Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Kurz

Publications and source records attributed to A Kurz.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Midazolam minimally impairs thermoregulatory control.

Perioperative hypothermia usually results largely from pharmacologic inhibition of normal thermoregulatory control. Midazolam is a commonly used sedative and anesthetic adjuvant whose thermoregulatory effects are unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that midazolam administration impairs thermoregulatory control. Eight volunteers were studied on 2 days each, once without drug and once at a target total plasma midazolam concentration of 0.3 micrograms/mL (corresponding to administration of approximately 40 mg over approximately 4 h). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased sufficiently to provoke sweating, and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response. From these calculated thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C), we determined the thermoregulatory effects of midazolam. The sweating threshold was decreased approximately 0.3 degrees C by midazolam administration: 37.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C vs 37.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C (P = 0.0004, paired t-test). Midazolam decreased the core temperature that triggered vasoconstriction somewhat more: 37.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C vs 36.3 +/- 0.5 degrees C (P = 0.0002). Similarly, midazolam decreased the shivering threshold: 35.9 +/- 0.3 degrees C vs 35.3 +/- 0.6 degrees C (P = 0.03). The sweating-to-vasoconstriction (interthreshold) range, therefore, increased from 0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C to 0.7 +/- 0.3 degrees C (P = 0.002). Although statistically significant, this relatively small increase contrasts markedly with the 3-5 degrees C interthreshold ranges produced by clinical doses of volatile anesthetics, propofol, and opioids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Heat flow and distribution during induction of general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Core hypothermia after induction of general anesthesia results from an internal core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat and a net loss of heat to the environment. However, the relative contributions of each mechanism remain unknown. The authors evaluated regional body heat content and the extent to which core hypothermia after induction of anesthesia resulted from altered heat balance and internal heat redistribution. METHODS: Six minimally clothed male volunteers in an approximately 22 degrees C environment were evaluated for 2.5 control hours before induction of general anesthesia and for 3 subsequent hours. Overall heat balance was determined from the difference between cutaneous heat loss (thermal flux transducers) and metabolic heat production (oxygen consumption). Arm and leg tissue heat contents were determined from 19 intramuscular needle thermocouples, 10 skin temperatures, and "deep" foot temperature. To separate the effects of redistribution and net heat loss, we multiplied the change in overall heat balance by body weight and the specific heat of humans. The resulting change in mean body temperature was subtracted from the change in distal esophageal (core) temperature, leaving the core hypothermia specifically resulting from redistribution. RESULTS: Core temperature was nearly constant during the control period but decreased 1.6 +/- 0.3 degree C in the first hour of anesthesia. Redistribution contributed 81% to this initial decrease and required transfer of 46 kcal from the trunk to the extremities. During the subsequent 2 h of anesthesia, core temperature decreased an additional 1.1 +/- 0.3 degree C, with redistribution contributing only 43%. Thus, only 17 kcal was redistributed during the second and third hours of anesthesia. Redistribution therefore contributed 65% to the entire 2.8 +/- 0.5 degree C decrease in core temperature during the 3 h of anesthesia. Proximal extremity heat content decreased slightly after induction of anesthesia, but distal heat content increased markedly. The distal extremities thus contributed most to core cooling. Although the arms constituted only a fifth of extremity mass, redistribution increased arm heat content nearly as much as leg heat content. Distal extremity heat content increased approximately 40 kcal during the first hour of anesthesia and remained elevated for the duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The arms and legs are both important components of the peripheral thermal compartment, but distal segments contribute most. Core hypothermia during the first hour after induction resulted largely from redistribution of body heat, and redistribution remained the major cause even after 3 h of anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction impairs active core cooling.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians now consider hypothermia indicated during neurosurgery. Active cooling often will be required to reach target temperatures < 34 degrees C sufficiently rapidly and nearly always will be required if the target temperature is 32 degrees C. However, the efficacy even of active cooling might be impaired by thermoregulatory vasoconstriction, which reduces cutaneous heat loss and constrains metabolic heat to the core thermal compartment. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that the efficacy of active cooling is reduced by thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. METHODS: Patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures with hypothermia were anesthetized with either isoflurane/nitrous oxide (n = 13) or propofol/fentanyl (n = 13) anesthesia. All were cooled using a prototype forced-air cooling device until core temperature reached 32 degrees C. Core temperature was measured in the distal esophagus. Vasoconstriction was evaluated using forearm minus fingertip skin-temperature gradients. The core temperature triggering a gradient of 0 degree C identified the vasoconstriction threshold. RESULTS: In 6 of the 13 patients given isoflurane, vasoconstriction (skin-temperature gradient = 0 degrees C) occurred at a core temperature of 34.4 +/- 0.9 degree C, 1.7 +/- 0.58 h after induction of anesthesia. Similarly, in 7 of the 13 patients given propofol, vasoconstriction occurred at a core temperature of 34.5 +/- 0.9 degree C, 1.6 +/- 0.6 h after induction of anesthesia. In the remaining patients, vasodilation continued even at core temperatures of 32 degrees C. Core cooling rates were comparable in each anesthetic group. However, patients in whom vasodilation was maintained cooled fastest. Patients in whom vasoconstriction occurred required nearly an hour longer to reach core temperatures of 33 degrees C and 32 degrees C than did those in whom vasodilation was maintained (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Vasoconstriction did not produce a full core temperature "plateau," because of the extreme microenvironment provided by forced-air cooling. However, it markedly decreased the rate at which hypothermia developed. The approximately 1-h delay in reaching core temperatures of 33 degrees C and 32 degrees C could be clinically important, depending on the target temperature and the time required to reach critical portions of the operation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering in humans.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of mean skin temperature to the thresholds for sweating and active precapillary vasodilation has been evaluated in numerous human studies. In contrast, the contribution of skin temperature to the control of cold responses such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering is less well established. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that mean skin and core temperatures are linearly related at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in men. Because the relation between skin and core temperatures might vary by gender, the cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control also was determined in women. METHODS: In the first portion of the study, six men participated on 5 randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 34, 35, 36, and 37 degrees C. Core hypothermia was induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The core-temperature thresholds were then plotted against skin temperature and a linear regression fit to the values. The relative skin and core contributions to the control of each response were calculated from the slopes of the regression equations. In the second portion of the study, six women participated on three randomly ordered days, during which mean skin temperatures were maintained near 31, 35, and 37 degrees C. At each designated skin temperature, core hypothermia sufficient to induce peripheral vasoconstriction and/or shivering was again induced by central venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution. The cutaneous contributions to control of each response were then calculated from the skin- and core-temperature pairs at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. RESULTS: There was a linear relation between mean skin and core temperatures at the response thresholds in the men: r = 0.90 +/- 0.06 for vasoconstriction and r = 0.94 +/- 0.07 for shivering. Skin temperature contributed 20 +/- 6% to vasoconstriction and 19 +/- 8% to shivering. Skin temperature in the women contributed to 18 +/- 4% to vasoconstriction and 18 +/- 7% to shivering, values not differing significantly from those in men. There was no apparent correlation between the cutaneous contributions to vasoconstriction and shivering in individual volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that skin and core temperatures contribute linearly to the control of vasoconstriction and shivering in men and that the cutaneous contributions average approximately 20% in both men and women. The same coefficients thus can be used to compensate for experimental skin temperature manipulations in men and women. However, the cutaneous contributions to each response vary among volunteers; furthermore, the contributions to the two responses vary within volunteers.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Propofol linearly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds.

