Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A G Turpie

Publications and source records attributed to A G Turpie.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Management of venous thromboembolism: optimization by clinical trials.

Antithrombotic therapy is mandatory in most patients with venous thrombosis. The results of randomized trials have established the requirement for initial treatment with heparin and have determined the optimal anticoagulant regimen for secondary prophylaxis. Recent studies have demonstrated that low molecular weight heparins, that have improved pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties over standard heparin, are effective and safe in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Two large randomized clinical trials have shown the feasibility of the outpatient treatment of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparins. Home therapy will result in improved clinical utility of anticoagulant treatment and in cost savings.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1996

Diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are important clinical disorders that affect patients in many medical and surgical specialties. In North America, deep vein thrombosis results in hospitalization of up to 600,000patients per year. Pulmonary embolism is also a serious problem that occurs in more than 500,000patients per year, of whom approximately 200,000will die. Almost half of those patients who die will be terminally ill or suffer an incurable disease, but the remainder of the deaths occur in patients who other- wise could have recovered completely.'

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for antithrombotic therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Five primary prevention trials and one secondary prevention trial compare antithrombotic therapy with placebo or no treatment. Two trials also determine the efficacy and safety of acetylsalicylic acid. MAIN FINDINGS: Warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 68%. The effect is consistent in all identifiable groups of patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, except patients at serious risk of hemorrhage. The absolute benefit of anticoagulants varies among patients because of markedly different inherent risk of stroke among patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant therapy should be considered for all patients with atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulant therapy is more effective than ASA in reducing the risk of stroke among patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1996

Low molecular weight heparin and compression stockings in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgery.

Perioperative anticoagulant prophylaxis for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in neurosurgical patients has not gained wide acceptance due to the fear of intracranial bleeding. Physical methods give a worthwhile reduction of postoperative VTE but there still remains a substantial residual incidence. In other clinical indications, low molecular weight heparins have proven to be effective for prophylaxis of VTE when administered postoperatively, with the advantage of no bleeding enhancement during surgery. Therefore, we performed a multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial in neurosurgical patients to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), nadroparin, initiated postoperatively, to graduated compression stockings in the prevention of VTE. Deep-vein thrombosis was detected by mandatory venography. Bleeding was determined according to pre-defined objective criteria for major and minor episodes. An adequate bilateral venogram was obtained in 166 of 241 LMWH patients (68.9%) and 179 of 244 control patients (73.4%). A total of 31 of 166 LMWH patients (18.7%) and 47 of 179 controls patients (26.3) had VTE up to Day 10 postoperatively (p = 0.047). The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 28.9%. The rates for proximal deep-vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism were 6.9% and 11.5% for the two groups, respectively (RRR: 40.2%; p = 0.065). Secondary analyses involved all VTE up to day 56 post-surgery which was detected in 33 patients of 241 in the LMWH group (13.7%) and 51 of 244 control patients (20.9%; RRR 34.5%; p = 0.018). The corresponding percentages for proximal deep-vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism were 5.8% and 10.2% for the two groups, respectively, giving a RRR of 43.3%; p = 0.36. Major bleeding complications, during the treatment period, occurred in six low molecular weight heparin treated patients (2.5%) and in two control patients (0.8%); p = 0.87. A higher mortality was observed in the low molecular weight heparin group over the 56-day follow-up period (22 versus 10; p = 0.026). However, none of these deaths was judged by a blinded adjudication committee to be related to the study drug. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the low molecular weight heparin, nadroparin, added to graduated compression stockings results in a clinically significant decrease in VTE without inducing any significant increase of major bleeding.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1995

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery bypass grafts.

