Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A M Kaunitz

Publications and source records attributed to A M Kaunitz.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC.

DMPA-SC 104 mg/0.65 mL is a new, low-dose subcutaneous (SC) formulation of Depo-Provera contraceptive injection (150 mg/mL medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable suspension) that provides efficacy, safety and immediacy of onset equivalent to Depo-Provera intramuscular (IM) injection. Two large, open-label, Phase 3 studies assessed the 1-year contraceptive efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with DMPA-SC administered every 3 months (12-13 weeks). Zero pregnancies were reported in both studies, which included a total of 16,023 woman-cycles of exposure to DMPA-SC and substantial numbers of overweight or obese women. DMPA-SC was well-tolerated and adverse events were similar to those reported previously with Depo-Provera IM. Thus, DMPA-SC offers women a new, highly effective and convenient long-acting contraceptive option.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Misoprostol use during the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy of misoprostol compared with placebo or other uterotonics in preventing maternal morbidity associated with the third stage of labor. METHODS: We identified, retrieved, evaluated, abstracted data, and assessed the quality of all published studies (from January 1996 to May 2002) which assessed misoprostol's efficacy in minimizing uterine blood loss during the third stage of labor. Seventeen studies included 28170 subjects; of these, approximately one-half received misoprostol with the remainder receiving either a placebo or another uterotonic agent. An estimate of the odds ratio (OR) and risk difference for dichotomous outcomes was calculated using a random- and fixed-effects model. Continuous outcomes were pooled using a variance-weighted average of within-study difference in means. RESULTS: In assessing studies comparing misoprostol with placebo, those who received oral misoprostol had a decreased risk of needing additional uterotonics (OR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.46, 0.90). Compared with placebo, use of misoprostol was associated with an increased risk for shivering and pyrexia. In contrast, in studies comparing misoprostol with oxytocin, oxytocin was associated with significantly lower rates of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal shivering and pyrexia. In studies comparing misoprostol with Syntometrine, misoprostol was associated with higher rates of the need for additional uterotonic agent as well as shivering. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol was inferior to oxytocin and other uterotonics with regard to any of the third stage of labor outcomes assessed. However, when compared to placebo, misoprostol had a decreased risk of needing additional uterotonics. Thus, in less-developed countries where administration of parenteral uterotonic drugs may be problematic, misoprostol represents a reasonable agent for the management of the third stage of labor. Additional randomized clinical trials examining objective outcome measures (i.e. need for blood transfusion or 10% hemoglobin change) may further define benefits and risks of misoprostol use during the third stage of labor.

Female↗
PubMed2003

Human chorionic gonadotropin in cervicovaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) detected in cervicovaginal secretions of patients with symptoms suggestive of preterm labor is a predictor of preterm birth. METHODS: Women presenting to labor and delivery with symptoms of preterm labor were invited to participate. After collecting secretions with a cotton-tipped applicator from the posterior fornix and endocervical canal, we placed the swab in a test tube containing 1 ml of normal saline. From this solution, we performed qualitative and quantitative hCG measurements. Qualitative and quantitative hCG results from women who delivered at term were compared with those delivering prior to 37 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: Samples were obtained and analyzed from 86 women at a mean (+/- standard deviation) gestational age of 30.7+/-2.9 weeks. Of the 86 subjects enrolled, 28 (32.6%) delivered preterm. A positive rapid qualitative assay from cervicovaginal secretions between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of preterm delivery (relative risk 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38, 4.98). The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.19 (95% CI 1.35, 3.56) and 0.51 (95% CI 0.30, 0.85) respectively. Using a cut-off of 19 mIU/ml, similar diagnostic accuracy for predicting preterm birth was obtained with the quantitative test 1.93 (95% CI 1.14, 3.26) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.40, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and quantitative hCG measurements from cervicovaginal secretions may be useful predictors of preterm birth in symptomatic patients. The qualitative hCG test can be used at the bedside with results obtained in minutes.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lunelle monthly injectable contraceptive. An effective, safe, and convenient new birth control option.

