Biomedical subjects

A L Rodacki

Publications and source records attributed to A L Rodacki.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Technical note: repeatability of measurement in determining stature in sitting and standing postures.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sitting and standing postures on the repeatability of a stadiometer designed to detect small variations in spinal length. Two groups of ten healthy subjects, with no previous or known history of back problems, participated in this study. One group was measured in the standing posture, while the other group was measured in a sitting posture. All subjects gave informed consent to participate in this study. Subjects had a set of landmarks defining the spinal contour marked on their backs and then stood in the stadiometer for three series of ten measurements to be performed. At the end of each measurement, the subjects were requested to move away from and then be repositioned in the stadiometer. Subjects improved the repeatability across the measurement series. At the end of the second measurement series, all subjects presented mean standard deviations of 0.43 +/- 0.08 mm (range 0.30-0.50 mm) in the standing posture. In the sitting posture, deviations of less than 0.05 mm were obtained only at the end of the third measurement series (0.48 +/- 0.08 mm; range 0.34-0.62 mm), suggesting that this posture required three measurement series before repeatable measurements could be assured rather than two in the standing posture.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Intermuscular coordination during pendulum rebound exercises.

In this study, we assessed coordination during pendulum rebound jumps. To gain insight into the movement coordination strategy, nine experienced male volleyball players performed maximal rebound jumps in a pendulum swing device using three different seat arrangements (90 degrees, 135 degrees and 180 degrees). Two-dimensional filming was performed in the right sagittal plane (200 Hz) synchronized with a force platform fitted to the wall (1000 Hz). The surface electromyograms of five muscles were recorded (200 Hz), in conjunction with kinematic and kinetic assessment. During the countermovement phase, the impact forces were attenuated by eccentric contractions of most muscles, which helped to reduce the energy input into the system. The wall reaction forces, net moments and joint power profiles were comparable between conditions. The small differences found between the extreme seat arrangements were attributed to differences in muscle length and the position of the feet. The strategy used during landing was similar to that observed in unconstrained vertical and drop jumps, where the neuromuscular system attenuates the impact forces. During the push-off phase, most muscles were found to contribute to positive work generation, except the semitendinosus, which was stretching throughout the propulsive phase. Despite not being able to exert a large influence over the trunk segment, this muscle was deemed to play an important role in regulating and synchronizing the onset of knee extension, enabling hip extension to occur before extension in the other more distal joints. Our findings show that the neuromuscular system is able to produce consistent movement coordination across experimental conditions and in accordance with the specific task demands and constraints imposed in the movement structure.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Multi-segment coordination: fatigue effects.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the segmental coordination of vertical jumps under fatigue. METHODS: Twelve subjects performed maximal countermovement jumps with and without fatigue, which was imposed by maximal continuous jumps in place until their maximal jump height corresponded to 70% of the nonfatigued condition. Video, ground reaction forces, and electromyographic signals were recorded to analyze the segmental coordination of countermovement jumps before (CMJ1) and after (CMJ2) fatigue. The magnitude of joint extension initiation, peak joint angular velocity, and peak net power around the ankle, knee, and hip joints and their respective times were determined. RESULTS: CMJ2 was characterized by a longer contact time, which was accompanied with an earlier movement initiation and several differences (P < 0.05) in the variables used to describe coordination. When the movement duration was normalized with respect to the contact phase duration, the differences between CMJ1 and CMJ2 were not sustained. A consistent pattern was indicated, in which the segmental coordination did not differ between jump conditions. When the magnitude of the muscle activation was set aside, a remarkably consistent muscle activation time was noticed between conditions. CONCLUSIONS: It was indicated that countermovement jumps were performed with a consistent well-timed motion of the segments. A "common drive," which acts without the knowledge of the muscle properties, was suggested as mediating and controlling the muscle activation timing between agonist-antagonist muscle pairs.

Adult↗