Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Giustina

Publications and source records attributed to A Giustina.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

A retrospective hormonal and immunohistochemical evaluation of 47 acromegalic patients: prognostic value of preoperative plasma prolactin.

UNLABELLED: This study was performed to investigate the correlations between preoperative prolactin (PRL) plasma values, immunohistochemical picture and the clinical course in growth hormone (GH) secreting pituitary adenomas. In 47 patients (19 males and 28 females; mean age 40 years; range 13 - 70 years), we measured GH, IGF-1 and prolactin plasma values both before and after transsphenoidal surgery, and basal IGF-1 and GH after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during four years of follow-up. We considered those patients as "controlled" who presented an undetectable growth hormone after OGTT (GH < 1 microg/l), IGF-I plasma values in the normal range, matched for age and sex, and no clinical activity or neuroradiological recurrence after a four-year follow-up. We considered patients as "poorly controlled" who still showed elevated GH and IGF-I plasma levels, uninhibited GH after OGTT (GH > 1 microg/l), presence of clinical activity and/or radiological signs of adenoma recurrence, even if a reduction of tumor size had been demonstrated. RESULTS: Controlled patients (n = 22) exhibited mean preoperative PRL levels (+/- SEM) lower than the group of poorly controlled (n = 25) ones (21.40 +/- 5.51 vs. 38.44 +/- 5.16 microg/l; p < 0.03). From 3 to 12 months after surgery, postoperative PRL levels were also lower in the controlled patients compared to the poorly controlled ones (8.31 +/- 1.20 vs. 25.32 +/- 3.20 microg/l; p < 0.0001). Eighty percent (20/25) of poorly controlled patients showed both PRL and GH positivity after immunostaining. Only 3/22 (13.6 %) of controlled patients showed the same double positivity. In conclusion, preoperative hyperprolactinemia identifies a group of acromegalic patients at elevated risk of disease persistence after surgery. We hypothesize that most of these high-risk patients may have more aggressive mixed GH-PRL secreting adenomas.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed2002

Growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) analogue, hexarelin stimulates GH from peripheral lymphocytes.

The role of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and growth hormone releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) analogue hexarelin was investigated in the regulation of GH production from lymphocytes. Porcine and bovine blood mononuclear cells were separated using density gradient centrifugation method by layering the whole blood or buffy coat cells on lymphodex. Cells were incubated for 3 or 5 days with or without phytohemagglutinin (PHA-M), GHRH, GHRP-6 analogue hexarelin, somatostatin or GHRH + hexarelin. Growth hormone was fractionated from supernatants by gel chromatography and further concentrated by lyophilization at - 20 degrees C. A nearly two fold increase in basal secretion of GH (porcine: 3.5 +/- 0.1 ng/ml, bovine: 3.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) was achieved by GHRH and hexarelin at concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, 10 and 100 nM in both porcine and bovine cells. Lymphocytic GH release was also stimulated in response to PHA-M (10 micro g/well). Neither a dose dependent nor a synergistic nor an additive effect was apparent on GH secretion from lymphocytes. GHRH stimulated lymphocytic GH secretion, whereas, somatostatin had no effect. This study reports for the first time that hexarelin stimulates the secretion of GH from peripheral lymphocytes.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Leptin regulates GH gene expression and secretion and nitric oxide production in pig pituitary cells.

The aim of this study was to investigate the direct effect of leptin on GH gene expression and secretion and the role of nitric oxide as a possible mediator in pig anterior pituitary cells. Pituitary cells from adult sows were treated for 4 or 24 h with rhleptin (from 0.1 nM to 1 microM) alone or in association with GHRH (10 nM) or hexarelin (10 nM). At the end of incubation, medium was collected for GH and nitric oxide determination by ELISA and Griess test, respectively. Total RNA was collected from cells, and GH gene expression was measured by RT-PCR. Leptin significantly (P < 0.001) stimulated GH secretion in both incubation periods. The maximum response was induced by 10 nM leptin; furthermore, a significant interaction (P < 0.002) between leptin and GHRH (P < 0.03) and between leptin and hexarelin was observed when the molecules were used in association. GH gene expression was significantly increased (at least P < 0.05) by hexarelin, GHRH, and leptin (1000 and 100 nM) after 24 h of treatment. Leptin (10 nM and 1 microM) significantly (P < 0.05) increased nitric oxide production, whereas S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine (from 0.01-1000 nM) significantly (P < 0.05) stimulated GH secretion. These data demonstrate that leptin directly influences GH regulation at the pituitary level, and nitric oxide may be involved in this function.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Characterization of new selective somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (sst2) antagonists, BIM-23627 and BIM-23454. Effects of BIM-23627 on GH release in anesthetized male rats after short-term high-dose dexamethasone treatment.