BACKGROUND: Skin temperature is best kept constant when determining response thresholds because both skin and core temperatures contribute to thermoregulatory control. In practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate both warm and cold thresholds while maintaining constant cutaneous temperature. A recent study shows that vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are a linear function of skin and core temperatures, with skin contributing 20 +/- 6% and 19 +/- 8%, respectively. (Skin temperature has long been known to contribute approximately 10% to the control of sweating). Using these relations, we were able to experimentally manipulate both skin and core temperatures, subsequently compensate for the changes in skin temperature, and finally report the results in terms of calculated core-temperature thresholds at a single-designated skin temperature. METHODS: Five volunteers were each studied on 4 days: (1) control; (2) a target blood propofol concentration of 2 micrograms/ml; (3) a target concentration of 4 micrograms/ml; and (4) a target concentration of 8 micrograms/ml. On each day, we increased skin and core temperatures sufficiently to provoke sweating. Skin and core temperatures were subsequently reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature by using the established linear cutaneous contributions to the control of sweating (10%) and to vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). From these calculated core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 35.7 degrees C), the propofol concentration-response curves for the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds were analyzed using linear regression. We validated this new method by comparing the concentration-dependent effects of propofol with those obtained previously with an established model. RESULTS: The concentration-response slopes for sweating and vasoconstriction were virtually identical to those reported previously. Propofol significantly decreased the core temperature triggering vasoconstriction (slope = -0.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms-1.ml-1; r2 = 0.98 +/- 0.02) and shivering (slope = -0.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms -1.ml-1; r2 = 0.95 +/- 0.05). In contrast, increasing the blood propofol concentration increased the sweating threshold only slightly (slope = 0.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C.micrograms -1.ml-1; r2 = 0.46 +/- 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Advantages of this new model include its being nearly noninvasive and requiring relatively little core-temperature manipulation. Propofol only slightly alters the sweating threshold, but markedly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Reductions in the shivering and vasoconstriction thresholds are similar; that is, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range increases only slightly during anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Alfentanil slightly increases the sweating threshold and markedly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds.