Lunelle, an injectable estrogen/progestin contraceptive, is administered on a monthly basis and is now available as the first monthly injectable in the United States. International and US clinical trials have established its safety and confirmed its contraceptive efficacy. Fertility returns rapidly after discontinuation of injections. Studies have noted a high level of patient satisfaction with Lunelle, suggesting that monthly injectable contraception will become a first-line contraceptive option in the United States.

Contraception↗
PubMed2001

Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in elective cesarean vs. attempted vaginal delivery for breech presentation at or near term. METHODS: We reviewed the maternal and neonatal charts of all singleton breech deliveries of at least 35 weeks' gestation or 2000 g delivered between 1986 and 1997 at our institution. Patients delivered by elective cesarean were compared to those attempting a vaginal delivery. The neonatal outcomes analyzed were: corrected mortality; Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min; abnormal umbilical cord blood gases; birth trauma; and admissions to the intensive care nursery. Maternal morbidity was also assessed and compared. RESULTS: Of 848 women meeting criteria for evaluation, 576 were delivered by elective cesarean while 272 attempted a vaginal delivery. Of 272 women undergoing a trial of labor, 203 (74.6%) were delivered vaginally, while 69 (25.4%) failed an attempt at vaginal delivery and underwent a cesarean. When comparing patients delivered by elective cesarean with those attempting a vaginal delivery, no significant differences were noted in neonatal outcomes. However, maternal morbidity was higher among women delivered by cesarean, regardless of the indications for the procedure. Similar neonatal and maternal results were noted when nulliparous patients were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery of selected near-term infants presenting as breech is associated with increased maternal morbidity without corresponding improvement in neonatal outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Adjunctive intravaginal metronidazole for the prevention of postcesarean endometritis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of preoperative administration of intravaginal metronidazole for the prevention of postcesarean endometritis. METHODS: This double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized trial included patients of at least 24 weeks' gestation undergoing cesarean deliveries for various indications. Patients were randomized to receive either 5 g of metronidazole gel intravaginally or matching placebo before the initiation of the cesarean. All patients underwent surgical cleansing of the abdomen, and most received prophylactic antibiotics after cord clamping. Patients with chorioamnionitis and/or suspected allergy to metronidazole were excluded. For a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and beta of 0.20 (80% power), 120 subjects were required in each group. The main outcome variable was the incidence of postcesarean endometritis. Secondary outcome variables included presence of febrile morbidity, wound infection, days on antibiotics, and length of postpartum hospitalization. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 minutes, umbilical arterial pH less than 7.16, admission and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 112 patients receiving metronidazole, eight (7%) developed postcesarean endometritis, compared with 19 of 112 (17%) of those receiving placebo gel (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.19, 0.92). No significant differences were noted between treatment groups with respect to the other outcome variables. CONCLUSION: The preoperative administration of 5 g of intravaginal metronidazole gel appears to reduce the incidence of postcesarean endometritis.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2001

Current options for injectable contraception in the United States.

Two injectable forms of hormonal contraception, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) and medroxyprogesterone acetate/estradiol cypionate (MPA/E(2)C, Lunelle), are now available to American women. Both formulations have demonstrated high degrees of efficacy, safety, and ease of use in international and U.S. trials. Data on DMPA have shown a number of noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits, the most prominent of which is an 80% reduction in the risk of endometrial cancer. Although such benefits are less documented for MPA/E(2)C, they are expected to be similar to those seen with DMPA and oral contraceptives. Minor side effects of both formulations include menstrual irregularities in the early months of treatment and amenorrhea with DMPA. Patient counseling about the potential for these side effects, as well as possible risks, is important to long-term successful use of these contraceptive methods.

Contraception↗
PubMed2001

Oral contraceptive use in perimenopause.

Perimenopause represents a transition period lasting about 5 years before the permanent cessation of spontaneous menses. During this transition, the emphasis of clinical care changes. Although women still need effective contraception during perimenopause, issues including loss of bone mineral density, menstrual cycle changes, and vasomotor instability also need to be addressed. Hormone replacement therapy is not the first-line treatment for women with symptomatic perimenopause because hormone replacement therapy neither suppresses ovulation nor provides contraception; also, it will not prevent and in fact may aggravate unpredictable perimenopausal bleeding. Oral contraceptives offer many benefits for healthy, nonsmoking, perimenopausal women. Oral contraceptive use by women in their 40s has been found to decrease the risk of postmenopausal hip fractures and regularize menses in women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, reducing the need for surgical intervention for benign menstrual conditions. Use of oral contraceptives also can reduce long-term risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers. There is also good evidence that oral contraceptives relieve vasomotor symptoms in perimenopausal women. Oral contraceptives can be viewed as a strategy not only to improve perimenopausal symptoms, provide effective contraception, and reduce some long-term health risks, but also to enhance the quality of life for perimenopausal women.