In most studies, aspirin has been shown to be effective for a period of 1 year in reducing the frequency of saphenous vein bypass graft occlusion when begun 1 day before surgery, on the day of surgery, or the day after surgery. Effective doses of aspirin range from 100 to 975 mg/d. Aspirin in combination with dipyridamole is effective in the prevention of saphenous vein bypass graft occlusion if aspirin and dipyridamole therapy is started 1 or 2 days before surgery or aspirin therapy is started on the day of surgery but dipyridamole therapy is started before surgery or if treatment with both aspirin and dipyridamole is started 1 day after surgery. Aspirin in combination with dipyridamole is not more effective than aspirin alone in the prevention of saphenous vein graft occlusion. Bleeding is higher among patients treated with aspirin alone than among controls if aspirin therapy is started 1 day before surgery. Bleeding is not greater in comparison to controls if aspirin therapy is started the day of surgery or 1 day after surgery. When aspirin and dipyridamole are used in combination, bleeding is higher than in controls, and bleeding is higher than with aspirin alone. The continued use of aspirin for 2 additional years after an initial year of aspirin therapy for the prevention of saphenous vein bypass graft occlusion showed no additional long-term benefit on graft patency at the end of the third year.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1995

Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in the outpatient setting: preventing complications following hospital discharge.

Venous thromboembolism is an important complication in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Without prophylaxis, there is a 50% to 60% incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a 10% to 30% incidence of proximal vein thrombosis, and a 1% to 2% rate of fatal pulmonary embolism after total hip replacement. The incidence of DVT after knee arthroplasty is even higher, ranging from 55% to 70% and, although there are no accurate figures on the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism, it is likely to be similar to that following hip arthroplasty. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be effective and safe in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic procedures. In comparative studies, LMWHs are more effective than adjusted dose heparin or warfarin without increased risk of bleeding.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1995

Advances in antithrombotic therapy: novel agents.

Most of the clinical evaluation of the direct thrombin inhibitors has been in coronary artery disease. The recent clinical reports suggest that there is a narrower window of safety with recombinant hirudin than initially thought particularly when it is used in conjunction with thrombolytic agents and aspirin in acute myocardial infarction. The efficacy data, however, indicate that the direct thrombin inhibitors have great potential particularly in the initial management of patients with acute unstable angina and non-Q-wave infarction. There is much to learn regarding the mechanism of action, optimal dose, and optimal concomitant therapy in the use of direct thrombin inhibitors in the management of acute coronary ischaemia; and since hirudin and other direct thrombin inhibitors have so much potential in the management of acute coronary ischaemia, it is critical that dose-finding studies be performed to determine safe regimens of these agents to allow their evaluation in large-scale trials with important clinical outcomes. The direct thrombin inhibitors have also shown to have promise in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in high-risk surgical patients. There is limited clinical data on the other novel anticoagulants which are currently being developed.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed1995

Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Based on the hypothesis that a normal impedance plethysmogram (IPG) following DVT defines a group of patients at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), a trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of only four weeks of warfarin. Patients with venographically confirmed acute proximal DVT who had received four weeks of warfarin after initial heparin and whose four week IPG was normal were allocated to either continue warfarin (targeted International Normalized Ratio 2.0 to 3.0) for a further eight weeks or receive placebo. Patients with an abnormal four week IPG received warfarin for a further eight weeks. Based on clinical characteristics at the time of the qualifying thrombosis, all patients were classified as having either continuing or transient risk factors for recurrent VTE. During the eight weeks following randomization, nine (8.6%) of the 105 placebo patients developed recurrent VTE compared to one (0.9%) of the 109 warfarin patients, P = 0.009. Over the entire 11 months of follow-up, 12 placebo patients developed recurrence compared to seven warfarin patients, P = 0.3. Nineteen of the 192 patients with an abnormal four week IPG experienced recurrence during the nine months after discontinuing warfarin. In the 301 patients who received three months of warfarin in the randomized trial or in the cohort study, all 26 recurrent events were in the 212 patients with continuing risk factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A randomized trial comparing activated thromboplastin time with heparin assay in patients with acute venous thromboembolism requiring large daily doses of heparin.