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is common in surgical patients and victims of major trauma; it also results from environmental exposure and drug abuse. In most cases, hypothermia results largely from drug-induced inhibition of normal thermoregulatory control. Although opioids are given to a variety of patients, the thermoregulatory effects of opioids in humans remain unknown. Accordingly, the hypothesis that opioid administration impairs thermoregulatory control was tested. METHODS: Eight volunteers were studied, each on 3 days: (1) a target total plasma alfentanil concentration of 100 ng/ml, (2) control (no drug), and (3) a target alfentanil concentration of 300 ng/ml. Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased sufficiently to provoke sweating. Temperatures subsequently were reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. Mathematical compensations were made for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of sweating (10%) and to vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). From the calculated thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C) and unbound plasma alfentanil concentrations, the individual concentration-response relationship was determined. The concentration-response relationship for all the volunteers was determined similarly using total alfentanil concentrations. RESULTS: In terms of unbound concentration, alfentanil increased the sweating threshold (slope = 0.021 +/- 0.016 degrees C.ng-1.ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Alfentanil also significantly decreased the vasoconstriction (slope = -0.075 +/- 0.067 degrees C.ng-1.ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.07) and shivering thresholds (slope = -0.063 +/- -0.037 degrees C.ng-1.ml; r2 = 0.98 +/- 0.04). In terms of total alfentanil concentration (degrees C.ng-1.ml), the sweating threshold increased according to the equation: threshold (degrees C) = 0.0014[alfentanil] + 37.2 (r2 = 0.33). In contrast, alfentanil produced a linear decrease in the core temperature, triggering vasoconstriction: threshold (degrees C) = -0.0049[alfentanil] + 36.7 (r2 = 0.64). Similarly, alfentanil linearly decreased the shivering threshold: threshold (degrees C) = -0.0057[alfentanil] + 35.9 (r2 = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The observed pattern of thermoregulatory impairment is similar to that produced by most general anesthetics: a slight increase in the sweating threshold and a substantial, linear decrease in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Heat balance and distribution during the core-temperature plateau in anesthetized humans.

