Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A J Matas

Publications and source records attributed to A J Matas.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Risk factors for slow graft function after kidney transplants: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: We previously defined an intermediate group of cadaver kidney transplant recipients who do not have immediate graft function (IGF), but do not have sufficient graft dysfunction to be classified as having delayed graft function (DGF). We showed that this group with slow graft function (SGF) had an increased risk of rejection and inferior long-term results vs. recipients with IGF. The aim of our current study was to determine risk factors for SGF, which have not been well defined (in contrast to risk factors for DGF). METHODS: Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1999, we performed 896 adult cadaver kidney transplants at the University of Minnesota. Recipients were analysed in three groups based on initial graft function: IGF [creatinine (Cr) < 3 mg/dL by post-operative day (POD) no. 5], SGF (Cr > 3 mg/dL on POD no. 5, but no need for dialysis), and DGF (need for dialysis in the first week post-transplant). A multivariate analysis looked specifically at risk factors for SGF, as compared with risk factors for DGF. Outcomes with regard to graft survival and acute rejection (AR) rates were determined for the three groups. RESULTS: Of the 896 recipients, 425 had IGF, 238 had SGF, and 233 had DGF. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for SGF showed donor age >50 yr (RR=3.3, p=0.0001) and kidney preservation time >24 h (RR=1.6, p=0.01) to be the most significant risk factors. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for DGF showed similar findings, although high panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) and donor Cr >1.7 mg/dL were also significant risk factors for DGF. Initial function of the graft significantly influenced the subsequent risk of AR: at 12 months post-transplant, the incidence of AR was 28% for those with IGF, 38% for those with SGF, and 44% for those with DGF (p=0.04 for SGF vs. DGF). Initial graft function also significantly influenced graft survival: the 5-yr death-censored graft survival rate was 89% for recipients with IGF, 72% for those with SGF, and 67% for those with DGF (p=0.01 for IGF vs. SGF; p=0.03 for SGF vs. DGF). CONCLUSIONS: SGF represents part of the spectrum of graft injury and post-transplant graft dysfunction. Risk factors for SGF are similar to those seen for DGF. Even mild to moderate graft dysfunction post-transplant can have a negative impact on long-term graft survival.

Female↗
PubMed2001

Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?

BACKGROUND: The most common surgical complication after a kidney transplant is likely related to the wound. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, wound complications (e.g., infections, hernias) in kidney recipients and to assess whether newer immunosuppressive drugs increase the risk for such complications. METHODS: Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1998, we performed 2013 adult kidney transplants. Of these 2013 recipients, 97 (4.8%) developed either a superficial or a deep wound infection. Additionally, 73 (3.6%) recipients developed either a fascial dehiscence or a hernia of the wound. We used univariate and multivariate techniques to determine significant risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Mean time to development of a superficial infection (defined as located above the fascia) was 11.9 days posttransplant; to development of a deep infection (defined as located below the fascia), 39.2 days; and to development of a hernia or fascial dehiscence, 12.8 months. By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for a superficial or deep wound infection was obesity (defined as body mass index>30 kg/m2) (RR=4.4, P=0.0001). Other significant risk factors were a urine leak posttransplant, any reoperation through the transplant incision, diabetes, and the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=2.43, P=0.0001). Significant risk factors for a hernia or fascial dehiscence were any reoperation through the transplant incision, increased recipient age, obesity, and the use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=3.54, P=0.0004). Use of antibody induction and treatment for acute rejection were not significant risk factors for either infections or hernias. Death-censored graft survival was lower in recipients who developed a wound infection (vs. those who did not); it was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who did not). CONCLUSIONS: Despite immunosuppression including chronic steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kidney recipients. As with other types of surgery, the main risk factors for postoperative complications are obesity, reoperation, and increased age. However, in kidney recipients, use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) is an additional risk factor -one that potentially could be altered, especially in high-risk recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Kidney transplantation in young children: should there be a minimum age?