BACKGROUND: The management of heparin therapy in patients who have a subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) despite high doses of heparin is problematic because the risk of heparin-associated bleeding increases with dose. Results of experimental studies in animals indicate that when the APTT response to heparin is blunted by infusion of procoagulants, dose escalation can be avoided without compromising efficacy, by monitoring treatment with a heparin assay. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in which patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or axillary vein thrombosis who required 35,000 U or more of intravenous heparin by continuous infusion during the previous 24 hours were allocated to have their heparin therapy monitored either by anti-factor Xa levels (targeted range, 0.35 to 0.67 U/mL) or by the APTT (targeted range, 60 to 85 seconds). Both ranges were equivalent to a heparin level of 0.2 to 0.4 U/mL by protamine titration. RESULTS: Three (4.6%) of 65 patients in the anti-factor Xa group experienced recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with four (6.1%) of 66 patients in the APTT group (difference, 1.5%; confidence interval, -6.7% to 8.4%) (P = .7). There were four bleeding events (6.1%) in the APTT group compared with one (1.5%) in the anti-factor Xa group (difference, 4.6%; confidence interval, -3.3% to 7.5%) (P = .4). During the period of heparin therapy before warfarin treatment was begun, the patients in the APTT group required a statistically significantly greater amount of heparin compared with the patients in the anti-factor Xa group. The daily mean APTT was subtherapeutic in patients in the anti-factor Xa group, and it was within the therapeutic range in the APTT group. The daily mean anti-factor Xa levels for both groups were within the therapeutic range. CONCLUSION: The heparin assay is a safe and effective method for monitoring heparin treatment in patients with acute venous thromboembolism whose APTT remains subtherapeutic despite large daily doses of heparin. In such patients, dosage escalation can be avoided if the heparin level is therapeutic.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Preventing thromboembolism in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

Despite improvements in valve design, thromboembolic complications remain an important complication in patients with heart valve replacement. Less intense anticoagulant regimens with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy have been shown to be effective and safe in such patients. The recommended intensity of oral anticoagulants for tissue valves is an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 and 2.5 to 3.5 for mechanical valves.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Impedance plethysmography performed serially over a one-week period has been shown to be an effective diagnostic strategy for patients with clinically suspected acute deep-vein thrombosis. Compression ultrasonography has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of proximal-vein thrombosis. The clinical value of repeated ultrasonography in the management of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial in 985 consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis to compare the diagnostic value of serial impedance plethysmography (494 patients) and serial compression ultrasonography (491 patients). We compared the positive predictive values of both tests for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis, using contrast venography as a reference. The frequencies of venous thromboembolism during a six-month follow-up period were also compared in patients with repeatedly normal results in order to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy from such patients. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of an abnormal ultrasonogram was 94 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 87 to 98 percent), whereas the predictive value of impedance plethysmography was 83 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 75 to 90 percent) (P = 0.02). In patients with repeatedly normal results, the incidence of venous thromboembolism during the six-month follow-up period was 1.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.3 percent) for serial compression ultrasonography, as compared with 2.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.6 percent) for serial impedance plethysmography. CONCLUSIONS: In making the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients, serial compression ultrasonography is preferable to impedance plethysmography, in view of its superior performance in detecting venous thrombosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