We here report a pharmacological characterization of two new somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype-2 (sst2) selective antagonists by evaluating their GH-releasing activity when administered, by different routes, in anesthetized adult rats and in freely moving 10-d-old rats. Moreover, we describe the effect of these SS antagonists on the GH response to GHRH after short-term high-dose dexamethasone (DEX) treatment in young male rats. BIM-23454 and BIM-23627, given iv, were able to counteract the SS-induced inhibition of GH secretion occurring after urethane anesthesia in a dose-dependent manner. In DEX-treated animals, the GH response to GHRH was partially blunted (5-min peak values, 270 +/- 50 ng/ml in saline-treated vs. 160 +/- 10 ng/ml in DEX-treated, P < 0.05); however, the simultaneous administration of BIM-23627 (0.2 mg/kg, iv) restored higher amplitude GH pulse, leading to a significantly higher overall mean GH response (area under the curve, 4200 +/- 120 ng/ml/30 min vs. 2800 +/- 100 ng/ml/30 min after GHRH alone; P < 0.05). The SS antagonists showed a reduced GH-releasing effect when administered sc or ip, likely attributable to decreased bioavailability, as compared with the iv route. SS antagonist administration also increased plasma glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels. Based on prior reports that sst2 tonically suppresses glucagon secretion, the antagonist most likely increased glucagon secretion from the pancreatic alpha-cells, with resultant increases in plasma glucose and then insulin.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2001

Acquired growth hormone resistance in patients with chronic heart failure: implications for therapy with growth hormone.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether growth hormone (GH) resistance is present in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and whether it may be linked to the biochemical response to GH treatment. BACKGROUND: Acquired GH resistance is a feature of severe illness, in particular, cachexia. In patients with CHF, the response to GH therapy appears to be variable. METHODS: Biochemical markers of the GH-insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis were compared in 21 cachectic patients with CHF, 51 noncachectic patients and 26 healthy control subjects. In separate studies, the predictive value of baseline biochemical variables for the IGF-I response to GH treatment was analyzed. RESULTS: Cachectic patients showed an increase of total GH and immunologically intact GH (p < or = 0.0002) and a decrease of GH-binding protein (BP) (p = 0.005), IGF-BP3 (p = 0.01) and IGF-I (p = 0.06), compared with noncachectic patients. Similar changes were found when the cachectic group was compared with the control group. No differences were found between noncachectic patients and control subjects. Levels of GH-BP correlated with the IGF-I/GH ratio in all subgroups (all p < or = 0.002). Baseline GH-BP levels were related to the increase of IGF-I levels in response to GH treatment in patients with CHF after 24 h (r = 0.83, p = 0.005; n = 9; study 2), 44 days (r = 0.52, p = 0.007; n = 25; study 3) and 96 days (r = 0.54, p = 0.006; n = 24; study 3). CONCLUSIONS: Most cachectic and some noncachectic patients with CHF show features of acquired GH resistance. The principal predictors of the biochemical features of GH resistance and of the poor biochemical response to short-term and longer-term GH treatment are GH-BP plasma levels. The presence of GH resistance is potentially a major factor determining the response to GH therapy in patients with CHF.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2001

Ectopic secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in neuroendocrine tumors: relevant clinical aspects.