The optimal age for transplantation in children with end-stage renal disease remains controversial. Many centers have adopted a policy of waiting until such children reach a certain minimum age or weight, maintaining them on chronic dialysis until then. Their policy is based on historical data showing inferior graft survival in very young children. We feel that with proper donor selection and recipient care, comparable results can be achieved in very young age groups. We herein present our results with kidney transplantation in children <1 year old. Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1999, we performed 321 kidney transplants in children < or =13 years at the University of Minnesota. We analyzed our results in three age groups: <1 year (n=30), 1 through 4 years (n=122), and 5 through 13 years (n=169). We found no significant differences in patient or graft survival rates between the three groups. Almost all our infant (<1 year) recipients underwent primary transplants from living donors (LDs). However, even when we compared results only of primary LD transplants between the three groups, we found no significant differences. To date, all our infant recipients are alive and well, 24 (80%) with a functioning original graft. Causes of the 6 graft losses were chronic rejection (n=3), vascular thrombosis (n=2), and recurrent disease (n=1). Infants had significantly lower incidences of acute and chronic rejection compared with older recipients, but a tendency to higher incidences of delayed graft function and vascular thrombosis. Infants had significant increases in weight post transplant: the mean standard deviation score rose from -2.8 pre transplant to -0.2 by age 5 years and to +1.8 by age 10 years. The improvement in height was less marked: the mean standard deviation rose from -3.2 pre transplant to -1.6 by age 5 years and to -1.4 by age 10 years. Kidney transplant results in very young children can be comparable to those in older children. There need be no minimum age for performing a kidney transplant. The timing of the transplant should not be based on age or size alone.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Kidney retransplants after initial graft loss to vascular thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular thrombosis early after a kidney transplant is an infrequent but devastating complication. Often, no cause is found. These recipients are generally felt to be good candidates for a retransplant. However, their ideal care at the time of the retransplant and their outcomes have not been well documented. We studied outcomes in 16 retransplant recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant (< 1 month) to vascular thrombosis. METHODS: Of 2,003 kidney transplants between I January 1984 and 30 September 1998, we identified 32 recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant to vascular thrombosis. Of these 32 recipients, 16 were subsequently retransplanted and detailed chart reviews were done. RESULTS: Of the 16 retransplant recipients, 12 lost their first graft to renal vein thrombosis and 4 to renal artery thrombosis. Thrombosis generally occurred early (mean, 3.6 d). Five recipients underwent a complete hematologic workup to rule out a thrombophilic disorder before their retransplant: 4 had a positive result (presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, n = 3; increased homocysteine levels, n = 1). These 4 recipients, along with 1 other recipient who had a strong family history of thrombosis, underwent thrombosis prophylaxis at the time of their retransplant. Prophylaxis consisted of low-dose heparin for the first 3-5 d posttransplant, followed by acetylsalicylic acid or Coumadin. Of the 16 retransplant recipients, none developed thrombosis. Of the 5 who underwent thrombosis prophylaxis, none had significant bleeding complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 yr, 10 (63%) recipients have functioning grafts. Causes of graft loss in the remaining 6 recipients were death with function (n = 5, 31%) and acute rejection (n = 1.6%). Graft and patient survival rates after these 16 retransplants were equivalent to results after primary transplants. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was also no different (p = ns). CONCLUSION: Vascular thrombosis in the absence of obvious technical factors should prompt a workup for a thrombophilic disorder before a retransplant. Recipients with an identified disorder should undergo prophylaxis at the time of the retransplant. Results in these retransplant recipients are equivalent to those seen in primary transplant recipients.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2001