A comparison of aspirin with placebo in patients treated with warfarin after heart-valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of warfarin, major systemic embolism remains an important complication in patients with heart-valve replacement. Although the addition of antiplatelet agents has the potential to reduce this complication, their efficacy and safety when given in combination with warfarin are uncertain. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of adding aspirin (100 mg per day) to warfarin treatment (target international normalized ratio, 3.0 to 4.5) in 370 patients with mechanical heart valves or with tissue valves plus atrial fibrillation or a history of thromboembolism. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were randomly assigned to aspirin and 184 to placebo, and they were followed for up to 4 years (average, 2.5). Major systemic embolism or death from vascular causes occurred in 6 aspirin-treated patients (1.9 percent per year) and 24 placebo-treated patients (8.5 percent per year) (risk reduction with aspirin, 77 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 44 to 91 percent; P < 0.001). Major systemic embolism, nonfatal intracranial hemorrhage, or death from hemorrhage or vascular causes occurred in 12 patients assigned to aspirin (3.9 percent per year) and 28 patients assigned to placebo (9.9 percent per year) (risk reduction, 61 per cent; 95 percent confidence interval, 24 to 80 percent; P = 0.005); major systemic embolism or death from any cause occurred in 13 patients (4.2 percent) and 33 patients (11.7 percent), respectively (risk reduction, 65 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 33 to 82 percent; P < 0.001); and death from all causes occurred in 9 patients (2.8 percent) and 22 patients (7.4 percent), respectively (risk reduction, 63 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 83 percent; P = 0.01). Bleeding occurred in 71 patients in the aspirin group (35.0 percent), as compared with 49 patients in the placebo group (22.0 percent) (increase in risk, 55 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 8 to 124 percent; P = 0.02); major bleeding occurred in 24 and 19 patients, respectively (increase in risk, 27 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -30 to 132 percent; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mechanical heart valves and high-risk patients with prosthetic tissue valves, the addition of aspirin to warfarin therapy reduced mortality, particularly mortality from vascular causes, together with major systemic embolism. Although there was some increase in bleeding, the risk of the combined treatment was more than offset by the considerable benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

A low-molecular-weight heparinoid compared with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. A randomized, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative safety and efficacy of a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (ORG 10172) with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized trial. SETTING: Seven Canadian university-affiliated hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting in lower-limb paresis. INTERVENTION: Patients received either low-molecular-weight heparinoid, 750 anti-factor Xa units twice daily, or unfractionated heparin, 5000 units subcutaneously twice daily. Treatment was continued for 14 days or until hospital discharge if sooner. MEASUREMENTS: Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed using 125I-labeled fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. Venography was indicated if either test was positive. Overt hemorrhage, major or minor, was assessed clinically. RESULTS: Venous thrombosis occurred in four patients (9%) given low-molecular-weight heparinoid and in 13 patients (31%) given heparin (relative risk reduction, 71%; 95% CI, 16% to 93%. The corresponding rates for proximal vein thrombosis were 4% and 12%, respectively (relative risk reduction, 63%; P greater than 0.2). The incidence of hemorrhage was 2% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Low-molecular-weight heparinoid, given in a fixed dose of 750 anti-factor Xa units subcutaneously twice daily, is more effective than subcutaneous low-dose heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Orgaran in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in stroke patients.

Venous thrombo-embolism is a common complication in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Without prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis occurs in 60-75% of patients with dense hemiplegia, usually in the paralyzed limb, and 1-2% suffer fatal pulmonary embolism. Orgaran (Org 10172, low-molecular-weight heparinoid) has been evaluated for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in two studies. In a double-blind study, 75 patients were randomized to receive Orgaran (50 patients) in a loading dose of 1,000 anti-Xa units intravenously followed by 750 anti-Xa units subcutaneously 12-hourly or placebo (25 patients). Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 2 of 50 (4%) in the Orgaran group and 7 of 25 (28%) in the placebo group (p = 0.005). The corresponding rates for proximal deep vein thrombosis were 0 and 16%, respectively (p = 0.01). There was one major haemorrhage in the treated group and one minor haemorrhage in the placebo group. In the second study, the safety and efficacy of Orgaran was compared with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in a double-blind randomized trial. Eighty-seven patients with marked lower limb paralysis secondary to stroke were randomized to receive Orgaran (45 patients) in a dose of 750 anti-factor Xa units subcutaneously 12-hourly or unfractionated heparin (42 patients) in a dose of 5,000 units subcutaneously 12-hourly. Venous thrombosis occurred in 4 of 45 (8.9%) of the Orgaran group and 13 of 42 (31%) in the unfractionated heparin group (2p = 0.014). The corresponding rates for proximal vein thrombosis were 4.4 and 11.9%, respectively (2p = 0.255).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