Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Goldhirsch

Publications and source records attributed to A Goldhirsch.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

A quality-adjusted survival meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

The purpose of this paper is to develop and apply a meta-analysis methodology, that does not require patient-level data, for comparing treatments in terms of quality-of-life-adjusted survival. As a motivating example, we considered adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. This therapy has been shown to offer an improvement in recurrence-free and overall survival, especially for younger women, but its acute toxic effects discourage some physicians from prescribing it. To determine whether the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment outweighs its costs in terms of toxic effects, we performed a meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival based on data from 1229 patients, 49 years of age or younger, randomized in eight clinical trials that compared chemotherapy versus no adjuvant systemic therapy. We conducted the meta-analysis by performing a quality-adjusted survival analysis known as a Q-TWiST analysis on each trial. A Q-TWiST analysis allows one to make treatment comparisons that incorporate differences in quality of life associated with various health states. In this analysis, we define as health states the periods of time patients spend: (i) with subjective toxic effects of chemotherapy; (ii) without symptoms of recurrence and toxicity, and (iii) following disease recurrence. We assigned weights to each health state which reflect their relative value in terms of quality of life and allowed them to vary in a sensitivity analysis. We then combined the individual trial results in a meta-analysis, using a multivariate regression model, in such a way that we could easily perform an overall sensitivity analysis. Individual patient-level data are not required to perform this meta-analysis methodology if the individual Q-TWiST analysis results for each trial are available.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Routine tests during follow-up of patients after primary treatment for operable breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)

BACKGROUND: Follow-up tests for patients after diagnosis and primary treatment of breast cancer are routinely performed. However, the usefulness of these follow-up parameters remains unclear. We determined the yield of a variety of blood tests used to detect the presence of overt metastatic disease. METHODS: 4105 patients enrolled in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trials from 1978 to 1985 were analyzed for abnormal or equivocal findings in six routine blood tests obtained every 3 months for the first two years, every six months for years 3-5 and yearly thereafter. The relationship of test results to the occurrence of overt metastatic disease was evaluated. The relapses were categorized as follows in order to estimate the yield of the different tests for relevant sites of metastases: any breast cancer relapse, bone +/- other; liver +/- other. RESULTS: Alkaline phosphatase alone was abnormal in a high proportion of patients with either bone metastases, liver metastases, or both. SGOT and gamma-GT were also sensitive for patients with liver metastases. Bilirubin, serum calcium, and serum creatinine were relatively insensitive indicators of relapse. Abnormal test results were reported sometime during a patient's disease-free period for 3% to 6% of patients, depending on the test. CONCLUSIONS: Alkaline phosphatase was the most effective blood test to distinguish patients with relapse from those without relapse. It is inexpensive and its yield is relatively high for predicting liver and bone metastases. The routine use of the other tests analyzed to detect metastases was not justified.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

Dose-finding study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (administered as a 3-hour infusion) and cyclophosphamide have been given to patients with advanced breast cancer every 3 weeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the two drugs in combination without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The maximum tolerated dose of the same regimen with G-CSF support will then be determined in a subsequent group of patients. Patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease were eligible for this study. The need for G-CSF support was established by an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for more than 7 days, an ANC count less than 0.1 x 10(9)/L for more than 3 days, febrile neutropenia requiring intravenous antibiotics, World Health Organization grade 3 or greater mucositis for more than 7 days, or the failure of the ANC to recover by day 28. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose level at which more than two of six patients treated needed G-CSF support during the second treatment cycle. To date, 20 patients have been entered at the following dose levels: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 1), paclitaxel 155 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (level 3), and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (level 4). Only one patient at level 2 needed G-CSF support because of an ANC below 0.1 x 10(9)/L for more than 3 days after the first cycle. Neither febrile neutropenia nor treatment delay for more than 1 week was reported. Antitumor activity has been observed from level 3. The evaluation of the toxicity of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 175 mg/m2 without G-CSF support is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Present and future projects of the International Breast Cancer Study Group.