Contraceptives, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy, cycle control, and safety of two triphasic oral contraceptives: Cyclessa (desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) and ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol): a randomized clinical trial.

The contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low-dose, triphasic desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (CTR 77, Cyclessa(TM)) was compared to that of a marketed, triphasic norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum(R) 7/7/7). Two identical multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group, comparative Phase III 6-cycle trials were designed to each enroll 4200 healthy women. The combined comparative data for Cyclessa versus Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 for both studies are reported here. Cyclessa and Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 had comparable contraceptive efficacy. Despite a lower ethinyl estradiol dose (25 microg/day vs. 35 microg/day), the Cyclessa group had significantly improved cycle control in comparison to the Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 group for presence of a withdrawal bleed (p = 0.001), lack of early withdrawal bleed (p = 0.01), and breakthrough bleeding/spotting (p = 0.001). For each of the months of the study, the incidence of breakthrough bleeding/spotting was lower in the Cyclessa group than the Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 group (breakthrough bleeding, p = 0.006; breakthrough spotting, p = 0.001). The incidence of other adverse events was similar among treatment groups, an observation that supports the safety of both formulations. There was significantly less weight gain (p = 0.0002) and less increase in the body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0002) in the Cyclessa group. The contraceptive efficacy and safety of Cyclessa is comparable to Ortho-Novum 7/7/7. Cyclessa provides significantly improved cycle control with no weight gain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Menstruation: choosing whether...and when.

For many women in the United States, menstruation is a major health concern because menstrual disorders and other conditions that may be aggravated during menses (e.g., migraine headaches, epilepsy) carry substantial morbidity. Women today menstruate nearly 3 times as often as in primitive societies, and evidence suggests that frequent, repetitive menstrual cycles may increase health risks. Because the conventional 21/7 combination oral contraceptive (OC) regimen provides only limited relief for women with menstrual disorders, alternative OC regimens that reduce menstrual frequency have been proposed. A new OC formulation specifically designed to decrease menstrual bleeding to 4 times per year is currently under investigation. Most women welcome less frequent menses or even amenorrhea. Women who may derive particular benefit from reduced menstrual frequency include not only those with medical conditions directly caused or aggravated by menses, but also those serving in the military, female athletes, mentally-retarded women with menstrual hygiene problems, young teens, and perimenopausal women.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Bleeding patterns of women using Lunelle monthly contraceptive injections (medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol cypionate injectable suspension) compared with those of women using Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol triphasic) or other oral contraceptives.