BACKGROUND: Once triggered, intraoperative thermoregulatory vasoconstriction is remarkably effective in preventing further hypothermia. Protection results from both vasoconstriction-induced decrease in cutaneous heat loss and altered distribution of body heat. However, the independent contributions of each mechanism have not been quantified. Accordingly, we evaluated overall heat balance and distribution of heat within the body during the core-temperature plateau. METHODS: Nine minimally clothed male volunteers were anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane and maintained in an approximately 22 degrees C environment. They were monitored for approximately 2 h before vasoconstriction and for 3 h subsequently. Overall heat balance was determined from the difference between cutaneous heat loss (thermal flux transducers) and metabolic heat production (oxygen consumption). Arm and leg tissue heat contents were determined from 19 intramuscular temperatures, ten skin temperatures, and "deep" foot temperature. Heat constrained by vasoconstriction to the trunk and head was calculated by subtracting the expected change in that region (overall heat balance multiplied by the fractional weight of the trunk and head) from the actual change (change in distal esophageal temperature multiplied by the specific heat of human tissue and the weight of the trunk and head); the result represents the amount by which core heat exceeded that which would be expected based on overall heat balance, assuming that the change was evenly distributed throughout the body. RESULTS: Vasoconstriction and passive tissue cooling decreased heat loss but not to the level of heat production. Consequently, heat loss exceeded metabolic heat production throughout the study. Core temperature decreased approximately 1.3 C during the 2-h prevasoconstriction period; however, core temperature remained virtually constant during the subsequent 3 h. In the 3 h after vasoconstriction, arm and leg heat content decreased 57 +/- 9 kcal, and vasoconstriction constrained 22 +/- 8 kcal to the trunk and head. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the efficacy of thermo-regulatory vasoconstriction in preventing additional core hypothermia. Decreased cutaneous heat loss and constraint of metabolic heat to the core thermal compartment contributed to the plateau.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Desflurane slightly increases the sweating threshold but produces marked, nonlinear decreases in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds.

BACKGROUND: Shivering is rare during general anesthesia. This observation suggests that anesthetics profoundly impair shivering. However, the effects of surgical doses of volatile anesthetics on control of shivering have yet to be evaluated. Furthermore, the effects of desflurane on sweating and thermoregulatory vasoconstriction remain unknown. Accordingly, the authors determined the concentration-dependent effects of desflurane on sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering. METHODS: Nine volunteers each were studied on three randomly ordered days: (1) control (no anesthesia); (2) a target end-tidal desflurane concentration of 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC; 3.5%); and (3) a target concentration of 0.8 MAC (5.6%). Each day, volunteers were warmed until sweating was induced and subsequently cooled until peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering was observed. Changes in skin temperature were arithmetically compensated using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response. From the calculated thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C), the concentration-response relationship was determined. RESULTS: Desflurane significantly and linearly increased the sweating threshold from 37.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C on the control day (mean +/- SD), to 37.6 +/- 0.4 degrees C at 0.5 MAC, and to 38.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C at 0.8 MAC. Desflurane significantly, but nonlinearly, reduced the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. The sweating-to-vasoconstriction (interthreshold) range thus increased from 0.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C to 2.3 +/- 0.7 degrees C at 0.5 MAC and further to 4.6 +/- 2.0 degrees C at 0.8 MAC. The vasoconstriction-to-shivering range (difference between the respective thresholds) remained between 1.1 and 1.5 degrees C on the three study days. CONCLUSIONS: The observed linear increase in the sweating threshold was similar in pattern and magnitude to that produced by most general anesthetics. The approximately 3 degrees C reduction in the vasoconstriction threshold by 0.8 MAC desflurane was similar to that observed previously during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. However, the threshold was reduced less than expected at 0.5 MAC, suggesting that the dose-response relationship for vasoconstriction is nonlinear. Shivering was induced without difficulty in this study although the response is rare in surgical patients. It is likely that shivering during general anesthesia is rare because thermoregulatory vasoconstriction usually prevents body temperature from decreasing the required additional 1-1.5 degrees C.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Desflurane reduces the gain of thermoregulatory arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction in humans.

