Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J van Balkom

Publications and source records attributed to A J van Balkom.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Comorbidity of the anxiety disorders in a community-based older population in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate patterns of comorbidity among the anxiety disorders in a community-based older population, and the relationship of these disorders with major depression, use of alcohol and benzodiazepines, cognitive impairment and chronic somatic illnesses. METHOD: The data were derived from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) study. A two-stage screening design was adopted to identify respondents with anxiety disorders. RESULTS: In total, 10% of the elderly with an anxiety diagnosis suffered from two or more anxiety disorders. Major depression (13% vs. 3%), benzodiazepine use (24% vs. 11%) and chronic somatic diseases (12% vs. 7%) were significantly more prevalent in respondents with an anxiety disorder than in respondents without anxiety disorders. Heavy or excessive alcohol intake (5% vs. 4%) and cognitive impairment (11% vs. 13%) were not significantly associated with any anxiety disorder. CONCLUSION: When anxiety disorders are diagnosed, in older people there is a relatively high probability of comorbid conditions being present.

Age Factors↗

The efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for social anxiety disorder (social phobia): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This article reviews all available studies on the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder. Using the search methods laid out by the Cochrane Collaboration, 25 published reports of SSRI effectiveness for social anxiety disorder were identified, of which eight were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). The odds ratios of responder status ('much improved' or 'very much improved' on the Clinical Global Impression Scale) for SSRI versus placebo varied between 2.1 and 26.2. In no RCT was the lower confidence limit less than 1. The number needed to treat varied from 1.6 to 4.2. The number of patients who responded to drug was approximately twice the number who responded to placebo. Comparing the change in mean Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale score in patients treated with drug versus those treated with placebo, the effect sizes of the RCTs varied from 0.3 to 2.2. In four RCTs the effect size was 'large', in one 'moderate' and in two 'small'. Furthermore, response rates and effect sizes for SSRIs were larger than those seen in trials of the reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors (RIMAs). It may be concluded with a high degree of confidence that SSRI treatment for social anxiety disorder is effective, both in reducing total levels of social anxiety and in improving patients' overall clinical condition.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia.

This review article summarizes comparator-controlled, short-term studies with currently available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia. Fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and citalopram have all been proven to be superior to pill-placebo in the treatment of panic disorder, agoraphobia and associated symptoms such as depression. Direct comparisons with other antidepressants, benzodiazepines, cognitive-behavioural therapies or combinations of SSRIs with psychotherapeutic interventions are scarce. The majority of studies have reported on fluvoxamine whereas, to date, sertraline and citalopram have been compared only with placebo. Meta-analyses have suggested that combining an antidepressant with exposure in vivo produces the greatest treatment gains. Since this procedure is already commonly used in everyday clinical practice, it is recommended that future research in the treatment of panic disorder be directed towards the investigation of a combination of SSRIs with exposure therapy.

Agoraphobia↗

Anxiety and depression in later life: Co-occurrence and communality of risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the comorbidity of and communality of risk factors associated with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders in later life. METHOD: A random age- and sex-stratified community-based sample (N=3,056) of the elderly (age 55-85 years) in the Netherlands was studied. A two-stage screening design was used, with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale as a screening instrument and the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule as a criterion instrument. Risk factors were measured with well-validated instruments and represented a broad range of vulnerability and stress-related factors associated with anxiety and depression. Multivariate analyses examined risk factors associated with pure major depressive disorder, pure anxiety disorders, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Comorbidity was highly prevalent: 47.5% of those with major depressive disorder also met criteria for anxiety disorders, whereas 26.1% of those with anxiety disorders also met criteria for major depressive disorder. While the only variables associated with pure major depressive disorder were younger age and external locus of control, risk factors representing a wide range of both vulnerability and stress were associated with pure anxiety disorders. External locus of control was the only common factor. The group with anxiety disorders plus major depressive disorder had a distinct risk factor profile and may represent those with a more severe disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Although high levels of comorbidity between major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders were found, comparing risk factors associated with pure major depressive disorder and pure anxiety disorders revealed more differences than similarities. Anxiety disorders in later life merit separate study.

