Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A L Siu

Publications and source records attributed to A L Siu.

65 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Use of the hospital in a randomized trial of prepaid care.

Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) achieve their cost savings through lower rates of hospital admissions. To determine whether HMOs selectively avoid discretionary hospitalizations, medical records were reviewed from a randomized trial where families were assigned to either HMO or free-for-service care. Physicians who were blinded to system reviewed 244 medical records and judged the appropriateness both of the hospital setting and of the medical indications for hospitalization. The rate of discretionary surgery was lower in the HMO, while the rate of nondiscretionary surgery was equivalent in the two systems. For medical admissions, rates of discretionary and nondiscretionary admissions were lower in the HMO. There were no observable adverse effects on health from the lower rates of nondiscretionary hospitalization, either because the net effect on health was small or because the HMO substituted appropriate ambulatory services. We conclude that HMO reductions in hospitalization rates do not occur "across the board"; discretionary surgery is selectively avoided.

Adult↗

The quality of care received by older patients in 15 university-based ambulatory practices.

To evaluate how the medical problems of older patients are managed in university-based internal medicine practices, the authors reviewed the medical records of 1,527 outpatients treated at 15 university teaching hospitals. Specific treatments for hypertension or diabetes had similar frequencies in patients 65 years of age and over and in patients under age 65. However, although the medical records mentioned hypertension in 43 percent and diabetes in 12 percent of the patients 65 or over, dementia and incontinence were recorded in only 0.4 percent and 2 percent, respectively. This finding suggests either that these elderly patients were extremely atypical or that their geriatric problems were unrecognized.

Age Factors↗

Assuring the quality of health care for older persons. An expert panel's priorities.

To select topics for quality assurance activities focusing on older patients, we convened a 14-member panel of physicians and experts in quality assurance. In two rounds of ratings, panelists rated 42 medical conditions (eg, pneumonia) in terms of their effects on patient outcomes, the availability of beneficial interventions, and the health benefits from improving current quality. They rated 27 health services (eg, adult day-care) on similar dimensions. The feasibility of doing quality assurance work on each condition and service also was rated. Using the ratings, the conditions selected for quality assurance work were congestive heart failure, hypertension, pneumonia, breast cancer, adverse effects of drugs, incontinence, and depression. Health care services selected were hospital discharge planning, acute inpatient care for the frail elderly, long-term-care facilities (intermediate-care facilities and skilled nursing facilities), home health care services, and case management.

Aged↗

The quality of medical care received by older persons.

This paper reviews studies published since 1970 on the quality of medical services received by older persons. Although many of the studies were flawed in design or limited in scope, they suggest that there are problems in the quality of care received by older persons in ambulatory, hospital, and nursing home settings. Changes in health care delivery and financing should attempt to improve, rather than merely maintain, the quality of medical and health services received by this vulnerable population.

Aged↗

Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans.

We examined geographic variation in the rate of inappropriate hospitalization and the effect of cost sharing on that rate. The medical records of 1132 adults hospitalized in a randomized trial of health insurance plans were reviewed by two physicians who were blinded to the patients' insurance plan. They judged 23 percent of the admissions to be inappropriate and an additional 17 percent to have been avoidable by the use of ambulatory surgery. The percentage of inappropriate admissions varied among six sites (from 10 to 35 percent), but areas with low total admission rates did not necessarily have low proportions of inappropriate admissions. In plans with cost sharing for all services, 22 percent of admissions and 34 percent of hospital days were classified as inappropriate, as compared with 24 percent of admissions and 35 percent of hospital days in the plan under which care was free to the patient (these differences were not statistically significant). Our data show that a substantial fraction of hospitalization is potentially avoidable. Because cost sharing did not selectively reduce inappropriate hospitalization, it is important to develop other mechanisms to do so.

Adult↗

Medicare capitation and quality of care for the frail elderly.

Previous studies have shown that the quality of care provided in health maintenance organizations (HMO's) is either similar or better than that in fee-for-service settings; however, few studies have included sufficiently large numbers of older persons. Although it is reasonable to believe that healthy older patients will do as well in HMO's as younger people, the outcome for the frail elderly is less certain. This population may not do as well in the conservative medical practice environment of HMO's, and decreased hospitalization may have detrimental effects on their health. On the other hand, this population may benefit from the improved continuity of care and potential for comprehensive assessment in HMO's. The quality of care received by the frail elderly will be an important test of the success of Medicare capitation.

Aged↗

Long-term care residents' preferences for health states on the quality of well-being scale.