Peri-operative cardiac morbidity in kidney transplant recipients: incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients are known to be at increased risk for developing cardiac disease. In both general and peripheral vascular surgery, pre-operative risk stratification (and intervention when indicated) has decreased the incidence of peri-operative cardiac complications. In this study, we set out to identify subsets of patients at high risk for peri-operative cardiac complications after a renal transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2694 adult renal transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1998. We determined the incidence of peri-operative (within 30 d post-transplant) cardiac complications, including myocardial infarction (MI). Risk factors for the development of these complications were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We found 163 peri-operative cardiac complications, for an overall incidence of 6.1%. Specific cardiac complications included MI (n=43, 1.6%), arrhythmia (n=74, 2.7%), angina (n=31, 1.2%), cardiac arrest (n=13, 0.5%), and congestive heart failure (n= 2, 0.1%). By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for any cardiac complication were age> or =50 yr (relative risk (RR)=3.0, p=0.0001) and pre-transplant cardiac disease (RR=3.3, p=0.0001). Not significant were diabetes mellitus (DM), cadaver donor source, pre-transplant dialysis, a history of smoking, and hypertension. Significant risk factors for peri-operative MI were age> or =50 yr, pre-existing cardiac disease, and DM. Diabetic patients with pre-existing cardiac disease were at especially high risk for peri-operative cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients>50 yr and those with pre-existing cardiac disease, especially if diabetic, are at significantly increased risk for developing peri-operative cardiac complications after a renal transplant. Such patients require aggressive pre-operative investigations, which may include coronary angiography, to decrease the risk of post-transplant complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Kidney and pancreas transplantation without a crossmatch in select circumstances--it can be done.

Given the constant flux in caseload and the number of personnel available in the OR, waiting for a final XM often prolongs organ preservation time (a room available at the time a XM is started is not available when the XM is completed). Longer preservation is associated with increased DGF and decreased graft survival. We have shown in a retrospective analysis that final XMs on 0% PRA recipients were always negative (Transplantation, 1999). We now describe a policy of: a) not doing screening XM and b) proceeding to the OR without a XM, in situations where the recipients's PRA has been documented to be 0% and when there have not been any interim transfusions (and the OR is ready before XM completion). Final XM is completed after the transplant. All patients send sera every 6 weeks for PRA (antiglobulin technique). If > o r=3 consecutive PRAs are 0%, no donor-specific screening XM is done prior to calling the patient in for tx (UNOS allocation algorithm used). If there have not been any interim transfusions, we have proceeded to tx prior to completion of the final XM. Between 1/1/98-12/31/99, we did 109 CAD kidney (K) and 79 simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) tx; 67 (61%) K and 56 (71%) SPK had 0% PRA. Of the 0% PRA, 25/67 (37%) K and 28/56 (50%) SPK had no pre-tx XM. For K with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (13.2+/-0.2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.01) and DGF less (12% vs. 24%, p=0.3); for SPK with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (15.2+/-2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.1); no diff in DGF. All post-XM were negative and there were no hyperacute rejections; there was no diff in acute rejection episodes. Actuarial 1 yr graft survival: no XM-K=87.5%, SKP=82%; Yes XM-K=88%, SKP=86% (NS). Our data suggests it is safe, in select circumstances, to proceed to the OR without a XM. Elimination of the screening XM for 0% PRA candidates saves money. Proceeding of the OR (if available) without a final XM shortens cold ischemia time.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2001

Rapid discontinuation of steroids in living donor kidney transplantation: a pilot study.