Age Factors↗

Double-blindness procedure did not mask giving of medication in panic disorder.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to measure the degree to which patients and their treating physicians correctly guessed whether patients were on an active treatment (paroxetine or clomipramine) or pill-placebo, and whether correctness of these guesses was related to treatment outcome. METHODS: Ninety-five panic disorder patients, randomized to receive double-blind treatment with paroxetine, clomipramine or placebo for twelve weeks, were asked half-way through this period to classify treatment as active or placebo. Medical doctors were asked the same. RESULTS: Both patients and physicians guessed correctly to a degree much greater than would be expected by chance whether the patient was on an active treatment. Neither patients nor physicians were good at estimating correctly whether a patient was on a placebo. There was a trend approaching significance for patients on a placebo, whose physicians believed that they were on active treatment, to have a higher rating of symptom improvement than those patients who were correctly guessed to be on placebo. CONCLUSION: The 'double-blindness' procedure did not mask the giving of antidepressive medication in panic disorder. There is some evidence that physicians who incorrectly classify patients on a placebo as receiving active treatment relate this to better treatment outcome.

Clomipramine↗

Consequences of anxiety in older persons: its effect on disability, well-being and use of health services.

BACKGROUND: Although anxiety is quite prevalent in late life, its impact on disability, well-being, and health care utilization of older persons has not been studied. Older persons are a highly relevant age group for studying the consequences of anxiety, since their increasing numbers put an extra strain on already limited health care resources. METHODS: Data of a large community-based random probability sample (N = 659) of older subjects (55-85 year) in the Netherlands were used to select three groups: subjects with a diagnosed anxiety disorder, subjects with merely anxiety symptoms and a reference group without anxiety. These groups were compared with regard to their functioning, subjective well-being, and use of health care services, while controlling for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Anxiety was associated with increased disability and diminished well-being. Older persons with a diagnosed anxiety disorder were equally affected in their functioning as those with merely anxiety symptoms. Although use of health services was increased in anxiety sufferers, their use of appropriate care was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety has a clear negative impact on the functioning and well-being of older subjects. The similarity of participants with an anxiety disorder and those having merely anxiety symptoms regarding quality of life variables and health care use was quite striking. Finally, in spite of its grave consequences for the quality of life, appropriate care for anxiety is seldom received. Efforts to improve recognition, disseminate effective treatments in primary care, and referring to specialized care may have positive effects on the management of anxiety in late life.

Aged↗

Long-term outcome of pharmacological and psychological treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia: a 2-year naturalistic follow-up.

Two years after completion of a controlled outcome study of treatments for panic disorder with agoraphobia, patients were revisited and interviewed about their complaints. In the initial study, four treatments had been compared: (i) fluvoxamine combined with exposure; (ii) placebo medication plus exposure; (iii) psychological panic management plus exposure; and (iv) exposure alone. Comparison of the results at post-test had revealed superior efficacy of fluvoxamine combined with exposure over the other three treatments in reducing agoraphobic avoidance. The current naturalistic follow-up study investigated the long-term efficacy of the treatments with regard to abatement of complaints and reduced demand for further treatment. In addition, we examined whether patients were able to taper off the study medication without a recurrence of complaints. In total, 71 of the 76 patients of the original trial (93%) were interviewed. Comparison of the mean level of psychopathology at follow-up revealed no difference between the original treatment groups. The effect in the fluvoxamine plus exposure group was maintained, but was no longer superior, due to further improvements in the other treatment groups. Most patients received additional treatment during the follow-up period, usually because the 12 treatment sessions in the controlled study had yielded insufficient improvement. There was a trend for patients who received the fluvoxamine plus exposure treatment to require less aftercare than those who received the other treatments. Finally, almost 50% of the patients who had received medication in the original trial were able to taper off the use of fluvoxamine without a recurrence of complaints.

Agoraphobia↗

Paroxetine, clomipramine, and cognitive therapy in the treatment of panic disorder.

