Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Illiano

Publications and source records attributed to A Illiano.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine is one of the most interesting agents currently in use in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and high response rates have been reported when it is administered in combination with cisplatin. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in a phase I-II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer received carboplatin at area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min and gemcitabine at an initial dose of 800 mg/m2, subsequently escalated by 100 mg/m2 per step. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin on day 8 of the 28-day cycle. Dose escalation proceeded up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Neutropenia was DLT, inasmuch as it occurred in three of five patients receiving gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Gemcitabine 1,100 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5 was recommended for phase II studies. An objective response was observed in 13 (50%) of 26 patients, including four complete responses (15%) and nine partial responses (35%). Median duration of response was 13 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Median overall survival was 16 months (range, 3 to 26 months). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is well tolerated and active. Neutropenia was DLT. The observed activity matches that observable in cisplatin-gemcitabine studies, whereas duration of response and survival are even higher. A phase II trial is under way.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase I study of vinorelbine and paclitaxel in small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine and paclitaxel interfere with mitotic spindle function through different mechanisms of action. Both of the drugs show antitumor activity in small-cell lung cancer when used as single agents; furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a synergistic activity between the two drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with small-cell lung cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I study in which vinorelbine was given at a fixed dose of 30 mg/m2 by 15-min intravenous infusion, whereas paclitaxel was given by 3-h infusion starting 1 h after vinorelbine at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2, which was subsequently escalated by 30-mg/m2 steps. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Grade 3 neutropenia was observed only in three patients treated at the fifty dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three of five patients treated at the fifth dose level (paclitaxel 210 mg/m2). Other side effects were generally mild. The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was 32% (95% CI 13-51%); in particular, 1 complete response (4.5%) and 6 partial responses (27.3%) were observed. The maximally tolerated doses recommended for phase II studies are 180 mg/m2 for paclitaxel and 30 mg/m2 for vinorelbine. The observed myelosuppression was less severe than anticipated on the basis of the effects of each drug alone. CONCLUSIONS: The promising activity of this drug combination warrants a phase II study in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Survival rate after resection for bronchial carcinoma.

Among factors influencing long-term survival of patients how had undergone resection for carcinoma of the lung, the most important seems to be the extent of the cancer at the time of resection, determined by histopathological studies of the resected specimen.

Adult↗