The aim of this article is to briefly review the physiology of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the diagnosis and treatment of GHRH-mediated acromegaly. Moreover, the role of GHRH and its antagonists in the pathogenesis and treatment of cancer will be reviewed. Hypothalamic GHRH is secreted into the portal system, binds to specific surface receptors of the somatotroph cell and elicits intracellular signals that modulate pituitary GH synthesis and/or secretion. GHRH-producing neurons have been well characterized in the hypothalamus by immunostaining techniques. Hypothalamic tumors, including hamartomas. choristomas, gliomas. and gangliocitomas. may produce excessive GHRH with subsequent GH hypersecretion and resultant acromegaly. GHRH is synthesized and expressed in multiple extrapituitary tissues. Excessive peripheral production of GHRH by a tumor source would therefore be expected to cause somatotroph cell hyperstimulation and increased GH secretion. The structure of hypothalamic GHRH was infact elucidated from material extracted from pancreatic GHRH-secreting tumors in two patients with acromegaly. Immunoreactive GHRH is present in several tumors, including carcinoid tumors, pancreatic cell tumors, small-cell lung cancers, adrenal adenomas, and pheochromocitomas which have been reported to secrete GHRH. Acromegaly in these patients. however, is uncommon. In a retrospective survey of 177 acromegalic patients only a single patient was identified with elevated plasma GHRH levels. Measuring GHRH plasma levels therefore provides a precise and cost-effective test for the diagnosis of ectopic acromegaly. Peripheral GHRH levels are not elevated in patients with hypothalamic GHRH- secreting tumors, supporting the notion that excess eutopic hypothalamic GHRH secretion into the hypophyseal portal system does not appreciably enter the systemic circulation. Elevated circulating GHRH levels, a normal or small-size pituitary gland, or clinical and biochemical features of other tumors known to be associated with extrapituitary acromegaly, are all indications for extrapituitary imaging. An enlarged pituitary is, however, often found on MRI of patients with peripheral GHRH-secreting tumors, and the radiologic diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma may be difficult to exclude. Surgical resection of the tumor secreting ectopic GHRH should reverse the hypersecretion of GH, and pituitary surgery should not be necessary in these patients. Nonresectable, disseminated or reccurrent carcinoid syndrome with ectopic GHRH secretion can also be managed medically with long-acting somatostatin analogs (octreotide and lanreotide). The presence of GHRH and its receptors in several extrahypothalamic tissues, including ovary, testis and the digestive tract, suggests that GHRH may have a regulatory role in these tissues. As previously mentioned, biologically or immunologically active GHRH and mRNA encoding GHRH have been found in several human malignant tumors. including cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary and their cell lines. The synthesis and evaluation of analogs with various modifications revealed that certain hydrophobic and helix-stabilizing amino acid substitutions can produce antagonists with increased GH releasing inhibitory potencies and GHRH receptor-binding affinities in vitro. The review of experimental results of these substances are promising altrough no clinical data are yet available. Finally, the advent of these antagonists has allowed significant progress in the understanding of the role of the central and tissue GHRH-GH-IGFs system in the pathogenesis of tumors.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed2001

Differential inhibition of growth hormone secretion by analogs selective for somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 in human growth-hormone-secreting adenoma cells in vitro.

Somatostatin (SRIH), a cyclic tetradecapeptide hormone originally isolated from mammalian hypothalamus, is a potent suppressor of pituitary growth hormone (GH) secretion. SRIH acts through a family of G-protein-coupled membrane receptors containing seven transmembrane domains. Five genes encoding distinct SRIH receptor (SSTR) subtypes have so far been cloned in human and other species and termed SSTR1-5. In human somatotrophe pituitary adenomas GH secretion is controlled by both SSTR2 and SSTR5. However, in clinical practice only somatostatin analogs selective for SSTR2 (octreotide and lanreotide) are available. This may explain why clinical and in vitro responses to these analogs in acromegaly are only partial. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effect of two new SRIH analogs with high selectivity for SSTR2 (NC-4-28B) and SSTR5 (BIM-23268) and compared it to that of native somatostatin (SRIH-14) on a large number of GH-secreting adenomas obtained by transphenoidal neurosurgery. Tissues from 16 adenomas were enzymatically dispersed and plated in 24-well dishes at 50,000 cells/well. After 3 days, groups of three wells were incubated for 4 h with medium alone, SRIH-14 or analogs NC-4-28B or BIM-23268, at the concentrations of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 microM. Our results show that 9 out of 16 adenomas were responsive (GH suppression: 20-40% vs. control, p < 0.05) to SRIH. In this group only 4 adenomas showed similar responses to both selective analogs, with 2 nonresponders (expression of other SRIH receptor subtypes) and 2 responders (concomitant expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5) to both analogs. GH release was selectively inhibited by NC-4-28B in 3 adenomas and by BIM-23268 in the remaining 2 adenomas, suggesting predominant expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5, respectively. SRIH failed to inhibit GH release in 7 adenomas (43%). Interestingly, in that group a better inhibitory effect was obtained with BIM-23268 (5 out of 7 adenomas) than with NC-4-28B, suggesting expression of a few SSTR5 receptors only, or of both SSTR2 and SSTR5, respectively. We conclude that the availability of somatostatin analogs selective for SSTR5 will enhance the treatment potency and spectrum in acromegaly.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2000

Exercise-induced microalbuminuria in patients with active acromegaly: acute effects of slow-release lanreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analog.

