Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Hochschild

Publications and source records attributed to A Hochschild.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Specificity determinants for the interaction of lambda repressor and P22 repressor dimers.

The related phage lambda and phage P22 repressors each bind cooperatively to adjacent and separated operator sites, an interaction that involves a pair of repressor dimers. The specificities of these interactions differ: Each dimer interacts with its own type but not with dimers of the heterologous repressor. The two repressors exhibit significant amino acid sequence homology in their carboxy-terminal domains, which are responsible for both dimer formation and the dimer-dimer interaction. Here, we identify a collection of amino acid substitutions that disrupt the protein-protein interaction of DNA-bound lambda repressor dimers and show that several of these substitutions have the same effect when introduced at the corresponding positions of P22 repressor. We use this information to construct a variant of the lambda repressor bearing only six non-wild-type amino acids that has a switched specificity; that is, it binds cooperatively with P22 repressor, but not with wild-type lambda repressor. These results identify a series of residues that determine the specificities of the two interactions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Amino acid substitutions in the -35 recognition motif of sigma 70 that result in defects in phage lambda repressor-stimulated transcription.

The phage lambda repressor activates transcription of its own gene from the promoter PRM. Previous work has suggested that this activation involves a protein-protein interaction between DNA-bound repressor and RNA polymerase. To identify the subunit of RNA polymerase that participates in this putative interaction, we searched for polymerase mutants that responded poorly to repressor. We report here the isolation of three sigma mutants that caused defects in repressor-stimulated, but not basal, transcription from PRM. These mutants bear amino acid substitutions in a putative helix-turn-helix motif that sigma uses to recognize the promoter -35 region. We suggest that lambda repressor interacts directly with this helix-turn-helix motif in facilitating the formation of a productive initiating complex.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Synergistic activation of transcription by Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein.

Activation of gene expression in eukaryotes generally involves the action of multiple transcription factors that function synergistically when bound near a particular target gene. Such effects have been suggested to occur because multiple activators can interact simultaneously with one or more components of the basal transcription machinery. In prokaryotes, examples of synergistic effects on transcription are much more limited and can often be explained by cooperative DNA binding. Here we show that the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) functions synergistically to activate transcription from a derivative of the lac promoter that bears a second CRP-binding site upstream of the natural binding site. We present evidence indicating that cooperative DNA binding of two CRP dimers does not account for the magnitude of the observed cooperative activation. We suggest, instead, that the two dimers stimulate transcription directly by contacting two distinct surfaces of RNA polymerase simultaneously. Thus, synergistic activation by CRP may provide a relatively simple model for examining the molecular basis of such effects in higher organisms.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1986

How lambda repressor and lambda Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3.

Although lambda repressor and lambda Cro bind to the same six operators on the phage chromosome, the fine specificities of the two proteins differ: repressor binds more tightly to OR1 than to OR3, and vice versa for Cro. In this paper, we change base pairs in the operators and amino acids in the proteins to analyze the basis for these preferences. We find that these preferences are determined by residues 5 and 6 of the recognition helices of the two proteins and by the amino-terminal arm, in the case of repressor. We also find that the most important base pairs in the operator which enable repressor and Cro to discriminate between OR1 and OR3 are position 3 (for Cro) and positions 5 and 8 (for repressor). These and previous results show how repressor and Cro recognize and distinguish between two related operator sequences.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1986

Homologous interactions of lambda repressor and lambda Cro with the lambda operator.

Lambda repressor and lambda Cro bind to the same six sites on the phage chromosome but with different relative affinities. Nucleotides at certain positions in the operator are conserved in all sites, as are amino acids at certain positions in the recognition alpha-helices of repressor and Cro. Here we focus on one of the conserved amino acids, a serine found at position 2 of each recognition helix. We show that, contrary to a previous model, both serines contact the same conserved position in the operator, position 4. We suggest a simplified view of how repressor and Cro recognized similar operator sites but distinguish differently among them.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1986

Cooperative binding of lambda repressors to sites separated by integral turns of the DNA helix.

Lambda repressors bind cooperatively to adjacent pairs of operator sites. Here we show that repressors bind cooperatively to pairs of operator sites whose centers have been separated by five or six turns of the helix. No cooperativity is observed when the centers of these sites are on opposite sides of the DNA helix. Cooperativity depends upon the same part of the protein (the carboxyl domain) that mediates cooperativity when the sites are adjacent. As the repressors bind, the DNA between the sites becomes alternately sensitive and resistant to DNAase I cleavage at half turn intervals. We suggest that when repressors bind cooperatively to separated sites, the DNA forms a loop, thus allowing the two repressors to touch.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1983

Repressor structure and the mechanism of positive control.

It has been suggested that the lambda repressor stimulates transcription of its own gene by binding to the lambda operator and contacting RNA polymerase bound to the adjacent promoter. We describe three different mutants (called pc) of the lambda phage repressor that are specifically deficient in the positive control function. We show that the amino acid residues altered in the pc mutants lie on the surface of the DNA-bound repressor that we predict, based on structural and other evidence, would most closely approach DNA-bound polymerase. Furthermore, we describe a pc mutant of the P22 repressor. We argue that in both the lambda and P22 repressors a structure comprised of two alpha helices has two functions: to bind DNA and to contact RNA polymerase. In the two cases, however, different regions of this structure contact polymerase to mediate positive control.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed1982

Mutant lambda phage repressor with a specific defect in its positive control function.

The lambda phage repressor is both a positive and a negative regulator of gene transcription. We describe a mutant lambda phage repressor that has specifically lost its activator function. The mutant binds to the lambda phage operator sites and represses the lambda phage promoters PR and PL. However, it fails to stimulate transcription from the promoter PRM. The mutation lies in that portion of repressor--namely, the amino-terminal domain--that has been shown [Sauer, R. T., Pabo, C. O., Meyer, B. J., Ptashne, M. & Backman, K. C. (1979) Nature (London) 279, 396-400] to mediate stimulation of PRM. We suggest that the mutation has altered that region of repressor which, in the wild-type, contacts RNA polymerase to activate transcription from PRM.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMedDate not supplied

DNA loops induced by cooperative binding of lambda repressor.

It has been shown by Hochschild and Ptashne that lambda repressors bind cooperatively to operator sites separated by five or six turns of the helix. Cooperative binding is not observed if the sites are separated by a nonintegral number of turns, unless a four-nucleotide gap is introduced into one of the strands between the two sites. These and other facts suggested that repressors at the separated sites touch each other, the DNA bending smoothly so as to accommodate the protein-protein interaction. Here we use electron microscopy to visualize the predicted protein-DNA complexes.

Binding Sites↗