The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) quantifies health-related quality of life with a single number that represents community-based preferences for combinations of symptom/problem complexes, mobility, physical activity, and social activity. The aim of this study was to compare preferences of a long-term care population with those of the general population, determine whether preferences vary by the age of the hypothetical (target) person depicted in the health-state case description, and derive weights for new symptom/problem complexes of particular relevance to frail, older individuals. A sample of 38 female and 12 male long-term care residents with an average age of 86 years was asked to rate health-state scenarios that combined the four health domains of the QWB. This sample rates quality of life 0.10 units lower on average (on a 0-1 scale) than did the general population sample from which the QWB preferences were originally developed. Ratings of the same health state for younger versus older target persons did not differ significantly (all p values > 0.05 for t statistics). Weights derived for 11 new symptom/problem complexes were: disturbed sleep (-0.252), sit-to-stand requires maximal effort (-0.259), lonely (-0.265), walking a short distance causes extreme fatigue (-0.273), agitated (-0.284), hallucinating (-0.355), incontinent (0-359), unable to control one's behavior (-0.36), urinary catheter (-0.374), restrained in bed or chair (-0.374), and feeding tube through the nose or stomach (-0.402). These new weights increase the relevance of the QWB for cost-utility evaluations of health interventions for long-term care residents.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Grading the evidence for diabetes performance measures.

CONTEXT: Grading scientific evidence is a critical step in developing practice guidelines and quality performance measures. GENERAL QUESTION: What is the most useful way to grade evidence? SPECIFIC QUESTION: How should we grade the recommended clinical practices for patients with diabetes? STANDARD APPROACH: Hierarchical grading systems (e.g., grades I, II, and III), such as that used by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, have traditionally been used to rank the research designs of studies that support a particular clinical practice. POTENTIAL DIFFICULTIES: Many studies that support the clinical practices of diabetes care do not clearly conform to the categories traditionally used in hierarchical grading systems. As a result, there is a tendency to inaccurately characterize the level of evidence, leading to the phenomenon of evidence inflation or evidence deflation. To avoid exaggerating the evidence, important sources of information may be excluded, resulting in an understatement of the available supporting evidence. ALTERNATE APPROACH: This paper offers a more descriptive typologic system that uses the study design and an explanatory modifier to grade the evidence supporting the clinical practices of diabetes care. The study grades are randomized, controlled trial (RCT); RCT-embedded component; RCT-treatment only; RCT-different population; observational study-risk factor; and expert opinion. Using this grading system, the authors were able to more accurately describe the best available evidence supporting the clinical practices of diabetes care.

Diabetes Mellitus↗

Primary care physicians' satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups.

CONTEXT: Managed care and capitation have placed new responsibilities on primary care physicians, including formally acting as "gatekeepers" for specialty services and tests. Previous studies have not examined whether primary care physicians who provide services to patients under many coverage arrangements feel differently about caring for patients covered under capitation vs those covered through more traditional forms of insurance. An understanding of whether California primary care physicians feel that they deliver a different level of quality to capitated patients could help signal whether variations in care for patients with different coverage forms are evolving. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether primary care physicians in California capitated groups report different satisfaction levels with quality of care for patients in their overall practice than for patients covered by capitated contracts and to examine whether physicians' satisfaction with capitated care quality is influenced by the characteristics of the practice setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SETTING: A total of 89 California physician groups with capitated contracts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 910 primary care physicians (80% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Satisfaction with 4 aspects of quality of care provided to patients covered by capitated contracts vs patients overall. RESULTS: Physicians reported lower satisfaction with all 4 aspects of care for patients covered by capitated contracts than for patients in their overall practice: 71% were very or somewhat satisfied with relationships with capitated patients (compared with 88% for overall practice), 64% were very or somewhat satisfied with the quality of care they provided to capitated patients (compared with 88% for overall practice), 51% were very or somewhat satisfied with their ability to treat capitated patients according to their own best judgment (compared with 79% for overall practice), and 50% were very or somewhat satisfied with their ability to obtain specialty referrals (compared with 59% for overall practice) (P< or =.001 for all comparisons). Being in a medical group practice (vs an independent practice association) and having a larger percentage of capitated patients were independently associated by multivariate analysis with higher levels of satisfaction with capitated quality of care (P< or =.005). CONCLUSION: These California primary care physicians were less satisfied with the quality of care they deliver to patients covered by capitated contracts than with the quality of care they deliver to patients covered by other payment sources. However, those in medical group practices and with a higher percentage of capitated patients were more satisfied with capitated care. National expansion of capitation should be accompanied by efforts to ensure that the satisfaction of practicing physicians with the care they deliver does not decline.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