BACKGROUND: Thermoregulatory responses, such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction, provide substantial protection against core hypothermia. A response can be characterized by its threshold (core temperature triggering response), gain (rate at which response intensity increases, once triggered), and maximum response intensity. Reduced gain decreases the efficacy of a thermoregulatory response at a given threshold because response intensity will increase more slowly than usual. The effects of general anesthesia on the gain of arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction have not been reported. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that desflurane decreases the gain of centrally mediated vasoconstriction. METHODS: We studied seven healthy male volunteers. Each was studied twice: (1) desflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.4 minimum alveolar concentration); and (2) control (no anesthesia). Mean skin and fingertip temperatures were controlled at 35.5 degrees C throughout the study. Core temperature was reduced at a rate of 1.5 degrees C/h by central venous infusion of cold fluid. Fingertip arteriovenous shunt flow was measured using venous occlusion volume plethysmography at 1-min intervals. Flow was also evaluated using the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry. Vasoconstriction thresholds were calculated as the core temperatures triggering fingertip flows of 1.0 ml/min (beginning of vasoconstriction) and 0.25 ml/min (intense vasoconstriction). The gain of vasoconstriction was considered to be the slope of the fingertip flow versus core temperature regression within the linear range from 1.0 ml/min to 0.15 ml/min. The minimum observed flow was considered maximum vasoconstriction intensity. Data are presented as means +/- SD; P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The vasoconstriction threshold (when defined using a flow of 1.0 ml/min) was reduced from 36.8 +/- 0.3 degrees C to 35.6 +/- 0.3 degrees C by desflurane anesthesia (P < 0.01). Desflurane reduced the gain of vasoconstriction by a factor of three, from 2.4 to 0.8 ml.min-1.degrees C-1 (P < 0.01). Gains, as determined by the perfusion index and laser Doppler flowmetry, were likewise reduced (P < 0.01). The threshold on the control day was only 0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C less when significant vasoconstriction was defined as a flow of 0.25 ml/min rather than 1.0 ml/min. Because gain was reduced, however, the threshold during desflurane administration was 0.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C less when significant vasoconstriction was defined by a flow of 0.25 ml/min. Minimum flows were comparable and near zero with and without anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold reduction (1.2 degrees C/0.4 minimum alveolar concentration) was similar to that observed previously during isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, it is established already that maximum vasoconstriction intensity is comparable with and without isoflurane anesthesia. However, the data also indicate that even relatively low desflurane concentrations markedly reduce the gain of vasoconstriction. It is likely that reduced gain (i.e., slow onset of vasoconstriction) contributes to core hypothermia in some surgical patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Attempted suicide: efficacy of treatment programs.

Persons with a history of attempted suicide have an increased risk of eventually committing suicide. Eleven controlled perspective studies are reviewed on treatment programs aimed at reducing the rates of suicide and of repeated suicidal attempt in these considered at risk. None of these aftercare programs had a demonstrable impact on the suicide rate, and only in one investigation was a significant reduction of repeated attempts observed. Lack of statistical power and inadequate treatment strategies are discussed as major contributors to this failure. Recent evidence of a reduction of suicide rates and mortality by consequent and long-term treatment of patients with affective disorders, as well as reports of undertreatment of depression prior to completed suicide, might provide a new stimulus for the development and evaluation of aftercare programs for those who attempt suicide. The available evidence advocates a shift of emphasis from crisis management to the identification and treatment of psychiatric illness in this risk group.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1994

[Longevity of patients with Alzheimer's disease].

Probability of survival was investigated in a sample of 90 patients with Alzheimer's disease of mild to moderate severity over a period of 36 months. It showed a decline of approximately 10 per cent per year of observation. This is equivalent to an excess mortality of 21 as compared with the age-matched population. The estimated survival rate was analysed with regard to the influence of sex, and of age and severity of cognitive impairment at the initial examination. The most powerful predictor for a reduced probability of survival was the degree of cognitive impairment at study entry.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Thermoregulatory thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: There are significant physiologic differences between spinal and epidural anesthesia. Consequently, these two types of regional anesthesia may influence thermoregulatory processing differently. Accordingly, in volunteers and in patients, we tested the null hypothesis that the core-temperature thresholds triggering thermoregulatory sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering are similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Six male volunteers participated on three consecutive study days: epidural or spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned on the 1st and 3rd days (approximately T10 level); no anesthesia was given on the 2nd day. On each day, the volunteers were initially warmed until they started to sweat, and subsequently cooled by central venous infusion of cold fluid until they shivered. Mean skin temperature was kept constant near 36 degrees C throughout each study. The tympanic membrane temperatures triggering a sweating rate of 40 g.m-2.h-1, a finger flow less than 0.1 ml/min, and a marked and sustained increase in oxygen consumption (approximately 30%) were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds for sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering, respectively. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive epidural (n = 10) or spinal (n = 11) anesthesia for knee and calf surgery (approximately T10 level). As in the volunteers, the shivering threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained increase in oxygen consumption. RESULTS: The thresholds and ranges were similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia in the volunteers. However, the sweating-to-vasoconstriction (inter-threshold) range, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range, and the sweating-to-shivering range all were significantly increased by regional anesthesia. The shivering thresholds in patients assigned to epidural and spinal anesthesia were virtually identical. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia suggest that thermoregulatory processing is similar during each type of regional anesthesia. However, thermoregulatory control was impaired during regional anesthesia, as indicated by the significantly enlarged inter-threshold and sweating-to-shivering ranges.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on right and left ventricular performance assessed by Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography.