UNLABELLED: Steroids are associated with significant postoperative complications (hypertension, cosmetic changes, bone loss, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and cataracts). Most develop early; in addition, late post-transplant steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients has been associated with increased acute rejection (AR). To obviate these problems, we studied outcome of a protocol of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDS) (steroids stopped on POD6). Between November 1, 1999 and October 31, 2000, 51 adult living donor (LD) first transplant recipients (2 HLA-id, 28 non-id relative, 21 LURD) were immunosuppressed with thymoglobulin (1.25 mg/kg intraoperatively and then qdx4); prednisone (P) (500 mg methylprednisolone intraoperatively, 1 mg/kg x 1 day, 0.5 mg/kg x 2 days, 0.25 mg/kg x 2 days, then d/c); MMF, 1 g b.i.d.; and CSA, 4 mg/kg b.i.d. adjusted to achieve levels of 150-200 ng/mL (by HPLC). Exclusion criteria were delayed graft function or primary disease requiring P. Minimum follow-up was 5.5 months (range 5.5 to 17.5 months). Outcome was compared vs. previous cohorts of LD recipients immunosuppressed with P/AZA/CSA (n = 171) or P/MMF/CSA (n = 43) (both without antibody induction). RESULTS: For the RDS group, average CSA level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months was 190 +/- 12 and 180 +/- 9; avg. MMF dose, 1.7 +/- 0.1 g and 1.7 +/- 0.1 g. There was no significant difference in 6- and 12-month actuarial patient survival, graft survival and rejection-free graft survival between recipients on the RDS protocol vs. historical controls. For RDS recipients, actuarial 6- and 12-month rejection-free graft survival was 87%. Of the 51 RDS recipients, five (10%) have had AR (at 20 days, 1 month, 3 months, 3 months, and 3.5 months post-transplant). After treatment, all five were maintained on 5 mg P; there have been no second AR episodes. Two additional recipients were started on 5 mg P due to low white blood count (WBC) and low/no MMF. Of the 51 grafts, one has failed (death with function). Average serum Cr level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months for RDS recipients was 1.7 +/- 0.5 (NS vs. historical controls). CONCLUSION: For low-risk LD recipients, a kidney transplant with an RDS protocol does not increase risk of AR or graft loss. Future studies will need to be done to assess AR rates with an RDS protocol in cadaver transplant recipients and in recipients with delayed graft function.

Azathioprine↗
PubMed2001

Life satisfaction in renal transplant recipients: preliminary results from the transplant learning center.

The Transplant Learning Center (TLC) was designed to improve quality of life (QOL) and preserve graft function in solid-organ transplant recipients. To meet the specific goals of the program, the Life Satisfaction Index and Transplant Care Index were designed to serve as composite measures for measuring transplant-specific QOL and the ability to care for a transplant, respectively. In this study, we analyzed self-reported health information to examine relationships between comorbidities and individual posttransplantation side effects, life satisfaction, and transplant care, defined by renal transplant recipients. Patients entered the TLC through self-referral or referral by a health professional. Included in the analysis were 3,676 TLC enrollees with a mean time since transplantation of 4.8 years. Comorbidities and adverse effects were common, with high blood pressure reported by 89% of respondents and unusual hair growth reported by 70%. Sexual dysfunction and headache had a greater impact on QOL than more common adverse effects, such as changes in body and facial shape, hirsutism, and tremor. Regression modeling was used to identify the most significant associations between QOL indices and structural (nonmedical), medical, and psychosocial factors. Greater life satisfaction was most strongly associated with being in control of one's health and living a normally active life with satisfying emotional relationships. Management of such clinical problems as adverse effects of medication and nonadherence should be informed by the patient's perspective. Clinicians should actively solicit information about physical activity, appearance concerns, side effects of medications, nonadherence, and sexual and relationship issues when evaluating renal transplant recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants. METHODS: From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA. RESULTS: Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol. METHODS: The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival. RESULTS: For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Donor scoring system for cadaveric renal transplantation.

