Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Locniskar

Publications and source records attributed to A Locniskar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Pharmacokinetic and electroencephalographic study of intravenous diazepam, midazolam, and placebo.

Eleven healthy volunteers received a single intravenous dose of diazepam (0.15 mg/kg), midazolam (0.1 mg/kg), and placebo by 1-minute infusion in a double-blind, three-way crossover study. Plasma concentrations were measured during 24 hours after dosage, and the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectrum was simultaneously computed by fast-Fourier transform to determine the percentage of total EEG amplitude occurring in the 13 to 30 Hz range. Both diazepam and midazolam had large volumes of distribution (1.2 and 2.3 L/kg, respectively), but diazepam's half-life was considerably longer (33 versus 2.8 hours) and its metabolic clearance lower (0.5 versus 11.0 ml/min kg) than those of midazolam. EEG changes were maximal at the end of the diazepam infusion and 5 to 10 minutes after midazolam infusion. Percent 13 to 30 Hz activity remained significantly above baseline until 5 hours for diazepam but only until 2 hours for midazolam. For both drugs, EEG effects were indistinguishable from baseline by 6 to 8 hours, suggesting that distribution contributes importantly to terminating pharmacodynamic action. The relationship of EEG change to plasma drug concentration indicated an apparent EC50 value of 269 ng/ml for diazepam as opposed to 35 ng/ml for midazolam. However, Emax values were similar for both drugs (+19.4% and +21.3%, respectively).

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A large-sample study of diazepam pharmacokinetics.

Healthy male volunteers (n = 48) aged 18-44 years received a single 10-mg oral dose of diazepam. Plasma diazepam and desmethyldiazepam concentrations were measured at multiple points during the next 11 days. The distribution of peak plasma concentration (mean, 406 ng/ml) was not skewed and did not differ significantly from normal (Guassian). However, the distributions of elimination half-life (44.2 h), elimination rate constant (0.0219/h), clearance (26.6 ml/min), and volume of distribution (83 L) all were significantly skewed and deviated significantly fron normal. After logarithmic transformation, the distributions of elimination rate constant, elimination half-life, and volume of distribution were consistent with normal; however, this was not the case for time of peak plasma concentration. Thus, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral diazepam are highly variable even in a relatively homogeneous population. Parametric statistical testing procedures and pharmacokinetic forecasting schemes may be improved by more precise delineation of the underlying distributions for pharmacokinetic variables.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Alprazolam pharmacokinetics in women on low-dose oral contraceptives.

Sixteen women chronically using low-dose estrogen-containing oral contraceptive steroids (OCs) and 23 drug-free control women received a single 1-mg oral dose of alprazolam. Multiple plasma samples drawn during 48 hours after the dose were analyzed by electron-capture gas-liquid chromatography. There were no significant differences between controls and oral contraceptive users in alprazolam volume of distribution (1.27 versus 1.39 L/kg), elimination half-life (11.9 versus 12.3 hours), total clearance (1.36 versus 1.39 mL/min/kg), or total area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (227 versus 243 ng/mL X hr). Alprazolam free fraction in plasma was slightly but significantly greater in the oral contraceptive group as opposed to the control group (28.4 versus 27.0% unbound), respectively. However, comparison of free clearance between groups revealed no significant difference (4.61 versus 4.89 mL/min/kg, respectively). Thus, low-dose estrogen-containing oral contraceptives do not significantly influence the metabolic clearance of alprazolam.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Bromazepam pharmacokinetics: influence of age, gender, oral contraceptives, cimetidine, and propranolol.

Pharmacokinetics of the benzodiazepine bromazepam were evaluated in volunteer subjects who received single 6 mg oral doses followed by blood sampling during the next 48 hours. Age and gender effects were studied in 32 subjects, divided into young (aged 21 to 29 years) and elderly (aged 60 to 81 years) groups. Compared with young subjects, the elderly had significantly higher peak serum bromazepam concentrations (132 vs. 82 ng/ml), smaller volume of distribution (0.88 vs. 1.44 L/kg), lower oral clearance (0.41 vs. 0.76 ml/min/kg), and increased serum free fraction (34.8% vs. 28.8% unbound). However, gender had no significant influence on bromazepam kinetics. In 11 young female users of oral contraceptive steroids, compared with seven age- and weight-matched control women not using oral contraceptives, no differences in bromazepam kinetics were observed. Coadministration of cimetidine (1.2 gm daily) significantly reduced bromazepam clearance (0.41 vs. 0.82 ml/min/kg) and prolonged elimination half-life (29 vs. 23 hours). Propranolol (160 mg daily) significantly prolonged bromazepam half-life (28 vs. 23 hours), but the reduction in clearance associated with propranolol (0.65 vs. 0.82 ml/min/kg) did not reach significance. Bromazepam has the pharmacokinetic characteristics of benzodiazepines with half-life values between 20 and 30 hours. Consistent with its biotransformation pathway by hepatic microsomal oxidation, bromazepam clearance is significantly impaired in elderly individuals, by coadministration of cimetidine and possibly propranolol.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1986

Influence of propranolol coadministration or cigarette smoking on the kinetics of desmethyldiazepam following intravenous clorazepate.