The International Breast Cancer Study Group (formerly the Ludwig Group) has conducted nine clinical trials since 1978 (see the Appendix for participants and authors). Biologic hypotheses related to the combined use of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in women with operable breast cancer were tested. Questions of timing of chemotherapy with respect to tumor surgery and late introduction of chemotherapy were also evaluated. Ongoing and future trials continue in this tradition to investigate combinations of available endocrine therapies and cytotoxic agents.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of the quality of life associated with zidovudine treatment in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Zidovudine therapy is recommended for asymptomatic patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who have fewer than 500 CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter. An analysis of the quality of life associated with therapy that integrated both the effects of adverse events and the benefits of delayed disease progression might influence this recommendation. METHODS: We applied a survival analysis adjusted for the quality of life to data from a randomized trial conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. The trial compared treatment with 500 mg of zidovudine per day, 1500 mg of zidovudine per day, and placebo (Protocol 019) in 1338 asymptomatic HIV-infected patients. RESULTS: The average time with neither a progression of disease nor an adverse event (symptom or laboratory finding) was 15.7, 15.6, and 14.8 months for patients receiving placebo, 500 mg of zidovudine, and 1500 mg of zidovudine, respectively. The incidence of severe symptoms was 13.8 percent in the placebo group, 15.2 percent in the 500-mg group, and 19.9 percent in the 1500-mg group (P = 0.038). After 18 months, the 500-mg group gained an average of 0.5 months without disease progression, as compared with the placebo group, but had severe adverse events an average of 0.6 months sooner. The 500-mg group had more quality-of-life--adjusted time than the placebo group only if the time lived after the progression of disease was considered by a patient to have less value than the time after the occurrence of a severe symptom. CONCLUSIONS: For asymptomatic patients treated with 500 mg of zidovudine, a reduction in the quality of life due to severe side effects of therapy approximately equals the increase in the quality of life associated with a delay in the progression of HIV disease.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1994

Effect of systemic adjuvant treatment on first sites of breast cancer relapse.

Adjuvant systemic treatment for resectable breast cancer changes the natural history of the disease but provides only a small and delayed effect on survival. Evaluation of the types of first relapse avoided by available treatments may explain why effects on mortality are small and appear late during follow-up. In randomised clinical trials done by the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) between 1978 and 1985, 2108 patients with node-positive disease received more-effective treatments (6 or more cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil and prednisone; with or without tamoxifen, or tamoxifen and prednisone alone), and 722 patients received less-effective treatments (no treatment or a single cycle of chemotherapy). 3 main categories of first site of relapse were defined and evaluated by cumulative incidence analysis: local or regional, and distant soft tissue, bone, and viscera. The more-effective treatments reduced the cumulative incidence of first relapse in local or regional and distant soft tissue sites at 10 years from 36% to 18% (p = 0.0001); first relapse in bone and viscera was not altered by the more-effective treatments. These results were similar for premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and for patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours. Adjuvant systemic treatments in current use improve patient outcome mainly by reducing the incidence of first local or regional and distant soft-tissue relapses, while first recurrences in bone or viscera are influenced much less. More intensive treatments at present being tested in clinical trials might affect bone and visceral relapses and have a greater and earlier influence on survival.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1994

