[Advanced nursing practice. Psychological therapy in affective disorders].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Hume.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An analysis is made of the maximum expenditure which could be justified in embryo transfer in cattle is used to: increase the rate of genetic improvement of dairy or beef cattle; increase the frequency of twin-pregnancies; and expedite a change of breed. Estimates of maximum justifiable expenditure have been compared with an estimate of the cost of non-surgical transfer. Embryo transfer should be used in elite beef herds to increase selection intensity, particularly if bulls from such herds can be used for artificial insemination. Other commercial applications will not be economically justifiable until the cost of transfer has fallen by 50 to 80 per cent.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The penetration of cefazolin and moxalactam into bone was studied in 20 adults scheduled for total hip arthroplasty. Patients randomly received both moxalactam and cefazolin (10 mg/kg of each) by either a rapid bolus or a 30-minute infusion. Serum and bone-extract concentrations were measured by HPLC. Serum concentrations of cefazolin were significantly greater than those of moxalactam at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and at the time of bone removal for both rates of injection. Bone concentrations of cefazolin were significantly greater than those of moxalactam for both the bolus study (7.7 +/- 4.8 micrograms/g versus 5.4 +/- 3.4 micrograms/g) and the infusion study (5.6 +/- 3.4 micrograms/g versus 4.3 +/- 2.6 micrograms/g, respectively). There was no significant difference in the bone levels for the two drugs when penetration was expressed as a function of the simultaneous serum concentration (18% for each drug), and there were no significant differences in bone concentrations between the two rates of administration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: We were interested in studying whether a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD) persisted as a significant risk factor for premature coronary heart disease after adjusting for traditional and nontraditional risk factors. METHODS: Ninety-five case patients with documented premature CHD (occurring in a person less than 60 years old and with greater than 50 percent occlusion of a major epicardial vessel or a documented myocardial infarction) and 95 community-based control patients were examined for risk factors including family history, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, and fibrinogen. RESULTS: The risk of premature CHD for a positive family history ranged from an odds ratio (OR) of 3.25 for a standard family history of CHD in a first-degree relative, 5.9 for family history of early CHD in a first-degree relative before the age of 45 years, and 6.1 for a strong family history of CHD defined as CHD in at least two first-degree relatives. Family history persisted as a significant risk factor for premature CHD (OR = 3.9, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.8-8.7) in multiple variable models that included traditional and nontraditional risk factors. It was rare, however, for a person with a positive family history not to have at least two other traditional or nontraditional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of CHD should not be considered a simple binary risk factor for premature CHD, and a positive family history of CHD indicates that a person is at high risk for premature CHD independent of traditional and nontraditional risk factors.