrhagic stroke were 0.15% and 0.10%, respectively (difference, 0.05%; 95% CI, -0.11% to 0.21%). Among patients treated with abciximab, the rate of hemorrhagic stroke in patients receiving standard-dose heparin in EPIC, CAPTURE, and EPILOG was higher than in those receiving low-dose heparin in the EPILOG and EPISTENT trials (0.27% vs 0.04%; P =.057). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab in addition to aspirin and heparin does not increase the risk of stroke in patients undergoing PCI. Patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab should receive low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal level of platelet inhibition with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist necessary to minimize thrombotic complications in patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred patients undergoing a PCI with the planned use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor had platelet inhibition measured at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours after the initiation of therapy with the Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay (Accumetrics). Major adverse cardiac events (MACES: composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization) were prospectively monitored, and the incidence correlated with the measured level of platelet function inhibition at all time points. One quarter of all patients did not achieve >/=95% inhibition 10 minutes after the bolus and experienced a significantly higher incidence of MACEs (14.4% versus 6.4%, P=0.006). Patients whose platelet function was <70% inhibited at 8 hours after the start of therapy had a MACE rate of 25% versus 8.1% for those >/=70% inhibited (P=0.009). By multivariate analysis, platelet function inhibition >/=95% at 10 minutes after the start of therapy was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of a MACE (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability in the level of platelet function inhibition is achieved with GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy among patients undergoing PCI. The level of platelet function inhibition as measured by a point-of-care assay is an independent predictor for the risk of MACEs after PCI.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Effect of lipid-lowering therapy on early mortality after acute coronary syndromes: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering agents are known to reduce long-term mortality in patients with stable coronary disease or significant risk factors. However, the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on short-term mortality immediately after an acute coronary syndrome has not been determined. We did an observational study using data from two randomised trials to investigate this issue. METHODS: We used data from the GUSTO IIb and PURSUIT trials to compare all-cause mortality among patients with acute coronary syndromes who were discharged on lipid-lowering agents (n=3653) with those who were not (n=17,156). A propensity analysis was done to adjust for presumed selection biases in the prescription of lipid-lowering agents. FINDINGS: Lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a smaller proportion of deaths at 30 days (17 [0.5%] vs 179 [1.0%], hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI 0.27-0.73], p=0.001) and at 6 months (63 [1.7%] vs 605 [3.5%], 0.48 [0.37-0.63], p<0.0001). After adjustment for the propensity to be prescribed lipid-lowering agents and other potential confounders, prescription of a lipid-lowering agent at discharge remained associated with a reduced risk of death at 6 months (0.67 [0.48-0.95], p=0.023). INTERPRETATION: Prescription of a lipid-lowering drug at hospital discharge was independently associated with reduced short-term mortality among patients after an acute coronary syndrome.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Ticlopidine pretreatment before coronary stenting is associated with sustained decrease in adverse cardiac events: data from the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inhibition at the time of a percutaneous coronary intervention has consistently been shown to decrease the risk of thrombotic adverse events but not restenosis. The role of enhanced antiplatelet protection through pretreatment with the platelet ADP-receptor antagonist ticlopidine in preventing both the early and late complications of coronary stenting has not previously been explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) trial, approximately 1600 patients were randomized to stenting with either placebo or abciximab in addition to aspirin and heparin. All stented patients also received ticlopidine after the procedure, but 58% of these patients were given ticlopidine before stenting at the discretion of the investigating physician. Among patients randomized to placebo, ticlopidine pretreatment was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P:=0.036). Ticlopidine pretreatment did not significantly influence the risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients randomized to abciximab. Controlling for patient characteristics and for the propensity of being on ticlopidine, Cox proportional hazards regression identified ticlopidine pretreatment as an independent predictor of the need for TVR at 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89; P:=0.010) in both placebo-treated and abciximab-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the EPISTENT trial, among patients randomized to stenting, starting ticlopidine before the percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of the 12-month composite end point for patients not receiving abciximab and the need for TVR among all patients.