Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Idoate

Publications and source records attributed to A Idoate.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of hepatic function on vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with cancer.

Vancomycin is widely used in the prophylaxis and treatment of infections in neutropenic patients with cancer. The objective of this study was to analyze liver damage effects on vancomycin pharmacokinetics and determine the necessity for liver function evaluation when selecting vancomycin dosing schedules in these patients. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the global two-stage method. To this purpose serum vancomycin concentrations from 154 cancer patients were measured and individual vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by the Sawchuk and Zaske method. Mean and standard deviation of the vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for various subgroups of patients classified according to the degree of liver damage. Then a multiple linear regression analysis was performed to select the best predictive models for vancomycin clearance (Clvan) and steady state distribution volume (V). Results revealed that Clvan is not influenced by liver failure. Differences in V between patients with and without hepatic failure were initially observed, but these disappeared when patients with ascites were excluded. In conclusion, vancomycin dosing schedule does not need to be modified for patients with liver failure, with the exception of patients with ascites.

Adolescent↗

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tropisetron vs. chlorpromazine-dexamethasone in the control of acute emesis induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in children.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) between a standard antiemetic regimen-chlorpromazine + dexamethasone (CPM-DEX)- and a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist-tropisetron (TROP)--in the control of acute emesis induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in children, considering two analytic perspectives: hospital and patients. METHODS: The CEA was performed by constructing a decision tree, for both analytic perspectives, of the possible outcomes of treatment with TROP (single 0.2 mg/kg i.v.) or CPM (5-15 mg i.v. infusion for 3 doses) plus DEX (2 mg/m2 i.v. bolus i.v. x2). The patients were stratified by age in two groups (2-12 and 13-17). To estimate the probability of each endpoint at the decision tree we have taken as a base a trial developed in the Department of Pediatrics. Direct medical cost of primary therapy, failure, complications and side effects were included in the cost calculations. RESULTS: From patients' analytic perspective, TROP was more cost-effective than CPM-DEX for both groups of patients. Discrepancy between both analytic perspectives in 13-17 year-old patient's group was resolved in favour of the option chosen from the patients' analytic perspective (TROP). Sensitivity analysis showed the reliability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: 1. TROP was more cost-effective than CPM-DEX. 2. Taking into account the patients' analytic perspective is essential when we compare antiemetics pharmacoeconomically. 3. It seems necessary to increase the effectiveness of TROP in pediatric patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy with strategies such as the addition of a steroid.

Adolescent↗

[Pharmacoeconomics of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin].

The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee of our hospital regulates the use of antimicrobial drugs every year. With the coming into the market of the new antibiotic carbapenem meropenem, comparative meropenem, it was assigned to the Drug Information Center the elaboration of comparative report on the two antibiotics, including as well cost analysis. We have analyzed the activities to be made since an antimicrobial drug is purchased until it is administered. We have only assessed on the direct costs that differ in the two antibiotics that are: the pre-use preparation in the pharmacy service and the preparation and administration in hospital floors. We have classified the direct cost in: goods and services, purchases and supplies costs costs and staff costs. We have calculated the daily cost of both antibiotics in the treatment of serious infections and even in more serious, life threatening infections. On top of that, we have a reviewed the use of imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem in our hospital. The information obtained shows that the saving in serious infections is of 34.6% and of 4.5% in more serious infections with vital compromise. The Pharmacy and Therapeutic Commission taking into account the report elaborated, has considered convenient the choice of meropenem as a representative of carbapenem drugs.

Cilastatin↗

Cost-evaluation model for clinical trials in a hospital pharmacy service.

A cost-evaluation model was applied to clinical trial protocols to estimate their cost for the hospital pharmacy service. The steps taken in the drug management of clinical research were identified. Fixed costs (common to all clinical trials) and variable costs (peculiar to each clinical trial) were determined for each step. The number of patients, the number of operations, the planned services (receptions, storage, drug dispensing), the timing and difficulty of the study (randomization) were included in the variable costs. The economic assessment of these items was based on the costs of the materials and means used, the cost of staff time and finally the cost of drug storage during the clinical trial. This model was applied to 24 clinical trials carried out in the University Clinic of Navarra. 83% of all pharmacy costs of a clinical trial were variable. Drug dispensing, stock management and return drugs account for 94% of the time expended. The approximate cost of the pharmacy providing investigational services was $1,766 per trial or $174 per patient. Drug storage costs were not an important source of expenditure among the variable costs (7.4%). The best way to determine the cost of a trial is to calculate the number of operations.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