The influence of propranolol coadministration or of cigarette smoking on the kinetics of desmethyldiazepam following a single 20-mg intravenous dose of clorazepate dipotassium was evaluated in healthy volunteers. In Study One, intravenous clorazepate was given once in the control condition, and again during coadministration of propranolol, 80 mg twice daily. Compliance with the prescribed propranolol regimen was verified by measurement of serum propranolol concentrations (mean, 37 ng/ml). In control vs propranolol treatment conditions, there was no significant difference in desmethyldiazepam volume of distribution (1.27 vs 1.23 liters/kg) or in free fraction in serum (1.83 vs 1.80% unbound). There was a small although statistically significant prolongation of desmethyldiazepam half-life (55 vs 61 h, P less than 0.05) and reduction in clearance (0.281 vs 0.247 ml/min/kg, P less than 0.02) attributable to propranolol. In Study Two, desmethyldiazepam kinetics were compared in eight cigarette smokers (mean, 19 cigarettes/day) and in 11 nonsmoking controls matched for age, sex, and body weight. There was no significant difference between controls and cigarette smokers in desmethyldiazepam volume of distribution (1.29 vs 1.34 liters/kg), elimination half-life (55 vs 59 h), clearance (0.284 vs 0.276 ml/min/kg), or free fraction in serum (1.96 vs 1.92% unbound). Thus, propranolol slightly although significantly impairs the clearance of desmethyldiazepam and prolongs its half-life. Cigarette smoking has no apparent influence on desmethyldiazepam kinetics.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Interaction of diazepam with famotidine and cimetidine, two H2-receptor antagonists.

Famotidine is currently under investigation as an H2-receptor antagonist. Eleven healthy male volunteers received a single 10 mg intravenous dose of diazepam on three occasions: once during coadministration of famotidine 40 mg bid, once during coadministration of cimetidine 300 mg qid, and once without other drug treatment (control). Multiple blood samples were drawn during the seven days after each diazepam dose. Diazepam and desmethyldiazepam plasma concentrations were measured by electron capture gas chromatography. There were no significant differences among the three treatment conditions in diazepam central compartment volume or total volume of distribution. During the cimetidine as compared with the control treatment, diazepam elimination half-life was significantly increased (72 vs 55 hr, P less than .05), total area under the curve (AUC) increased (11.8 vs 9.8 hr-micrograms/mL, P less than .05), and total clearance reduced (0.20 vs 0.28 mL/min/kg, P less than .05). Seven-day AUC for desmethyldiazepam also increased (4.6 vs 3.8 hr-micrograms/mL, P less than .05). However, there were no significant differences between famotidine and control treatment conditions in diazepam elimination half-life (53 vs 55 hr), total AUC (9.5 vs 9.8 hr-micrograms/mL), or total clearance (0.28 vs 0.28 mL/min/kg) or in seven-day AUC for desmethyldiazepam (3.9 vs 3.8 hr-micrograms/mL). Thus, therapeutic doses of cimetidine significantly impair the clearance of diazepam and desmethyldiazepam. Therapeutic doses of famotidine do not impair diazepam and desmethyldiazepam kinetics, suggesting that there is no significant kinetic interaction when diazepam and famotidine are administered concurrently in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Pharmacokinetics of dezocine, a new analgesic: effect of dose and route of administration.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) dezocine, and bioavailability of intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SQ) dezocine, were evaluated in healthy male volunteers. Elimination half-life following 5, 10, and 20 mg IV doses averaged 2.6-2.8 h, and was independent of dose. Clearance decreased slightly, although significantly, with dose. After Deltoid IM injection, dezocine was rapidly absorbed (peak level: 0.6 h after dose), with bioavailability 97%. Thus dezocine has extensive distribution, high clearance and short half-life over a range of IV doses. It is rapidly and completely absorbed following IM or SQ administration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

Obesity effects on nitrazepam disposition.