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Prognostic importance of concomitant heparin with eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been extensively studied in the treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease. Data regarding the use of these agents in the absence of concomitant intravenous heparin have been conflicting. We sought to determine, using propensity analysis, whether the benefit of eptifibatide, a IIb/IIIa inhibitor, in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes is affected by the concurrent administration of heparin. By trial design, patients were randomized to either eptifibatide or placebo, whereas use of intravenous heparin was left to the discretion of treating physicians. The effect of eptifibatide on the 30-day composite end point of death or myocardial infarction was studied in patients who received heparin and those who did not. Propensity analysis methods were used to control for confounding and presumed selection biases. Among 5,576 patients who were receiving heparin when the bolus dose of the study drug was administered, eptifibatide was associated with a reduced composite end point rate (13%) compared with that of placebo (14.5% vs 16.6%, p = 0.03). In contrast, among 1,441 patients who were not receiving heparin, there was no difference in 30-day event rates with eptifibatide compared with placebo (13.7% vs 13.1%, p > 0.7). After a propensity score for use of heparin was developed, however, use of heparin did not affect the reduced risk associated with eptifibatide (adjusted relative risk [RR] for heparin-eptifibatide interaction term 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 1.32, p > 0.5), but the propensity for heparin use was a strong predictor of events (adjusted RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.17, p < 0.001). The use of eptifibatide independently predicted a lower risk of events (adjusted RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.93, p = 0.04). Thus, the apparent positive impact of heparin on the benefits of eptifibatide therapy was largely due to confounding and bias.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Defining the optimal activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention: aggregate results from 6 randomized, controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin has been the primary anticoagulant therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention for >20 years. Despite the availability of rapid "point of care" testing, little clinical data defining the optimal level of anticoagulation are available. Furthermore, recent reports have advocated the use of low-dose heparin regimens in the absence of large-scale, well-conducted studies to support this practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled the data from 6 randomized, controlled trials of novel adjunctive antithrombotic regimens for percutaneous coronary interventions in which unfractionated heparin constituted the control arm. Patients were divided into 25-s intervals of activated clotting times (ACTs), from <275 s to >476 s. In a total of 5216 patients, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or any revascularization and major or minor bleeding at 7 days were calculated for each group and compared. An ACT in the range of 350 to 375 s provided the lowest composite ischemic event rate of 6.6%, or a 34% relative risk reduction in 7-day ischemic events compared with rates observed between 171 and 295 s by quartile analysis (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to recent reports, the optimal suppression of ischemic events with unfractionated heparin therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention demands treatment to ACT levels that are substantially higher than currently appreciated. These data define a goal for heparin dosing within coronary interventions and establish a benchmark of optimal unfractionated heparin therapy against which future trials of novel antithrombotic regimens in percutaneous interventions can be compared.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2001

Therapeutic value of eptifibatide at community hospitals transferring patients to tertiary referral centers early after admission for acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the benefits of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, eptifibatide, after patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) were admitted to hospitals that approach revascularization for ACS through early transfer to tertiary referral centers. BACKGROUND: Across a variety of hospital settings, GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, after patients were admitted to the hospital for non-ST segment elevation ACS, is associated with a reduction in death or myocardial infarction (MI) before and during a percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: The outcomes of 429 patients from 153 sites in the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, who were transferred during study drug infusion ("transfer patients"), were compared with those of 1,987 patients who either remained in the hospital at those sites or were transferred after study drug termination ("nontransfer patients"). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of transfer and nontransfer patients were similar. Patients receiving eptifibatide were transferred less frequently than those receiving placebo (16% vs. 20%, p = 0.014). Transfer patients underwent more procedures and experienced a greater 30-day incidence of death or MI, as compared with nontransfer patients (21% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). Eptifibatide was associated with a reduction in death or MI through 30 days, independent of transfer status (2.5% absolute reduction), as well as for those transferred (5.5% absolute reduction). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ACS admitted to community hospitals, eptifibatide is associated with a reduced need for transfer and improved clinical outcomes.

Aged↗