Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Scheen

Publications and source records attributed to A J Scheen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Allergy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin analogues.

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence but not completely suppressed the occurrence of insulin allergy manifestations. Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), and the use of insulin analogues, resulting from the alteration in the amino acid sequence of the native insulin molecule, may influence the immunogenicity and antigenicity of native insulin. Instead of increasing allergy reactions, CSII has been reported to represent a successful alternative treatment in diabetic patients presenting local or generalized allergy to insulin or other components (zinc, protamine) of conventional treatment. Most recent reports concern CSII-treated patients using short-acting insulin analogues (essentially insulin lispro), although the precise role of these insulin analogues remains unclear as allergy to them has also been described. Finally, data on antigenicity and immunogenicity of long-acting insulin analogues (glargine, detemir), which may mimic the basal insulin delivery with CSII, remain scarce at present.

Diabetes Mellitus↗

[Drug therapy in the elderly. What should we know?].

Because of the increasing longevity of the population, a growing number of very old people are exposed to medications. Drug therapy in this population is difficult because of our lack of knowledge. The number of drugs administered is generally high and the prescription is often inappropriate. Changes in body composition, malnutrition and renal failure can cause drug accumulation and toxicity. However, hepatic metabolism via cytochrome P450 does not seem to be markedly influenced by oldness. Iatrogenic pathology is frequent in the elderly and may lead to hospitalisation and reduction in quality of life. Specific education of the medical care team should be promoted in order to tackle this important problem of public health.

Aged↗

[Diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure: physiopathology and treatment].

Diabetes mellitus increases by 2.5 to 5 the relative risk of congestive heart failure. Besides the classical risk factors of congestive heart failure such as obesity, arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease that are frequently associated to type 2 diabetes, a diabetic cardiomyopathy plays also a role. This specific complication is related to metabolic factors and oxidative stress, leading to muscular cell apoptosis and fibrosis. The management of a diabetic patient with congestive heart failure has several specificities not only concerning the treatment of cardiac insufficiency but most importantly concerning antidiabetic therapy. The relationship between glitazones, peripheral oedema and risk of congestive heart failure is currently raising much interest and controversies.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗

[Aspirin therapy for cardiovascular prevention in the diabetic patient: what have we learned from the evidence?].

Diabetes mellitus markedly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, with an especially elevated relative risk among women. Aspirin prescription is mandatory in secondary prevention, even if the protection by aspirin appears less efficacious in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. In primary prevention, available data are paradoxically rather scarce, but also suggest a less effective prevention when diabetes is present. Aspirin remains the first antiplatelet agent in the diabetic population in all international guidelines of cardiovascular prevention although a higher daily dose may be proposed in this subgroup of patients (160-300 mg rather than 75-100 mg).

Aspirin↗

[Distinction between good synthesizer and good absorber patients to optimize cholesterol-lowering therapy].

The inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by a statin enhances intestinal absorption of both cholesterol and various phytosterols. The atherogenic role of phytosterols, well proven in hypersitosterolemia, is now suspected in patients with premature coronary artery disease. The cholestanol/cholesterol ratio can be used as a marker of intestinal cholesterol absorption. Individuals with elevated ratio ("high absorbers") have less favourable cholesterol-lowering response and cardiovascular protection with statin therapy as compared to individuals with low ratio ("high synthesizers"). They may benefit of an adjunct therapy with phytostanols or ezetimibe, both being capable to reduce plasma concentrations of cholesterol and of phytosterols.

Cholesterol↗

[Rimonabant improves cardiometabolic risk profile in obese or overweight subjects: overview of RIO studies].

RIO (Rimonabant In Obesity and related disorders) is a large phase 3 programme (>6600 patients) evaluating the efficacy and safety of rimonabant (5 or 20 mg/day), a CBI receptor antagonist of endocannabinoid system, in obese or overweight patients with or without comorbidities (RIO-Europe and RIO-North America), with untreated dyslipidaemia (RIO-Lipids) or with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin or sulfonylurea (RIO-Diabetes). Compared to placebo, rimonabant 20 mg/day consistently increases weight loss, reduces waist circumference, increases HDL cholesterol, lowers triglyceride levels, diminishes insulin resistance, and reduces the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Almost half of the metabolic effects, including adiponectin increase, occur beyond weight loss, suggesting a direct peripheral effect of rimonabant.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗

[How to explore...the metabolic syndrome by its new IDF definition].

The International Diabetes Federation recently proposed a so-called consensus definition of metabolic syndrome. According to this new definition, a subject has the metabolic syndrome if he/she has abdominal obesity (considered as a prerequisite and assessed, in the European population, by a waist circumference > 80 cm in women and > 94 cm in men) and, in addition, at least two other risk factors among 1) elevated fasting triglycerides > or = 150 mg/dl; 2) low HDL cholesterol HDL < 50 mg/dl in women and < 40 mg/dl in men; 3) increased arterial blood pressure > or = 130/ 85 mm Hg; and 4) elevated fasting plasma glucose concentration > or = 100 mg/dl. We will discuss the advantages and limitations of this new definition as well as the consequences of its use on the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Belgian population.

Abdominal Fat↗

[The IDEAL study comparing simvastatin 20-40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: between two ideas of the ideal].

The IDEAL ("Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering") study compared the effects of two strategies of lipid lowering on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/day; n = 4439), or an usual dose of simvastatin (20 mg/day, titrated up to 40 mg/day if necessary; n = 4449). During treatment, mean LDL cholesterol levels were 104 mg/dl in the simvastatin group and 81 mg/dl in the atorvastatin group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome of major coronary events (defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation), but the risk of other composite secondary end points (i.e., major cardiovascular events, all cardiovascular events, all coronary events) was statistically reduced in the atorvastatin group compared to the simvastatin group. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality between the two groups. In conclusion, patients with myocardial infarction may benefit from intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol without an increase in noncardiovascular mortality or other serious adverse reactions.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

[How I explore...outcomes in clinical trials: comments about recent studies of cardiovascular prevention].