BACKGROUND: This 12-week, placebo-controlled study was carried out to compare the relative efficacy of paroxetine, clomipramine, and cognitive therapy in the treatment of DSM-III-R-defined panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. METHOD: After a 3-week single-blind, placebo run-in period, 131 patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind medication or 12 sessions of cognitive therapy based on the model of Clark. Efficacy assessments included the daily panic attack diary, the Clinical Global Impression scale, the Patient Global Evaluation, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, the Marks-Sheehan Phobia Scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Sheehan Disability Scale. RESULTS: Comparisons with placebo revealed significant superiority of paroxetine (20-60 mg/day) and clomipramine (50-150 mg/day) on nearly all outcome measures. On most measures, paroxetine also showed higher efficacy than cognitive therapy. With few exceptions, cognitive therapy did not differ significantly from placebo. The number of subjects becoming panic-free (66%) was higher and the onset of action was faster in the paroxetine-treated group. Treatment with cognitive therapy yielded the highest drop-out rate (26%). CONCLUSION: In this short-term study assessing treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia, paroxetine and clomipramine were consistently superior to pill placebo, whereas cognitive therapy was superior on only a few measures.

Adolescent↗

[Hypochondriasis].

In a female patient aged 33 years and suffering from excessive concern with her physical health, hypochondriasis was diagnosed. By cognitive behavioural therapy the obsessive thoughts, controlling behaviour and avoidance behaviour were alleviated. After treatment the patient needed fewer consultations. In general practice hypochondriasis is a common problem. Patients will ask for a lot of diagnostic tests. Nothing will give them enough reassurance and there can be irritation. The general practitioner must confront them with the fact that their main problem is hypochondriasis and search for solutions. Cognitive and behavioural therapy as well as treatment with antidepressive drugs may be helpful. The earlier the diagnosis and the start of treatment, the better the prognosis.

Adult↗

Anxiety disorders in later life: a report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence and risk factors of anxiety disorders in the older (55-85) population of The Netherlands. METHOD: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) is based on a random sample of 3107 older adults, stratified for age and sex, which was drawn from the community registries of 11 municipalities in three regions in The Netherlands. Anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule in a two-stage screening design. The risk factors under study comprise vulnerability, stress and network-related variables. Both bivariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to evaluate the risk factors. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anxiety disorders was estimated at 10.2%. Generalized anxiety disorder was the most common disorder (7.3%), followed by phobic disorders (3.1%). Both panic disorder (1.0%) and obsessive compulsive disorder (0.6%) were rare. These figures are roughly similar to previous findings. Ageing itself did not have any impact on the prevalence in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. The impact of other factors did not change much with age. Vulnerability factors (female sex, lower levels of education, having suffered extreme experiences during World War II and external locus of control) appeared to dominate, while stresses commonly experienced by older people (recent losses in the family and chronic physical illness) also played a part. Of the network-related variables, only a smaller size of the network was associated with anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety disorders are common in later life. The risk factors support using a vulnerability-stress model to conceptualize anxiety disorders. Although the prevalence of risk factors changes dramatically with age, their impact is not age-dependent. The risk factors indicate which groups of older people are at a high risk for anxiety disorders and in whom active screening and treatment may be warranted.

Aged↗

Follow-up on the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: a quantitative review.

We conducted a meta-analysis to update the knowledge of long-term efficacy of different treatments in panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Included were 68 studies pertaining to 106 treatment conditions and 1346 patients. Effect sizes Cohen's d were calculated within the treatment conditions at posttest and at follow-up for panic and agoraphobia. A comparison was made between six treatments: high-potency benzodiazepines, antidepressants, psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, antidepressants combined with exposure, and psychological panic management combined with exposure in vivo. The mean (+/- SD) duration of the follow-up period was 62 +/- 89 weeks. In the majority of the studies (84%), follow-up had a naturalistic character. The lack of information about treatments received between posttest and follow-up limits the interpretation of the results. For all conditions, the treatment gains at posttest were maintained during the follow-up period. The mean (+/- SD) d for panic was 1.11 +/- 0.70 at posttest and 1.28 +/- 0.61 at follow-up; for agoraphobia, the mean d at posttest was 1.36 +/- 1.10 and at follow-up it was 1.41 +/- 0.82. Significant differences were found in efficacy on agoraphobic measures at follow-up between the combination of antidepressants and exposure in vivo versus psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, and the combination of psychological panic management and exposure. Overall, the data suggest that different treatment options for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia are effective at both posttest and follow-up. Research on long-term treatment, discontinuation of therapies, and interventions between posttest and follow-up need more attention, for pharmacotherapy as well as psychotherapy.

Agoraphobia↗

Cognitive and behavioral therapies alone versus in combination with fluvoxamine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder.