Timing of baseline quality of life assessment in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial: its effect on patient self-estimation. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Variability in timing of baseline quality of life (QL) assessments in two ongoing International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trials occurred as a result of allowing some flexibility in the timing. This retrospective report describes the QL timing in relation to surgery and start of adjuvant therapy and its effect on QL self-estimation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Self-administered measures of baseline QL were obtained on day 1 of adjuvant therapy or as close to that date as possible from 1389 pre- and post-menopausal women with operable breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of QL assessments were done on day 1 of adjuvant therapy, 18% before day 1 and 28% after. An ANOVA, controlling for surgery, institution and language, showed that: for patients receiving endocrine therapy alone, QL improved as time from surgery increased, but start of adjuvant treatment had no effect, while for chemotherapy patients, appetite, physical well-being and, in pre-menopausal patients, coping were worse 1 to 5 days after the start of treatment. Chemotherapy had little effect on mood and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of QL assessment in relation to diagnosis affects global adjustment measures; timing in relation to chemotherapy affects measures sensitive to toxicity. Timing is an important consideration in study conduct and data analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I-IV: 15 years follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant systemic therapy prolongs disease-free and overall survival in both pre- and postmenopausal patients. Available data shown benefit from multi-agent chemotherapy, prolonged tamoxifen treatment, and ovarian ablation, and that the combination of chemo- and endocrine therapy might be advantageous. In 1978 the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) initiated four complementary randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the roles of chemo-endocrine combinations or endocrine therapy alone in specific populations defined by risk (for pre- and perimenopausal patients) or by age (for postmenopausal patients). The results at 10 and 13 years' median follow-up for these trials are summarized in this report and are compared to those of the Overview meta-analysis with regard to chemo-endocrine or endocrine therapy combinations. Furthermore, types of first relapses by sites and second malignant diseases are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1601 evaluable patients with node positive disease were included into the studies I-IV. In Trial I (491 premenopausal patients with 1-3 positive axillary nodes) we studied the addition of low-dose continuous prednisone (p) to a cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil (CMF) combination. In Trial II 327 premenopausal patients with four or more positive axillary nodes were randomized to one year CMFp or to a surgical oophorectomy followed by CMFp. In Trial III (463 postmenopausal patients 65 years old or younger), combined chemoendocrine therapy (one year of CMFp plus tamoxifen (T)) was compared to endocrine therapy (1 year of p + T) or to surgery alone. In Trial IV 320 postmenopausal patients 66 to 80 years old were treated either by surgery alone or by surgery followed by 1 year prednisone and tamoxifen. RESULTS: In Trial I the addition of prednisone allowed a higher dose of cytotoxics to be administered compared with CMF alone. Despite this increased dose intensity, 13-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for the two treatment groups (49% vs. 52% DFS, 59% vs. 65% OS for CMFp vs. CMF). In Trial II the addition of surgical oophorectomy to CMFp yielded an improved outcome which approached statistical significance for the subset of 107 patients known to have estrogen receptor-positive tumors (DFS, 23% vs. 15%, p = 0.13; OS, 41% vs. 30%, p = 0.12). In Trial III combined chemoendocrine therapy improved DFS and OS compared with endocrine therapy alone (p + T) given for the same duration, or no adjuvant treatment (DFS, 35% vs. 25% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001; OS, 48% vs. 36% vs. 32%, p = 0.01). In Trial IV p + T improved DFS compared with no adjuvant therapy (27% vs. 15%, p = 0.004). Despite competing risks for this elderly population, OS was also improved but the result was not statistically significant (34% vs. 22%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The overall results of these four trials indicate that the continuation of investigations on combined chemo-endocrine therapies is warranted. The prognosis of the patients, all node-positive, treated with the most effective adjuvant treatment is such that there is a large potential for improvement.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

First isolated locoregional recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer: results of a phase III multicenter study comparing systemic treatment with observation after excision and radiation. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized phase III multicenter study to compare systemic treatment versus no treatment after complete excision and radiotherapy for isolated first locoregional recurrence in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven good-risk patients with an estrogen receptor (ER+) positive recurrence or, in case of unknown receptor status, a disease-free interval (DFI) of greater than 12 months and < or = three recurrent tumor nodules each < or = 3 cm in diameter were entered onto the study. They were randomized to observation subsequent to local treatment or to receive tamoxifen (TAM) until disease progression. Seventy-nine percent of the patients were postmenopausal. RESULTS: The median observation period for the entire study population was 6.3 years. The median disease-free survival (DFS) duration was 26 months for observation and 82 months for TAM patients (P = .007). This was mainly due to the reduction of further local recurrences, whereas the occurrence of early distant metastases was delayed. A multivariate analysis identified DFI and treatment with TAM as significant prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% and 74%, respectively (P = .77). DFI was also a prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: Systemic therapy with TAM after isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer significantly increased 5-year DFS rates from 36% to 59% compared with observation alone and prolonged median DFS by more than 4.5 years in patients with ER+ tumors or in the case of unknown ER status with a DFI of greater than 12 months and minimal tumor burden. Treatment with TAM currently has no significant impact on OS, but the median survival duration of the study population has not yet been reached.

Adult↗