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated an increase of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) at rest in acromegalic patients and, on the other hand, a reduced UAE in patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency. Physical exercise is known to induce abnormal UAE in patients with diabetes, probably unmasking early glomerular alterations. The effect of exercise on UAE in acromegaly is not known. Moreover, the effect of acute but sustained GH inhibition in acromegaly on UAE at rest and after exercise has never been studied. The aim of our study was to evaluate the acute short-term effects of slow-release lanreotide (SR-L), a long-acting somatostatin analog, on UAE and alpha1-microglobulinuria (A-1-M), a marker of renal tubular damage, at rest and after exercise in 7 normotensive patients with active acromegaly and normal renal function (4 males and 3 females; mean age, 53 +/- 3.1 years; body mass index [BMI], 27.3 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) at baseline and 7 and 14 days after SR-L injection (30 mg). Two of the acromegalic patients were microalbuminuric at rest, and in other 3 cases, UAE was in the borderline range (10 to 20 microg/min). At baseline in the acromegalic subjects, we found a significant increase in UAE at rest with respect to 7 normal subjects considered as a control group. GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) were also reduced compared with baseline 7 and 14 days after SR-L injection (GH, 13.4 +/- 7.3 and 13.61 +/- 7 v 18.5 +/- 9.3 microg/L, P < .05; IGF-1, 230 +/- 53 and 255 +/- 54 v 275 +/- 64 microg/L). Concomitantly, we observed a significant decrease of UAE at rest and after exercise and 7 and 14 days after SR-L injection as compared with baseline values (27.3 +/- 20.5 and 18.2 +/- 13.7 v 35.3 +/- 12.8 microg/min, P < .05; exercise, 48.5 +/- 24.1 and 18.6 +/- 6.8 v68.3 +/- 39.7 microg/min, P < .05). A-1-M always remained in the normal range (< 12 mg/L) both at rest and after exercise. We can thus conclude that in acromegaly, submaximal exercise induces abnormal increases in microalbuminuria. We hypothesize that this phenomenon may be due to the functional glomeruler involvement. SR-L can significantly reduce UAE at rest and after exercise in the short-term in acromegaly, probably via a decrease in circulating GH levels.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed2000

Effects of galanin on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa.

Galanin (GAL) elicits growth hormone (GH) release in normal subjects through interaction with hypothalamic somatostatin. GAL also stimulates GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in vitro. In rats, GAL is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, but this effect is not clear in humans. We have thus investigated GAL effects on GH and PRL release in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), known to have altered regulation of the GH-insulin-like growth factor axis and PRL dynamics, and compared the effects of GHRH and GAL on GH and PRL secretion in AN and normal healthy subjects. Eight women with AN (15 to 27 years; body mass index [BMI], 17 to 19.5 kg/m2) were treated with (1) GHRH 50 microg intravenous (IV) injection, (2) porcine GAL 500 microg infusion from -10 to +30 minutes, and (3) 135-minutes saline infusion as a control, respectively. Both peptides induced a significant increase in plasma GH in AN patients (peak level, 27.41 +/- 5.50 microg/L after GAL and 18.97 +/- 2.67 microg/L after GHRH). When data for AN patients and the control group were compared, GH peak levels after GAL were significantly higher in AN patients (27.41 +/- 5.50 v 13.64 +/- 2.32 microg/L), while GH peak levels after GHRH were not different between the 2 groups (18.97 +/- 2.67 v 15.98 +/- 3.88 microg/L). PRL levels significantly increased after both GHRH (peak, 11.70 +/- 2.80 microg/L) and GAL (peak, 18.02 +/- 5.10 microg/L) treatment in AN patients, but not in normal subjects. We conclude that GAL stimulates exaggerated GH release in AN patients as compared with normal controls, suggesting a dual hypothalamic interaction via both an increase in endogenous GHRH and a decrease in somatostatin secretion. Finally, GAL may act as a PRL secretagogue in AN patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Endogenous cortisol excess and glucocorticoid (GC) treatment have a profound effect on bone metabolism, acting at many sites. The mechanism of GC action on bone turnover is complex and has not been elucidated completely. GCs increase bone resorption, inhibit bone formation and have an indirect action on bone by decreasing intestinal Ca2+ absorption, modifying vitamin D metabolism, and sustaining a marked hypercalciuria, with variable changes in plasma PTH levels; finally, GCs inhibit the gonadotropic and somatotropic axis. GC-induced osteoporosis is preventable, treatable and potentially reversible. The prevention and treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis include some general measures (as well as the use of the minimal effective dose of GC), Ca2+ and vitamin D supplementation and treatment with bone anabolic and antiresorptive agents. Recent trials suggest that bisphosphonates are an effective therapeutic tool in the treatment of GC-induced bone damage. Recent data on GC receptor-selective modulators indicate that these new molecules might induce only minimal bone loss while maintaining the typical anti-inflammatory properties of GC. Another new line of study for the prevention of GC-induced osteoporosis is the characterization of the individual's susceptibility to GC-induced bone damage.

Animals↗