The comparison of two therapeutic interventions requires the use of endpoints in randomized clinical trials, which supports evidence-based medicine. It is preferable to consider hard endpoints, such as major clinical events and mortality rather than biological or surrogate endpoints. In large cardiovascular prevention trials, it is now well accepted to analyze primary and secondary endpoints as well as to use combined clinical endpoints. Such composite endpoints offer the advantage of increasing the number of events, but have the disadvantage of diluting the therapeutic effect and of exposing to possible bias. We discuss this crucial issue at the light of controversial results from a few recent important cardiovascular prevention trials.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

[Clinical study of the month: ASTEROID: regression of coronary atherosclerosis with rosuvastatin at a maximal daily dose of 40 mg].

ASTEROID is a prospective, open-label blinded end-points trial aiming to assess whether very intensive statin therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg/day could regress coronary atherosclerosis as determined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). This multinational study included 507 patients, among whom 349 had evaluable serial IVUS examinations at 24 months. Rosuvastatin decreased LDL cholesterol level from 130 mg/dl to 61 mg/dl (- 53.2%) and increased HDL cholesterol from 43 to 49 mg/dl (+ 14.7%). The three prespecified IVUS efficacy parameters were positively altered by rosuvastatin, demonstrating regression of coronary atherosclerosis : the mean change in percent atheroma volume (- 0.98%), the change in atheroma volume in the most diseased 10-mm subsegment me (- 6.1 mm3) and the change in total atheroma volume (- 6.8%) were all significant (p < 0,001). Adverse events were infrequent and similar to other statin trials. The present study demonstrates that a 2-year treatment with a high dose of rosuvastatin 40 mg/day is able to induce significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis as determined by IVU imaging. Further ongoing studies in the GALAXY clinical investigation programme should now demonstrate that rosuvastatin, the most potent statin to reduce LDL and increase HDL cholesterol, is also able to diminish the incidence of clinical outcomes, cardiovascular events in general and major coronary events in particular.

Cholesterol, HDL↗

[Increasing cost of insulin therapy in Belgium. From a critical analysis of the situation to a search for practical solutions].

Cost related to insulin therapy is markedly increasing in Belgium, as in other Eucopean countries. In the present paper, we will briefly analyze the main reasons for such aa increase, integrate such observation withIn the global context of diabetes management and suggest some solutions to provide best care to insulin-treated diabetic patients at a reasonable cost. The rise of the cost of insulin therapy has a multifactorial origin. It mainly results from an increase in the number of diabetic patients, a more intensive management, In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and a greater use of more expansive insulin analogues. It is important to analyze the increase of the cost of insulin therapy within the global burden of diabetes melitus. Only a better responsibility of all health care partners, patients, physicians, pharmaceutical companies, public health authorities, could provide solutions allowing diabetic people to profit from best treatments they should receive in order to prevent diabetic complications, by far the main cause of expenses.

Belgium↗

[Type 1 diabetes and celiac disease].

Celiac disease is more prevalent in type 1 diabetic patients than in the general population. The exact reason for this association remains unknown. Two hypotheses are taken into consideration: either a common genetic background or an immune response against Langerhans islets triggered by celiac disease. This review presents recent data about this association and its consequences in clinical practice.

Celiac Disease↗

[The CHARISMA study: in search of the best antiplatelet strategy for cardiovascular prevention].

The CHARISMA ("Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance") trial compared the effects of a dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus low dose aspirin with those of a monotherapy with aspirin (75-162 mg/day) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in 15,603 patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events followed for a median of 28 months. The primary efficacy endpoint, a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes, was not significantly different between the two treatment arms. The secondary principal efficacy endpoint, which included all hospitalizations for ischaemic events, was slightly reduced in the group with clopidogrel-aspirin as compared to the group with placebo-aspirin. In a subgroup analysis, among so-called "symptomatico" patients (79 % of the studied population), the dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of events than aspirin alone, including the primary efficacy end point. On the contrary, in "asymptomatic" patients, such a favourable effect was not observed. Unexpectedly, in this subgroup, a paradoxical increase in the mortality rate was observed with the clopidogrel-aspirin combination. As far as safety was concerned, the risk of severe (difference not significant) and moderate (difference significant) bleeding was higher in patients with the clopidogrel-aspirin combination. In conclusion, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is the first choice drug and the only antiplatelet agent to be used in prvention of cardiovascular disease. In secondary prevention, the addition of clopidogrel may reinforce the cardiovascular protection given by aspirin in "symptomatic" patients, but at the expense of a slightly higher bleeding rate.

Aspirin↗

[Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in diabetic patients: focus on gender difference and insulin resistance].

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is widely used as antiplatelet therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, the effects appear to be different according to the studied population, with a reduction of coronary events in men and, rather, a diminution of strokes in women. Diabetes mellitus markedly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, with an especially elevated relative risk among women. We present a detailed analysis of the literature about the efficacy of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular complications in the diabetic population. Limited available data suggest a lower protection in the diabetic than in the non-diabetic population. A greater aspirin resistance has been suggested in diabetic patents, which might lead to the use of a higher daily dosage of aspirin in diabetic than in non diabetic patients. Whatsoever, aspirin remains the first antiplatelet agent in the diabetic population in all international guidelines of cardiovascular prevention.

Aspirin↗