Nitrazepam pharmacokinetics were studied in 14 obese (mean +/- s.e. mean body weight 107 +/- 9 kg; percent ideal body weight [IBW] 166 +/- 12%) and 14 normal body weight (63 +/- 3 kg; percent IBW 98 +/- 2%) subjects. After an overnight fast, each subject ingested 10 mg nitrazepam orally. Nitrazepam concentrations were determined in plasma samples obtained over the following 72 h. Comparison of peak nitrazepam plasma concentration (94.2 +/- 10.3-obese vs 119 +/- 14.6 ng ml-1; NS) and time required after drug administration to reach peak concentration (1.52 +/- 0.24-obese vs 1.59 +/- 0.36 h; NS) indicated no differences between obese and control subjects. Elimination half-life was markedly increased in obese subjects (33.5 +/- 2.2 vs 23.9 +/- 1.2 h; P less than 0.001) due to increased apparent volume of distribution (Vd) (290 +/- 45 vs 137 +/- 12 l; P less than 0.005). Oral clearance was also increased in the obese subjects (101 +/- 12.4 vs 66.8 +/- 12.4 ml min-1; P less than 0.02). Extent of nitrazepam binding to plasma proteins was slightly decreased in obese subjects (% unbound--19.7 +/- 0.4-obese vs 17.9 +/- 0.3%; P less than 0.005). Correction of both Vd (2.62 +/- 0.17-obese vs 2.22 +/- 0.19 l kg-1; NS) and clearance (0.93 +/- 0.06-obese +/- 1.07 +/- 0.07 ml min-1 kg-1; NS) for total body weight (TBW) suggested that increases in obese subjects of both of these parameters were a function of body weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Absence of interaction of cimetidine and ranitidine with intravenous and oral midazolam.

Eight healthy volunteers received a single 5-mg intravenous dose of the imidazobenzodiazepine derivative midazolam on three occasions in random sequence: a, control, with no other treatment; b, during coadministration of cimetidine, 300 mg every 6 hr; c, during coadministration of ranitidine, 150 mg every 12 hr. Midazolam kinetics in each trial were determined from multiple plasma midazolam levels measured by gas chromatography for 24 hr after each dose. High pressure liquid chromatography analysis of plasma also verified compliance with cimetidine (mean level, 0.61 microgram/ml) and ranitidine (mean level, 0.36 microgram/ml) regimens. Analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in mean values for trials a, b, and c in midazolam elimination half-life (2.25 vs 2.02 vs 2.05 hr), volume of distribution (2.13 vs 2.14 vs 2.16 L/kg) or total clearance (10.8 vs 12.2 vs 12.3 ml . min-1 . kg-1). In a second study, six subjects received a 15-mg oral dose of midazolam on three occasions identical to those described above. Again, there were no significant differences among trials a, b, and c in midazolam peak plasma level (90 vs 95 vs 117 ng/ml), time of peak level (0.65 vs 1.45 vs 0.90 hr after dose), elimination half-life (3.04 vs 3.38 vs 3.30 hr), or apparent oral clearance (16.2 vs 14.3 vs 13.8 ml . min-1 . kg-1). Thus the usual therapeutic doses of cimetidine or ranitidine do not significantly alter the kinetics of intravenous or oral midazolam in healthy individuals.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1985

Age, sex, and nitrazepam kinetics: relation to antipyrine disposition.

Forty healthy men and women 19 to 80 years old received a single 10 mg oral dose of the 7-nitro benzodiazepine nitrazepam. Nitrazepam plasma concentrations were measured during the next 72 hours. Among men, the elderly had a larger volume of distribution (Varea) than did younger subjects (1.96 vs. 1.63 L/kg; P less than 0.05); because clearance did not change with age (0.84 vs. 0.95 ml/min/kg), the prolonged t1/2 in elderly men (28 vs. 20 hours; P less than 0.01) was a result of the larger Varea. Elderly and young women did not differ in nitrazepam Varea (2.58 vs. 2.55 L/kg), t1/2 (26 vs. 27 hours), or total clearance (1.19 vs. 1.09 ml/min/kg). The nitrazepam free fraction in plasma (18% to 19% unbound) was not related to age or sex. Among 18 subjects who also received antipyrine, the clearance of nitrazepam and antipyrine were not correlated (r = 0.23). Thus age minimally influences nitrazepam clearance (accomplished mainly by nitroreduction), which in turn is not significantly related to antipyrine oxidizing capacity.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1984

Comparative single-dose kinetics of oxazolam, prazepam, and clorazepate: three precursors of desmethyldiazepam.