The purpose of this treatment package design study was to investigate the differential efficacy of cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo with response prevention for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) versus the sequential combination with fluvoxamine. Patients with OCD (N = 117) were randomized to one of the following five conditions: a) cognitive therapy for weeks 1 to 16, b) exposure in vivo with response prevention for weeks 1 to 16, c) fluvoxamine for weeks 1 to 16 plus cognitive therapy in weeks 9 to 16, d) fluvoxamine for weeks 1 to 16 plus exposure in vivo with response prevention in weeks 9 to 16, or e) waiting list control condition for weeks 1 to 8 only. Assessments took place before treatment (pretest) and after 8 (midtest), and 16 weeks (posttest). In the first 8 weeks, six treatment sessions were delivered. During weeks 9 to 16, another 10 sessions were given. Thirty-one patients dropped out. Outcome was assessed by patient-, therapist- and assessor-ratings of the Anxiety Discomfort Scale, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, and the Padua Inventory-Revised. In contrast with the four treatments, after 8 weeks the waiting list control condition did not result in a significant decrease of symptoms. After 16 weeks of treatment, all four treatment packages were effective on these OCD ratings, but they did not differ among each other in effectiveness. In OCD, the sequential combination of fluvoxamine with cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo with response prevention is not superior to either cognitive therapy or exposure in vivo alone.

Adult↗

A meta-analysis of the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: a comparison of psychopharmacological, cognitive-behavioral, and combination treatments.

To compare short-term efficacy of benzodiazepines, antidepressants, psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, and combination treatments in panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PA), a meta-analysis was conducted. Included were 106 studies, pertaining to 222 treatment conditions, 5,011 patients at pretest and 4,016 at posttest. Pre/post effect sizes Cohen's d were calculated within the treatment conditions for four clinical variables: panic, agoraphobia, depression, and general anxiety. Seven large treatment conditions were used in the main analyses: high-potency benzodiazepines, antidepressants, psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, pill-placebo combined with exposure, antidepressants combined with exposure, and psychological panic management combined with exposure in vivo. First, these treatments were compared with a control condition, consisting of pill-placebo, attention placebo, and waiting list. Next, a comparison was made between the treatments. Antidepressants, psychological panic management, high-potency benzodiazepines, and antidepressants combined with exposure in vivo were superior to the control condition for panic attacks. Exposure in vivo alone was not effective for panic attacks. With regard to agoraphobic avoidance, all seven treatments were superior to the control condition. When comparing the various treatment conditions, no differences concerning panic attacks were found. For agoraphobic avoidance, the combination of antidepressants with exposure in vivo was superior to the other conditions. The combination of antidepressants with exposure in vivo is the most potent short-term treatment of PA.

Adult↗

Prediction of outcome and early vs. late improvement in OCD patients treated with cognitive behaviour therapy and pharmacotherapy.

In this study, follow-up results of cognitive-behaviour therapy and of a combination of cognitive-behaviour therapy with a serotonergic antidepressant were determined. The study also examined factors that can predict this treatment effect, both in the long term and in the short term. In addition, it investigated whether differential prediction is possible for cognitive-behaviour therapy vs. a combination of cognitive-behaviour therapy with a serotonergic antidepressant. A total of 99 patients were included in the study. Treatment lasted 16 weeks, and a naturalistic follow-up measurement was made 6 months later. Of the 70 patients who completed the treatment, follow-up information was available for 61 subjects. Significant time effects were found on all outcome measures at both post-treatment measurement and follow-up. No differences in efficacy were found between the treatment conditions. Effectiveness at post-treatment measurement appears to predict success at follow-up. However, 17 of the 45 non-responders at the post-treatment measurement had become responders by the follow-up. The severity of symptoms, motivation for treatment and the dimensional score on the PDQ-R for cluster A personality disorder appear to predict treatment outcome. No predictors were found that related specifically to cognitive-behaviour therapy or combined treatment. These results indicate that the effectiveness of cognitive-behaviour therapy or a combination of cognitive-behaviour therapy and fluvoxamine at the post-treatment measurement is maintained at follow-up. However, non-response at post-treatment does not always imply non-response at follow-up. Patients with more severe symptoms need a longer period of therapy to become responders. Although predictors for treatment success were found, no evidence was found to determine the choice of one of the treatment modalities.

Adult↗

[Social phobia].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