The advent of modern Doppler two-dimensional ultrasound technology has overcome the need of invasive measurements of several important cardiac parameters. It allows estimation of preload, contractility, and afterload. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is associated with a reduction in cardiac output. The responsible mechanisms are controversial. To evaluate the cardiovascular responses to PEEP, we employed different Doppler hemodynamic indices for the first time, combined with conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. Twenty-one healthy, young, and unsedated volunteers were admitted to the study. Under spontaneous respiration, PEEP level was increased stepwise (0, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 cm H2O). At each PEEP level, the following right and left ventricular parameters were assessed with Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography: two-dimensional variables: end-diastolic volume indices (EDVI), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular afterload-LaPlace relation (combined with cuff systolic pressure); Doppler variables: cardiac index (CI) (combined with two-dimensional measure of valve area), maximum velocity (Vmax), time velocity integral (TVI), acceleration time (AT), deceleration time (DT), deceleration rate (DR), ratio of early to atrial peak (E/A), ratio of isovolumic contraction time to ejection time (IVCT/ET), and maximum blood acceleration (dv/dt) in aorta and main pulmonary artery. Increasing PEEP resulted in a proportional decrease in biventricular EDVI. Moreover, PEEP application is also causing a drop of CI, which is determined from a decrease in Vmax and TVI, while EF, IVCT/ET, dv/dt, Doppler trans-atrioventricular parameters, and afterload stay in normal ranges. Employing Doppler hemodynamic indices for the first time in this study setting clearly supports data that the drop in EDVI and CI during PEEP is caused by reduction in ventricular filling due to decreased venous return. Using the Doppler parameters IVCT/ET and dv/dt, changes in myocardial contractility, as well as changes in afterload (LaPlace relation) can be ruled out.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[The apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 allele is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease with early and late onset].

The apolipoprotein E genotype was determined in 50 patients with clinically diagnosed and prospectively confirmed Alzheimer's disease of mild to moderate severity and in 50 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. The frequency of the epsilon 4 allele was increased in the patients irrespective of the age at onset and of a possible familial transmission of the disease. It was associated with a relative risk of 2.97. In patients who experienced first symptoms after the age of 65 years there was an inverse correlation between the number of epsilon 4 alleles and age at onset. The results suggest that in the absence of amyloid precursor protein mutations and of a gene which has not yet been precisely localized on chromosome 14, apolipoprotein E is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. It probably exerts its influence by an acceleration or retardation of amyloid formation and/or tau hyperphosphorylation.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Evidence for a nuclear compartment of transcription and splicing located at chromosome domain boundaries.

The nuclear topography of splicing snRNPs, mRNA transcripts and chromosome domains in various mammalian cell types are described. The visualization of splicing snRNPs, defined by the Sm antigen, and coiled bodies, revealed distinctly different distribution patterns in these cell types. Heat shock experiments confirmed that the distribution patterns also depend on physiological parameters. Using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunodetection protocols, individual chromosome domains were visualized simultaneously with the Sm antigen or the transcript of an integrated human papilloma virus genome. Three-dimensional analysis of fluorescence-stained target regions was performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. RNA transcripts and components of the splicing machinery were found to be generally excluded from the interior of the territories occupied by the individual chromosomes. Based on these findings we present a model for the functional compartmentalization of the cell nucleus. According to this model the space between chromosome domains, including the surface areas of these domains, defines a three-dimensional network-like compartment, termed the interchromosome domain (ICD) compartment, in which transcription and splicing of mRNA occurs.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1993

The threshold for thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during nitrous oxide/isoflurane anesthesia is lower in elderly than in young patients.