Persistent and/or unpredictable bleeding is a common reason for discontinuation of hormonal contraceptive methods. An open-label, nonrandomized, parallel, controlled study compared the efficacy, safety, and cycle control of the new, highly efficacious monthly injectable contraceptive containing 25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 5 mg estradiol cypionate (E(2)C) (MPA/E(2)C) (Lunelle Monthly Contraceptive Injection) with that of the frequently used norethindrone 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 mg/0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol (NET/EE) triphasic oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum 7/7/7). This report directly compares the bleeding patterns of women on MPA/E(2)C to those of women on NET/EE and untreated women. Overall, breakthrough bleeding occurred less frequently in women using MPA/E(2)C than in women using NET/EE (p < or =0.01). However, more women using MPA/E(2)C experienced amenorrhea/missed periods than those on NET/EE (p < or =0.01). In addition, the percentage of women experiencing breakthrough bleeding or amenorrhea while using other oral contraceptives is compared to that of women using MPA/E(2)C. A rapidly reversible method, MPA/E(2)C, combines the high contraceptive efficacy of surgical sterilization with the convenience of monthly administration. These data suggest that, for a large proportion of women, MPA/E(2)C offers predictability in bleeding patterns comparable to or greater than that experienced by ovulatory untreated women or those using combination oral contraceptives.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Prophylactic amnioinfusion for intrapartum oligohydramnios: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intrapartum prophylactic amnioinfusion in pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios. DATA SOURCES: Randomized controlled trials of prophylactic amnioinfusion in women with oligohydramnios were identified using computerized databases, index reviews, and references cited in original studies and review articles. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We evaluated, abstracted data from, and analyzed randomized studies of prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion in women with oligohydramnios. In every study the group allocation was based exclusively on presence of oligohydramnios. Only published studies with clearly documented outcome data were included. The quality of each trial was evaluated for methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria, adequacy of randomization, amnioinfusion protocols, definition of outcomes, and statistical analyses. The trials were evaluated concerning cesarean deliveries for fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities, overall cesarean rates, acidemia at birth, intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities, Apgar scores under 7 at 5 minutes, and postpartum endometritis. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were identified, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. They included 1533 patients, 793 in the amnioinfusion group, and 740 controls. Odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each outcome were calculated. We calculated an estimate of the OR and risk difference for dichotomous outcomes using random and fixed-effects models. A test of homogeneity was done across studies. Women with oligohydramnios who received intrapartum amnioinfusion had lower incidence of cesarean for FHR abnormalities (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.15, 0.35). Intrapartum amnioinfusion also was associated with lower overall rates of cesarean deliveries (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.40, 0. 68), acidemia at birth (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30, 0.55), FHR abnormalities during labor (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.17, 0.34), and Apgar scores under 7 at 5 minutes (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29, 0.91). Postpartum endometritis rates were similar among the study groups. CONCLUSION: In the presence of oligohydramnios, prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion significantly improves neonatal outcome and lessens the rate of cesarean delivery, without increasing the rate of postpartum endometritis.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed2000

Injectable contraception. New and existing options.

DMPA and MPA/E2C contraception offer women safe, effective, convenient, and reversible birth control choices. The use of DMPA, a 3-month injectable, is characteristically associated with amenorrhea. Lactating women and women in whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated can use this progestin-only birth control method. Return of fertility can be delayed in women discontinuing DMPA to become pregnant. In some cases, the use of DMPA also confers important noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits. A monthly estrogen/progestin injectable contraceptive, MPA/E2C should appeal to women who are concerned about daily pill taking, who prefer regular cycles to amenorrhea, and who find monthly injections acceptable and accessible. As is true for oral contraceptives, MPA/E2C represents an appropriate choice for women who prefer a rapidly reversible contraceptive. Currently, the proposed contraindications for MPA/E2C parallel those for combined oral contraceptives. As MPA/E2C contraception becomes available for American women, clinicians will learn how to best include this new method among the array of contraceptive choices. By individualizing contraceptive selection, counseling, and management approaches based on the relevant behavioral and medical considerations reviewed herein, clinicians can maximize their patients' success with injectable contraceptives. The more innovative that clinicians, family planning agencies, and insurers are in facilitating access to care (including reinjections), the more women will be able to avail themselves of safe, effective, and reversible methods of contraception. In addition to the physician's office or health clinic, other sites at which women might receive contraceptive injections include employee health clinics, college health clinics, or perhaps the pharmacy where the prescription is filled. Self-administration may become an appropriate option for some users of injectable contraception.

Affect↗
PubMed2000

The effect of obstetric resident gender on forceps delivery rate.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the effect of obstetric resident physician gender on the forceps delivery rate. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis was based on >350,000 deliveries performed by >800 residents in obstetrics and gynecology throughout the United States from 1994 to 1998. A chi(2) analysis was performed on resident statistics from residency review committee report forms. RESULTS: The percentage of total deliveries performed with forceps during residency was significantly higher among male residents (P <. 0001), as was the percentage of vaginal deliveries performed with forceps during residency (P <.0001). The percentage of overall operative vaginal deliveries (vacuum plus forceps) was significantly higher for male residents (P <.0001); however, the percentage of vacuum deliveries did not vary according to gender of the resident when considered independently. CONCLUSION: These results strongly suggest that resident gender affects performance of forceps delivery.

Delivery, Obstetric↗