Twelve healthy volunteers received a single 40-mg oral dose of the benzodiazepine derivative oxazolam, which serves primarily as a precursor of the active substance desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ). Concentrations of DMDZ were measured in multiple serum samples drawn for up to two weeks after the dose. Peak serum DMDZ concentrations averaged 115 ng/ml, measured at 8.6 hours after dosage. Mean DMDZ elimination half-life averaged 61 hours. Three of the subjects also received 40 mg each of prazepam and clorazepate, two other DMDZ precursors, on separate occasions. Although DMDZ elimination half-life was similar, total area under the curve (AUC) for DMDZ was larger for clorazepate, known to be completely transformed into DMDZ, than for oxazolam or prazepam the extent of whose conversion to DMDZ has not been previously established. After correcting for the different molar equivalent of DMDZ available from each preparation, the DMDZ ratio averaged 0.22 for oxazolam vs. clorazepate and 0.51 for prazepam vs. clorazepate. Thus, both oxazolam and prazepam lead to slow appearance of DMDZ in the systemic circulation. Furthermore the extent of DMDZ formation from oxazolam and prazepam is either incomplete or the drugs are incompletely absorbed. Equivalent doses of oxazolam, prazepam, and clorazepate should not be interchanged in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Noninteraction of temazepam and cimetidine.

The possible kinetic interaction of the hypnotic temazepam and the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine was evaluated. Nine healthy male and female volunteers received a 30-mg oral dose of temazepam on two occasions in random sequence, separated by at least 1 week. On one occasion, temazepam was given in the otherwise drug-free state; on the other, temazepam was given with concurrent administration of cimetidine, 300 mg every 6 h. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for temazepam in control versus cimetidine trials were: peak plasma concentration, 560 versus 498 ng/mL; time of peak concentration, 2.0 versus 2.1 h after the dose; volume of distribution, 1.30 versus 1.39 L/kg; elimination half-life, 9.9 versus 11.4 h; total clearance, 1.59 versus 1.60 mL/min/kg; free fraction of temazepam in plasma, 4.1 versus 3.8% unbound. Cimetidine has been shown to reduce the metabolic clearance of the benzodiazepines that are biotransformed by oxidative mechanisms. Temazepam, transformed by conjugation, appears unaffected by the coadministration of cimetidine.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Plasma concentrations and clinical effects after single oral doses of prazepam, clorazepate, and diazepam.

In a double-blind parallel-group pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study, 31 healthy volunteers received single oral doses of prazepam (10 mg), clorazepate (7.5 mg), or diazepam (5 mg). Appearance in plasma of diazepam and of desmethyldiazepam was rapid after administration of diazepam and clorazepate, respectively, with peak plasma concentrations reached within an average of 1 hour. After oral prazepam, however, desmethyldiazepam appeared in blood slowly, with the highest mean concentration at 6 hours postdosage. Clinical self-ratings of fatigue and of "feeling spacey" were significantly different among groups, with changes over baseline being more marked with clorazepate and diazepam than with prazepam. Thus, differences in absorption rate of orally administered benzodiazepines can lead to differences in the intensity of single-dose effects, despite administration of doses that are equivalent in terms of long-term anxiolytic efficacy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1984

Effect of age, gender, and obesity on midazolam kinetics.

The effects of age, sex, and obesity on the kinetics of single intravenous (iv) and oral doses of midazolam were evaluated in healthy volunteers who received 2.5-5 mg of iv midazolam on one occasion and 5-10 mg orally on another. Kinetics were determined from multiple plasma midazolam concentrations measured during 24 h after dosage. Midazolam elimination half-life (t1/2) after iv dosage was significantly prolonged in elderly (aged 60-74 yr) versus young (24-33 yr) males (5.6 vs. 2.1 hours, P less than 0.01) and total clearance was significantly reduced (4.4 vs. 7.8 ml X min-1 X kg-1, P less than 0.01), leading to increased systemic availability of the oral dose (50% vs. 41%, P less than 0.05). However total volume of distribution calculated by the area method (Vd) (1.6 vs. 1.3 1/kg) and protein binding (3.5 vs. 3.4% unbound) did not differ between groups. Among women there were no significant differences between elderly (64-79 yr) and young (23-37 yr) volunteers in t1/2 (4.0 vs. 2.6 h), clearance (7.5 vs. 9.4 ml X min-1 X kg-1), Vd (2.1 vs. 2.0 1/kg), protein binding (3.7% vs. 3.7% unbound), or oral bioavailability (38% vs. 36%). In obese volunteers (mean weight 117 kg; 173% of ideal weight) versus control subjects of normal weight (66 kg, 95% of ideal weight) matched for age, sex, and smoking habits, midazolam Vd was increased significantly (311 vs. 114 1, P less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