BACKGROUND: Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction minimizes further core hypothermia during anesthesia. Elderly patients become more hypothermic during surgery than do younger patients, and take longer to rewarm postoperatively. These data indicate that perianesthetic thermoregulatory responses may be especially impaired in the elderly. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that the thermoregulatory threshold for vasoconstriction during nitrous oxide/isoflurane anesthesia is reduced more in elderly than in young patients. METHODS: The authors studied 12 young patients aged 30-50 yr and 12 elderly patients aged 60-80 yr. All were undergoing major orthopedic or open abdominal surgery. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and fentanyl, and maintained only with nitrous oxide (70%) and isoflurane (0.6-0.8%). Core temperature was measured in the distal esophagus. Fingertip vasoconstriction was evaluated using forearm minus fingertip, skin-temperature gradients. A gradient of 4 degrees C identified significant vasoconstriction, and the core temperature triggering vasoconstriction identified the thermoregulatory threshold. RESULTS: The vasoconstriction threshold was significantly less in the elderly patients (33.9 +/- 0.6 degree C) than in the younger ones (35.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C) (P < 0.01). The gender distribution, weight, and height of the elderly and young patients did not differ significantly. The end-tidal isoflurane concentration at the time of vasoconstriction did not differ significantly in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that thermoregulatory responses in the elderly are initiated at temperatures approximately 1.2 degrees C less than that in younger patients. Thus, it is likely that elderly surgical patients become more hypothermic than do younger patients, at least in part, because they fail to trigger protective thermoregulatory responses.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Naloxone, meperidine, and shivering.

BACKGROUND: Meperidine, which binds both mu and kappa opioid receptors, is reportedly more effective in treating shivering than are equianalgesic doses of morphine (a nearly pure mu-receptor agonist). Furthermore, butorphanol, a kappa-receptor agonist/antagonist, treats shivering better than does fentanyl, which mostly binds mu receptors. These data indicate that much of meperidine's special antishivering activity may be mediated by its kappa activity. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that the antishivering activity of meperidine will be minimally impaired by low-dose naloxone (blocking most mu-receptors), but largely prevented by high-dose naloxone (blocking all mu and most kappa receptors). METHODS: Twelve volunteers each participated on 2 days. On both days, shivering was induced by central venous infusion of cold fluid. Twenty minutes later, six volunteers were given a placebo infusion of saline on one day, or an infusion of 0.5 microgram.kg-1.min-1 naloxone hydrochloride ("low-dose," designed to block mu receptors) on the other. The second group of six volunteers was given a saline bolus and infusion on one day, or a bolus of 11.5 micrograms/kg naloxone hydrochloride followed by an infusion of naloxone at 5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 ("high-dose," designed to block both mu and kappa receptors) on the other day. The infusions were continued for the duration of the study. The order of the treatment days (saline vs. naloxone) was randomly assigned, and the study was double blinded. Fifteen minutes after the test infusion was started, all 12 volunteers were given an intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg meperidine hydrochloride. Pupillary diameter and light reflex amplitude were used to quantify opioid-receptor agonist activity; shivering intensity was evaluated using oxygen consumption. RESULTS: Administration of naloxone alone did not alter oxygen consumption, pupil size, or the pupillary light reflex. No pupillary constriction was detected in either group when naloxone and meperidine were combined; in contrast, meperidine alone decreased pupil size and amplitude of the light reflex 30%. The meperidine bolus decreased oxygen consumption nearly to control values when the volunteers were given saline placebo. Combined administration of meperidine and low-dose naloxone also significantly reduced oxygen consumption, but the reduction and the duration of the reduction was less than during saline. When the volunteers were given high-dose naloxone, meperidine only slightly reduced oxygen consumption, and the values rapidly returned to premeperidine levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the antishivering property of meperidine is not fully mediated by mu-receptors. Although meperidine has well-known nonopioid actions, stimulation of kappa receptors seems a likely alternative explanation for much of the drug's antishivering action.

Adult↗