We studied early renal function in 241 consecutive patients who received cadaveric renal transplants at two different transplantation centers (group 1, n = 90; group 2, n = 151). Univariate and multivariate analyses of data from group 1 showed a significant correlation between seven donor variables and early renal function after cadaveric renal transplantation. A scoring system was developed from these seven donor variables (cause of death, 0-6 points; history of hypertension, 0-6; final creatinine clearance before procurement, 0-6; age, 0-6; history of diabetes mellitus, 0-3; cold ischemia time, 0-3; and severity of renal artery plaque, 0-3). Data from group 2 were used to validate the donor scoring system and stratify cadaver kidneys on the basis of score: grade A, 0-5 points; grade B, 6-10; grade C, 11-15; and grade D, 16-32. A significant decline in early renal function was observed with increasing donor score and grade of cadaver kidney. In conclusion, a donor scoring system based on information available at the time of procurement can be used to estimate early graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation and may assist in the allocation of marginal organs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Pre-emptive transplants for patients with renal failure: an argument against waiting until dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive kidney transplants have not been favored in some centers because of concern about possible increased noncompliance and allegedly inferior long-term results. We analyzed our experience with pre-emptive kidney transplants to determine whether such concerns are justified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 1984, and June 30, 1998, we performed 1849 adult primary kidney transplants: 385 pre-emptive (recipients not undergoing dialysis, ND) and 1464 non-pre-emptive (recipients undergoing dialysis, D). Results were subdivided by donor source: cadaver (CAD) and living donor (LD). ND recipients tended to be younger, but otherwise, the two groups were similar. Posttransplantation quality of life in recipients was evaluated using the nationally standardized Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The posttransplantation employment status of the recipients was also evaluated. RESULTS: The patient survival rate 5 years posttransplantation was significantly better for ND (vs. D) recipients for both CAD (92.6% vs. 76.6%, P=0.001) and LD (93.3% vs. 89.5%, P=0.02) transplants. The 5-year patient survival rate was significantly higher for ND recipients compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation for both CAD (P=0.0005) and LD (P=0.0001) transplants. The graft survival rate 5 years posttransplantation was similar between ND and D recipients for CAD transplants, but significantly better for ND (vs. D) recipients of LD transplants (92.3% vs. 84.8%, P=0.006). For CAD transplants, the 5-year graft survival rate was not different when ND recipients were compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation; for LD transplants it was significantly higher for ND recipients compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation (P=0.04). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was no different between ND and D recipients for either CAD or LD transplants, and it was also not affected by the pretransplantation time undergoing dialysis. Graft loss secondary to the recipient's discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy (a crude estimate of compliance) was similar between ND and D recipients. Five years posttransplantation, the SF-36 scores regarding the recipient's quality of life and the employment status were similar for ND compared with D recipients, regardless of donor source. CONCLUSIONS: ND recipients do not seem to have higher rates of noncompliance than D recipients. Results for ND recipients seem to be superior than for D recipients, supporting the contention that renal failure patients should, if possible, undergo transplantation before dialysis.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Increased incidence of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus disease.

BACKGROUND: The transplant literature has not shown cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease to be a significant risk factor for posttransplant cardiac complications. A large number of nontransplant studies have, however, reported an association between coronary heart disease (CHD) and CMV disease. Pathology studies have demonstrated a high incidence of CMV in atheromatous plaques from the coronary circulation. METHODS: We performed multivariate analysis to determine if posttransplant CMV disease was a significant risk factor for cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. We also performed univariate analysis to determine which cardiac complications were more common in the recipients with CMV disease. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1984 and June 30, 1997, 1859 adults underwent kidney transplants at our institution. Of these, 377 developed one of the following cardiac complications posttransplant: myocardial infarction, angina, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and angiographic vessel occlusion. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for one of the above cardiac complications were recipient age >50 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.5, P=0.0001], diabetes (OR=1.99, P=0.0001), a history of cardiac disease pretransplant (OR= 1.34, P=0.04), and CMV disease (OR=1.5, P=0.01). Univariate analysis demonstrated that recipients with CMV disease had a higher overall incidence of cardiac complications. Arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and vessel occlusion were more common in those with CMV disease. The incidence of myocardial infarction, angina, and cardiac arrest did not differ between the two groups (recipients with versus without CMV disease). CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease is associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. In our series, angiographic vessel occlusion was more common in recipients with CMV disease. This interesting finding may support the theory that CMV plays some role in the pathogenesis of CHD.

Adult↗